Microbiological analysis and evaluation of Good Manufacturing Practices during the processing of raw white cabbage (Brassica oleracea var. capitata f. alba) served in a self-service restaurant

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Beltrão, Jhonathan Campos do Couto
Data de Publicação: 2017
Outros Autores: Pereira, Letícia Gonçalves, Gonzalez, Alice Gonçalves Martins
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
eng
Título da fonte: Vigilância Sanitária em Debate
Texto Completo: https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/892
Resumo: Introduction: The consumption of meals outside the home has become an increasingly common practice in the life of the Brazilian population and of everyone. Objective: The aim of this work was to evaluate the microbiological quality of raw white cabbage (Brassica oleracea var. capitata f. alba), served in an institutional self-service restaurant, in the different stages of processing (reception, sanitation, slicing, cooling and distribution). In addition, Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP) were evaluated through a checklist. Method: Total coliform, Escherichia coli and total aerobic bacteria were counted and Salmonella spp. was searched. Results: A sample collected at the reception stage showed Salmonella spp. Sanitization eliminated Salmonella spp. and reduced total coliforms and E. coli to undetectable numbers. The environment, the equipment and the manipulation strongly influenced the microbiological quality of food. Samples collected on day 4, after slicing, showed 3.2 log CFU of E. coli per g and at distribution 4.1 log CFU/g, which indicates unsatisfactory hygienic conditions. The restaurant had 55.75% compliance with GMP items, being classified as regular (Group 2), in accordance with RDC n° 275/2002. Conclusions: The non-conformities (37.00%) observed in the exposure to prepared food consumption may be influencing the microbiological quality of raw white cabbage salad served. In this way we highlight the importance of the application of GMP in the production process to obtain a safe food and the compliance with the four POP required by RDC n° 216/2004.
id FIOCRUZ-9_be1c4529500548d8e612cdf2d0e0b9bb
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br:article/892
network_acronym_str FIOCRUZ-9
network_name_str Vigilância Sanitária em Debate
repository_id_str
spelling Microbiological analysis and evaluation of Good Manufacturing Practices during the processing of raw white cabbage (Brassica oleracea var. capitata f. alba) served in a self-service restaurantAnálise microbiológica e avaliação das Boas Práticas de Fabricação durante o fluxograma de processamento do repolho branco (Brassica oleracea var. capitata f. alba) cru servido em um restaurante self-serviceHortaliçasAnálise MicrobiológicaBoas Práticas de FabricaçãoServiços de AlimentaçãoProdução de AlimentosVegetablesMicrobiological AnalysisGood Manufacturing PracticesFood ServicesFood ProductionIntroduction: The consumption of meals outside the home has become an increasingly common practice in the life of the Brazilian population and of everyone. Objective: The aim of this work was to evaluate the microbiological quality of raw white cabbage (Brassica oleracea var. capitata f. alba), served in an institutional self-service restaurant, in the different stages of processing (reception, sanitation, slicing, cooling and distribution). In addition, Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP) were evaluated through a checklist. Method: Total coliform, Escherichia coli and total aerobic bacteria were counted and Salmonella spp. was searched. Results: A sample collected at the reception stage showed Salmonella spp. Sanitization eliminated Salmonella spp. and reduced total coliforms and E. coli to undetectable numbers. The environment, the equipment and the manipulation strongly influenced the microbiological quality of food. Samples collected on day 4, after slicing, showed 3.2 log CFU of E. coli per g and at distribution 4.1 log CFU/g, which indicates unsatisfactory hygienic conditions. The restaurant had 55.75% compliance with GMP items, being classified as regular (Group 2), in accordance with RDC n° 275/2002. Conclusions: The non-conformities (37.00%) observed in the exposure to prepared food consumption may be influencing the microbiological quality of raw white cabbage salad served. In this way we highlight the importance of the application of GMP in the production process to obtain a safe food and the compliance with the four POP required by RDC n° 216/2004.Introdução: O consumo de refeições fora do lar vem se tornando uma prática cada dia mais comum na vida da população brasileira e de todo mundo. Objetivo: O objetivo deste trabalho foi avaliar a qualidade microbiológica do repolho branco (Brassica oleracea var. capitata f. alba)cru, servido em um restaurante self-service, nas diferentes etapas do processamento (recepção,higienização, fatiamento, resfriamento e distribuição). Além de avaliar os procedimentos de Boas Práticas de Fabricação (BPF), através de uma lista de verificação. Método: Foram realizadas as contagens de coliformes totais, Escherichia coli e bactérias totais aeróbias, e pesquisa de Salmonella spp. Resultados: Uma amostra coletada na etapa de recepção apresentou Salmonella spp. A higienização eliminou Salmonella spp. e reduziu coliformes totais e E. coli a números indetectáveis. O ambiente, os equipamentos e a manipulação influenciaram fortemente na qualidade microbiológica do alimento. As amostras coletadas no dia 4, após o fatiamento, apresentaram contagem de 3,2 log UFC de E. coli por g, chegando a distribuição com 4,1 log UFC/g, valor que indica, condições higiênico-sanitárias insatisfatórias. O restaurante apresentou 55,75% de conformidade aos requisitos das BPF, sendo classificado no Grupo 2, de acordo com a RDC n° 275, de 21 de outubro de 2002. As não conformidades (37,00%) observadas no item exposição ao consumo do alimento preparado podem estar influenciando diretamente a qualidade microbiológica do repolho branco cru servido. Conclusões: Desta forma, destacamos a importância da aplicação das BPF no processo produtivo para a obtenção de um alimento seguro e o atendimento aos quatro POP exigidos pela RDC n° 216, de 15 de setembro de 2004.Instituto Nacional de Controle de Qualidade em Saúde2017-11-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion"Peer-reviewed article""Artículo revisado por pares""Artigo avaliado pelos pares"application/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/89210.22239/2317-269X.00892Health Surveillance under Debate: Society, Science & Technology ; Vol. 5 No. 4 (2017): November; 24-31Vigilancia en Salud en Debate: Sociedad, Ciencia y Tecnología; Vol. 5 Núm. 4 (2017): Noviembre; 24-31Vigil Sanit Debate, Rio de Janeiro; v. 5 n. 4 (2017): Novembro; 24-312317-269Xreponame:Vigilância Sanitária em Debateinstname:Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)instacron:FIOCRUZporenghttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/892/414https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/892/478Copyright (c) 2017 Vigilância Sanitária em Debate: Sociedade, Ciência & Tecnologia (Health Surveillance under Debate: Society, Science & Technology) – Visa em Debatehttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBeltrão, Jhonathan Campos do CoutoPereira, Letícia GonçalvesGonzalez, Alice Gonçalves Martins2023-06-27T15:01:00Zoai:ojs.visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br:article/892Revistahttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebatePUBhttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/oaiincqs.visaemdebate@fiocruz.br || gisele.neves@fiocruz.br2317-269X2317-269Xopendoar:2023-06-27T15:01Vigilância Sanitária em Debate - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Microbiological analysis and evaluation of Good Manufacturing Practices during the processing of raw white cabbage (Brassica oleracea var. capitata f. alba) served in a self-service restaurant
Análise microbiológica e avaliação das Boas Práticas de Fabricação durante o fluxograma de processamento do repolho branco (Brassica oleracea var. capitata f. alba) cru servido em um restaurante self-service
title Microbiological analysis and evaluation of Good Manufacturing Practices during the processing of raw white cabbage (Brassica oleracea var. capitata f. alba) served in a self-service restaurant
spellingShingle Microbiological analysis and evaluation of Good Manufacturing Practices during the processing of raw white cabbage (Brassica oleracea var. capitata f. alba) served in a self-service restaurant
Beltrão, Jhonathan Campos do Couto
Hortaliças
Análise Microbiológica
Boas Práticas de Fabricação
Serviços de Alimentação
Produção de Alimentos
Vegetables
Microbiological Analysis
Good Manufacturing Practices
Food Services
Food Production
title_short Microbiological analysis and evaluation of Good Manufacturing Practices during the processing of raw white cabbage (Brassica oleracea var. capitata f. alba) served in a self-service restaurant
title_full Microbiological analysis and evaluation of Good Manufacturing Practices during the processing of raw white cabbage (Brassica oleracea var. capitata f. alba) served in a self-service restaurant
title_fullStr Microbiological analysis and evaluation of Good Manufacturing Practices during the processing of raw white cabbage (Brassica oleracea var. capitata f. alba) served in a self-service restaurant
title_full_unstemmed Microbiological analysis and evaluation of Good Manufacturing Practices during the processing of raw white cabbage (Brassica oleracea var. capitata f. alba) served in a self-service restaurant
title_sort Microbiological analysis and evaluation of Good Manufacturing Practices during the processing of raw white cabbage (Brassica oleracea var. capitata f. alba) served in a self-service restaurant
author Beltrão, Jhonathan Campos do Couto
author_facet Beltrão, Jhonathan Campos do Couto
Pereira, Letícia Gonçalves
Gonzalez, Alice Gonçalves Martins
author_role author
author2 Pereira, Letícia Gonçalves
Gonzalez, Alice Gonçalves Martins
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Beltrão, Jhonathan Campos do Couto
Pereira, Letícia Gonçalves
Gonzalez, Alice Gonçalves Martins
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Hortaliças
Análise Microbiológica
Boas Práticas de Fabricação
Serviços de Alimentação
Produção de Alimentos
Vegetables
Microbiological Analysis
Good Manufacturing Practices
Food Services
Food Production
topic Hortaliças
Análise Microbiológica
Boas Práticas de Fabricação
Serviços de Alimentação
Produção de Alimentos
Vegetables
Microbiological Analysis
Good Manufacturing Practices
Food Services
Food Production
description Introduction: The consumption of meals outside the home has become an increasingly common practice in the life of the Brazilian population and of everyone. Objective: The aim of this work was to evaluate the microbiological quality of raw white cabbage (Brassica oleracea var. capitata f. alba), served in an institutional self-service restaurant, in the different stages of processing (reception, sanitation, slicing, cooling and distribution). In addition, Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP) were evaluated through a checklist. Method: Total coliform, Escherichia coli and total aerobic bacteria were counted and Salmonella spp. was searched. Results: A sample collected at the reception stage showed Salmonella spp. Sanitization eliminated Salmonella spp. and reduced total coliforms and E. coli to undetectable numbers. The environment, the equipment and the manipulation strongly influenced the microbiological quality of food. Samples collected on day 4, after slicing, showed 3.2 log CFU of E. coli per g and at distribution 4.1 log CFU/g, which indicates unsatisfactory hygienic conditions. The restaurant had 55.75% compliance with GMP items, being classified as regular (Group 2), in accordance with RDC n° 275/2002. Conclusions: The non-conformities (37.00%) observed in the exposure to prepared food consumption may be influencing the microbiological quality of raw white cabbage salad served. In this way we highlight the importance of the application of GMP in the production process to obtain a safe food and the compliance with the four POP required by RDC n° 216/2004.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-11-30
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
"Peer-reviewed article"
"Artículo revisado por pares"
"Artigo avaliado pelos pares"
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/892
10.22239/2317-269X.00892
url https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/892
identifier_str_mv 10.22239/2317-269X.00892
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
eng
language por
eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/892/414
https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/892/478
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto Nacional de Controle de Qualidade em Saúde
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto Nacional de Controle de Qualidade em Saúde
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Health Surveillance under Debate: Society, Science & Technology ; Vol. 5 No. 4 (2017): November; 24-31
Vigilancia en Salud en Debate: Sociedad, Ciencia y Tecnología; Vol. 5 Núm. 4 (2017): Noviembre; 24-31
Vigil Sanit Debate, Rio de Janeiro; v. 5 n. 4 (2017): Novembro; 24-31
2317-269X
reponame:Vigilância Sanitária em Debate
instname:Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)
instacron:FIOCRUZ
instname_str Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)
instacron_str FIOCRUZ
institution FIOCRUZ
reponame_str Vigilância Sanitária em Debate
collection Vigilância Sanitária em Debate
repository.name.fl_str_mv Vigilância Sanitária em Debate - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv incqs.visaemdebate@fiocruz.br || gisele.neves@fiocruz.br
_version_ 1797042044773859328