Rhinoplasty Complications and Reoperations: Systematic Review
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2017 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | International Archives of Otorhinolaryngology |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1809-48642017000100097 |
Resumo: | Abstract Introduction This article is related to complications of rhinoplasty and its main causes of reoperations. Objectives The objective of this study is to perform a systematic review of literature on complications in rhinoplasty. Data Synthesis The authors conducted a survey of articles related to key terms in the literature by using three important databases within 11 years, between January 2002 and January 2013. We found 1,271 abstracts and selected 49 articles to this review. Conclusion Themain results showed that the number of primary open rhinoplasty was 7902 (89%) and 765 closed (11%) and the percentage of reoperations in primary open complete rhinoplasties was 2.73% and closed complete was 1.56%. The statistical analysis revealed a value of p = 0.071. The standardization of terms can improve the quality of scientific publications about rhinoplasty. There is no difference between primary open or closed rhinoplasty techniques in relation to reoperations. |
id |
FORL-1_53fa5c024e11ce568424826e8f15b0a7 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S1809-48642017000100097 |
network_acronym_str |
FORL-1 |
network_name_str |
International Archives of Otorhinolaryngology |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Rhinoplasty Complications and Reoperations: Systematic Reviewpostoperative complicationssurgical revisionrhinoplastyAbstract Introduction This article is related to complications of rhinoplasty and its main causes of reoperations. Objectives The objective of this study is to perform a systematic review of literature on complications in rhinoplasty. Data Synthesis The authors conducted a survey of articles related to key terms in the literature by using three important databases within 11 years, between January 2002 and January 2013. We found 1,271 abstracts and selected 49 articles to this review. Conclusion Themain results showed that the number of primary open rhinoplasty was 7902 (89%) and 765 closed (11%) and the percentage of reoperations in primary open complete rhinoplasties was 2.73% and closed complete was 1.56%. The statistical analysis revealed a value of p = 0.071. The standardization of terms can improve the quality of scientific publications about rhinoplasty. There is no difference between primary open or closed rhinoplasty techniques in relation to reoperations.Fundação Otorrinolaringologia2017-03-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1809-48642017000100097International Archives of Otorhinolaryngology v.21 n.1 2017reponame:International Archives of Otorhinolaryngologyinstname:Fundação Otorrinolaringologia (FORL)instacron:FORL10.1055/s-0036-1586489info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCrosara,Paulo Fernando Tormin BorgesNunes,Flávio BarbosaRodrigues,Danilo SantanaFigueiredo,Ana Rosa PimentelBecker,Helena Maria GonçalvesBecker,Celso GoncalvesGuimarães,Roberto Eustáquio Santoseng2017-04-27T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1809-48642017000100097Revistahttps://www.scielo.br/j/iao/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||iaorl@iaorl.org||archives@internationalarchivesent.org||arquivos@forl.org.br1809-48641809-4864opendoar:2017-04-27T00:00International Archives of Otorhinolaryngology - Fundação Otorrinolaringologia (FORL)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Rhinoplasty Complications and Reoperations: Systematic Review |
title |
Rhinoplasty Complications and Reoperations: Systematic Review |
spellingShingle |
Rhinoplasty Complications and Reoperations: Systematic Review Crosara,Paulo Fernando Tormin Borges postoperative complications surgical revision rhinoplasty |
title_short |
Rhinoplasty Complications and Reoperations: Systematic Review |
title_full |
Rhinoplasty Complications and Reoperations: Systematic Review |
title_fullStr |
Rhinoplasty Complications and Reoperations: Systematic Review |
title_full_unstemmed |
Rhinoplasty Complications and Reoperations: Systematic Review |
title_sort |
Rhinoplasty Complications and Reoperations: Systematic Review |
author |
Crosara,Paulo Fernando Tormin Borges |
author_facet |
Crosara,Paulo Fernando Tormin Borges Nunes,Flávio Barbosa Rodrigues,Danilo Santana Figueiredo,Ana Rosa Pimentel Becker,Helena Maria Gonçalves Becker,Celso Goncalves Guimarães,Roberto Eustáquio Santos |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Nunes,Flávio Barbosa Rodrigues,Danilo Santana Figueiredo,Ana Rosa Pimentel Becker,Helena Maria Gonçalves Becker,Celso Goncalves Guimarães,Roberto Eustáquio Santos |
author2_role |
author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Crosara,Paulo Fernando Tormin Borges Nunes,Flávio Barbosa Rodrigues,Danilo Santana Figueiredo,Ana Rosa Pimentel Becker,Helena Maria Gonçalves Becker,Celso Goncalves Guimarães,Roberto Eustáquio Santos |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
postoperative complications surgical revision rhinoplasty |
topic |
postoperative complications surgical revision rhinoplasty |
description |
Abstract Introduction This article is related to complications of rhinoplasty and its main causes of reoperations. Objectives The objective of this study is to perform a systematic review of literature on complications in rhinoplasty. Data Synthesis The authors conducted a survey of articles related to key terms in the literature by using three important databases within 11 years, between January 2002 and January 2013. We found 1,271 abstracts and selected 49 articles to this review. Conclusion Themain results showed that the number of primary open rhinoplasty was 7902 (89%) and 765 closed (11%) and the percentage of reoperations in primary open complete rhinoplasties was 2.73% and closed complete was 1.56%. The statistical analysis revealed a value of p = 0.071. The standardization of terms can improve the quality of scientific publications about rhinoplasty. There is no difference between primary open or closed rhinoplasty techniques in relation to reoperations. |
publishDate |
2017 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2017-03-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1809-48642017000100097 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1809-48642017000100097 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1055/s-0036-1586489 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Fundação Otorrinolaringologia |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Fundação Otorrinolaringologia |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
International Archives of Otorhinolaryngology v.21 n.1 2017 reponame:International Archives of Otorhinolaryngology instname:Fundação Otorrinolaringologia (FORL) instacron:FORL |
instname_str |
Fundação Otorrinolaringologia (FORL) |
instacron_str |
FORL |
institution |
FORL |
reponame_str |
International Archives of Otorhinolaryngology |
collection |
International Archives of Otorhinolaryngology |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
International Archives of Otorhinolaryngology - Fundação Otorrinolaringologia (FORL) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||iaorl@iaorl.org||archives@internationalarchivesent.org||arquivos@forl.org.br |
_version_ |
1754203975676067840 |