Registration, technology adoption and public production of a medicine: study of atazanavir
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2016 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Vigilância Sanitária em Debate |
Texto Completo: | https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/740 |
Resumo: | Brazil was one of the first countries in the Global South to include in its public health policies robust control measures against HIV/Aids. Thus, in 2015, approximately 450,000 patients were under treatment by the Unified Health System. The sanitary registration is a crucial step for the drug entry into the domestic market, what configures a very favorable element for the drug access. Several sectors of society, even if based on different reasons, act in favor of the incorporation of new technologies; this fact, ultimately, favorably weighs in controlling the epidemic. In this work the atazanavir antiretroviral cycle is discussed through a descriptive documental study; that cycle involves: the selection of the drug by therapeutic consensus; the sanitary registration; and the definition of technological incorporation strategies for a national drug production. In 2003, the registration of atazanavir was granted in Brazil: only three months after being granted by the FDA in America and only five and a half months before being granted in Europe. This resulted in the rapid inclusion in the recommendations and in a therapeutic consensus being adopted in Brazil as the preferred drug (1st choice) in 2004. Moreover, atazanavir’s development became the object of a public-private partnership –known as Productive Development Partnership (PDP)-, inside the hegemonic policy of adopting new health technologies, defined by the Ministry of Health. |
id |
FIOCRUZ-9_5540c54bf74b339127e0dc1fa3c6ab4f |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br:article/740 |
network_acronym_str |
FIOCRUZ-9 |
network_name_str |
Vigilância Sanitária em Debate |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Registration, technology adoption and public production of a medicine: study of atazanavirRegistro, incorporação tecnológica e produção pública de medicamento: estudo sobre o atazanavirRegistroIncorporaçãoPDPAtazanavirSaúde PúblicaRegistrationAdoptionPDPAtazanavirPublic HealthBrazil was one of the first countries in the Global South to include in its public health policies robust control measures against HIV/Aids. Thus, in 2015, approximately 450,000 patients were under treatment by the Unified Health System. The sanitary registration is a crucial step for the drug entry into the domestic market, what configures a very favorable element for the drug access. Several sectors of society, even if based on different reasons, act in favor of the incorporation of new technologies; this fact, ultimately, favorably weighs in controlling the epidemic. In this work the atazanavir antiretroviral cycle is discussed through a descriptive documental study; that cycle involves: the selection of the drug by therapeutic consensus; the sanitary registration; and the definition of technological incorporation strategies for a national drug production. In 2003, the registration of atazanavir was granted in Brazil: only three months after being granted by the FDA in America and only five and a half months before being granted in Europe. This resulted in the rapid inclusion in the recommendations and in a therapeutic consensus being adopted in Brazil as the preferred drug (1st choice) in 2004. Moreover, atazanavir’s development became the object of a public-private partnership –known as Productive Development Partnership (PDP)-, inside the hegemonic policy of adopting new health technologies, defined by the Ministry of Health.O Brasil foi um dos primeiros países do Sul Global a incluir em suas políticas de saúde pública robustas medidas de controle contra a epidemia de HIV/Aids. Assim, em 2015, cerca de 450 mil pacientes encontravam-se em tratamento no Sistema Único de Saúde. O registro sanitário é uma etapa crucial para entrada do medicamento no mercado nacional, configurando elemento muito favorável ao acesso. Vários setores da sociedade, ainda que baseados em interesses diversos, atuam em prol da incorporação de novas tecnologias que acabam por pesar favoravelmente no controle da epidemia. Nesse trabalho, por meio de um estudo documental descritivo, foi discutido o ciclo do antirretroviral atazanavir, entendido como um ciclo que envolve a seleção do medicamento pelo consenso terapêutico, o registro sanitário e a definição das estratégias de incorporação tecnológica para a produção nacional do medicamento. O registro do atazanavir no Brasil foi concedido em 2003, três meses após ter sido obtido no FDA e cinco meses e meio antes de ser concedido na Europa. Esses fatores resultaram em sua rápida inclusão nas recomendações no consenso terapêutico brasileiro, que o adotou como medicamento preferencial (1ª escolha), em 2004. Ademais, o atazanavir se tornou objeto de uma parceria público privada para o desenvolvimento do produto, dentro da política hegemônica de incorporação de novas tecnologias em saúde definida pelo Ministério da Saúde, a chamada Política para o Desenvolvimento Produtivo (PDP).Instituto Nacional de Controle de Qualidade em Saúde2016-08-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion"Peer-reviewed article""Artículo revisado por pares""Artigo avaliado pelos pares"application/pdfhttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/74010.22239/2317-269X.00740Health Surveillance under Debate: Society, Science & Technology ; Vol. 4 No. 3 (2016): August; 18-27Vigilancia en Salud en Debate: Sociedad, Ciencia y Tecnología; Vol. 4 Núm. 3 (2016): Agosto; 18-27Vigil Sanit Debate, Rio de Janeiro; v. 4 n. 3 (2016): Agosto; 18-272317-269Xreponame:Vigilância Sanitária em Debateinstname:Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)instacron:FIOCRUZporhttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/740/323Copyright (c) 2016 Vigilância Sanitária em Debate: Sociedade, Ciência & Tecnologia (Health Surveillance under Debate: Society, Science & Technology) – Visa em Debatehttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSilveira, Carla Cristina de Freitas daCorrêa, Marilena Cordeiro Dias VillelaBarroso, Wanise Borges GouveaFigueiredo, Tatiana Aragão2023-06-27T15:17:11Zoai:ojs.visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br:article/740Revistahttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebatePUBhttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/oaiincqs.visaemdebate@fiocruz.br || gisele.neves@fiocruz.br2317-269X2317-269Xopendoar:2023-06-27T15:17:11Vigilância Sanitária em Debate - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Registration, technology adoption and public production of a medicine: study of atazanavir Registro, incorporação tecnológica e produção pública de medicamento: estudo sobre o atazanavir |
title |
Registration, technology adoption and public production of a medicine: study of atazanavir |
spellingShingle |
Registration, technology adoption and public production of a medicine: study of atazanavir Silveira, Carla Cristina de Freitas da Registro Incorporação PDP Atazanavir Saúde Pública Registration Adoption PDP Atazanavir Public Health |
title_short |
Registration, technology adoption and public production of a medicine: study of atazanavir |
title_full |
Registration, technology adoption and public production of a medicine: study of atazanavir |
title_fullStr |
Registration, technology adoption and public production of a medicine: study of atazanavir |
title_full_unstemmed |
Registration, technology adoption and public production of a medicine: study of atazanavir |
title_sort |
Registration, technology adoption and public production of a medicine: study of atazanavir |
author |
Silveira, Carla Cristina de Freitas da |
author_facet |
Silveira, Carla Cristina de Freitas da Corrêa, Marilena Cordeiro Dias Villela Barroso, Wanise Borges Gouvea Figueiredo, Tatiana Aragão |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Corrêa, Marilena Cordeiro Dias Villela Barroso, Wanise Borges Gouvea Figueiredo, Tatiana Aragão |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Silveira, Carla Cristina de Freitas da Corrêa, Marilena Cordeiro Dias Villela Barroso, Wanise Borges Gouvea Figueiredo, Tatiana Aragão |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Registro Incorporação PDP Atazanavir Saúde Pública Registration Adoption PDP Atazanavir Public Health |
topic |
Registro Incorporação PDP Atazanavir Saúde Pública Registration Adoption PDP Atazanavir Public Health |
description |
Brazil was one of the first countries in the Global South to include in its public health policies robust control measures against HIV/Aids. Thus, in 2015, approximately 450,000 patients were under treatment by the Unified Health System. The sanitary registration is a crucial step for the drug entry into the domestic market, what configures a very favorable element for the drug access. Several sectors of society, even if based on different reasons, act in favor of the incorporation of new technologies; this fact, ultimately, favorably weighs in controlling the epidemic. In this work the atazanavir antiretroviral cycle is discussed through a descriptive documental study; that cycle involves: the selection of the drug by therapeutic consensus; the sanitary registration; and the definition of technological incorporation strategies for a national drug production. In 2003, the registration of atazanavir was granted in Brazil: only three months after being granted by the FDA in America and only five and a half months before being granted in Europe. This resulted in the rapid inclusion in the recommendations and in a therapeutic consensus being adopted in Brazil as the preferred drug (1st choice) in 2004. Moreover, atazanavir’s development became the object of a public-private partnership –known as Productive Development Partnership (PDP)-, inside the hegemonic policy of adopting new health technologies, defined by the Ministry of Health. |
publishDate |
2016 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2016-08-30 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion "Peer-reviewed article" "Artículo revisado por pares" "Artigo avaliado pelos pares" |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/740 10.22239/2317-269X.00740 |
url |
https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/740 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.22239/2317-269X.00740 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/740/323 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto Nacional de Controle de Qualidade em Saúde |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto Nacional de Controle de Qualidade em Saúde |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Health Surveillance under Debate: Society, Science & Technology ; Vol. 4 No. 3 (2016): August; 18-27 Vigilancia en Salud en Debate: Sociedad, Ciencia y Tecnología; Vol. 4 Núm. 3 (2016): Agosto; 18-27 Vigil Sanit Debate, Rio de Janeiro; v. 4 n. 3 (2016): Agosto; 18-27 2317-269X reponame:Vigilância Sanitária em Debate instname:Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ) instacron:FIOCRUZ |
instname_str |
Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ) |
instacron_str |
FIOCRUZ |
institution |
FIOCRUZ |
reponame_str |
Vigilância Sanitária em Debate |
collection |
Vigilância Sanitária em Debate |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Vigilância Sanitária em Debate - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
incqs.visaemdebate@fiocruz.br || gisele.neves@fiocruz.br |
_version_ |
1797042044693118976 |