The prequalification of medicines: Comparative analysis between WHO and Anvisa

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Couto, Marcus Vinicius Lima do
Data de Publicação: 2017
Outros Autores: Medina, Fernando, Costa, Hudson Eduardo Souza da, Dantas, Silvania Iacovino, Bermudez, Jorge Antonio Zepeda, Rech, Norberto, Costa, Jorge Carlos Santos da
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
eng
Título da fonte: Vigilância Sanitária em Debate
Texto Completo: https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/796
Resumo: The production of medicines with quality, safety and efficacy is essential to meet national and international requirements, aiming at subsidizing pharmaceutical care within the public health. Given the strategic role in which the public health industrial complex is inserted, compliance with Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP) of the World Health Organization (WHO) is essential to export its drugs via international organizations. The objectives of this article were to identify the main technical requirements recommended by WHO and enforced by the Brazilian Health Regulatory Agency (Anvisa), for compliance and recognition of GMP for medicinal products, and to compare them critically, to obtain the prequalification of medicines. This literature and documentary review promoted a comprehensive approach on national regulations and WHO guidelines. This work enabled to show a high degree of harmonization concerning the topics/subtopics compared between WHO and the national standards guides imposed by Anvisa about GMP, which demonstrates an integration of the national legislation in the international context, corroborating the alignment between Anvisa and WHO regarding compliance with GMP.
id FIOCRUZ-9_4cef096a4e71fbe9d7eb680c2569ffee
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br:article/796
network_acronym_str FIOCRUZ-9
network_name_str Vigilância Sanitária em Debate
repository_id_str
spelling The prequalification of medicines: Comparative analysis between WHO and AnvisaA pré-qualificação de medicamentos: análise comparativa entre OMS e AnvisaBoas Práticas de FabricaçãoGestão da QualidadeLaboratório Farmacêutico OficialPré-qualificaçãoVigilância SanitáriaGood Manufacturing PracticesQuality ManagementOfficial Pharmaceutical LaboratoryPrequalificationSanitary SurveillanceThe production of medicines with quality, safety and efficacy is essential to meet national and international requirements, aiming at subsidizing pharmaceutical care within the public health. Given the strategic role in which the public health industrial complex is inserted, compliance with Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP) of the World Health Organization (WHO) is essential to export its drugs via international organizations. The objectives of this article were to identify the main technical requirements recommended by WHO and enforced by the Brazilian Health Regulatory Agency (Anvisa), for compliance and recognition of GMP for medicinal products, and to compare them critically, to obtain the prequalification of medicines. This literature and documentary review promoted a comprehensive approach on national regulations and WHO guidelines. This work enabled to show a high degree of harmonization concerning the topics/subtopics compared between WHO and the national standards guides imposed by Anvisa about GMP, which demonstrates an integration of the national legislation in the international context, corroborating the alignment between Anvisa and WHO regarding compliance with GMP.A produção de medicamentos com qualidade, segurança e eficácia é fundamental para atender às demandas nacionais e internacionais, com o fito de subsidiar a assistência farmacêutica no âmbito da saúde pública. Diante do papel estratégico em que o complexo fabril público de saúde está inserido, o cumprimento das Boas Práticas de Fabricação (BPF) da Organização Mundial de Saúde (OMS) é essencial para a exportação de seus medicamentos via organismos internacionais. Os objetivos deste artigo foram identificar os principais requisitos técnicos recomendados pela OMS e exigidos pela Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária (Anvisa), para o cumprimento e reconhecimento das BPF de medicamentos, e compará-los, de maneira crítica, em prol da obtenção da pré-qualificação de medicamentos. A metodologia empregada promoveu uma abordagem abrangente acerca das regulamentações nacionais e dos guias da OMS, por intermédio da seguinte técnica de coleta de dados: pesquisa bibliográfica e documental. O presente trabalho possibilitou evidenciar um alto grau de harmonização acerca dos tópicos/subtópicos comparados entre os guias da OMS e a normatização nacional imposta pela Anvisa em BPF, o que demonstra uma inserção da legislação nacional no contexto internacional, corroborando o alinhamento entre a Anvisa e OMS, no tocante ao cumprimento das BPF.Instituto Nacional de Controle de Qualidade em Saúde2017-05-31info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion"Peer-reviewed article""Artículo revisado por pares""Artigo avaliado pelos pares"application/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/79610.22239/2317-269X.00796Health Surveillance under Debate: Society, Science & Technology ; Vol. 5 No. 2 (2017): May; 24-33Vigilancia en Salud en Debate: Sociedad, Ciencia y Tecnología; Vol. 5 Núm. 2 (2017): Puede; 24-33Vigil Sanit Debate, Rio de Janeiro; v. 5 n. 2 (2017): Maio; 24-332317-269Xreponame:Vigilância Sanitária em Debateinstname:Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)instacron:FIOCRUZporenghttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/796/377https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/796/455Copyright (c) 2017 Vigilância Sanitária em Debate: Sociedade, Ciência & Tecnologia (Health Surveillance under Debate: Society, Science & Technology) – Visa em Debatehttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCouto, Marcus Vinicius Lima doMedina, FernandoCosta, Hudson Eduardo Souza daDantas, Silvania IacovinoBermudez, Jorge Antonio ZepedaRech, NorbertoCosta, Jorge Carlos Santos da2023-06-27T15:19:44Zoai:ojs.visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br:article/796Revistahttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebatePUBhttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/oaiincqs.visaemdebate@fiocruz.br || gisele.neves@fiocruz.br2317-269X2317-269Xopendoar:2023-06-27T15:19:44Vigilância Sanitária em Debate - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The prequalification of medicines: Comparative analysis between WHO and Anvisa
A pré-qualificação de medicamentos: análise comparativa entre OMS e Anvisa
title The prequalification of medicines: Comparative analysis between WHO and Anvisa
spellingShingle The prequalification of medicines: Comparative analysis between WHO and Anvisa
Couto, Marcus Vinicius Lima do
Boas Práticas de Fabricação
Gestão da Qualidade
Laboratório Farmacêutico Oficial
Pré-qualificação
Vigilância Sanitária
Good Manufacturing Practices
Quality Management
Official Pharmaceutical Laboratory
Prequalification
Sanitary Surveillance
title_short The prequalification of medicines: Comparative analysis between WHO and Anvisa
title_full The prequalification of medicines: Comparative analysis between WHO and Anvisa
title_fullStr The prequalification of medicines: Comparative analysis between WHO and Anvisa
title_full_unstemmed The prequalification of medicines: Comparative analysis between WHO and Anvisa
title_sort The prequalification of medicines: Comparative analysis between WHO and Anvisa
author Couto, Marcus Vinicius Lima do
author_facet Couto, Marcus Vinicius Lima do
Medina, Fernando
Costa, Hudson Eduardo Souza da
Dantas, Silvania Iacovino
Bermudez, Jorge Antonio Zepeda
Rech, Norberto
Costa, Jorge Carlos Santos da
author_role author
author2 Medina, Fernando
Costa, Hudson Eduardo Souza da
Dantas, Silvania Iacovino
Bermudez, Jorge Antonio Zepeda
Rech, Norberto
Costa, Jorge Carlos Santos da
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Couto, Marcus Vinicius Lima do
Medina, Fernando
Costa, Hudson Eduardo Souza da
Dantas, Silvania Iacovino
Bermudez, Jorge Antonio Zepeda
Rech, Norberto
Costa, Jorge Carlos Santos da
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Boas Práticas de Fabricação
Gestão da Qualidade
Laboratório Farmacêutico Oficial
Pré-qualificação
Vigilância Sanitária
Good Manufacturing Practices
Quality Management
Official Pharmaceutical Laboratory
Prequalification
Sanitary Surveillance
topic Boas Práticas de Fabricação
Gestão da Qualidade
Laboratório Farmacêutico Oficial
Pré-qualificação
Vigilância Sanitária
Good Manufacturing Practices
Quality Management
Official Pharmaceutical Laboratory
Prequalification
Sanitary Surveillance
description The production of medicines with quality, safety and efficacy is essential to meet national and international requirements, aiming at subsidizing pharmaceutical care within the public health. Given the strategic role in which the public health industrial complex is inserted, compliance with Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP) of the World Health Organization (WHO) is essential to export its drugs via international organizations. The objectives of this article were to identify the main technical requirements recommended by WHO and enforced by the Brazilian Health Regulatory Agency (Anvisa), for compliance and recognition of GMP for medicinal products, and to compare them critically, to obtain the prequalification of medicines. This literature and documentary review promoted a comprehensive approach on national regulations and WHO guidelines. This work enabled to show a high degree of harmonization concerning the topics/subtopics compared between WHO and the national standards guides imposed by Anvisa about GMP, which demonstrates an integration of the national legislation in the international context, corroborating the alignment between Anvisa and WHO regarding compliance with GMP.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-05-31
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
"Peer-reviewed article"
"Artículo revisado por pares"
"Artigo avaliado pelos pares"
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/796
10.22239/2317-269X.00796
url https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/796
identifier_str_mv 10.22239/2317-269X.00796
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
eng
language por
eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/796/377
https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/796/455
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto Nacional de Controle de Qualidade em Saúde
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto Nacional de Controle de Qualidade em Saúde
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Health Surveillance under Debate: Society, Science & Technology ; Vol. 5 No. 2 (2017): May; 24-33
Vigilancia en Salud en Debate: Sociedad, Ciencia y Tecnología; Vol. 5 Núm. 2 (2017): Puede; 24-33
Vigil Sanit Debate, Rio de Janeiro; v. 5 n. 2 (2017): Maio; 24-33
2317-269X
reponame:Vigilância Sanitária em Debate
instname:Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)
instacron:FIOCRUZ
instname_str Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)
instacron_str FIOCRUZ
institution FIOCRUZ
reponame_str Vigilância Sanitária em Debate
collection Vigilância Sanitária em Debate
repository.name.fl_str_mv Vigilância Sanitária em Debate - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv incqs.visaemdebate@fiocruz.br || gisele.neves@fiocruz.br
_version_ 1797042044726673408