Rhinoplasty Complications and Reoperations: Systematic Review

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Crosara,Paulo Fernando Tormin Borges
Data de Publicação: 2017
Outros Autores: Nunes,Flávio Barbosa, Rodrigues,Danilo Santana, Figueiredo,Ana Rosa Pimentel, Becker,Helena Maria Gonçalves, Becker,Celso Goncalves, Guimarães,Roberto Eustáquio Santos
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: International Archives of Otorhinolaryngology
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1809-48642017000100097
Resumo: Abstract Introduction This article is related to complications of rhinoplasty and its main causes of reoperations. Objectives The objective of this study is to perform a systematic review of literature on complications in rhinoplasty. Data Synthesis The authors conducted a survey of articles related to key terms in the literature by using three important databases within 11 years, between January 2002 and January 2013. We found 1,271 abstracts and selected 49 articles to this review. Conclusion Themain results showed that the number of primary open rhinoplasty was 7902 (89%) and 765 closed (11%) and the percentage of reoperations in primary open complete rhinoplasties was 2.73% and closed complete was 1.56%. The statistical analysis revealed a value of p = 0.071. The standardization of terms can improve the quality of scientific publications about rhinoplasty. There is no difference between primary open or closed rhinoplasty techniques in relation to reoperations.
id FORL-1_53fa5c024e11ce568424826e8f15b0a7
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1809-48642017000100097
network_acronym_str FORL-1
network_name_str International Archives of Otorhinolaryngology
repository_id_str
spelling Rhinoplasty Complications and Reoperations: Systematic Reviewpostoperative complicationssurgical revisionrhinoplastyAbstract Introduction This article is related to complications of rhinoplasty and its main causes of reoperations. Objectives The objective of this study is to perform a systematic review of literature on complications in rhinoplasty. Data Synthesis The authors conducted a survey of articles related to key terms in the literature by using three important databases within 11 years, between January 2002 and January 2013. We found 1,271 abstracts and selected 49 articles to this review. Conclusion Themain results showed that the number of primary open rhinoplasty was 7902 (89%) and 765 closed (11%) and the percentage of reoperations in primary open complete rhinoplasties was 2.73% and closed complete was 1.56%. The statistical analysis revealed a value of p = 0.071. The standardization of terms can improve the quality of scientific publications about rhinoplasty. There is no difference between primary open or closed rhinoplasty techniques in relation to reoperations.Fundação Otorrinolaringologia2017-03-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1809-48642017000100097International Archives of Otorhinolaryngology v.21 n.1 2017reponame:International Archives of Otorhinolaryngologyinstname:Fundação Otorrinolaringologia (FORL)instacron:FORL10.1055/s-0036-1586489info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCrosara,Paulo Fernando Tormin BorgesNunes,Flávio BarbosaRodrigues,Danilo SantanaFigueiredo,Ana Rosa PimentelBecker,Helena Maria GonçalvesBecker,Celso GoncalvesGuimarães,Roberto Eustáquio Santoseng2017-04-27T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1809-48642017000100097Revistahttps://www.scielo.br/j/iao/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||iaorl@iaorl.org||archives@internationalarchivesent.org||arquivos@forl.org.br1809-48641809-4864opendoar:2017-04-27T00:00International Archives of Otorhinolaryngology - Fundação Otorrinolaringologia (FORL)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Rhinoplasty Complications and Reoperations: Systematic Review
title Rhinoplasty Complications and Reoperations: Systematic Review
spellingShingle Rhinoplasty Complications and Reoperations: Systematic Review
Crosara,Paulo Fernando Tormin Borges
postoperative complications
surgical revision
rhinoplasty
title_short Rhinoplasty Complications and Reoperations: Systematic Review
title_full Rhinoplasty Complications and Reoperations: Systematic Review
title_fullStr Rhinoplasty Complications and Reoperations: Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Rhinoplasty Complications and Reoperations: Systematic Review
title_sort Rhinoplasty Complications and Reoperations: Systematic Review
author Crosara,Paulo Fernando Tormin Borges
author_facet Crosara,Paulo Fernando Tormin Borges
Nunes,Flávio Barbosa
Rodrigues,Danilo Santana
Figueiredo,Ana Rosa Pimentel
Becker,Helena Maria Gonçalves
Becker,Celso Goncalves
Guimarães,Roberto Eustáquio Santos
author_role author
author2 Nunes,Flávio Barbosa
Rodrigues,Danilo Santana
Figueiredo,Ana Rosa Pimentel
Becker,Helena Maria Gonçalves
Becker,Celso Goncalves
Guimarães,Roberto Eustáquio Santos
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Crosara,Paulo Fernando Tormin Borges
Nunes,Flávio Barbosa
Rodrigues,Danilo Santana
Figueiredo,Ana Rosa Pimentel
Becker,Helena Maria Gonçalves
Becker,Celso Goncalves
Guimarães,Roberto Eustáquio Santos
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv postoperative complications
surgical revision
rhinoplasty
topic postoperative complications
surgical revision
rhinoplasty
description Abstract Introduction This article is related to complications of rhinoplasty and its main causes of reoperations. Objectives The objective of this study is to perform a systematic review of literature on complications in rhinoplasty. Data Synthesis The authors conducted a survey of articles related to key terms in the literature by using three important databases within 11 years, between January 2002 and January 2013. We found 1,271 abstracts and selected 49 articles to this review. Conclusion Themain results showed that the number of primary open rhinoplasty was 7902 (89%) and 765 closed (11%) and the percentage of reoperations in primary open complete rhinoplasties was 2.73% and closed complete was 1.56%. The statistical analysis revealed a value of p = 0.071. The standardization of terms can improve the quality of scientific publications about rhinoplasty. There is no difference between primary open or closed rhinoplasty techniques in relation to reoperations.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-03-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1809-48642017000100097
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1809-48642017000100097
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1055/s-0036-1586489
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Fundação Otorrinolaringologia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Fundação Otorrinolaringologia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv International Archives of Otorhinolaryngology v.21 n.1 2017
reponame:International Archives of Otorhinolaryngology
instname:Fundação Otorrinolaringologia (FORL)
instacron:FORL
instname_str Fundação Otorrinolaringologia (FORL)
instacron_str FORL
institution FORL
reponame_str International Archives of Otorhinolaryngology
collection International Archives of Otorhinolaryngology
repository.name.fl_str_mv International Archives of Otorhinolaryngology - Fundação Otorrinolaringologia (FORL)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||iaorl@iaorl.org||archives@internationalarchivesent.org||arquivos@forl.org.br
_version_ 1754203975676067840