Efficiency of a remediation filter (TEVAP) for the removal of pollutants in swine effluents
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2019 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por eng |
Título da fonte: | Vigilância Sanitária em Debate |
Texto Completo: | https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/1226 |
Resumo: | Introduction: Swine breeding is a fast growing activity of socioeconomic relevance and potential pollution, whose sustainable expansion depends on technological alternatives that minimize environmental impact, such as techniques and remediation operations in these areas. Remedial effluents must be properly managed prior to their application to soil to avoid potential environmental contamination and damage to human health. Objective: The objective was to evaluate the physical and chemical parameters of effluent samples, before and after the treatment through a system of evapotranspiration (TEVAP) for swine manure. Method: Physical-chemical aspects were investigated, evaluated before (control: raw effluent) and after treatment, 10 days (treated effluent) and 40 days (final effluent) were investigated. In addition, a microbiological evaluation was performed. Results: The hydrogenation potential (pH) did not change. There was a reduction of chemical substances (chemical oxygen demand (COD), ammoniacal nitrogen, chlorides), total dissolved solids (TDS), temperature, alkalinity, electrical conductivity, total hardness and thermotolerantcoliforms, for treated and final effluents. There was an increase in dissolved oxygen (OD). The efficiency of the COD system for the treated effluent was 40%, and for the final effluent was 98%. Conclusions: Chemical and microbiological results indicate that the treated effluent, i.e. gray water, can be reused for cleaning pig facilities, although there is a need for additional treatment to achieve complete inactivation for use and direct contact with animals. The low cost of implementation of TEVAP, together with the efficiency of the organic load removal, and with the rural communities, allows the mitigation of negative impacts to the environment, propitiating prevention in the transmission of possible diseases. |
id |
FIOCRUZ-9_83a03b0bb67216f9d4ef352e2b79c83e |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br:article/1226 |
network_acronym_str |
FIOCRUZ-9 |
network_name_str |
Vigilância Sanitária em Debate |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Efficiency of a remediation filter (TEVAP) for the removal of pollutants in swine effluentsEficiência de um filtro de remediação (TEVAP) na remoção de poluentes em efluentes suínosSuinoculturaFiltro de evapotranspiração (TEVAP)Eficiência de RemoçãoSaúdePig BreedingSystem of Evapotranspiration (TEVAP)Removal EfficiencyHealthIntroduction: Swine breeding is a fast growing activity of socioeconomic relevance and potential pollution, whose sustainable expansion depends on technological alternatives that minimize environmental impact, such as techniques and remediation operations in these areas. Remedial effluents must be properly managed prior to their application to soil to avoid potential environmental contamination and damage to human health. Objective: The objective was to evaluate the physical and chemical parameters of effluent samples, before and after the treatment through a system of evapotranspiration (TEVAP) for swine manure. Method: Physical-chemical aspects were investigated, evaluated before (control: raw effluent) and after treatment, 10 days (treated effluent) and 40 days (final effluent) were investigated. In addition, a microbiological evaluation was performed. Results: The hydrogenation potential (pH) did not change. There was a reduction of chemical substances (chemical oxygen demand (COD), ammoniacal nitrogen, chlorides), total dissolved solids (TDS), temperature, alkalinity, electrical conductivity, total hardness and thermotolerantcoliforms, for treated and final effluents. There was an increase in dissolved oxygen (OD). The efficiency of the COD system for the treated effluent was 40%, and for the final effluent was 98%. Conclusions: Chemical and microbiological results indicate that the treated effluent, i.e. gray water, can be reused for cleaning pig facilities, although there is a need for additional treatment to achieve complete inactivation for use and direct contact with animals. The low cost of implementation of TEVAP, together with the efficiency of the organic load removal, and with the rural communities, allows the mitigation of negative impacts to the environment, propitiating prevention in the transmission of possible diseases.Introdução: A suinocultura é uma atividade de rápido crescimento, de relevância socioeconômica e potencial poluidor, cuja expansão sustentável depende de alternativas tecnológicas que minimizem o impacto ambiental, como técnicas e operações de remediação de áreas, a fim de evitar a contaminação ambiental potencial e danos à saúde humana. Objetivo: Avaliar os parâmetros físico-químicos de amostras de efluentes, através de um filtro de evapotranspiração (TEVAP) para dejetos suínos. Método: Foram investigados os aspectos físico-químicos e microbiológicos, antes (controle: efluente bruto) e após o tratamento, no 10º dia (efluente tratado) e no 40º dia (efluente final). Resultados: O potencial hidrogeniônico (pH) não exibiu alteração. Houve redução de substâncias químicas (demanda química de oxigênio (DQO), nitrogênio amoniacal, cloretos), sólidos dissolvidos totais, temperatura, alcalinidade, condutividade elétrica, dureza total e coliformes termotolerantes paras os efluentes tratado e final. Verificou-se aumento do oxigênio dissolvido (OD). A eficiência do sistema com relação à DQO, para o efluente tratado foi de 40% e, para o efluente final, foi de 98%. Conclusões: Os resultados químicos e microbiológicos indicam que o efluente tratado, pode ser reutilizado para limpeza de instalações de suínos. O baixo custo do TEVAP aliado à eficiência na remoção de carga orgânica podem possibilitar a mitigação de impactos negativos ao meio ambiente e à saúde.Instituto Nacional de Controle de Qualidade em Saúde2019-07-11info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion"Peer-reviewed article""Artículo revisado por pares""Artigo avaliado pelos pares"application/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/122610.22239/2317-269x.01226Health Surveillance under Debate: Society, Science & Technology ; Vol. 7 No. 2 (2019): May; 94-101Vigilancia en Salud en Debate: Sociedad, Ciencia y Tecnología; Vol. 7 Núm. 2 (2019): Puede; 94-101Vigil Sanit Debate, Rio de Janeiro; v. 7 n. 2 (2019): Maio; 94-1012317-269Xreponame:Vigilância Sanitária em Debateinstname:Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)instacron:FIOCRUZporenghttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/1226/1018https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/1226/1075Copyright (c) 2019 Vigilância Sanitária em Debate: Sociedade, Ciência & Tecnologia (Health Surveillance under Debate: Society, Science & Technology) – Visa em Debatehttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessVilar, João Bosco BelchiorSantos, Vagner Sales dosDuarte, Antônia ElieneSanavria, Argemiro2023-06-27T15:11:12Zoai:ojs.visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br:article/1226Revistahttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebatePUBhttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/oaiincqs.visaemdebate@fiocruz.br || gisele.neves@fiocruz.br2317-269X2317-269Xopendoar:2023-06-27T15:11:12Vigilância Sanitária em Debate - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Efficiency of a remediation filter (TEVAP) for the removal of pollutants in swine effluents Eficiência de um filtro de remediação (TEVAP) na remoção de poluentes em efluentes suínos |
title |
Efficiency of a remediation filter (TEVAP) for the removal of pollutants in swine effluents |
spellingShingle |
Efficiency of a remediation filter (TEVAP) for the removal of pollutants in swine effluents Vilar, João Bosco Belchior Suinocultura Filtro de evapotranspiração (TEVAP) Eficiência de Remoção Saúde Pig Breeding System of Evapotranspiration (TEVAP) Removal Efficiency Health |
title_short |
Efficiency of a remediation filter (TEVAP) for the removal of pollutants in swine effluents |
title_full |
Efficiency of a remediation filter (TEVAP) for the removal of pollutants in swine effluents |
title_fullStr |
Efficiency of a remediation filter (TEVAP) for the removal of pollutants in swine effluents |
title_full_unstemmed |
Efficiency of a remediation filter (TEVAP) for the removal of pollutants in swine effluents |
title_sort |
Efficiency of a remediation filter (TEVAP) for the removal of pollutants in swine effluents |
author |
Vilar, João Bosco Belchior |
author_facet |
Vilar, João Bosco Belchior Santos, Vagner Sales dos Duarte, Antônia Eliene Sanavria, Argemiro |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Santos, Vagner Sales dos Duarte, Antônia Eliene Sanavria, Argemiro |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Vilar, João Bosco Belchior Santos, Vagner Sales dos Duarte, Antônia Eliene Sanavria, Argemiro |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Suinocultura Filtro de evapotranspiração (TEVAP) Eficiência de Remoção Saúde Pig Breeding System of Evapotranspiration (TEVAP) Removal Efficiency Health |
topic |
Suinocultura Filtro de evapotranspiração (TEVAP) Eficiência de Remoção Saúde Pig Breeding System of Evapotranspiration (TEVAP) Removal Efficiency Health |
description |
Introduction: Swine breeding is a fast growing activity of socioeconomic relevance and potential pollution, whose sustainable expansion depends on technological alternatives that minimize environmental impact, such as techniques and remediation operations in these areas. Remedial effluents must be properly managed prior to their application to soil to avoid potential environmental contamination and damage to human health. Objective: The objective was to evaluate the physical and chemical parameters of effluent samples, before and after the treatment through a system of evapotranspiration (TEVAP) for swine manure. Method: Physical-chemical aspects were investigated, evaluated before (control: raw effluent) and after treatment, 10 days (treated effluent) and 40 days (final effluent) were investigated. In addition, a microbiological evaluation was performed. Results: The hydrogenation potential (pH) did not change. There was a reduction of chemical substances (chemical oxygen demand (COD), ammoniacal nitrogen, chlorides), total dissolved solids (TDS), temperature, alkalinity, electrical conductivity, total hardness and thermotolerantcoliforms, for treated and final effluents. There was an increase in dissolved oxygen (OD). The efficiency of the COD system for the treated effluent was 40%, and for the final effluent was 98%. Conclusions: Chemical and microbiological results indicate that the treated effluent, i.e. gray water, can be reused for cleaning pig facilities, although there is a need for additional treatment to achieve complete inactivation for use and direct contact with animals. The low cost of implementation of TEVAP, together with the efficiency of the organic load removal, and with the rural communities, allows the mitigation of negative impacts to the environment, propitiating prevention in the transmission of possible diseases. |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-07-11 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion "Peer-reviewed article" "Artículo revisado por pares" "Artigo avaliado pelos pares" |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/1226 10.22239/2317-269x.01226 |
url |
https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/1226 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.22239/2317-269x.01226 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por eng |
language |
por eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/1226/1018 https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/1226/1075 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto Nacional de Controle de Qualidade em Saúde |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto Nacional de Controle de Qualidade em Saúde |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Health Surveillance under Debate: Society, Science & Technology ; Vol. 7 No. 2 (2019): May; 94-101 Vigilancia en Salud en Debate: Sociedad, Ciencia y Tecnología; Vol. 7 Núm. 2 (2019): Puede; 94-101 Vigil Sanit Debate, Rio de Janeiro; v. 7 n. 2 (2019): Maio; 94-101 2317-269X reponame:Vigilância Sanitária em Debate instname:Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ) instacron:FIOCRUZ |
instname_str |
Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ) |
instacron_str |
FIOCRUZ |
institution |
FIOCRUZ |
reponame_str |
Vigilância Sanitária em Debate |
collection |
Vigilância Sanitária em Debate |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Vigilância Sanitária em Debate - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
incqs.visaemdebate@fiocruz.br || gisele.neves@fiocruz.br |
_version_ |
1797042045298147328 |