Instrumentality in local actions of health surveillance
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2016 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Vigilância Sanitária em Debate |
Texto Completo: | https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/536 |
Resumo: | This article is part of a doctoral thesis that uses both Symbolic Interactionism as a theoretical framework, and Grounded Theory as a method, to understand the interpretations and meanings attributed to the instruments used in local actions of health surveillance; also to comprehend how these instruments interfere with risk identification and decision-making processes of interventions. The professional uses a set of empirical techniques and instrumental references that allow him to interpret possibilities for actions and situational conditions. Using health legislation, knowledge, and experience, the professional identifies and assesses the risk. These instruments structure knowledge and actions, rationally composing an objectified process using technical knowledge and critical interpretations; this nonetheless involves subjective decisions based on experience and interpretations. The intervention is the representation of the existence of risk and of protective measures. It is set in a specific context, constituting a system aiming to modify a problematic situation. It is not enough to identify the risk, but to define how and what means can be mobilized to control it. Intervening constitutes therefore a scientific and political challenge for the professional. |
id |
FIOCRUZ-9_12600e3be9af9466ecd62831b96d120b |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br:article/536 |
network_acronym_str |
FIOCRUZ-9 |
network_name_str |
Vigilância Sanitária em Debate |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Instrumentality in local actions of health surveillanceA instrumentalidade nas ações de vigilância sanitária em Minas GeraisVigilância SanitáriaControle de RiscoPesquisa QualitativaHealth SurveillanceRisk ManagementQualitative ResearchThis article is part of a doctoral thesis that uses both Symbolic Interactionism as a theoretical framework, and Grounded Theory as a method, to understand the interpretations and meanings attributed to the instruments used in local actions of health surveillance; also to comprehend how these instruments interfere with risk identification and decision-making processes of interventions. The professional uses a set of empirical techniques and instrumental references that allow him to interpret possibilities for actions and situational conditions. Using health legislation, knowledge, and experience, the professional identifies and assesses the risk. These instruments structure knowledge and actions, rationally composing an objectified process using technical knowledge and critical interpretations; this nonetheless involves subjective decisions based on experience and interpretations. The intervention is the representation of the existence of risk and of protective measures. It is set in a specific context, constituting a system aiming to modify a problematic situation. It is not enough to identify the risk, but to define how and what means can be mobilized to control it. Intervening constitutes therefore a scientific and political challenge for the professional.Trata-se de um recorte de tese de doutorado que utilizou o Interacionismo Simbólico como referencial teórico e a Teoria Fundamentada dos Dados como método, para compreender as interpretações e os sentidos atribuídos aos instrumentos utilizados nas ações locais de vigilância sanitária e como eles interferem na identificação do risco e nas escolhas das intervenções. O profissional utiliza um conjunto de referências técnicas, empíricas e instrumentais que lhe permite interpretar as possibilidades de ações e as condições situacionais. Utilizando a legislação sanitária, o conhecimento e a experiência, o profissional identifica e avalia o risco. Estes instrumentos estruturam os saberes e as ações, compondo um processo objetivado racionalmente que utiliza o conhecimento técnico e interpretações críticas, mas que envolve decisões subjetivas baseadas na experiência e nas interpretações. A intervenção é a representação da existência do risco e da ação protetora. É definida em um contexto específico, constituindo um sistema com objetivo de modificar uma situação problemática. Não basta identificar o risco, mas definir como e quais meios podem ser mobilizados para controlá-lo. Intervir constitui-se, portanto, em um desafio científico e político para o profissional.Instituto Nacional de Controle de Qualidade em Saúde2016-02-29info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion"Peer-reviewed article""Artículo revisado por pares""Artigo avaliado pelos pares"application/pdfhttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/53610.3395/2317-269x.00536Health Surveillance under Debate: Society, Science & Technology ; Vol. 4 No. 1 (2016): February; 3-12Vigilancia en Salud en Debate: Sociedad, Ciencia y Tecnología; Vol. 4 Núm. 1 (2016): Febrero; 3-12Vigil Sanit Debate, Rio de Janeiro; v. 4 n. 1 (2016): Fevereiro; 3-122317-269Xreponame:Vigilância Sanitária em Debateinstname:Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)instacron:FIOCRUZporhttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/536/283Copyright (c) 2016 Vigilância Sanitária em Debate: Sociedade, Ciência & Tecnologia (Health Surveillance under Debate: Society, Science & Technology) – Visa em Debatehttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSilva, Ana Valesca Fernandes GilsonLana, Francisco Carlos Felix2023-06-27T15:16:43Zoai:ojs.visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br:article/536Revistahttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebatePUBhttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/oaiincqs.visaemdebate@fiocruz.br || gisele.neves@fiocruz.br2317-269X2317-269Xopendoar:2023-06-27T15:16:43Vigilância Sanitária em Debate - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Instrumentality in local actions of health surveillance A instrumentalidade nas ações de vigilância sanitária em Minas Gerais |
title |
Instrumentality in local actions of health surveillance |
spellingShingle |
Instrumentality in local actions of health surveillance Silva, Ana Valesca Fernandes Gilson Vigilância Sanitária Controle de Risco Pesquisa Qualitativa Health Surveillance Risk Management Qualitative Research |
title_short |
Instrumentality in local actions of health surveillance |
title_full |
Instrumentality in local actions of health surveillance |
title_fullStr |
Instrumentality in local actions of health surveillance |
title_full_unstemmed |
Instrumentality in local actions of health surveillance |
title_sort |
Instrumentality in local actions of health surveillance |
author |
Silva, Ana Valesca Fernandes Gilson |
author_facet |
Silva, Ana Valesca Fernandes Gilson Lana, Francisco Carlos Felix |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Lana, Francisco Carlos Felix |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Silva, Ana Valesca Fernandes Gilson Lana, Francisco Carlos Felix |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Vigilância Sanitária Controle de Risco Pesquisa Qualitativa Health Surveillance Risk Management Qualitative Research |
topic |
Vigilância Sanitária Controle de Risco Pesquisa Qualitativa Health Surveillance Risk Management Qualitative Research |
description |
This article is part of a doctoral thesis that uses both Symbolic Interactionism as a theoretical framework, and Grounded Theory as a method, to understand the interpretations and meanings attributed to the instruments used in local actions of health surveillance; also to comprehend how these instruments interfere with risk identification and decision-making processes of interventions. The professional uses a set of empirical techniques and instrumental references that allow him to interpret possibilities for actions and situational conditions. Using health legislation, knowledge, and experience, the professional identifies and assesses the risk. These instruments structure knowledge and actions, rationally composing an objectified process using technical knowledge and critical interpretations; this nonetheless involves subjective decisions based on experience and interpretations. The intervention is the representation of the existence of risk and of protective measures. It is set in a specific context, constituting a system aiming to modify a problematic situation. It is not enough to identify the risk, but to define how and what means can be mobilized to control it. Intervening constitutes therefore a scientific and political challenge for the professional. |
publishDate |
2016 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2016-02-29 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion "Peer-reviewed article" "Artículo revisado por pares" "Artigo avaliado pelos pares" |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/536 10.3395/2317-269x.00536 |
url |
https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/536 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.3395/2317-269x.00536 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/536/283 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto Nacional de Controle de Qualidade em Saúde |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto Nacional de Controle de Qualidade em Saúde |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Health Surveillance under Debate: Society, Science & Technology ; Vol. 4 No. 1 (2016): February; 3-12 Vigilancia en Salud en Debate: Sociedad, Ciencia y Tecnología; Vol. 4 Núm. 1 (2016): Febrero; 3-12 Vigil Sanit Debate, Rio de Janeiro; v. 4 n. 1 (2016): Fevereiro; 3-12 2317-269X reponame:Vigilância Sanitária em Debate instname:Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ) instacron:FIOCRUZ |
instname_str |
Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ) |
instacron_str |
FIOCRUZ |
institution |
FIOCRUZ |
reponame_str |
Vigilância Sanitária em Debate |
collection |
Vigilância Sanitária em Debate |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Vigilância Sanitária em Debate - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
incqs.visaemdebate@fiocruz.br || gisele.neves@fiocruz.br |
_version_ |
1797042044200288256 |