Analysis of the regulatory scenario for the renewal of registration of generic and similar drugs at the National Health Surveillance Agency: subsidy to the health regulation of post-registration of drugs

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Oliveira, Henrique Mansano Rosa
Data de Publicação: 2020
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
eng
Título da fonte: Vigilância Sanitária em Debate
Texto Completo: https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/1323
Resumo: Introduction: The publication of the Resolution of the Collegiate Directorate of the Brazilian Health Regulatory Agency (Anvisa) Nº. 200, of December 26, 2017, made the analysis of petitions for renewing the registration of medicines would become a lesser activity complexity. However, the number of automatic registration revalidations remains expressive. In addition, rejections of these petitions continue to occur. Objective: Characterize the outcomes of the analyzes of these renewals and quantify the number of automatic renewals of registration of generic and similar drugs. Method: Retrospective analysis of requests for renewal of registration of generic drugs and similar procedures processed by the General Office of Medicines and Biological Products (GGMED) Anvisa, from January 2017 to August 2018. The information was obtained in the system Datavisa, from Anvisa, after GGMED and the Coordination of Institutional Security (CSEGI) authorized access. Results: In the period from January 2017 to August 2018 processed through GGMED 1,450 requests for renewal of medication registration generics and the like. A considerable percentage of automatic revalidations was observed medication registration, since 378 (26,0%) petitions among those processed by GGMED in the study period were automatically revalidated. An expressive portion was found of medicinal products belonging to the similar category, 247 petitions, corresponding to 65,0% of the 378 petitions renewed automatically. In the set of analyzed and rejected petitions, the main reasons for rejections were related with technical-administrative reasons (36 petitions, out of 51 rejected). Conclusions: The automatic registration revalidations, which should be an exception possibly if became the rule. Fact that brings concern from the health point of view.
id FIOCRUZ-9_6de2dc12287e3a4c310f73c58faaa88e
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br:article/1323
network_acronym_str FIOCRUZ-9
network_name_str Vigilância Sanitária em Debate
repository_id_str
spelling Analysis of the regulatory scenario for the renewal of registration of generic and similar drugs at the National Health Surveillance Agency: subsidy to the health regulation of post-registration of drugsAnálise do cenário regulatório da renovação de registro de medicamentos genéricos e similares na Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária: subsídio à regulação sanitária do pós-registro de medicamentosRenovação de RegistroLegislação SanitáriaRevalidação AutomáticaRegistro de ProdutosMedicamentosAgência Nacional de Vigilância SanitáriaRenewal of RegistrationHealth LegislationAutomatic revalidationProduct RegistrationMedicinesBrazilian Health Regulatory AgencyIntroduction: The publication of the Resolution of the Collegiate Directorate of the Brazilian Health Regulatory Agency (Anvisa) Nº. 200, of December 26, 2017, made the analysis of petitions for renewing the registration of medicines would become a lesser activity complexity. However, the number of automatic registration revalidations remains expressive. In addition, rejections of these petitions continue to occur. Objective: Characterize the outcomes of the analyzes of these renewals and quantify the number of automatic renewals of registration of generic and similar drugs. Method: Retrospective analysis of requests for renewal of registration of generic drugs and similar procedures processed by the General Office of Medicines and Biological Products (GGMED) Anvisa, from January 2017 to August 2018. The information was obtained in the system Datavisa, from Anvisa, after GGMED and the Coordination of Institutional Security (CSEGI) authorized access. Results: In the period from January 2017 to August 2018 processed through GGMED 1,450 requests for renewal of medication registration generics and the like. A considerable percentage of automatic revalidations was observed medication registration, since 378 (26,0%) petitions among those processed by GGMED in the study period were automatically revalidated. An expressive portion was found of medicinal products belonging to the similar category, 247 petitions, corresponding to 65,0% of the 378 petitions renewed automatically. In the set of analyzed and rejected petitions, the main reasons for rejections were related with technical-administrative reasons (36 petitions, out of 51 rejected). Conclusions: The automatic registration revalidations, which should be an exception possibly if became the rule. Fact that brings concern from the health point of view.Introdução: A publicação da Resolução da Diretoria Colegiada da Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária (Anvisa) nº 200, de 26 de dezembro de 2017, fez com que a análise das petições de renovação de registro de medicamentos se tornasse atividade de menor complexidade. Contudo, o número de revalidações automáticas de registro continua expressivo. Além disso, continuam a ocorrer indeferimentos dessas petições. Objetivo: Caracterizar os desfechos das análises dessas renovações e quantificar o número de renovações automáticas de registro de medicamentos genéricos e similares. Método: Análise retrospectiva das petições de renovação de registro de medicamentos genéricos e similares tramitadas pela Gerência-geral de Medicamentos e Produtos Biológicos (GGMED) da Anvisa, de janeiro de 2017 a agosto de 2018. As informações foram obtidas no sistema Datavisa, da Anvisa, após o acesso ter sido autorizado pela GGMED e pela Coordenação de Segurança Institucional (CSEGI). Resultados: No período de janeiro de 2017 a agosto de 2018 tramitaram pela GGMED 1.450 petições de renovação de registro de medicamentos genéricos e similares. Observou-se percentual considerável de revalidações automáticas de registro de medicamentos, pois 378 (26,0%) petições dentre as tramitadas pela GGMED no período do estudo foram revalidadas automaticamente. Foi encontrada parcela expressiva de produtos medicamentosos pertencentes à categoria dos similares, 247 petições, correspondendo a 65,0% das 378 petições renovadas automaticamente. No conjunto das petições analisadas e indeferidas, os principais motivos de indeferimentos relacionaram-se com razões técnico-administrativas (36 petições, das 51 indeferidas). Conclusões: As revalidações automáticas de registro, que deveriam ser uma exceção possivelmente se tornaram regra. Fato que traz preocupação do ponto de vista sanitário.Instituto Nacional de Controle de Qualidade em Saúde2020-02-27info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion"Peer-reviewed article""Artículo revisado por pares""Artigo avaliado pelos pares"application/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/132310.22239/2317-269X.01323Health Surveillance under Debate: Society, Science & Technology ; Vol. 8 No. 1 (2020): February; 4-9Vigilancia en Salud en Debate: Sociedad, Ciencia y Tecnología; Vol. 8 Núm. 1 (2020): Febrero; 4-9Vigil Sanit Debate, Rio de Janeiro; v. 8 n. 1 (2020): Fevereiro; 4-92317-269Xreponame:Vigilância Sanitária em Debateinstname:Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)instacron:FIOCRUZporenghttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/1323/1123https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/1323/1180Copyright (c) 2020 Vigilância Sanitária em Debate: Sociedade, Ciência & Tecnologia (Health Surveillance under Debate: Society, Science & Technology) – Visa em Debatehttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessOliveira, Henrique Mansano Rosa2023-06-27T15:12:10Zoai:ojs.visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br:article/1323Revistahttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebatePUBhttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/oaiincqs.visaemdebate@fiocruz.br || gisele.neves@fiocruz.br2317-269X2317-269Xopendoar:2023-06-27T15:12:10Vigilância Sanitária em Debate - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Analysis of the regulatory scenario for the renewal of registration of generic and similar drugs at the National Health Surveillance Agency: subsidy to the health regulation of post-registration of drugs
Análise do cenário regulatório da renovação de registro de medicamentos genéricos e similares na Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária: subsídio à regulação sanitária do pós-registro de medicamentos
title Analysis of the regulatory scenario for the renewal of registration of generic and similar drugs at the National Health Surveillance Agency: subsidy to the health regulation of post-registration of drugs
spellingShingle Analysis of the regulatory scenario for the renewal of registration of generic and similar drugs at the National Health Surveillance Agency: subsidy to the health regulation of post-registration of drugs
Oliveira, Henrique Mansano Rosa
Renovação de Registro
Legislação Sanitária
Revalidação Automática
Registro de Produtos
Medicamentos
Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária
Renewal of Registration
Health Legislation
Automatic revalidation
Product Registration
Medicines
Brazilian Health Regulatory Agency
title_short Analysis of the regulatory scenario for the renewal of registration of generic and similar drugs at the National Health Surveillance Agency: subsidy to the health regulation of post-registration of drugs
title_full Analysis of the regulatory scenario for the renewal of registration of generic and similar drugs at the National Health Surveillance Agency: subsidy to the health regulation of post-registration of drugs
title_fullStr Analysis of the regulatory scenario for the renewal of registration of generic and similar drugs at the National Health Surveillance Agency: subsidy to the health regulation of post-registration of drugs
title_full_unstemmed Analysis of the regulatory scenario for the renewal of registration of generic and similar drugs at the National Health Surveillance Agency: subsidy to the health regulation of post-registration of drugs
title_sort Analysis of the regulatory scenario for the renewal of registration of generic and similar drugs at the National Health Surveillance Agency: subsidy to the health regulation of post-registration of drugs
author Oliveira, Henrique Mansano Rosa
author_facet Oliveira, Henrique Mansano Rosa
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Oliveira, Henrique Mansano Rosa
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Renovação de Registro
Legislação Sanitária
Revalidação Automática
Registro de Produtos
Medicamentos
Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária
Renewal of Registration
Health Legislation
Automatic revalidation
Product Registration
Medicines
Brazilian Health Regulatory Agency
topic Renovação de Registro
Legislação Sanitária
Revalidação Automática
Registro de Produtos
Medicamentos
Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária
Renewal of Registration
Health Legislation
Automatic revalidation
Product Registration
Medicines
Brazilian Health Regulatory Agency
description Introduction: The publication of the Resolution of the Collegiate Directorate of the Brazilian Health Regulatory Agency (Anvisa) Nº. 200, of December 26, 2017, made the analysis of petitions for renewing the registration of medicines would become a lesser activity complexity. However, the number of automatic registration revalidations remains expressive. In addition, rejections of these petitions continue to occur. Objective: Characterize the outcomes of the analyzes of these renewals and quantify the number of automatic renewals of registration of generic and similar drugs. Method: Retrospective analysis of requests for renewal of registration of generic drugs and similar procedures processed by the General Office of Medicines and Biological Products (GGMED) Anvisa, from January 2017 to August 2018. The information was obtained in the system Datavisa, from Anvisa, after GGMED and the Coordination of Institutional Security (CSEGI) authorized access. Results: In the period from January 2017 to August 2018 processed through GGMED 1,450 requests for renewal of medication registration generics and the like. A considerable percentage of automatic revalidations was observed medication registration, since 378 (26,0%) petitions among those processed by GGMED in the study period were automatically revalidated. An expressive portion was found of medicinal products belonging to the similar category, 247 petitions, corresponding to 65,0% of the 378 petitions renewed automatically. In the set of analyzed and rejected petitions, the main reasons for rejections were related with technical-administrative reasons (36 petitions, out of 51 rejected). Conclusions: The automatic registration revalidations, which should be an exception possibly if became the rule. Fact that brings concern from the health point of view.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-02-27
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
"Peer-reviewed article"
"Artículo revisado por pares"
"Artigo avaliado pelos pares"
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/1323
10.22239/2317-269X.01323
url https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/1323
identifier_str_mv 10.22239/2317-269X.01323
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
eng
language por
eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/1323/1123
https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/1323/1180
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto Nacional de Controle de Qualidade em Saúde
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto Nacional de Controle de Qualidade em Saúde
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Health Surveillance under Debate: Society, Science & Technology ; Vol. 8 No. 1 (2020): February; 4-9
Vigilancia en Salud en Debate: Sociedad, Ciencia y Tecnología; Vol. 8 Núm. 1 (2020): Febrero; 4-9
Vigil Sanit Debate, Rio de Janeiro; v. 8 n. 1 (2020): Fevereiro; 4-9
2317-269X
reponame:Vigilância Sanitária em Debate
instname:Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)
instacron:FIOCRUZ
instname_str Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)
instacron_str FIOCRUZ
institution FIOCRUZ
reponame_str Vigilância Sanitária em Debate
collection Vigilância Sanitária em Debate
repository.name.fl_str_mv Vigilância Sanitária em Debate - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv incqs.visaemdebate@fiocruz.br || gisele.neves@fiocruz.br
_version_ 1797042045406150656