Sistema estadual de inovação: estrutura organizacional, constrangimentos e oportunidades institucionais no processo de desenvolvimento de Minas Gerais

• Autor(a) principal: Campos, Maria Letícia Duarte
• Data de Publicação: 2003
• Tipo de documento: Dissertação
• Idioma: por
• Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da Fundação João Pinheiro
• Texto Completo: http://repositorio.fjp.mg.gov.br/handle/tede/337
• topic: Administração pública; Inovação tecnológica; Política econômica; Desenvolvimento econômico; Desenvolvimento científico e tecnológico; Minas Gerais; ADMINISTRACAO PUBLICA::PLANEJAMENTO EM CIENCIA E TECNOLOGIA

This work seeks an analysis on the structure characteristics of the state innovation system, built along the last decades, emphasizing its recent evolution and performance. To accomplish the intended study, a theoretical support of organizational analysis was used, specially the contemporaneous contributions which highlights the importance of the environment as an clement able to explain the creation and transformation of the organizations, its legitimization and institutionalization. An analytical perspective is more specifically adopted which states a reciprocal influence in the interaction between organization and environment, as the neo-institutionalist branch desires. Therefore, important variables of the environment such as cultural factors, political orientations and economical development models, as well as the support basis, power and interests, concerning different historical periods are discussed in this study, so that the ST&I organizations arising process in the country is understood up to the constitution of institutional, national and "mineiro" arrangements. However, (he political and macrocconomic conditions and the historical dependence of the external technological and scientific production act in a contradictory form on the institutionalization effort of the ST&l organizations in the country. The development economical model, as of the thirties, reinforced the external dependence situation and, in spite of the investments accomplished in the erection of a ST&I structure, the subordination to dominant external interests prevented the progress of the discussion about the importance of the knowledge generation and innovation for the development and autonomy of the country. At the end of the sixties the state incorporated the idea of a S&T National System, with a explicit police of development conducted by the military regime. The system arises as a result of the historical contradictions and limitations imposed to the country, institutionally weakened, ccntralizer, bureaucratic, rational and without a support basis clearly identified.