Risk in reprocessing of health products in Basic Units of Salvador, BA
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2018 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por eng |
Título da fonte: | Vigilância Sanitária em Debate |
Texto Completo: | https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/991 |
Resumo: | Introduction: There are gaps in the reprocessing of products in primary health care services. Objective: To analyze the reprocessing of medical products in Basic Units of Salvador, BA. Method: Multiple case study, carried out in Basic Health Units (UBS) of Salvador. The search for data was by interview and observation in loco. The analytical categories: management of the reprocessing practices of medical products; Physical structure of the Material and Sterilization Centers (CME); Product reprocessing protocols; Monitoring of processes and traceability of products. Results: 11 UBS (84.6%) were analyzed. Of these, the reprocessing activities of products are carried out by the auxiliary of oral health in 81.8%. Absence of air conditioning in 100.0% of CME. Protocols exist in 36.3% of CME. Physical and chemical monitoring of the sterilization process is absent in 100.0% of the cases and biological monitoring is performed in 45.4% of the cases. In no CME is performed annual thermal qualification of the sterilizing equipment, nor is there traceability of the sterilized products. Conclusions: The practices identified herein pose a potential risk to users of reprocessed products and urges an effective sanitary control of these services in order to prevent damages related to the reuse of medical products. |
id |
FIOCRUZ-9_4da3c40112c58453bdf2bb7a06011936 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br:article/991 |
network_acronym_str |
FIOCRUZ-9 |
network_name_str |
Vigilância Sanitária em Debate |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Risk in reprocessing of health products in Basic Units of Salvador, BARisco em processamento de produtos para saúde em Unidades Básicas de Salvador, BASterilizationEquipment and SuppliesRisk ManagementHealth CentersEsterilizaçãoEquipamentos e ProvisõesGestão de RiscoCentros de SaúdeIntroduction: There are gaps in the reprocessing of products in primary health care services. Objective: To analyze the reprocessing of medical products in Basic Units of Salvador, BA. Method: Multiple case study, carried out in Basic Health Units (UBS) of Salvador. The search for data was by interview and observation in loco. The analytical categories: management of the reprocessing practices of medical products; Physical structure of the Material and Sterilization Centers (CME); Product reprocessing protocols; Monitoring of processes and traceability of products. Results: 11 UBS (84.6%) were analyzed. Of these, the reprocessing activities of products are carried out by the auxiliary of oral health in 81.8%. Absence of air conditioning in 100.0% of CME. Protocols exist in 36.3% of CME. Physical and chemical monitoring of the sterilization process is absent in 100.0% of the cases and biological monitoring is performed in 45.4% of the cases. In no CME is performed annual thermal qualification of the sterilizing equipment, nor is there traceability of the sterilized products. Conclusions: The practices identified herein pose a potential risk to users of reprocessed products and urges an effective sanitary control of these services in order to prevent damages related to the reuse of medical products.Introdução: Existem lacunas acerca do processamento de produtos em serviços de atenção primária da saúde. Objetivo: Analisar o processamento de produtos para a saúde em Unidades Básicas de Salvador, BA. Método: Pesquisa de casos múltiplos, realizada em Unidades Básicas de Saúde (UBS) de Salvador. A busca de dados foi feita por meio de entrevista e observação in loco. As categorias analíticas foram: gerenciamento das práticas de processamento de produtos para a saúde; estrutura física dos Centros de Material e Esterilização (CME); protocolos de processamento de produtos; monitoramento dos processos e rastreabilidade de produtos. Resultados: Foram analisadas 11 UBS (84,6%). Dessas, as atividades de processamento de produtos são desempenhadas pelo auxiliar de saúde bucal em 81,8%. Há ausência de climatização em 100,0% dos CME. Existem protocolos em 36,3% dos CME. O monitoramento físico e químico do processo de esterilização é ausente em 100,0% dos casos e o monitoramento biológico é realizado em 45,4% dos casos. Em nenhum CME é realizada qualificação térmica anual do equipamento esterilizador, nem existe rastreabilidade dos produtos esterilizados. Conclusões: As práticas ora identificadas configuram risco potencial para os usuários de produtos processados e urge um controle sanitário efetivo desses serviços a fim de prevenir os danos relacionados com o reúso de produtos para a saúde.Instituto Nacional de Controle de Qualidade em Saúde2018-05-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion"Peer-reviewed article""Artículo revisado por pares""Artigo avaliado pelos pares"application/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/99110.22239/2317-269X.00991Health Surveillance under Debate: Society, Science & Technology ; Vol. 6 No. 2 (2018): May; 38-43Vigilancia en Salud en Debate: Sociedad, Ciencia y Tecnología; Vol. 6 Núm. 2 (2018): Puede; 38-43Vigil Sanit Debate, Rio de Janeiro; v. 6 n. 2 (2018): Maio; 38-432317-269Xreponame:Vigilância Sanitária em Debateinstname:Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)instacron:FIOCRUZporenghttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/991/443https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/991/479Copyright (c) 2018 Vigilância Sanitária em Debate: Sociedade, Ciência & Tecnologia (Health Surveillance under Debate: Society, Science & Technology) – Visa em Debatehttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCosta, Eliana Auxiliadora Magalhãesdos Santos, Quézia Nunes FróisDantas, Isabele dos Santos2023-06-27T15:10:49Zoai:ojs.visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br:article/991Revistahttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebatePUBhttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/oaiincqs.visaemdebate@fiocruz.br || gisele.neves@fiocruz.br2317-269X2317-269Xopendoar:2023-06-27T15:10:49Vigilância Sanitária em Debate - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Risk in reprocessing of health products in Basic Units of Salvador, BA Risco em processamento de produtos para saúde em Unidades Básicas de Salvador, BA |
title |
Risk in reprocessing of health products in Basic Units of Salvador, BA |
spellingShingle |
Risk in reprocessing of health products in Basic Units of Salvador, BA Costa, Eliana Auxiliadora Magalhães Sterilization Equipment and Supplies Risk Management Health Centers Esterilização Equipamentos e Provisões Gestão de Risco Centros de Saúde |
title_short |
Risk in reprocessing of health products in Basic Units of Salvador, BA |
title_full |
Risk in reprocessing of health products in Basic Units of Salvador, BA |
title_fullStr |
Risk in reprocessing of health products in Basic Units of Salvador, BA |
title_full_unstemmed |
Risk in reprocessing of health products in Basic Units of Salvador, BA |
title_sort |
Risk in reprocessing of health products in Basic Units of Salvador, BA |
author |
Costa, Eliana Auxiliadora Magalhães |
author_facet |
Costa, Eliana Auxiliadora Magalhães dos Santos, Quézia Nunes Fróis Dantas, Isabele dos Santos |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
dos Santos, Quézia Nunes Fróis Dantas, Isabele dos Santos |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Costa, Eliana Auxiliadora Magalhães dos Santos, Quézia Nunes Fróis Dantas, Isabele dos Santos |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Sterilization Equipment and Supplies Risk Management Health Centers Esterilização Equipamentos e Provisões Gestão de Risco Centros de Saúde |
topic |
Sterilization Equipment and Supplies Risk Management Health Centers Esterilização Equipamentos e Provisões Gestão de Risco Centros de Saúde |
description |
Introduction: There are gaps in the reprocessing of products in primary health care services. Objective: To analyze the reprocessing of medical products in Basic Units of Salvador, BA. Method: Multiple case study, carried out in Basic Health Units (UBS) of Salvador. The search for data was by interview and observation in loco. The analytical categories: management of the reprocessing practices of medical products; Physical structure of the Material and Sterilization Centers (CME); Product reprocessing protocols; Monitoring of processes and traceability of products. Results: 11 UBS (84.6%) were analyzed. Of these, the reprocessing activities of products are carried out by the auxiliary of oral health in 81.8%. Absence of air conditioning in 100.0% of CME. Protocols exist in 36.3% of CME. Physical and chemical monitoring of the sterilization process is absent in 100.0% of the cases and biological monitoring is performed in 45.4% of the cases. In no CME is performed annual thermal qualification of the sterilizing equipment, nor is there traceability of the sterilized products. Conclusions: The practices identified herein pose a potential risk to users of reprocessed products and urges an effective sanitary control of these services in order to prevent damages related to the reuse of medical products. |
publishDate |
2018 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2018-05-30 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion "Peer-reviewed article" "Artículo revisado por pares" "Artigo avaliado pelos pares" |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/991 10.22239/2317-269X.00991 |
url |
https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/991 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.22239/2317-269X.00991 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por eng |
language |
por eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/991/443 https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/991/479 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto Nacional de Controle de Qualidade em Saúde |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto Nacional de Controle de Qualidade em Saúde |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Health Surveillance under Debate: Society, Science & Technology ; Vol. 6 No. 2 (2018): May; 38-43 Vigilancia en Salud en Debate: Sociedad, Ciencia y Tecnología; Vol. 6 Núm. 2 (2018): Puede; 38-43 Vigil Sanit Debate, Rio de Janeiro; v. 6 n. 2 (2018): Maio; 38-43 2317-269X reponame:Vigilância Sanitária em Debate instname:Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ) instacron:FIOCRUZ |
instname_str |
Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ) |
instacron_str |
FIOCRUZ |
institution |
FIOCRUZ |
reponame_str |
Vigilância Sanitária em Debate |
collection |
Vigilância Sanitária em Debate |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Vigilância Sanitária em Debate - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
incqs.visaemdebate@fiocruz.br || gisele.neves@fiocruz.br |
_version_ |
1797042044826288128 |