Health conditions and evaluation of biosafety procedures adopted in tattoo studies
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Vigilância Sanitária em Debate |
Texto Completo: | https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/1679 |
Resumo: | Introduction: The tattoo procedure offers biological risk to professionals and clients. Objective: To describe the hygienic and sanitary conditions, as well as to analyze the adoption of procedures for the management of biosafety risks by professional tattoo artists who work in tattoo studios in a municipality located in the Northwestern Region of the State of Ceará, Brazil. Method: Qualitative, descriptive and transversal study, carried out in five tattoo studios through the application of a checklist based on the Technical Standard for the operation of tattoo and piercing services by the Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária (2009). Results: The main negative points allude to the functioning of clandestine studios, poor registration of personal data of customers and inadequate collection of infectious waste. On the other hand, the main positive points achieved in this study are related to the proper sharps waste, the existence of a reserved and adequate place for the tattoo procedure, including a sink for washing hands close to the procedure site. The research also showed that professional tattoo artists have appropriate materials and equipment for their respective practices, but perform biosafety procedures incorrectly, which predispose professionals and clients to biological risk factors. Conclusions: The tattoo studios analyzed have poor compliance with health surveillance norms, which are insufficient to guarantee the promotion and maintenance of safety for the health of everyone involved in body aesthetic procedures such as tattoos. |
id |
FIOCRUZ-9_3e5a21b55961668ae3bfe02fbda1e498 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br:article/1679 |
network_acronym_str |
FIOCRUZ-9 |
network_name_str |
Vigilância Sanitária em Debate |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Health conditions and evaluation of biosafety procedures adopted in tattoo studiesCondições sanitárias e avaliação dos procedimentos de biossegurança adotados em estúdios de tatuagemGestão de Riscos; Vigilância Sanitária; Gestão da Segurança; Fatores de Risco; Risco à Saúde HumanaRisk Management; Health Surveillance; Safety Management; Risk Factors; Health RiskIntroduction: The tattoo procedure offers biological risk to professionals and clients. Objective: To describe the hygienic and sanitary conditions, as well as to analyze the adoption of procedures for the management of biosafety risks by professional tattoo artists who work in tattoo studios in a municipality located in the Northwestern Region of the State of Ceará, Brazil. Method: Qualitative, descriptive and transversal study, carried out in five tattoo studios through the application of a checklist based on the Technical Standard for the operation of tattoo and piercing services by the Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária (2009). Results: The main negative points allude to the functioning of clandestine studios, poor registration of personal data of customers and inadequate collection of infectious waste. On the other hand, the main positive points achieved in this study are related to the proper sharps waste, the existence of a reserved and adequate place for the tattoo procedure, including a sink for washing hands close to the procedure site. The research also showed that professional tattoo artists have appropriate materials and equipment for their respective practices, but perform biosafety procedures incorrectly, which predispose professionals and clients to biological risk factors. Conclusions: The tattoo studios analyzed have poor compliance with health surveillance norms, which are insufficient to guarantee the promotion and maintenance of safety for the health of everyone involved in body aesthetic procedures such as tattoos.Introdução: O procedimento de tatuagem oferece risco biológico aos profissionais e clientes. Objetivo: Descrever as condições higiênicas e sanitárias, bem como analisar a adoção de procedimentos para a gestão de riscos de biossegurança por profissionais tatuadores que atuam em estúdios de tatuagem de um município localizado na região noroeste do estado do Ceará, Brasil. Método: Estudo qualitativo, descritivo e transversal, realizado em cinco estúdios de tatuagem através da aplicação de um checklist baseado em Referência Técnica para o funcionamento dos serviços de tatuagem e piercing da Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária (2009). Resultados: Os principais pontos negativos fazem alusão ao funcionamento de estúdios clandestinos, registro precário dos dados pessoais dos clientes e coleta inadequada do lixo infectante. Por outro lado, os principais pontos positivos alcançados nesse estudo estão relacionados com o descarte adequado de objetos perfurocortantes, existência de local reservado e adequado para o procedimento de tatuagem, incluindo pia para a lavagem das mãos próxima ao local do procedimento. A pesquisa evidenciou também que os profissionais tatuadores possuem materiais e equipamentos apropriados para as respectivas práticas, porém executam procedimentos de biossegurança de maneira incorreta, os quais predispõem profissionais e clientes a fatores de risco biológico. Conclusões: Os estúdios de tatuagem analisados apresentam pobre adequação às normas da Vigilância Sanitária, as quais são insuficientes para garantir a promoção e manutenção da segurança para a saúde de todos os envolvidos em procedimentos de estética corporal do tipo tatuagem.Instituto Nacional de Controle de Qualidade em Saúde2021-05-31info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion"Peer-reviewed article""Artículo revisado por pares""Artigo avaliado pelos pares"application/pdfhttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/1679Health Surveillance under Debate: Society, Science & Technology ; Vol. 9 No. 2 (2021): May; 130-137Vigilancia en Salud en Debate: Sociedad, Ciencia y Tecnología; Vol. 9 Núm. 2 (2021): Puede; 130-137Vigil Sanit Debate, Rio de Janeiro; v. 9 n. 2 (2021): Maio; 130-1372317-269Xreponame:Vigilância Sanitária em Debateinstname:Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)instacron:FIOCRUZporhttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/1679/1287Copyright (c) 2020 Vigilância Sanitária em Debate: Sociedade, Ciência & Tecnologia (Health Surveillance under Debate: Society, Science & Technology) – Visa em Debatehttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSantos, Brena MesquitaMeloMagalhães, Marcelle Vassiliepe Sousa Arruda, Francisco Dutra Girão, Mauro Vinicius2023-06-27T15:13:26Zoai:ojs.visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br:article/1679Revistahttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebatePUBhttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/oaiincqs.visaemdebate@fiocruz.br || gisele.neves@fiocruz.br2317-269X2317-269Xopendoar:2023-06-27T15:13:26Vigilância Sanitária em Debate - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Health conditions and evaluation of biosafety procedures adopted in tattoo studies Condições sanitárias e avaliação dos procedimentos de biossegurança adotados em estúdios de tatuagem |
title |
Health conditions and evaluation of biosafety procedures adopted in tattoo studies |
spellingShingle |
Health conditions and evaluation of biosafety procedures adopted in tattoo studies Santos, Brena Mesquita Gestão de Riscos; Vigilância Sanitária; Gestão da Segurança; Fatores de Risco; Risco à Saúde Humana Risk Management; Health Surveillance; Safety Management; Risk Factors; Health Risk |
title_short |
Health conditions and evaluation of biosafety procedures adopted in tattoo studies |
title_full |
Health conditions and evaluation of biosafety procedures adopted in tattoo studies |
title_fullStr |
Health conditions and evaluation of biosafety procedures adopted in tattoo studies |
title_full_unstemmed |
Health conditions and evaluation of biosafety procedures adopted in tattoo studies |
title_sort |
Health conditions and evaluation of biosafety procedures adopted in tattoo studies |
author |
Santos, Brena Mesquita |
author_facet |
Santos, Brena Mesquita MeloMagalhães, Marcelle Vassiliepe Sousa Arruda, Francisco Dutra Girão, Mauro Vinicius |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
MeloMagalhães, Marcelle Vassiliepe Sousa Arruda, Francisco Dutra Girão, Mauro Vinicius |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Santos, Brena Mesquita MeloMagalhães, Marcelle Vassiliepe Sousa Arruda, Francisco Dutra Girão, Mauro Vinicius |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Gestão de Riscos; Vigilância Sanitária; Gestão da Segurança; Fatores de Risco; Risco à Saúde Humana Risk Management; Health Surveillance; Safety Management; Risk Factors; Health Risk |
topic |
Gestão de Riscos; Vigilância Sanitária; Gestão da Segurança; Fatores de Risco; Risco à Saúde Humana Risk Management; Health Surveillance; Safety Management; Risk Factors; Health Risk |
description |
Introduction: The tattoo procedure offers biological risk to professionals and clients. Objective: To describe the hygienic and sanitary conditions, as well as to analyze the adoption of procedures for the management of biosafety risks by professional tattoo artists who work in tattoo studios in a municipality located in the Northwestern Region of the State of Ceará, Brazil. Method: Qualitative, descriptive and transversal study, carried out in five tattoo studios through the application of a checklist based on the Technical Standard for the operation of tattoo and piercing services by the Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária (2009). Results: The main negative points allude to the functioning of clandestine studios, poor registration of personal data of customers and inadequate collection of infectious waste. On the other hand, the main positive points achieved in this study are related to the proper sharps waste, the existence of a reserved and adequate place for the tattoo procedure, including a sink for washing hands close to the procedure site. The research also showed that professional tattoo artists have appropriate materials and equipment for their respective practices, but perform biosafety procedures incorrectly, which predispose professionals and clients to biological risk factors. Conclusions: The tattoo studios analyzed have poor compliance with health surveillance norms, which are insufficient to guarantee the promotion and maintenance of safety for the health of everyone involved in body aesthetic procedures such as tattoos. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-05-31 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion "Peer-reviewed article" "Artículo revisado por pares" "Artigo avaliado pelos pares" |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/1679 |
url |
https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/1679 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/1679/1287 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto Nacional de Controle de Qualidade em Saúde |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto Nacional de Controle de Qualidade em Saúde |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Health Surveillance under Debate: Society, Science & Technology ; Vol. 9 No. 2 (2021): May; 130-137 Vigilancia en Salud en Debate: Sociedad, Ciencia y Tecnología; Vol. 9 Núm. 2 (2021): Puede; 130-137 Vigil Sanit Debate, Rio de Janeiro; v. 9 n. 2 (2021): Maio; 130-137 2317-269X reponame:Vigilância Sanitária em Debate instname:Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ) instacron:FIOCRUZ |
instname_str |
Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ) |
instacron_str |
FIOCRUZ |
institution |
FIOCRUZ |
reponame_str |
Vigilância Sanitária em Debate |
collection |
Vigilância Sanitária em Debate |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Vigilância Sanitária em Debate - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
incqs.visaemdebate@fiocruz.br || gisele.neves@fiocruz.br |
_version_ |
1797042046032150528 |