New technical requirements for nutrition labeling in packaged foods: overview of reviews
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por eng |
Título da fonte: | Vigilância Sanitária em Debate |
Texto Completo: | https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/1607 |
Resumo: | Introduction: Personal food preferences, purchasing decisions and eating behaviors are shaped by price, marketing, availability and accessibility, which are influenced by health policies and regulations. The National Health Surveillance Agency in Brazil (Anvisa) published in 2009 a public consultation on the proposal for a Normative Instruction that establishes the technical requirements for declaring nutrition labeling in packaged foods. However, the path through which a legislative proposal is implemented is permeated by several possibilities, being subject to disputes by interest groups, such as consumers and food companies. Objective: to carry out a comparison between the new technical requirements for declaring nutrition labeling in packaged foods with the literature on the standardization of food labels and the effects on the influence on the population’s food choices. Method: An overview of systematic reviews was conducted to carry out a comparative study between the scientific evidence and the new technical requirements for declaring nutrition labeling proposed by Anvisa. Results: Of the 99 studies identified, six systematic reviews, published from 2011 to 2018, were included. The reviews reported positive results in the presentation of nutritional information on food labels, especially when dealing with healthy choices by consumers. Based on this outcome, Anvisa’s regulation follows international labeling standards so that consumers can have more information, which favors the promotion of healthy food choices. Conclusions: The Public Consultation on nutritional labeling of foods is based on the interventions studied and on the current evidence, which ensures reliability for decision-making by the Ministry of Health and Anvisa. |
id |
FIOCRUZ-9_ac45aaef0e9923431abb6979a21a9485 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br:article/1607 |
network_acronym_str |
FIOCRUZ-9 |
network_name_str |
Vigilância Sanitária em Debate |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
New technical requirements for nutrition labeling in packaged foods: overview of reviewsNuevos requisitos técnicos para declarar el etiquetado nutricional en alimentos envasados: resumen de las revisionesNovos requisitos técnicos para rotulagem nutricional nos alimentos embalados: overview de revisõesRotulagem de Alimentos; Obesidade; OverviewFood Labeling; Obesity; OverviewIntroduction: Personal food preferences, purchasing decisions and eating behaviors are shaped by price, marketing, availability and accessibility, which are influenced by health policies and regulations. The National Health Surveillance Agency in Brazil (Anvisa) published in 2009 a public consultation on the proposal for a Normative Instruction that establishes the technical requirements for declaring nutrition labeling in packaged foods. However, the path through which a legislative proposal is implemented is permeated by several possibilities, being subject to disputes by interest groups, such as consumers and food companies. Objective: to carry out a comparison between the new technical requirements for declaring nutrition labeling in packaged foods with the literature on the standardization of food labels and the effects on the influence on the population’s food choices. Method: An overview of systematic reviews was conducted to carry out a comparative study between the scientific evidence and the new technical requirements for declaring nutrition labeling proposed by Anvisa. Results: Of the 99 studies identified, six systematic reviews, published from 2011 to 2018, were included. The reviews reported positive results in the presentation of nutritional information on food labels, especially when dealing with healthy choices by consumers. Based on this outcome, Anvisa’s regulation follows international labeling standards so that consumers can have more information, which favors the promotion of healthy food choices. Conclusions: The Public Consultation on nutritional labeling of foods is based on the interventions studied and on the current evidence, which ensures reliability for decision-making by the Ministry of Health and Anvisa. Introdução: As preferências alimentares pessoais, as decisões de compra e os comportamentos alimentares são moldados pelo preço, marketing, disponibilidade e acessibilidade, os quais são influenciados por políticas e regulamentações sanitárias. A Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária (Anvisa) publicou em 2009 uma consulta pública da proposta de Instrução Normativa que estabelece os requisitos técnicos para declaração da rotulagem nutricional nos alimentos embalados. No entanto, o percurso pelo qual uma proposta de legislação passa a ser implementada é permeado por diversas possibilidades, estando sujeita a disputas por parte de grupos de interesse, como consumidores e empresas alimentícias. Objetivo: Realizar uma comparação entre os novos requisitos técnicos para declaração da rotulagem nutricional nos alimentos embalados com a literatura sobre a padronização de rotulagens de alimentos e os efeitos sobre a influência nas escolhas alimentares da população. Método: Foi conduzida um overview de revisões sistemáticas para realização de um estudo comparativo entre as evidências científicas e os novos requisitos técnicos para declaração da rotulagem nutricional propostos pela Anvisa. Resultados: Dos 99 estudos identificados, foram incluídas seis revisões sistemáticas, publicadas de 2011 a 2018. As revisões reportaram resultados positivos na apresentação de informações nutricionais nos rótulos dos alimentos, principalmente se tratando de escolhas saudáveis por parte dos consumidores. Baseados nesse desfecho, a regulação da Anvisa segue os padrões de rotulagem internacionais para que assim os consumidores possam ter mais informações, o que favorece a promoção de escolhas alimentares saudáveis. Conclusões: As consultas públicas sobre rotulagem nutricional de alimentos estão fundamentadas nas intervenções estudadas e nas evidências atuais, o que assegura confiabilidade para a tomada de decisão do Ministério da Saúde e da Anvisa.Instituto Nacional de Controle de Qualidade em Saúde2021-05-31info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion"Peer-reviewed article""Artículo revisado por pares""Artigo avaliado pelos pares"application/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/160710.22239/2317-269X.01607Health Surveillance under Debate: Society, Science & Technology ; Vol. 9 No. 2 (2021): May; 79-87Vigilancia en Salud en Debate: Sociedad, Ciencia y Tecnología; Vol. 9 Núm. 2 (2021): Puede; 79-87Vigil Sanit Debate, Rio de Janeiro; v. 9 n. 2 (2021): Maio; 79-872317-269Xreponame:Vigilância Sanitária em Debateinstname:Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)instacron:FIOCRUZporenghttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/1607/1286https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/1607/1371Copyright (c) 2021 Vigilância Sanitária em Debate: Sociedade, Ciência & Tecnologia (Health Surveillance under Debate: Society, Science & Technology) – Visa em Debatehttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessEstevas da Silva Pereira, Ana Carolina Rocha Gonçalves, Mônica Silva, Erica TatianeElias, Flavia Tavares Silva2023-06-27T15:13:26Zoai:ojs.visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br:article/1607Revistahttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebatePUBhttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/oaiincqs.visaemdebate@fiocruz.br || gisele.neves@fiocruz.br2317-269X2317-269Xopendoar:2023-06-27T15:13:26Vigilância Sanitária em Debate - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
New technical requirements for nutrition labeling in packaged foods: overview of reviews Nuevos requisitos técnicos para declarar el etiquetado nutricional en alimentos envasados: resumen de las revisiones Novos requisitos técnicos para rotulagem nutricional nos alimentos embalados: overview de revisões |
title |
New technical requirements for nutrition labeling in packaged foods: overview of reviews |
spellingShingle |
New technical requirements for nutrition labeling in packaged foods: overview of reviews Estevas da Silva Pereira, Ana Carolina Rotulagem de Alimentos; Obesidade; Overview Food Labeling; Obesity; Overview |
title_short |
New technical requirements for nutrition labeling in packaged foods: overview of reviews |
title_full |
New technical requirements for nutrition labeling in packaged foods: overview of reviews |
title_fullStr |
New technical requirements for nutrition labeling in packaged foods: overview of reviews |
title_full_unstemmed |
New technical requirements for nutrition labeling in packaged foods: overview of reviews |
title_sort |
New technical requirements for nutrition labeling in packaged foods: overview of reviews |
author |
Estevas da Silva Pereira, Ana Carolina |
author_facet |
Estevas da Silva Pereira, Ana Carolina Rocha Gonçalves, Mônica Silva, Erica Tatiane Elias, Flavia Tavares Silva |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Rocha Gonçalves, Mônica Silva, Erica Tatiane Elias, Flavia Tavares Silva |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Estevas da Silva Pereira, Ana Carolina Rocha Gonçalves, Mônica Silva, Erica Tatiane Elias, Flavia Tavares Silva |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Rotulagem de Alimentos; Obesidade; Overview Food Labeling; Obesity; Overview |
topic |
Rotulagem de Alimentos; Obesidade; Overview Food Labeling; Obesity; Overview |
description |
Introduction: Personal food preferences, purchasing decisions and eating behaviors are shaped by price, marketing, availability and accessibility, which are influenced by health policies and regulations. The National Health Surveillance Agency in Brazil (Anvisa) published in 2009 a public consultation on the proposal for a Normative Instruction that establishes the technical requirements for declaring nutrition labeling in packaged foods. However, the path through which a legislative proposal is implemented is permeated by several possibilities, being subject to disputes by interest groups, such as consumers and food companies. Objective: to carry out a comparison between the new technical requirements for declaring nutrition labeling in packaged foods with the literature on the standardization of food labels and the effects on the influence on the population’s food choices. Method: An overview of systematic reviews was conducted to carry out a comparative study between the scientific evidence and the new technical requirements for declaring nutrition labeling proposed by Anvisa. Results: Of the 99 studies identified, six systematic reviews, published from 2011 to 2018, were included. The reviews reported positive results in the presentation of nutritional information on food labels, especially when dealing with healthy choices by consumers. Based on this outcome, Anvisa’s regulation follows international labeling standards so that consumers can have more information, which favors the promotion of healthy food choices. Conclusions: The Public Consultation on nutritional labeling of foods is based on the interventions studied and on the current evidence, which ensures reliability for decision-making by the Ministry of Health and Anvisa. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-05-31 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion "Peer-reviewed article" "Artículo revisado por pares" "Artigo avaliado pelos pares" |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/1607 10.22239/2317-269X.01607 |
url |
https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/1607 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.22239/2317-269X.01607 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por eng |
language |
por eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/1607/1286 https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/1607/1371 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto Nacional de Controle de Qualidade em Saúde |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto Nacional de Controle de Qualidade em Saúde |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Health Surveillance under Debate: Society, Science & Technology ; Vol. 9 No. 2 (2021): May; 79-87 Vigilancia en Salud en Debate: Sociedad, Ciencia y Tecnología; Vol. 9 Núm. 2 (2021): Puede; 79-87 Vigil Sanit Debate, Rio de Janeiro; v. 9 n. 2 (2021): Maio; 79-87 2317-269X reponame:Vigilância Sanitária em Debate instname:Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ) instacron:FIOCRUZ |
instname_str |
Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ) |
instacron_str |
FIOCRUZ |
institution |
FIOCRUZ |
reponame_str |
Vigilância Sanitária em Debate |
collection |
Vigilância Sanitária em Debate |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Vigilância Sanitária em Debate - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
incqs.visaemdebate@fiocruz.br || gisele.neves@fiocruz.br |
_version_ |
1797042045983916032 |