Analysis of notifications of technical complaints and preventive health inspection measures applied during the COVID-19 pandemic in Brazil: Vigil Sanit Debate, Rio de Janeiro, 2023, v.11: e02067 | Published on: 11/08/2023
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2023 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por eng |
Título da fonte: | Vigilância Sanitária em Debate |
Texto Completo: | https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/2067 |
Resumo: | Introduction: The consumptio of falsified, unregistered, and substandard medicines is a serious public health problem, and it is essential to know the legal enforcement actions related that were taken during the pandemic in Brazil. Objective: To Analyze notifications of technical complaints and preventive health measures applied during the Covid-19 pandemic in Brazil. Method: Descriptive, quantitative, retrospective study with data from notifications of technical complaints and measures determined by the National Health Surveillance Agency (Anvisa), from 2019 to June 2021. Results: 25,088 notifications of technical complaints about medicines and562 measures were identified. 314 were classified as class I risk, with high potential to cause serious injury to health, including death. Most unregistered products claim pharmaceutical properties regarding body image, immunity, or information as being “natural” or Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM). There were 63.3% of actions for advertising and irregular commerce of medicines on the internet. There were 333 measures (59.3%) with an unknown/non-existent company associated, making it impossible to legally hold the offender responsible. The type of enforcement activities the most frequent were: seizure (322), destruction (305) and prohibition (376). The most cited stages of the chain related to post-production, included distribution, commercialization and use. It was observed that the frequency of risk classification of medicines is significantly different with enforcement actions (p < 0.001). Conclusions: It is important to: develop strategies aimed at preventing, detecting, and responding to irregular/illegal practices, by reviewing the legal regulatory and the framework; and have greater corporate accountability, traceability mechanisms, effective inspection actions and improvement of the measures adopted by Anvisa to protect the population’s health. |
id |
FIOCRUZ-9_1ba29f66b8d17cf1c8e5159bfcd78585 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br:article/2067 |
network_acronym_str |
FIOCRUZ-9 |
network_name_str |
Vigilância Sanitária em Debate |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Analysis of notifications of technical complaints and preventive health inspection measures applied during the COVID-19 pandemic in Brazil: Vigil Sanit Debate, Rio de Janeiro, 2023, v.11: e02067 | Published on: 11/08/2023Análise das notificações de queixas técnicas e das medidas preventivas de fiscalização sanitária, aplicadas durante a pandemia da COVID-19 no Brasil: Vigil Sanit Debate, Rio de Janeiro, 2023, v.11: e02067 | Publicado em: 11/08/2023Vigilância de Produtos ComercializadosFarmacovigilânciaVigilância SanitáriaApreensão de ProdutosVigilância SanitáriaPost-Market Product SurveillancePharmacovigilanceHealth SurveillanceProducts RetentionIntroduction: The consumptio of falsified, unregistered, and substandard medicines is a serious public health problem, and it is essential to know the legal enforcement actions related that were taken during the pandemic in Brazil. Objective: To Analyze notifications of technical complaints and preventive health measures applied during the Covid-19 pandemic in Brazil. Method: Descriptive, quantitative, retrospective study with data from notifications of technical complaints and measures determined by the National Health Surveillance Agency (Anvisa), from 2019 to June 2021. Results: 25,088 notifications of technical complaints about medicines and562 measures were identified. 314 were classified as class I risk, with high potential to cause serious injury to health, including death. Most unregistered products claim pharmaceutical properties regarding body image, immunity, or information as being “natural” or Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM). There were 63.3% of actions for advertising and irregular commerce of medicines on the internet. There were 333 measures (59.3%) with an unknown/non-existent company associated, making it impossible to legally hold the offender responsible. The type of enforcement activities the most frequent were: seizure (322), destruction (305) and prohibition (376). The most cited stages of the chain related to post-production, included distribution, commercialization and use. It was observed that the frequency of risk classification of medicines is significantly different with enforcement actions (p < 0.001). Conclusions: It is important to: develop strategies aimed at preventing, detecting, and responding to irregular/illegal practices, by reviewing the legal regulatory and the framework; and have greater corporate accountability, traceability mechanisms, effective inspection actions and improvement of the measures adopted by Anvisa to protect the population’s health.Introdução: O consumo de medicamentos falsificados, não registrados e fora do padrão é um grave problema de saúde pública, sendo fundamental conhecer as ações legais de fiscalização sanitária durante a pandemia no Brasil. Objetivo: Analisar as notificações de queixas técnicas e as medidas preventivas de fiscalização sanitária, aplicadas durante a pandemia da COVID-19, no Brasil. Método: Estudo descritivo, quantitativo, retrospectivo com dados das notificações de queixas técnicas e das medidas determinadas pela Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária (Anvisa), no intervalo de 2019 a junho de 2021. As notificações foram obtidas por meio da Lei de Acesso à Informação, enquanto as medidas preventivas foram coletadas no portal da Anvisa, com a validação dos dados no site da imprensa nacional. Resultados: Foram registradas 25.088 notificações de queixas técnicas de medicamentos e 562 medidas, sendo 314 com elevado potencial de causar sérios danos à saúde, incluindo óbito. A maioria dos produtos não registrados alegam propriedades farmacêuticas relativas à imagem corporal, à imunidade ou ditos “naturais” ou da Medicina Tradicional Chinesa. Dentre as medidas, 63,3% estavam voltadas para propaganda irregular e comércio eletrônico de medicamentos suspeitos. Em cerca de 59,3% das medidas, as empresas não tinham o Cadastro Nacional de Pessoa Jurídica na Receita Federal, o que dificulta a responsabilização legal do infrator. Quanto às ações de fiscalização, as mais frequentes foram: apreensão (322), inutilização (305) e proibição (376). Quanto às medidas de proibição, as mais citadas se relacionam à pós-produção no ciclo produtivo, incluindo distribuição, comercialização e uso. Observa-se que a frequência observada de medicamentos segundo a classificação de risco é significativamente diferente para as várias ações fiscalizatórias (p < 0,001). Conclusões: Faz-se necessário desenvolver estratégias voltadas à prevenção, detecção e resposta às práticas irregulares/ilícitas, mediante revisão do marco regulatório e do modelo de atuação; maior responsabilização das empresas; mecanismos de rastreabilidade; ações fiscalizatórias efetivas e aprimoramento das medidas adotadas pela Anvisa para proteger a saúde da população.Instituto Nacional de Controle de Qualidade em Saúde2023-08-11info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion"Peer-reviewed article""Artículo revisado por pares""Artigo avaliado pelos pares"application/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/206710.22239/2317-269x.02067Health Surveillance under Debate: Society, Science & Technology ; v. 11 (2023) | Continuous publication; 1-11Vigilancia en Salud en Debate: Sociedad, Ciencia y Tecnología; v. 11 (2023) | Publicación continua; 1-11Vigil Sanit Debate, Rio de Janeiro; v. 11 (2023) | Publicação contínua; 1-112317-269Xreponame:Vigilância Sanitária em Debateinstname:Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)instacron:FIOCRUZporenghttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/2067/1512https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/2067/1605Copyright (c) 2023 Josivan Lima Padro, Dayani Galato, Camila Alves Areda, Mary Anne Fontenele Martins (Autor)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessLima Padro, JosivanGalato, DayaniAlves Areda, CamilaFontenele Martins, Mary Anne2024-02-15T18:32:32Zoai:ojs.visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br:article/2067Revistahttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebatePUBhttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/oaiincqs.visaemdebate@fiocruz.br || gisele.neves@fiocruz.br2317-269X2317-269Xopendoar:2024-02-15T18:32:32Vigilância Sanitária em Debate - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Analysis of notifications of technical complaints and preventive health inspection measures applied during the COVID-19 pandemic in Brazil: Vigil Sanit Debate, Rio de Janeiro, 2023, v.11: e02067 | Published on: 11/08/2023 Análise das notificações de queixas técnicas e das medidas preventivas de fiscalização sanitária, aplicadas durante a pandemia da COVID-19 no Brasil: Vigil Sanit Debate, Rio de Janeiro, 2023, v.11: e02067 | Publicado em: 11/08/2023 |
title |
Analysis of notifications of technical complaints and preventive health inspection measures applied during the COVID-19 pandemic in Brazil: Vigil Sanit Debate, Rio de Janeiro, 2023, v.11: e02067 | Published on: 11/08/2023 |
spellingShingle |
Analysis of notifications of technical complaints and preventive health inspection measures applied during the COVID-19 pandemic in Brazil: Vigil Sanit Debate, Rio de Janeiro, 2023, v.11: e02067 | Published on: 11/08/2023 Lima Padro, Josivan Vigilância de Produtos Comercializados Farmacovigilância Vigilância Sanitária Apreensão de Produtos Vigilância Sanitária Post-Market Product Surveillance Pharmacovigilance Health Surveillance Products Retention |
title_short |
Analysis of notifications of technical complaints and preventive health inspection measures applied during the COVID-19 pandemic in Brazil: Vigil Sanit Debate, Rio de Janeiro, 2023, v.11: e02067 | Published on: 11/08/2023 |
title_full |
Analysis of notifications of technical complaints and preventive health inspection measures applied during the COVID-19 pandemic in Brazil: Vigil Sanit Debate, Rio de Janeiro, 2023, v.11: e02067 | Published on: 11/08/2023 |
title_fullStr |
Analysis of notifications of technical complaints and preventive health inspection measures applied during the COVID-19 pandemic in Brazil: Vigil Sanit Debate, Rio de Janeiro, 2023, v.11: e02067 | Published on: 11/08/2023 |
title_full_unstemmed |
Analysis of notifications of technical complaints and preventive health inspection measures applied during the COVID-19 pandemic in Brazil: Vigil Sanit Debate, Rio de Janeiro, 2023, v.11: e02067 | Published on: 11/08/2023 |
title_sort |
Analysis of notifications of technical complaints and preventive health inspection measures applied during the COVID-19 pandemic in Brazil: Vigil Sanit Debate, Rio de Janeiro, 2023, v.11: e02067 | Published on: 11/08/2023 |
author |
Lima Padro, Josivan |
author_facet |
Lima Padro, Josivan Galato, Dayani Alves Areda, Camila Fontenele Martins, Mary Anne |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Galato, Dayani Alves Areda, Camila Fontenele Martins, Mary Anne |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Lima Padro, Josivan Galato, Dayani Alves Areda, Camila Fontenele Martins, Mary Anne |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Vigilância de Produtos Comercializados Farmacovigilância Vigilância Sanitária Apreensão de Produtos Vigilância Sanitária Post-Market Product Surveillance Pharmacovigilance Health Surveillance Products Retention |
topic |
Vigilância de Produtos Comercializados Farmacovigilância Vigilância Sanitária Apreensão de Produtos Vigilância Sanitária Post-Market Product Surveillance Pharmacovigilance Health Surveillance Products Retention |
description |
Introduction: The consumptio of falsified, unregistered, and substandard medicines is a serious public health problem, and it is essential to know the legal enforcement actions related that were taken during the pandemic in Brazil. Objective: To Analyze notifications of technical complaints and preventive health measures applied during the Covid-19 pandemic in Brazil. Method: Descriptive, quantitative, retrospective study with data from notifications of technical complaints and measures determined by the National Health Surveillance Agency (Anvisa), from 2019 to June 2021. Results: 25,088 notifications of technical complaints about medicines and562 measures were identified. 314 were classified as class I risk, with high potential to cause serious injury to health, including death. Most unregistered products claim pharmaceutical properties regarding body image, immunity, or information as being “natural” or Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM). There were 63.3% of actions for advertising and irregular commerce of medicines on the internet. There were 333 measures (59.3%) with an unknown/non-existent company associated, making it impossible to legally hold the offender responsible. The type of enforcement activities the most frequent were: seizure (322), destruction (305) and prohibition (376). The most cited stages of the chain related to post-production, included distribution, commercialization and use. It was observed that the frequency of risk classification of medicines is significantly different with enforcement actions (p < 0.001). Conclusions: It is important to: develop strategies aimed at preventing, detecting, and responding to irregular/illegal practices, by reviewing the legal regulatory and the framework; and have greater corporate accountability, traceability mechanisms, effective inspection actions and improvement of the measures adopted by Anvisa to protect the population’s health. |
publishDate |
2023 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2023-08-11 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion "Peer-reviewed article" "Artículo revisado por pares" "Artigo avaliado pelos pares" |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/2067 10.22239/2317-269x.02067 |
url |
https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/2067 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.22239/2317-269x.02067 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por eng |
language |
por eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/2067/1512 https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/2067/1605 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto Nacional de Controle de Qualidade em Saúde |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto Nacional de Controle de Qualidade em Saúde |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Health Surveillance under Debate: Society, Science & Technology ; v. 11 (2023) | Continuous publication; 1-11 Vigilancia en Salud en Debate: Sociedad, Ciencia y Tecnología; v. 11 (2023) | Publicación continua; 1-11 Vigil Sanit Debate, Rio de Janeiro; v. 11 (2023) | Publicação contínua; 1-11 2317-269X reponame:Vigilância Sanitária em Debate instname:Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ) instacron:FIOCRUZ |
instname_str |
Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ) |
instacron_str |
FIOCRUZ |
institution |
FIOCRUZ |
reponame_str |
Vigilância Sanitária em Debate |
collection |
Vigilância Sanitária em Debate |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Vigilância Sanitária em Debate - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
incqs.visaemdebate@fiocruz.br || gisele.neves@fiocruz.br |
_version_ |
1797042046694850560 |