Application of alternative methods to the use of animals in the development and quality control of immunobiological products in Brazil: Vigil Sanit Debate, Rio de Janeiro, 2023, v.11: e02126 | Published on: 19/04/2023

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Küster Gon, Rafaela
Data de Publicação: 2023
Outros Autores: Mauro Granjeiro, José, Fernandes Delgado, Isabella
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
eng
Título da fonte: Vigilância Sanitária em Debate
Texto Completo: https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/2126
Resumo: Introduction: For decades, the need, number and predictive potential of the use of animals for research purposes, production and quality control of various products have been  questioned. Objective: To map the in vivo tests used in official public laboratories (LPO), verifying the application or not of alternative methods. Method: LPOs were identified and invited to answer a screening questionnaire to map the alternative methods used by them, followed by an interview to assess interest in developing a new alternative method, application of the 3Rs principle, and manufacturers’ perception of regarding the trend of substitution by alternative methods. Results: Brazilian LPOs reported difficulties in implementing in vitro alternatives, including the need to adapt infrastructure, insufficient personnel and lack of training of technical staff. Some respondents claim the need to systematize the bureaucratic and regulatory procedures applicable to the concept of the 3Rs in the field of immunobiologicals. All respondents showed interest in implementing in vitro alternatives, pointing out advantages such as: reduction of time and cost of analyses, greater accuracy of results, minimization of difficulties inherent to in vivo tests and animal handling. Conclusions: Promoting a scenario - from a political, technical and regulatory point of view - more conducive to the validation and implementation of alternative methods in Brazil will contribute to the reduction of cost and time in the release of lots of immunobiological products. There is room for reducing the use of animals in some in vivo tests used in LPO, however, there is a need for investment in infrastructure and qualified personnel in alternative testing.
id FIOCRUZ-9_ac5d4fe0a5446bf3828a6573ecaea58a
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br:article/2126
network_acronym_str FIOCRUZ-9
network_name_str Vigilância Sanitária em Debate
repository_id_str
spelling Application of alternative methods to the use of animals in the development and quality control of immunobiological products in Brazil: Vigil Sanit Debate, Rio de Janeiro, 2023, v.11: e02126 | Published on: 19/04/2023Aplicação de métodos alternativos ao uso de animais no desenvolvimento e controle da qualidade de produtos imunobiológicos no Brasil: Vigil Sanit Debate, Rio de Janeiro, 2023, v.11: e02126| Publicado em: 19/04/2023Métodos Alternativos3RsLaboratórios Públicos OficiaisControle da QualidadeProdutos ImunobiológicosAlternative Methods3RsOfficial Public LaboratoriesQuality ControlImmunobiological ProductsIntroduction: For decades, the need, number and predictive potential of the use of animals for research purposes, production and quality control of various products have been  questioned. Objective: To map the in vivo tests used in official public laboratories (LPO), verifying the application or not of alternative methods. Method: LPOs were identified and invited to answer a screening questionnaire to map the alternative methods used by them, followed by an interview to assess interest in developing a new alternative method, application of the 3Rs principle, and manufacturers’ perception of regarding the trend of substitution by alternative methods. Results: Brazilian LPOs reported difficulties in implementing in vitro alternatives, including the need to adapt infrastructure, insufficient personnel and lack of training of technical staff. Some respondents claim the need to systematize the bureaucratic and regulatory procedures applicable to the concept of the 3Rs in the field of immunobiologicals. All respondents showed interest in implementing in vitro alternatives, pointing out advantages such as: reduction of time and cost of analyses, greater accuracy of results, minimization of difficulties inherent to in vivo tests and animal handling. Conclusions: Promoting a scenario - from a political, technical and regulatory point of view - more conducive to the validation and implementation of alternative methods in Brazil will contribute to the reduction of cost and time in the release of lots of immunobiological products. There is room for reducing the use of animals in some in vivo tests used in LPO, however, there is a need for investment in infrastructure and qualified personnel in alternative testing.Introdução: Há décadas, a necessidade, o número e o potencial preditivo do uso de animais para fins de pesquisa, produção e controle da qualidade de diversos produtos vêm sendo questionados. Objetivo: Mapear os testes in vivo utilizados nos laboratórios públicos oficiais (LPO), verificando a aplicação ou não de métodos alternativos. Método: Os LPO foram identificados e convidados a responder um questionário de triagem para mapear os métodos alternativos utilizados por eles seguido de uma entrevista para avaliar o interesse em desenvolver um novo método alternativo, a aplicação do princípio dos 3Rs e a percepção dos fabricantes em relação à tendência da substituição por métodos alternativos. Resultados: Os LPO brasileiros reportaram dificuldades para a implementação de alternativas in vitro, entre elas a necessidade de adequação de infraestrutura, insuficiência de pessoal e falta de capacitação dos quadros técnicos. Alguns respondentes alegam a necessidade de sistematização dos trâmites burocráticos e regulatórios aplicáveis ao conceito dos 3Rs no campo de imunobiológicos. Todos os respondentes apresentaram interesse na implementação de alternativas in vitro, apontando vantagens como: redução de tempo e custo das análises, maior precisão de resultados, minimização de dificuldades inerentes aos testes in vivo e à manipulação de animais. Conclusões: Promover um cenário – sob o ponto de vista político, técnico e regulatório – mais propício para validação e implementação de métodos alternativos no Brasil contribuirá para a redução de custo e o tempo na liberação de lotes de produtos imunobiológicos. Há espaço para a redução do uso de animais em alguns testes in vivo utilizados na LPO, porém, há necessidade de investimento em infraestrutura e pessoal qualificado em testes alternativos.Instituto Nacional de Controle de Qualidade em Saúde2023-04-19info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion"Peer-reviewed article""Artículo revisado por pares""Artigo avaliado pelos pares"application/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/212610.22239/2317-269x.02126Health Surveillance under Debate: Society, Science & Technology ; v. 11 (2023) | Continuous publication; 1-8Vigilancia en Salud en Debate: Sociedad, Ciencia y Tecnología; v. 11 (2023) | Publicación continua; 1-8Vigil Sanit Debate, Rio de Janeiro; v. 11 (2023) | Publicação contínua; 1-82317-269Xreponame:Vigilância Sanitária em Debateinstname:Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)instacron:FIOCRUZporenghttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/2126/1493https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/2126/1584https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/2126/1562https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/2126/1563https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/2126/1564Copyright (c) 2023 Rafaela Kuster Gon (Autor)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessKüster Gon, RafaelaMauro Granjeiro, JoséFernandes Delgado, Isabella2024-02-21T17:51:01Zoai:ojs.visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br:article/2126Revistahttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebatePUBhttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/oaiincqs.visaemdebate@fiocruz.br || gisele.neves@fiocruz.br2317-269X2317-269Xopendoar:2024-02-21T17:51:01Vigilância Sanitária em Debate - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Application of alternative methods to the use of animals in the development and quality control of immunobiological products in Brazil: Vigil Sanit Debate, Rio de Janeiro, 2023, v.11: e02126 | Published on: 19/04/2023
Aplicação de métodos alternativos ao uso de animais no desenvolvimento e controle da qualidade de produtos imunobiológicos no Brasil: Vigil Sanit Debate, Rio de Janeiro, 2023, v.11: e02126| Publicado em: 19/04/2023
title Application of alternative methods to the use of animals in the development and quality control of immunobiological products in Brazil: Vigil Sanit Debate, Rio de Janeiro, 2023, v.11: e02126 | Published on: 19/04/2023
spellingShingle Application of alternative methods to the use of animals in the development and quality control of immunobiological products in Brazil: Vigil Sanit Debate, Rio de Janeiro, 2023, v.11: e02126 | Published on: 19/04/2023
Küster Gon, Rafaela
Métodos Alternativos
3Rs
Laboratórios Públicos Oficiais
Controle da Qualidade
Produtos Imunobiológicos
Alternative Methods
3Rs
Official Public Laboratories
Quality Control
Immunobiological Products
title_short Application of alternative methods to the use of animals in the development and quality control of immunobiological products in Brazil: Vigil Sanit Debate, Rio de Janeiro, 2023, v.11: e02126 | Published on: 19/04/2023
title_full Application of alternative methods to the use of animals in the development and quality control of immunobiological products in Brazil: Vigil Sanit Debate, Rio de Janeiro, 2023, v.11: e02126 | Published on: 19/04/2023
title_fullStr Application of alternative methods to the use of animals in the development and quality control of immunobiological products in Brazil: Vigil Sanit Debate, Rio de Janeiro, 2023, v.11: e02126 | Published on: 19/04/2023
title_full_unstemmed Application of alternative methods to the use of animals in the development and quality control of immunobiological products in Brazil: Vigil Sanit Debate, Rio de Janeiro, 2023, v.11: e02126 | Published on: 19/04/2023
title_sort Application of alternative methods to the use of animals in the development and quality control of immunobiological products in Brazil: Vigil Sanit Debate, Rio de Janeiro, 2023, v.11: e02126 | Published on: 19/04/2023
author Küster Gon, Rafaela
author_facet Küster Gon, Rafaela
Mauro Granjeiro, José
Fernandes Delgado, Isabella
author_role author
author2 Mauro Granjeiro, José
Fernandes Delgado, Isabella
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Küster Gon, Rafaela
Mauro Granjeiro, José
Fernandes Delgado, Isabella
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Métodos Alternativos
3Rs
Laboratórios Públicos Oficiais
Controle da Qualidade
Produtos Imunobiológicos
Alternative Methods
3Rs
Official Public Laboratories
Quality Control
Immunobiological Products
topic Métodos Alternativos
3Rs
Laboratórios Públicos Oficiais
Controle da Qualidade
Produtos Imunobiológicos
Alternative Methods
3Rs
Official Public Laboratories
Quality Control
Immunobiological Products
description Introduction: For decades, the need, number and predictive potential of the use of animals for research purposes, production and quality control of various products have been  questioned. Objective: To map the in vivo tests used in official public laboratories (LPO), verifying the application or not of alternative methods. Method: LPOs were identified and invited to answer a screening questionnaire to map the alternative methods used by them, followed by an interview to assess interest in developing a new alternative method, application of the 3Rs principle, and manufacturers’ perception of regarding the trend of substitution by alternative methods. Results: Brazilian LPOs reported difficulties in implementing in vitro alternatives, including the need to adapt infrastructure, insufficient personnel and lack of training of technical staff. Some respondents claim the need to systematize the bureaucratic and regulatory procedures applicable to the concept of the 3Rs in the field of immunobiologicals. All respondents showed interest in implementing in vitro alternatives, pointing out advantages such as: reduction of time and cost of analyses, greater accuracy of results, minimization of difficulties inherent to in vivo tests and animal handling. Conclusions: Promoting a scenario - from a political, technical and regulatory point of view - more conducive to the validation and implementation of alternative methods in Brazil will contribute to the reduction of cost and time in the release of lots of immunobiological products. There is room for reducing the use of animals in some in vivo tests used in LPO, however, there is a need for investment in infrastructure and qualified personnel in alternative testing.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023-04-19
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
"Peer-reviewed article"
"Artículo revisado por pares"
"Artigo avaliado pelos pares"
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/2126
10.22239/2317-269x.02126
url https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/2126
identifier_str_mv 10.22239/2317-269x.02126
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
eng
language por
eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/2126/1493
https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/2126/1584
https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/2126/1562
https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/2126/1563
https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/2126/1564
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 Rafaela Kuster Gon (Autor)
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 Rafaela Kuster Gon (Autor)
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto Nacional de Controle de Qualidade em Saúde
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto Nacional de Controle de Qualidade em Saúde
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Health Surveillance under Debate: Society, Science & Technology ; v. 11 (2023) | Continuous publication; 1-8
Vigilancia en Salud en Debate: Sociedad, Ciencia y Tecnología; v. 11 (2023) | Publicación continua; 1-8
Vigil Sanit Debate, Rio de Janeiro; v. 11 (2023) | Publicação contínua; 1-8
2317-269X
reponame:Vigilância Sanitária em Debate
instname:Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)
instacron:FIOCRUZ
instname_str Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)
instacron_str FIOCRUZ
institution FIOCRUZ
reponame_str Vigilância Sanitária em Debate
collection Vigilância Sanitária em Debate
repository.name.fl_str_mv Vigilância Sanitária em Debate - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv incqs.visaemdebate@fiocruz.br || gisele.neves@fiocruz.br
_version_ 1797042046758813696