Procedures for production, storage and utilization of platelet-rich plasma and correlated products in Brazil: a cross-sectional study
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por eng |
Título da fonte: | Vigilância Sanitária em Debate |
Texto Completo: | https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/1492 |
Resumo: | Introduction: Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) is a technology with potential application in several areas of Medicine and Dentistry. The high variability observed during the production process imposes a challenge for the regulation of its production and use. Objectives: To evaluate current practices of production, storage and use of platelet-rich plasma and related products in Brazil, allowing the identification of operational variability throughout these processes. Method: Crosssectional study with data collection carried out by using a self-applied electronic questionnaire,with protection of anonymity. Questions were defined based on a literature review and consultation with a specialist in the field. The study questionnaire was sent to researchers and professionals who are producing PRP identified by different strategies, such as previous participation in events and publications in the area. Results: 64 responses were obtained, with 36 complete responses (56.3%) and 28 partial responses (43.7%). The rate of respondents could not be calculated, considering the means for dispatching the questionnaire. For PRP, there was a predominance of use of protocols with double centrifugation and platelet activation by different methods. Most respondents reported using PRP in the areas of orthopedics, physiatry and sports medicine. For fibrin-rich plasma (PRF), there was a predominance of responses using a single centrifugation protocol, without the use of platelet activation methods. Most respondents indicate the use of PRF in areas of dentistry. Variability of procedures and usage profile were observed for all platelet concentrates. Analyses were carried out comparatively according to the three main types of platelet concentrates. Conclusions: Findings corroborate the need to develop regulatory norms aiming at reducing variability and at promoting safety along the production and use of platelet concentrates. |
id |
FIOCRUZ-9_f978e62cc61bc77e2bfe998c40957596 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br:article/1492 |
network_acronym_str |
FIOCRUZ-9 |
network_name_str |
Vigilância Sanitária em Debate |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Procedures for production, storage and utilization of platelet-rich plasma and correlated products in Brazil: a cross-sectional studyPráticas de produção, armazenamento e utilização do plasma rico em plaquetas e produtos relacionados no Brasil: estudo transversalPlasma Rico em Plaquetas; Concentrado de Plaquetas; Preservação de Sangue; Segurança do SanguePlasma Rico en Plaquetas, Concentrado Plaquetario, Seguridad de la SangrePlatelet-Rich Plasma; Platelet Concentrates; Blood Preservation; Blood SafetyIntroduction: Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) is a technology with potential application in several areas of Medicine and Dentistry. The high variability observed during the production process imposes a challenge for the regulation of its production and use. Objectives: To evaluate current practices of production, storage and use of platelet-rich plasma and related products in Brazil, allowing the identification of operational variability throughout these processes. Method: Crosssectional study with data collection carried out by using a self-applied electronic questionnaire,with protection of anonymity. Questions were defined based on a literature review and consultation with a specialist in the field. The study questionnaire was sent to researchers and professionals who are producing PRP identified by different strategies, such as previous participation in events and publications in the area. Results: 64 responses were obtained, with 36 complete responses (56.3%) and 28 partial responses (43.7%). The rate of respondents could not be calculated, considering the means for dispatching the questionnaire. For PRP, there was a predominance of use of protocols with double centrifugation and platelet activation by different methods. Most respondents reported using PRP in the areas of orthopedics, physiatry and sports medicine. For fibrin-rich plasma (PRF), there was a predominance of responses using a single centrifugation protocol, without the use of platelet activation methods. Most respondents indicate the use of PRF in areas of dentistry. Variability of procedures and usage profile were observed for all platelet concentrates. Analyses were carried out comparatively according to the three main types of platelet concentrates. Conclusions: Findings corroborate the need to develop regulatory norms aiming at reducing variability and at promoting safety along the production and use of platelet concentrates.Introdução: O plasma rico em plaquetas (PRP) é uma tecnologia com potencial aplicação em diversas áreas da medicina e odontologia. A alta variabilidade no processo de produção desta tecnologia e de tecnologias relacionadas desafiam a regulamentação de sua produção, do controle de qualidade e do uso. Objetivo: Avaliar práticas de produção, armazenamento e utilização do PRP e produtos relacionados no Brasil, permitindo a identificação de variabilidade operacional ao longo destes processos. Método: Estudo transversal com coleta de dados realizadas por meio de um questionário eletrônico, autoaplicado e com preservação de anonimato. As perguntas foram definidas a partir de revisão de literatura e por consulta a especialista da área. O questionário foi encaminhado a pesquisadores e a profissionais de várias áreas atualmente envolvidas na produção do PRP. Esses profissionais foram identificados por diferentes estratégias, tais como participação prévia em eventos relacionados e publicações na área. Resultados: Foram obtidas 64 respostas, sendo 36 respostas completas (56,3%) e 28 respostas parciais (43,7%). A taxa de respondentes não pôde ser calculada, considerando-se as formas de divulgação do questionário. Para a produção de PRP, as respostas indicaram predomínio de protocolos com centrifugação dupla e utilização de métodos variados para ativação plaquetária. A maioria dos respondentes referiu utilizar o PRP nas áreas de ortopedia, fisiatria e medicina esportiva. Para a produção do plasma rico em fibrina (PRF), houve predomínio de respostas indicando utilização de protocolo de centrifugação única, sem utilização de métodos de ativação plaquetária. A maioria dos respondentes indicou utilizar o PRF em áreas da odontologia. No geral, observou-se grande variabilidade nos procedimentos de obtenção e do perfil de utilização entre os principais tipos de concentrados de plaquetas. Conclusões: Os achados corroboram a necessidade do desenvolvimento de medidas regulatórias com foco nos pontos críticos identificados, visando promover a segurança durante a produção e utilização dos concentrados de plaqueta.Instituto Nacional de Controle de Qualidade em Saúde2021-05-31info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion"Peer-reviewed article""Artículo revisado por pares""Artigo avaliado pelos pares"application/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/149210.22239/2317-269X.01492Health Surveillance under Debate: Society, Science & Technology ; Vol. 9 No. 2 (2021): May; 48-58Vigilancia en Salud en Debate: Sociedad, Ciencia y Tecnología; Vol. 9 Núm. 2 (2021): Puede; 48-58Vigil Sanit Debate, Rio de Janeiro; v. 9 n. 2 (2021): Maio; 48-582317-269Xreponame:Vigilância Sanitária em Debateinstname:Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)instacron:FIOCRUZporenghttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/1492/1274https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/1492/1364Copyright (c) 2021 Vigilância Sanitária em Debate: Sociedade, Ciência & Tecnologia (Health Surveillance under Debate: Society, Science & Technology) – Visa em Debatehttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessVianna Pachito, Daniela Bagattini, Ângela MariaMendrone Júnior, Alfredo Riera, Rachel2023-06-27T15:13:26Zoai:ojs.visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br:article/1492Revistahttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebatePUBhttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/oaiincqs.visaemdebate@fiocruz.br || gisele.neves@fiocruz.br2317-269X2317-269Xopendoar:2023-06-27T15:13:26Vigilância Sanitária em Debate - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Procedures for production, storage and utilization of platelet-rich plasma and correlated products in Brazil: a cross-sectional study Práticas de produção, armazenamento e utilização do plasma rico em plaquetas e produtos relacionados no Brasil: estudo transversal |
title |
Procedures for production, storage and utilization of platelet-rich plasma and correlated products in Brazil: a cross-sectional study |
spellingShingle |
Procedures for production, storage and utilization of platelet-rich plasma and correlated products in Brazil: a cross-sectional study Vianna Pachito, Daniela Plasma Rico em Plaquetas; Concentrado de Plaquetas; Preservação de Sangue; Segurança do Sangue Plasma Rico en Plaquetas, Concentrado Plaquetario, Seguridad de la Sangre Platelet-Rich Plasma; Platelet Concentrates; Blood Preservation; Blood Safety |
title_short |
Procedures for production, storage and utilization of platelet-rich plasma and correlated products in Brazil: a cross-sectional study |
title_full |
Procedures for production, storage and utilization of platelet-rich plasma and correlated products in Brazil: a cross-sectional study |
title_fullStr |
Procedures for production, storage and utilization of platelet-rich plasma and correlated products in Brazil: a cross-sectional study |
title_full_unstemmed |
Procedures for production, storage and utilization of platelet-rich plasma and correlated products in Brazil: a cross-sectional study |
title_sort |
Procedures for production, storage and utilization of platelet-rich plasma and correlated products in Brazil: a cross-sectional study |
author |
Vianna Pachito, Daniela |
author_facet |
Vianna Pachito, Daniela Bagattini, Ângela Maria Mendrone Júnior, Alfredo Riera, Rachel |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Bagattini, Ângela Maria Mendrone Júnior, Alfredo Riera, Rachel |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Vianna Pachito, Daniela Bagattini, Ângela Maria Mendrone Júnior, Alfredo Riera, Rachel |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Plasma Rico em Plaquetas; Concentrado de Plaquetas; Preservação de Sangue; Segurança do Sangue Plasma Rico en Plaquetas, Concentrado Plaquetario, Seguridad de la Sangre Platelet-Rich Plasma; Platelet Concentrates; Blood Preservation; Blood Safety |
topic |
Plasma Rico em Plaquetas; Concentrado de Plaquetas; Preservação de Sangue; Segurança do Sangue Plasma Rico en Plaquetas, Concentrado Plaquetario, Seguridad de la Sangre Platelet-Rich Plasma; Platelet Concentrates; Blood Preservation; Blood Safety |
description |
Introduction: Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) is a technology with potential application in several areas of Medicine and Dentistry. The high variability observed during the production process imposes a challenge for the regulation of its production and use. Objectives: To evaluate current practices of production, storage and use of platelet-rich plasma and related products in Brazil, allowing the identification of operational variability throughout these processes. Method: Crosssectional study with data collection carried out by using a self-applied electronic questionnaire,with protection of anonymity. Questions were defined based on a literature review and consultation with a specialist in the field. The study questionnaire was sent to researchers and professionals who are producing PRP identified by different strategies, such as previous participation in events and publications in the area. Results: 64 responses were obtained, with 36 complete responses (56.3%) and 28 partial responses (43.7%). The rate of respondents could not be calculated, considering the means for dispatching the questionnaire. For PRP, there was a predominance of use of protocols with double centrifugation and platelet activation by different methods. Most respondents reported using PRP in the areas of orthopedics, physiatry and sports medicine. For fibrin-rich plasma (PRF), there was a predominance of responses using a single centrifugation protocol, without the use of platelet activation methods. Most respondents indicate the use of PRF in areas of dentistry. Variability of procedures and usage profile were observed for all platelet concentrates. Analyses were carried out comparatively according to the three main types of platelet concentrates. Conclusions: Findings corroborate the need to develop regulatory norms aiming at reducing variability and at promoting safety along the production and use of platelet concentrates. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-05-31 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion "Peer-reviewed article" "Artículo revisado por pares" "Artigo avaliado pelos pares" |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/1492 10.22239/2317-269X.01492 |
url |
https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/1492 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.22239/2317-269X.01492 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por eng |
language |
por eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/1492/1274 https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/1492/1364 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto Nacional de Controle de Qualidade em Saúde |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto Nacional de Controle de Qualidade em Saúde |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Health Surveillance under Debate: Society, Science & Technology ; Vol. 9 No. 2 (2021): May; 48-58 Vigilancia en Salud en Debate: Sociedad, Ciencia y Tecnología; Vol. 9 Núm. 2 (2021): Puede; 48-58 Vigil Sanit Debate, Rio de Janeiro; v. 9 n. 2 (2021): Maio; 48-58 2317-269X reponame:Vigilância Sanitária em Debate instname:Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ) instacron:FIOCRUZ |
instname_str |
Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ) |
instacron_str |
FIOCRUZ |
institution |
FIOCRUZ |
reponame_str |
Vigilância Sanitária em Debate |
collection |
Vigilância Sanitária em Debate |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Vigilância Sanitária em Debate - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
incqs.visaemdebate@fiocruz.br || gisele.neves@fiocruz.br |
_version_ |
1797042045893738496 |