Registration, technology adoption and public production of a medicine: study of atazanavir

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Silveira, Carla Cristina de Freitas da
Data de Publicação: 2016
Outros Autores: Corrêa, Marilena Cordeiro Dias Villela, Barroso, Wanise Borges Gouvea, Figueiredo, Tatiana Aragão
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Vigilância Sanitária em Debate
Texto Completo: https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/740
Resumo: Brazil was one of the first countries in the Global South to include in its public health policies robust control measures against HIV/Aids. Thus, in 2015, approximately 450,000 patients were under treatment by the Unified Health System. The sanitary registration is a crucial step for the drug entry into the domestic market, what configures a very favorable element for the drug access. Several sectors of society, even if based on different reasons, act in favor of the incorporation of new technologies; this fact, ultimately, favorably weighs in controlling the epidemic. In this work the atazanavir antiretroviral cycle is discussed through a descriptive documental study; that cycle involves: the selection of the drug by therapeutic consensus; the sanitary registration; and the definition of technological incorporation strategies for a national drug production. In 2003, the registration of atazanavir was granted in Brazil: only three months after being granted by the FDA in America and only five and a half months before being granted in Europe. This resulted in the rapid inclusion in the recommendations and in a therapeutic consensus being adopted in Brazil as the preferred drug (1st choice) in 2004. Moreover, atazanavir’s development became the object of a public-private partnership –known as Productive Development Partnership (PDP)-, inside the hegemonic policy of adopting new health technologies, defined by the Ministry of Health.
id FIOCRUZ-9_5540c54bf74b339127e0dc1fa3c6ab4f
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br:article/740
network_acronym_str FIOCRUZ-9
network_name_str Vigilância Sanitária em Debate
repository_id_str
spelling Registration, technology adoption and public production of a medicine: study of atazanavirRegistro, incorporação tecnológica e produção pública de medicamento: estudo sobre o atazanavirRegistroIncorporaçãoPDPAtazanavirSaúde PúblicaRegistrationAdoptionPDPAtazanavirPublic HealthBrazil was one of the first countries in the Global South to include in its public health policies robust control measures against HIV/Aids. Thus, in 2015, approximately 450,000 patients were under treatment by the Unified Health System. The sanitary registration is a crucial step for the drug entry into the domestic market, what configures a very favorable element for the drug access. Several sectors of society, even if based on different reasons, act in favor of the incorporation of new technologies; this fact, ultimately, favorably weighs in controlling the epidemic. In this work the atazanavir antiretroviral cycle is discussed through a descriptive documental study; that cycle involves: the selection of the drug by therapeutic consensus; the sanitary registration; and the definition of technological incorporation strategies for a national drug production. In 2003, the registration of atazanavir was granted in Brazil: only three months after being granted by the FDA in America and only five and a half months before being granted in Europe. This resulted in the rapid inclusion in the recommendations and in a therapeutic consensus being adopted in Brazil as the preferred drug (1st choice) in 2004. Moreover, atazanavir’s development became the object of a public-private partnership –known as Productive Development Partnership (PDP)-, inside the hegemonic policy of adopting new health technologies, defined by the Ministry of Health.O Brasil foi um dos primeiros países do Sul Global a incluir em suas políticas de saúde pública robustas medidas de controle contra a epidemia de HIV/Aids. Assim, em 2015, cerca de 450 mil pacientes encontravam-se em tratamento no Sistema Único de Saúde. O registro sanitário é uma etapa crucial para entrada do medicamento no mercado nacional, configurando elemento muito favorável ao acesso. Vários setores da sociedade, ainda que baseados em interesses diversos, atuam em prol da incorporação de novas tecnologias que acabam por pesar favoravelmente no controle da epidemia. Nesse trabalho, por meio de um estudo documental descritivo, foi discutido o ciclo do antirretroviral atazanavir, entendido como um ciclo que envolve a seleção do medicamento pelo consenso terapêutico, o registro sanitário e a definição das estratégias de incorporação tecnológica para a produção nacional do medicamento. O registro do atazanavir no Brasil foi concedido em 2003, três meses após ter sido obtido no FDA e cinco meses e meio antes de ser concedido na Europa. Esses fatores resultaram em sua rápida inclusão nas recomendações no consenso terapêutico brasileiro, que o adotou como medicamento preferencial (1ª escolha), em 2004. Ademais, o atazanavir se tornou objeto de uma parceria público privada para o desenvolvimento do produto, dentro da política hegemônica de incorporação de novas tecnologias em saúde definida pelo Ministério da Saúde, a chamada Política para o Desenvolvimento Produtivo (PDP).Instituto Nacional de Controle de Qualidade em Saúde2016-08-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion"Peer-reviewed article""Artículo revisado por pares""Artigo avaliado pelos pares"application/pdfhttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/74010.22239/2317-269X.00740Health Surveillance under Debate: Society, Science & Technology ; Vol. 4 No. 3 (2016): August; 18-27Vigilancia en Salud en Debate: Sociedad, Ciencia y Tecnología; Vol. 4 Núm. 3 (2016): Agosto; 18-27Vigil Sanit Debate, Rio de Janeiro; v. 4 n. 3 (2016): Agosto; 18-272317-269Xreponame:Vigilância Sanitária em Debateinstname:Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)instacron:FIOCRUZporhttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/740/323Copyright (c) 2016 Vigilância Sanitária em Debate: Sociedade, Ciência & Tecnologia (Health Surveillance under Debate: Society, Science & Technology) – Visa em Debatehttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSilveira, Carla Cristina de Freitas daCorrêa, Marilena Cordeiro Dias VillelaBarroso, Wanise Borges GouveaFigueiredo, Tatiana Aragão2023-06-27T15:17:11Zoai:ojs.visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br:article/740Revistahttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebatePUBhttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/oaiincqs.visaemdebate@fiocruz.br || gisele.neves@fiocruz.br2317-269X2317-269Xopendoar:2023-06-27T15:17:11Vigilância Sanitária em Debate - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Registration, technology adoption and public production of a medicine: study of atazanavir
Registro, incorporação tecnológica e produção pública de medicamento: estudo sobre o atazanavir
title Registration, technology adoption and public production of a medicine: study of atazanavir
spellingShingle Registration, technology adoption and public production of a medicine: study of atazanavir
Silveira, Carla Cristina de Freitas da
Registro
Incorporação
PDP
Atazanavir
Saúde Pública
Registration
Adoption
PDP
Atazanavir
Public Health
title_short Registration, technology adoption and public production of a medicine: study of atazanavir
title_full Registration, technology adoption and public production of a medicine: study of atazanavir
title_fullStr Registration, technology adoption and public production of a medicine: study of atazanavir
title_full_unstemmed Registration, technology adoption and public production of a medicine: study of atazanavir
title_sort Registration, technology adoption and public production of a medicine: study of atazanavir
author Silveira, Carla Cristina de Freitas da
author_facet Silveira, Carla Cristina de Freitas da
Corrêa, Marilena Cordeiro Dias Villela
Barroso, Wanise Borges Gouvea
Figueiredo, Tatiana Aragão
author_role author
author2 Corrêa, Marilena Cordeiro Dias Villela
Barroso, Wanise Borges Gouvea
Figueiredo, Tatiana Aragão
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Silveira, Carla Cristina de Freitas da
Corrêa, Marilena Cordeiro Dias Villela
Barroso, Wanise Borges Gouvea
Figueiredo, Tatiana Aragão
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Registro
Incorporação
PDP
Atazanavir
Saúde Pública
Registration
Adoption
PDP
Atazanavir
Public Health
topic Registro
Incorporação
PDP
Atazanavir
Saúde Pública
Registration
Adoption
PDP
Atazanavir
Public Health
description Brazil was one of the first countries in the Global South to include in its public health policies robust control measures against HIV/Aids. Thus, in 2015, approximately 450,000 patients were under treatment by the Unified Health System. The sanitary registration is a crucial step for the drug entry into the domestic market, what configures a very favorable element for the drug access. Several sectors of society, even if based on different reasons, act in favor of the incorporation of new technologies; this fact, ultimately, favorably weighs in controlling the epidemic. In this work the atazanavir antiretroviral cycle is discussed through a descriptive documental study; that cycle involves: the selection of the drug by therapeutic consensus; the sanitary registration; and the definition of technological incorporation strategies for a national drug production. In 2003, the registration of atazanavir was granted in Brazil: only three months after being granted by the FDA in America and only five and a half months before being granted in Europe. This resulted in the rapid inclusion in the recommendations and in a therapeutic consensus being adopted in Brazil as the preferred drug (1st choice) in 2004. Moreover, atazanavir’s development became the object of a public-private partnership –known as Productive Development Partnership (PDP)-, inside the hegemonic policy of adopting new health technologies, defined by the Ministry of Health.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-08-30
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
"Peer-reviewed article"
"Artículo revisado por pares"
"Artigo avaliado pelos pares"
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/740
10.22239/2317-269X.00740
url https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/740
identifier_str_mv 10.22239/2317-269X.00740
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/740/323
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto Nacional de Controle de Qualidade em Saúde
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto Nacional de Controle de Qualidade em Saúde
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Health Surveillance under Debate: Society, Science & Technology ; Vol. 4 No. 3 (2016): August; 18-27
Vigilancia en Salud en Debate: Sociedad, Ciencia y Tecnología; Vol. 4 Núm. 3 (2016): Agosto; 18-27
Vigil Sanit Debate, Rio de Janeiro; v. 4 n. 3 (2016): Agosto; 18-27
2317-269X
reponame:Vigilância Sanitária em Debate
instname:Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)
instacron:FIOCRUZ
instname_str Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)
instacron_str FIOCRUZ
institution FIOCRUZ
reponame_str Vigilância Sanitária em Debate
collection Vigilância Sanitária em Debate
repository.name.fl_str_mv Vigilância Sanitária em Debate - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv incqs.visaemdebate@fiocruz.br || gisele.neves@fiocruz.br
_version_ 1797042044693118976