Analysis of the regulatory scenario for the renewal of registration of generic and similar drugs at the National Health Surveillance Agency: subsidy to the health regulation of post-registration of drugs
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por eng |
Título da fonte: | Vigilância Sanitária em Debate |
Texto Completo: | https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/1323 |
Resumo: | Introduction: The publication of the Resolution of the Collegiate Directorate of the Brazilian Health Regulatory Agency (Anvisa) Nº. 200, of December 26, 2017, made the analysis of petitions for renewing the registration of medicines would become a lesser activity complexity. However, the number of automatic registration revalidations remains expressive. In addition, rejections of these petitions continue to occur. Objective: Characterize the outcomes of the analyzes of these renewals and quantify the number of automatic renewals of registration of generic and similar drugs. Method: Retrospective analysis of requests for renewal of registration of generic drugs and similar procedures processed by the General Office of Medicines and Biological Products (GGMED) Anvisa, from January 2017 to August 2018. The information was obtained in the system Datavisa, from Anvisa, after GGMED and the Coordination of Institutional Security (CSEGI) authorized access. Results: In the period from January 2017 to August 2018 processed through GGMED 1,450 requests for renewal of medication registration generics and the like. A considerable percentage of automatic revalidations was observed medication registration, since 378 (26,0%) petitions among those processed by GGMED in the study period were automatically revalidated. An expressive portion was found of medicinal products belonging to the similar category, 247 petitions, corresponding to 65,0% of the 378 petitions renewed automatically. In the set of analyzed and rejected petitions, the main reasons for rejections were related with technical-administrative reasons (36 petitions, out of 51 rejected). Conclusions: The automatic registration revalidations, which should be an exception possibly if became the rule. Fact that brings concern from the health point of view. |
id |
FIOCRUZ-9_6de2dc12287e3a4c310f73c58faaa88e |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br:article/1323 |
network_acronym_str |
FIOCRUZ-9 |
network_name_str |
Vigilância Sanitária em Debate |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Analysis of the regulatory scenario for the renewal of registration of generic and similar drugs at the National Health Surveillance Agency: subsidy to the health regulation of post-registration of drugsAnálise do cenário regulatório da renovação de registro de medicamentos genéricos e similares na Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária: subsídio à regulação sanitária do pós-registro de medicamentosRenovação de RegistroLegislação SanitáriaRevalidação AutomáticaRegistro de ProdutosMedicamentosAgência Nacional de Vigilância SanitáriaRenewal of RegistrationHealth LegislationAutomatic revalidationProduct RegistrationMedicinesBrazilian Health Regulatory AgencyIntroduction: The publication of the Resolution of the Collegiate Directorate of the Brazilian Health Regulatory Agency (Anvisa) Nº. 200, of December 26, 2017, made the analysis of petitions for renewing the registration of medicines would become a lesser activity complexity. However, the number of automatic registration revalidations remains expressive. In addition, rejections of these petitions continue to occur. Objective: Characterize the outcomes of the analyzes of these renewals and quantify the number of automatic renewals of registration of generic and similar drugs. Method: Retrospective analysis of requests for renewal of registration of generic drugs and similar procedures processed by the General Office of Medicines and Biological Products (GGMED) Anvisa, from January 2017 to August 2018. The information was obtained in the system Datavisa, from Anvisa, after GGMED and the Coordination of Institutional Security (CSEGI) authorized access. Results: In the period from January 2017 to August 2018 processed through GGMED 1,450 requests for renewal of medication registration generics and the like. A considerable percentage of automatic revalidations was observed medication registration, since 378 (26,0%) petitions among those processed by GGMED in the study period were automatically revalidated. An expressive portion was found of medicinal products belonging to the similar category, 247 petitions, corresponding to 65,0% of the 378 petitions renewed automatically. In the set of analyzed and rejected petitions, the main reasons for rejections were related with technical-administrative reasons (36 petitions, out of 51 rejected). Conclusions: The automatic registration revalidations, which should be an exception possibly if became the rule. Fact that brings concern from the health point of view.Introdução: A publicação da Resolução da Diretoria Colegiada da Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária (Anvisa) nº 200, de 26 de dezembro de 2017, fez com que a análise das petições de renovação de registro de medicamentos se tornasse atividade de menor complexidade. Contudo, o número de revalidações automáticas de registro continua expressivo. Além disso, continuam a ocorrer indeferimentos dessas petições. Objetivo: Caracterizar os desfechos das análises dessas renovações e quantificar o número de renovações automáticas de registro de medicamentos genéricos e similares. Método: Análise retrospectiva das petições de renovação de registro de medicamentos genéricos e similares tramitadas pela Gerência-geral de Medicamentos e Produtos Biológicos (GGMED) da Anvisa, de janeiro de 2017 a agosto de 2018. As informações foram obtidas no sistema Datavisa, da Anvisa, após o acesso ter sido autorizado pela GGMED e pela Coordenação de Segurança Institucional (CSEGI). Resultados: No período de janeiro de 2017 a agosto de 2018 tramitaram pela GGMED 1.450 petições de renovação de registro de medicamentos genéricos e similares. Observou-se percentual considerável de revalidações automáticas de registro de medicamentos, pois 378 (26,0%) petições dentre as tramitadas pela GGMED no período do estudo foram revalidadas automaticamente. Foi encontrada parcela expressiva de produtos medicamentosos pertencentes à categoria dos similares, 247 petições, correspondendo a 65,0% das 378 petições renovadas automaticamente. No conjunto das petições analisadas e indeferidas, os principais motivos de indeferimentos relacionaram-se com razões técnico-administrativas (36 petições, das 51 indeferidas). Conclusões: As revalidações automáticas de registro, que deveriam ser uma exceção possivelmente se tornaram regra. Fato que traz preocupação do ponto de vista sanitário.Instituto Nacional de Controle de Qualidade em Saúde2020-02-27info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion"Peer-reviewed article""Artículo revisado por pares""Artigo avaliado pelos pares"application/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/132310.22239/2317-269X.01323Health Surveillance under Debate: Society, Science & Technology ; Vol. 8 No. 1 (2020): February; 4-9Vigilancia en Salud en Debate: Sociedad, Ciencia y Tecnología; Vol. 8 Núm. 1 (2020): Febrero; 4-9Vigil Sanit Debate, Rio de Janeiro; v. 8 n. 1 (2020): Fevereiro; 4-92317-269Xreponame:Vigilância Sanitária em Debateinstname:Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)instacron:FIOCRUZporenghttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/1323/1123https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/1323/1180Copyright (c) 2020 Vigilância Sanitária em Debate: Sociedade, Ciência & Tecnologia (Health Surveillance under Debate: Society, Science & Technology) – Visa em Debatehttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessOliveira, Henrique Mansano Rosa2023-06-27T15:12:10Zoai:ojs.visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br:article/1323Revistahttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebatePUBhttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/oaiincqs.visaemdebate@fiocruz.br || gisele.neves@fiocruz.br2317-269X2317-269Xopendoar:2023-06-27T15:12:10Vigilância Sanitária em Debate - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Analysis of the regulatory scenario for the renewal of registration of generic and similar drugs at the National Health Surveillance Agency: subsidy to the health regulation of post-registration of drugs Análise do cenário regulatório da renovação de registro de medicamentos genéricos e similares na Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária: subsídio à regulação sanitária do pós-registro de medicamentos |
title |
Analysis of the regulatory scenario for the renewal of registration of generic and similar drugs at the National Health Surveillance Agency: subsidy to the health regulation of post-registration of drugs |
spellingShingle |
Analysis of the regulatory scenario for the renewal of registration of generic and similar drugs at the National Health Surveillance Agency: subsidy to the health regulation of post-registration of drugs Oliveira, Henrique Mansano Rosa Renovação de Registro Legislação Sanitária Revalidação Automática Registro de Produtos Medicamentos Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária Renewal of Registration Health Legislation Automatic revalidation Product Registration Medicines Brazilian Health Regulatory Agency |
title_short |
Analysis of the regulatory scenario for the renewal of registration of generic and similar drugs at the National Health Surveillance Agency: subsidy to the health regulation of post-registration of drugs |
title_full |
Analysis of the regulatory scenario for the renewal of registration of generic and similar drugs at the National Health Surveillance Agency: subsidy to the health regulation of post-registration of drugs |
title_fullStr |
Analysis of the regulatory scenario for the renewal of registration of generic and similar drugs at the National Health Surveillance Agency: subsidy to the health regulation of post-registration of drugs |
title_full_unstemmed |
Analysis of the regulatory scenario for the renewal of registration of generic and similar drugs at the National Health Surveillance Agency: subsidy to the health regulation of post-registration of drugs |
title_sort |
Analysis of the regulatory scenario for the renewal of registration of generic and similar drugs at the National Health Surveillance Agency: subsidy to the health regulation of post-registration of drugs |
author |
Oliveira, Henrique Mansano Rosa |
author_facet |
Oliveira, Henrique Mansano Rosa |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Oliveira, Henrique Mansano Rosa |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Renovação de Registro Legislação Sanitária Revalidação Automática Registro de Produtos Medicamentos Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária Renewal of Registration Health Legislation Automatic revalidation Product Registration Medicines Brazilian Health Regulatory Agency |
topic |
Renovação de Registro Legislação Sanitária Revalidação Automática Registro de Produtos Medicamentos Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária Renewal of Registration Health Legislation Automatic revalidation Product Registration Medicines Brazilian Health Regulatory Agency |
description |
Introduction: The publication of the Resolution of the Collegiate Directorate of the Brazilian Health Regulatory Agency (Anvisa) Nº. 200, of December 26, 2017, made the analysis of petitions for renewing the registration of medicines would become a lesser activity complexity. However, the number of automatic registration revalidations remains expressive. In addition, rejections of these petitions continue to occur. Objective: Characterize the outcomes of the analyzes of these renewals and quantify the number of automatic renewals of registration of generic and similar drugs. Method: Retrospective analysis of requests for renewal of registration of generic drugs and similar procedures processed by the General Office of Medicines and Biological Products (GGMED) Anvisa, from January 2017 to August 2018. The information was obtained in the system Datavisa, from Anvisa, after GGMED and the Coordination of Institutional Security (CSEGI) authorized access. Results: In the period from January 2017 to August 2018 processed through GGMED 1,450 requests for renewal of medication registration generics and the like. A considerable percentage of automatic revalidations was observed medication registration, since 378 (26,0%) petitions among those processed by GGMED in the study period were automatically revalidated. An expressive portion was found of medicinal products belonging to the similar category, 247 petitions, corresponding to 65,0% of the 378 petitions renewed automatically. In the set of analyzed and rejected petitions, the main reasons for rejections were related with technical-administrative reasons (36 petitions, out of 51 rejected). Conclusions: The automatic registration revalidations, which should be an exception possibly if became the rule. Fact that brings concern from the health point of view. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-02-27 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion "Peer-reviewed article" "Artículo revisado por pares" "Artigo avaliado pelos pares" |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/1323 10.22239/2317-269X.01323 |
url |
https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/1323 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.22239/2317-269X.01323 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por eng |
language |
por eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/1323/1123 https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/1323/1180 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto Nacional de Controle de Qualidade em Saúde |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto Nacional de Controle de Qualidade em Saúde |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Health Surveillance under Debate: Society, Science & Technology ; Vol. 8 No. 1 (2020): February; 4-9 Vigilancia en Salud en Debate: Sociedad, Ciencia y Tecnología; Vol. 8 Núm. 1 (2020): Febrero; 4-9 Vigil Sanit Debate, Rio de Janeiro; v. 8 n. 1 (2020): Fevereiro; 4-9 2317-269X reponame:Vigilância Sanitária em Debate instname:Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ) instacron:FIOCRUZ |
instname_str |
Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ) |
instacron_str |
FIOCRUZ |
institution |
FIOCRUZ |
reponame_str |
Vigilância Sanitária em Debate |
collection |
Vigilância Sanitária em Debate |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Vigilância Sanitária em Debate - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
incqs.visaemdebate@fiocruz.br || gisele.neves@fiocruz.br |
_version_ |
1797042045406150656 |