Application of alternative methods to the use of animals in the development and quality control of immunobiological products in Brazil: Vigil Sanit Debate, Rio de Janeiro, 2023, v.11: e02126 | Published on: 19/04/2023
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2023 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por eng |
Título da fonte: | Vigilância Sanitária em Debate |
Texto Completo: | https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/2126 |
Resumo: | Introduction: For decades, the need, number and predictive potential of the use of animals for research purposes, production and quality control of various products have been questioned. Objective: To map the in vivo tests used in official public laboratories (LPO), verifying the application or not of alternative methods. Method: LPOs were identified and invited to answer a screening questionnaire to map the alternative methods used by them, followed by an interview to assess interest in developing a new alternative method, application of the 3Rs principle, and manufacturers’ perception of regarding the trend of substitution by alternative methods. Results: Brazilian LPOs reported difficulties in implementing in vitro alternatives, including the need to adapt infrastructure, insufficient personnel and lack of training of technical staff. Some respondents claim the need to systematize the bureaucratic and regulatory procedures applicable to the concept of the 3Rs in the field of immunobiologicals. All respondents showed interest in implementing in vitro alternatives, pointing out advantages such as: reduction of time and cost of analyses, greater accuracy of results, minimization of difficulties inherent to in vivo tests and animal handling. Conclusions: Promoting a scenario - from a political, technical and regulatory point of view - more conducive to the validation and implementation of alternative methods in Brazil will contribute to the reduction of cost and time in the release of lots of immunobiological products. There is room for reducing the use of animals in some in vivo tests used in LPO, however, there is a need for investment in infrastructure and qualified personnel in alternative testing. |
id |
FIOCRUZ-9_ac5d4fe0a5446bf3828a6573ecaea58a |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br:article/2126 |
network_acronym_str |
FIOCRUZ-9 |
network_name_str |
Vigilância Sanitária em Debate |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Application of alternative methods to the use of animals in the development and quality control of immunobiological products in Brazil: Vigil Sanit Debate, Rio de Janeiro, 2023, v.11: e02126 | Published on: 19/04/2023Aplicação de métodos alternativos ao uso de animais no desenvolvimento e controle da qualidade de produtos imunobiológicos no Brasil: Vigil Sanit Debate, Rio de Janeiro, 2023, v.11: e02126| Publicado em: 19/04/2023Métodos Alternativos3RsLaboratórios Públicos OficiaisControle da QualidadeProdutos ImunobiológicosAlternative Methods3RsOfficial Public LaboratoriesQuality ControlImmunobiological ProductsIntroduction: For decades, the need, number and predictive potential of the use of animals for research purposes, production and quality control of various products have been questioned. Objective: To map the in vivo tests used in official public laboratories (LPO), verifying the application or not of alternative methods. Method: LPOs were identified and invited to answer a screening questionnaire to map the alternative methods used by them, followed by an interview to assess interest in developing a new alternative method, application of the 3Rs principle, and manufacturers’ perception of regarding the trend of substitution by alternative methods. Results: Brazilian LPOs reported difficulties in implementing in vitro alternatives, including the need to adapt infrastructure, insufficient personnel and lack of training of technical staff. Some respondents claim the need to systematize the bureaucratic and regulatory procedures applicable to the concept of the 3Rs in the field of immunobiologicals. All respondents showed interest in implementing in vitro alternatives, pointing out advantages such as: reduction of time and cost of analyses, greater accuracy of results, minimization of difficulties inherent to in vivo tests and animal handling. Conclusions: Promoting a scenario - from a political, technical and regulatory point of view - more conducive to the validation and implementation of alternative methods in Brazil will contribute to the reduction of cost and time in the release of lots of immunobiological products. There is room for reducing the use of animals in some in vivo tests used in LPO, however, there is a need for investment in infrastructure and qualified personnel in alternative testing.Introdução: Há décadas, a necessidade, o número e o potencial preditivo do uso de animais para fins de pesquisa, produção e controle da qualidade de diversos produtos vêm sendo questionados. Objetivo: Mapear os testes in vivo utilizados nos laboratórios públicos oficiais (LPO), verificando a aplicação ou não de métodos alternativos. Método: Os LPO foram identificados e convidados a responder um questionário de triagem para mapear os métodos alternativos utilizados por eles seguido de uma entrevista para avaliar o interesse em desenvolver um novo método alternativo, a aplicação do princípio dos 3Rs e a percepção dos fabricantes em relação à tendência da substituição por métodos alternativos. Resultados: Os LPO brasileiros reportaram dificuldades para a implementação de alternativas in vitro, entre elas a necessidade de adequação de infraestrutura, insuficiência de pessoal e falta de capacitação dos quadros técnicos. Alguns respondentes alegam a necessidade de sistematização dos trâmites burocráticos e regulatórios aplicáveis ao conceito dos 3Rs no campo de imunobiológicos. Todos os respondentes apresentaram interesse na implementação de alternativas in vitro, apontando vantagens como: redução de tempo e custo das análises, maior precisão de resultados, minimização de dificuldades inerentes aos testes in vivo e à manipulação de animais. Conclusões: Promover um cenário – sob o ponto de vista político, técnico e regulatório – mais propício para validação e implementação de métodos alternativos no Brasil contribuirá para a redução de custo e o tempo na liberação de lotes de produtos imunobiológicos. Há espaço para a redução do uso de animais em alguns testes in vivo utilizados na LPO, porém, há necessidade de investimento em infraestrutura e pessoal qualificado em testes alternativos.Instituto Nacional de Controle de Qualidade em Saúde2023-04-19info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion"Peer-reviewed article""Artículo revisado por pares""Artigo avaliado pelos pares"application/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/212610.22239/2317-269x.02126Health Surveillance under Debate: Society, Science & Technology ; v. 11 (2023) | Continuous publication; 1-8Vigilancia en Salud en Debate: Sociedad, Ciencia y Tecnología; v. 11 (2023) | Publicación continua; 1-8Vigil Sanit Debate, Rio de Janeiro; v. 11 (2023) | Publicação contínua; 1-82317-269Xreponame:Vigilância Sanitária em Debateinstname:Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)instacron:FIOCRUZporenghttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/2126/1493https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/2126/1584https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/2126/1562https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/2126/1563https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/2126/1564Copyright (c) 2023 Rafaela Kuster Gon (Autor)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessKüster Gon, RafaelaMauro Granjeiro, JoséFernandes Delgado, Isabella2024-02-21T17:51:01Zoai:ojs.visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br:article/2126Revistahttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebatePUBhttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/oaiincqs.visaemdebate@fiocruz.br || gisele.neves@fiocruz.br2317-269X2317-269Xopendoar:2024-02-21T17:51:01Vigilância Sanitária em Debate - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Application of alternative methods to the use of animals in the development and quality control of immunobiological products in Brazil: Vigil Sanit Debate, Rio de Janeiro, 2023, v.11: e02126 | Published on: 19/04/2023 Aplicação de métodos alternativos ao uso de animais no desenvolvimento e controle da qualidade de produtos imunobiológicos no Brasil: Vigil Sanit Debate, Rio de Janeiro, 2023, v.11: e02126| Publicado em: 19/04/2023 |
title |
Application of alternative methods to the use of animals in the development and quality control of immunobiological products in Brazil: Vigil Sanit Debate, Rio de Janeiro, 2023, v.11: e02126 | Published on: 19/04/2023 |
spellingShingle |
Application of alternative methods to the use of animals in the development and quality control of immunobiological products in Brazil: Vigil Sanit Debate, Rio de Janeiro, 2023, v.11: e02126 | Published on: 19/04/2023 Küster Gon, Rafaela Métodos Alternativos 3Rs Laboratórios Públicos Oficiais Controle da Qualidade Produtos Imunobiológicos Alternative Methods 3Rs Official Public Laboratories Quality Control Immunobiological Products |
title_short |
Application of alternative methods to the use of animals in the development and quality control of immunobiological products in Brazil: Vigil Sanit Debate, Rio de Janeiro, 2023, v.11: e02126 | Published on: 19/04/2023 |
title_full |
Application of alternative methods to the use of animals in the development and quality control of immunobiological products in Brazil: Vigil Sanit Debate, Rio de Janeiro, 2023, v.11: e02126 | Published on: 19/04/2023 |
title_fullStr |
Application of alternative methods to the use of animals in the development and quality control of immunobiological products in Brazil: Vigil Sanit Debate, Rio de Janeiro, 2023, v.11: e02126 | Published on: 19/04/2023 |
title_full_unstemmed |
Application of alternative methods to the use of animals in the development and quality control of immunobiological products in Brazil: Vigil Sanit Debate, Rio de Janeiro, 2023, v.11: e02126 | Published on: 19/04/2023 |
title_sort |
Application of alternative methods to the use of animals in the development and quality control of immunobiological products in Brazil: Vigil Sanit Debate, Rio de Janeiro, 2023, v.11: e02126 | Published on: 19/04/2023 |
author |
Küster Gon, Rafaela |
author_facet |
Küster Gon, Rafaela Mauro Granjeiro, José Fernandes Delgado, Isabella |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Mauro Granjeiro, José Fernandes Delgado, Isabella |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Küster Gon, Rafaela Mauro Granjeiro, José Fernandes Delgado, Isabella |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Métodos Alternativos 3Rs Laboratórios Públicos Oficiais Controle da Qualidade Produtos Imunobiológicos Alternative Methods 3Rs Official Public Laboratories Quality Control Immunobiological Products |
topic |
Métodos Alternativos 3Rs Laboratórios Públicos Oficiais Controle da Qualidade Produtos Imunobiológicos Alternative Methods 3Rs Official Public Laboratories Quality Control Immunobiological Products |
description |
Introduction: For decades, the need, number and predictive potential of the use of animals for research purposes, production and quality control of various products have been questioned. Objective: To map the in vivo tests used in official public laboratories (LPO), verifying the application or not of alternative methods. Method: LPOs were identified and invited to answer a screening questionnaire to map the alternative methods used by them, followed by an interview to assess interest in developing a new alternative method, application of the 3Rs principle, and manufacturers’ perception of regarding the trend of substitution by alternative methods. Results: Brazilian LPOs reported difficulties in implementing in vitro alternatives, including the need to adapt infrastructure, insufficient personnel and lack of training of technical staff. Some respondents claim the need to systematize the bureaucratic and regulatory procedures applicable to the concept of the 3Rs in the field of immunobiologicals. All respondents showed interest in implementing in vitro alternatives, pointing out advantages such as: reduction of time and cost of analyses, greater accuracy of results, minimization of difficulties inherent to in vivo tests and animal handling. Conclusions: Promoting a scenario - from a political, technical and regulatory point of view - more conducive to the validation and implementation of alternative methods in Brazil will contribute to the reduction of cost and time in the release of lots of immunobiological products. There is room for reducing the use of animals in some in vivo tests used in LPO, however, there is a need for investment in infrastructure and qualified personnel in alternative testing. |
publishDate |
2023 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2023-04-19 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion "Peer-reviewed article" "Artículo revisado por pares" "Artigo avaliado pelos pares" |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/2126 10.22239/2317-269x.02126 |
url |
https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/2126 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.22239/2317-269x.02126 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por eng |
language |
por eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/2126/1493 https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/2126/1584 https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/2126/1562 https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/2126/1563 https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/2126/1564 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2023 Rafaela Kuster Gon (Autor) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2023 Rafaela Kuster Gon (Autor) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto Nacional de Controle de Qualidade em Saúde |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto Nacional de Controle de Qualidade em Saúde |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Health Surveillance under Debate: Society, Science & Technology ; v. 11 (2023) | Continuous publication; 1-8 Vigilancia en Salud en Debate: Sociedad, Ciencia y Tecnología; v. 11 (2023) | Publicación continua; 1-8 Vigil Sanit Debate, Rio de Janeiro; v. 11 (2023) | Publicação contínua; 1-8 2317-269X reponame:Vigilância Sanitária em Debate instname:Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ) instacron:FIOCRUZ |
instname_str |
Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ) |
instacron_str |
FIOCRUZ |
institution |
FIOCRUZ |
reponame_str |
Vigilância Sanitária em Debate |
collection |
Vigilância Sanitária em Debate |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Vigilância Sanitária em Debate - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
incqs.visaemdebate@fiocruz.br || gisele.neves@fiocruz.br |
_version_ |
1797042046758813696 |