Can the vaccination against COVID-19 be compulsory in Brazil? The legal issue and political dispute

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: de Oliveira Abud, Carol
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Pereira de Souza, Luciano
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
eng
Título da fonte: Vigilância Sanitária em Debate
Texto Completo: https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/1856
Resumo: Introduction: The recent uproar around COVID-19 hangs over the rights and duties of the population regarding vaccination and mass immunization. The exercise of individual freedom and the possible imposition of a measure that makes vaccination compulsory may be the focus of a political dispute around the adoption of scientific criteria for government decision-making, and with that, bring serious collective consequences in relation to the spread and the lack of control of the disease. Objective: To study whether compulsory vaccination against COVID-19, once instituted by law or normative act, will have a legal basis in view of fundamental rights and analyze whether the political dispute around the vaccine may be influencing its regulation. Method:  Exploratory and descriptive study developed through documentary and bibliographic research, collection of texts from the World Health Organization, Ministry of Health, federal government and the state of São Paulo, analysis of national legislation and recent decisions by the  Supreme Court. Results: It was observed that it is possible to establish compulsory vaccination in Brazil, ensuring fundamental rights; however, political issues are influencing decision-making based on technical-scientific criteria for health surveillance. Conclusions:  The restriction of individual freedom finds support in the search for health in the collective interest, as long as it does not go beyond the limits of the physical integrity of the citizen and human dignity, the use of physical coercion being prohibited. The political dispute led by some public agents may have caused delays and setbacks in the vaccination of the Brazilian population, an effective way to control the pandemic.
id FIOCRUZ-9_5db16fd5d4a26f166f3f119f04b87606
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br:article/1856
network_acronym_str FIOCRUZ-9
network_name_str Vigilância Sanitária em Debate
repository_id_str
spelling Can the vaccination against COVID-19 be compulsory in Brazil? The legal issue and political disputeA vacinação contra a COVID-19 pode ser compulsória no Brasil? A questão jurídica e a disputa políticaRight to Health; Coronavirus Infections; Public Health; Immunization Programs; Vaccination RefusalDireito à Saúde; Infecções por Coronavírus; Saúde Pública; Programas de Imunização; Recusa de VacinaçãoIntroduction: The recent uproar around COVID-19 hangs over the rights and duties of the population regarding vaccination and mass immunization. The exercise of individual freedom and the possible imposition of a measure that makes vaccination compulsory may be the focus of a political dispute around the adoption of scientific criteria for government decision-making, and with that, bring serious collective consequences in relation to the spread and the lack of control of the disease. Objective: To study whether compulsory vaccination against COVID-19, once instituted by law or normative act, will have a legal basis in view of fundamental rights and analyze whether the political dispute around the vaccine may be influencing its regulation. Method:  Exploratory and descriptive study developed through documentary and bibliographic research, collection of texts from the World Health Organization, Ministry of Health, federal government and the state of São Paulo, analysis of national legislation and recent decisions by the  Supreme Court. Results: It was observed that it is possible to establish compulsory vaccination in Brazil, ensuring fundamental rights; however, political issues are influencing decision-making based on technical-scientific criteria for health surveillance. Conclusions:  The restriction of individual freedom finds support in the search for health in the collective interest, as long as it does not go beyond the limits of the physical integrity of the citizen and human dignity, the use of physical coercion being prohibited. The political dispute led by some public agents may have caused delays and setbacks in the vaccination of the Brazilian population, an effective way to control the pandemic.Introdução:  A recente celeuma em torno da COVID-19 paira sobre os direitos e deveres da população frente à vacinação e a imunização em massa.  O exercício da liberdade individual e a eventual imposição de medida que torna compulsória a vacinação podem estar no foco de uma disputa política em torno da adoção de critérios científicos para a tomada de decisões governamentais que poderão trazer sérias consequências coletivas em relação à propagação e ao descontrole da doença. Objetivo:Estudar se a vacinação compulsória contra a COVID-19, uma vez instituída por lei ou ato normativo, terá fundamentação jurídica em face dos direitos fundamentais e analisar se a disputa política em torno da vacina pode estar influenciando a sua normatização. Método: Estudo exploratório e descritivo elaborado por meio de pesquisa documental e bibliográfica, coleta de textos provenientes da Organização Mundial da Saúde, do Ministério da Saúde, do governo federal, do estado de São Paulo, da análise da legislação pátria e de decisões recentes do Supremo Tribunal Federal. Resultados:  Observou-se que é possível estabelecer a vacinação compulsória no Brasil assegurando os direitos fundamentais, entretanto, questões políticas estão influenciando a tomada de decisões pautadas por critérios técnico-científicos de Vigilância Sanitária. Conclusões: A restrição da liberdade individual encontra amparo no fundamento de busca pela saúde de interesse coletivo, desde que não extrapole os limites da integridade física do cidadão e da dignidade humana, vedado o uso da coerção física. A disputa política encabeçada por alguns agentes públicos pode ter acarretado atrasos e retrocessos na imunização vacinal da população brasileira, forma eficaz de controle da pandemia. Instituto Nacional de Controle de Qualidade em Saúde2021-11-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion"Peer-reviewed article""Artículo revisado por pares""Artigo avaliado pelos pares"application/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/185610.22239/2317-269x.01856Health Surveillance under Debate: Society, Science & Technology ; Vol. 9 No. 4 (2021): November; 4-15Vigilancia en Salud en Debate: Sociedad, Ciencia y Tecnología; Vol. 9 Núm. 4 (2021): Noviembre; 4-15Vigil Sanit Debate, Rio de Janeiro; v. 9 n. 4 (2021): Novembro; 4-152317-269Xreponame:Vigilância Sanitária em Debateinstname:Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)instacron:FIOCRUZporenghttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/1856/1367https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/1856/1412Copyright (c) 2021 Vigilância Sanitária em Debate: Sociedade, Ciência & Tecnologia (Health Surveillance under Debate: Society, Science & Technology) – Visa em Debatehttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessde Oliveira Abud, Carol Pereira de Souza, Luciano 2023-06-27T15:13:49Zoai:ojs.visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br:article/1856Revistahttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebatePUBhttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/oaiincqs.visaemdebate@fiocruz.br || gisele.neves@fiocruz.br2317-269X2317-269Xopendoar:2023-06-27T15:13:49Vigilância Sanitária em Debate - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Can the vaccination against COVID-19 be compulsory in Brazil? The legal issue and political dispute
A vacinação contra a COVID-19 pode ser compulsória no Brasil? A questão jurídica e a disputa política
title Can the vaccination against COVID-19 be compulsory in Brazil? The legal issue and political dispute
spellingShingle Can the vaccination against COVID-19 be compulsory in Brazil? The legal issue and political dispute
de Oliveira Abud, Carol
Right to Health; Coronavirus Infections; Public Health; Immunization Programs; Vaccination Refusal
Direito à Saúde; Infecções por Coronavírus; Saúde Pública; Programas de Imunização; Recusa de Vacinação
title_short Can the vaccination against COVID-19 be compulsory in Brazil? The legal issue and political dispute
title_full Can the vaccination against COVID-19 be compulsory in Brazil? The legal issue and political dispute
title_fullStr Can the vaccination against COVID-19 be compulsory in Brazil? The legal issue and political dispute
title_full_unstemmed Can the vaccination against COVID-19 be compulsory in Brazil? The legal issue and political dispute
title_sort Can the vaccination against COVID-19 be compulsory in Brazil? The legal issue and political dispute
author de Oliveira Abud, Carol
author_facet de Oliveira Abud, Carol
Pereira de Souza, Luciano
author_role author
author2 Pereira de Souza, Luciano
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv de Oliveira Abud, Carol
Pereira de Souza, Luciano
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Right to Health; Coronavirus Infections; Public Health; Immunization Programs; Vaccination Refusal
Direito à Saúde; Infecções por Coronavírus; Saúde Pública; Programas de Imunização; Recusa de Vacinação
topic Right to Health; Coronavirus Infections; Public Health; Immunization Programs; Vaccination Refusal
Direito à Saúde; Infecções por Coronavírus; Saúde Pública; Programas de Imunização; Recusa de Vacinação
description Introduction: The recent uproar around COVID-19 hangs over the rights and duties of the population regarding vaccination and mass immunization. The exercise of individual freedom and the possible imposition of a measure that makes vaccination compulsory may be the focus of a political dispute around the adoption of scientific criteria for government decision-making, and with that, bring serious collective consequences in relation to the spread and the lack of control of the disease. Objective: To study whether compulsory vaccination against COVID-19, once instituted by law or normative act, will have a legal basis in view of fundamental rights and analyze whether the political dispute around the vaccine may be influencing its regulation. Method:  Exploratory and descriptive study developed through documentary and bibliographic research, collection of texts from the World Health Organization, Ministry of Health, federal government and the state of São Paulo, analysis of national legislation and recent decisions by the  Supreme Court. Results: It was observed that it is possible to establish compulsory vaccination in Brazil, ensuring fundamental rights; however, political issues are influencing decision-making based on technical-scientific criteria for health surveillance. Conclusions:  The restriction of individual freedom finds support in the search for health in the collective interest, as long as it does not go beyond the limits of the physical integrity of the citizen and human dignity, the use of physical coercion being prohibited. The political dispute led by some public agents may have caused delays and setbacks in the vaccination of the Brazilian population, an effective way to control the pandemic.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-11-30
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
"Peer-reviewed article"
"Artículo revisado por pares"
"Artigo avaliado pelos pares"
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/1856
10.22239/2317-269x.01856
url https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/1856
identifier_str_mv 10.22239/2317-269x.01856
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
eng
language por
eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/1856/1367
https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/1856/1412
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto Nacional de Controle de Qualidade em Saúde
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto Nacional de Controle de Qualidade em Saúde
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Health Surveillance under Debate: Society, Science & Technology ; Vol. 9 No. 4 (2021): November; 4-15
Vigilancia en Salud en Debate: Sociedad, Ciencia y Tecnología; Vol. 9 Núm. 4 (2021): Noviembre; 4-15
Vigil Sanit Debate, Rio de Janeiro; v. 9 n. 4 (2021): Novembro; 4-15
2317-269X
reponame:Vigilância Sanitária em Debate
instname:Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)
instacron:FIOCRUZ
instname_str Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)
instacron_str FIOCRUZ
institution FIOCRUZ
reponame_str Vigilância Sanitária em Debate
collection Vigilância Sanitária em Debate
repository.name.fl_str_mv Vigilância Sanitária em Debate - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv incqs.visaemdebate@fiocruz.br || gisele.neves@fiocruz.br
_version_ 1797042046528126976