Lacrimal Diversion Devices (Sinopsys Lacrimal Stent): Sharing our Experience with Patients with Chronic Rhinosinusitis without Polyposis

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Baptista,Peter
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: Garaycochea,Octavio, Prieto-Matos,Carlos, Alperi,Marta Alvarez de Linera, Alcalde,Juan
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: International Archives of Otorhinolaryngology
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1809-48642019000400422
Resumo: Abstract Introduction Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) is a highly prevalent pathology in our society. Due to the prevalence of this condition and to the persisting symptoms despite an appropriate medical treatment, surgical techniques are often required. Lately, minimal invasive techniques have been described, such as lacrimal diversion devices (LDDs). This technique offers a fast and convenient choice for delivery of sinus irrigation and topical medication. Objective We aimed to describe our experience with LDDs and evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the procedure in patients with moderate to severe CRS without nasal polyposis (CRSsNP) and persistent symptomatology despite medical therapy. Methods A total of 7 patients underwent bilateral lacrimal stents placement in the operating room. A retrospective observational study was conducted. The Sino-Nasal Outcome Test-20 (SNOT-20) survey was performed and the score obtained was compared before and 1 month after the procedure. Results The LDDs were used for an average of 80 days. During the follow-up, only three patients had a mild complication with the device (granuloma in the punctum, obstruction, and early extrusion). The mean baseline SNOT-20 score dropped significantly (p = 0.015) from 25.85 to 11.57 (mean: - 14.29) 1 month after the procedure. Conclusion According to our experience and results, the use of LDD is a novel, feasible, and less invasive technique to treat refractory CRS. It reduces the risk of mucosal stripping, provides short-term outcomes, and the surgical procedure does not require advanced training in endoscopic sinus surgery. Moreover, it can be performed in-office under local anesthesia or sedation.
id FORL-1_8114733b7ad9291f5ab3e2bbe2ffd0df
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1809-48642019000400422
network_acronym_str FORL-1
network_name_str International Archives of Otorhinolaryngology
repository_id_str
spelling Lacrimal Diversion Devices (Sinopsys Lacrimal Stent): Sharing our Experience with Patients with Chronic Rhinosinusitis without Polyposissinusitisparanasal sinusesnasolacrimal ductminimally invasive surgical proceduresnasal surgical proceduresdrug delivery systemsAbstract Introduction Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) is a highly prevalent pathology in our society. Due to the prevalence of this condition and to the persisting symptoms despite an appropriate medical treatment, surgical techniques are often required. Lately, minimal invasive techniques have been described, such as lacrimal diversion devices (LDDs). This technique offers a fast and convenient choice for delivery of sinus irrigation and topical medication. Objective We aimed to describe our experience with LDDs and evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the procedure in patients with moderate to severe CRS without nasal polyposis (CRSsNP) and persistent symptomatology despite medical therapy. Methods A total of 7 patients underwent bilateral lacrimal stents placement in the operating room. A retrospective observational study was conducted. The Sino-Nasal Outcome Test-20 (SNOT-20) survey was performed and the score obtained was compared before and 1 month after the procedure. Results The LDDs were used for an average of 80 days. During the follow-up, only three patients had a mild complication with the device (granuloma in the punctum, obstruction, and early extrusion). The mean baseline SNOT-20 score dropped significantly (p = 0.015) from 25.85 to 11.57 (mean: - 14.29) 1 month after the procedure. Conclusion According to our experience and results, the use of LDD is a novel, feasible, and less invasive technique to treat refractory CRS. It reduces the risk of mucosal stripping, provides short-term outcomes, and the surgical procedure does not require advanced training in endoscopic sinus surgery. Moreover, it can be performed in-office under local anesthesia or sedation.Fundação Otorrinolaringologia2019-09-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1809-48642019000400422International Archives of Otorhinolaryngology v.23 n.4 2019reponame:International Archives of Otorhinolaryngologyinstname:Fundação Otorrinolaringologia (FORL)instacron:FORL10.1055/s-0039-1683849info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBaptista,PeterGaraycochea,OctavioPrieto-Matos,CarlosAlperi,Marta Alvarez de LineraAlcalde,Juaneng2019-11-22T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1809-48642019000400422Revistahttps://www.scielo.br/j/iao/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||iaorl@iaorl.org||archives@internationalarchivesent.org||arquivos@forl.org.br1809-48641809-4864opendoar:2019-11-22T00:00International Archives of Otorhinolaryngology - Fundação Otorrinolaringologia (FORL)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Lacrimal Diversion Devices (Sinopsys Lacrimal Stent): Sharing our Experience with Patients with Chronic Rhinosinusitis without Polyposis
title Lacrimal Diversion Devices (Sinopsys Lacrimal Stent): Sharing our Experience with Patients with Chronic Rhinosinusitis without Polyposis
spellingShingle Lacrimal Diversion Devices (Sinopsys Lacrimal Stent): Sharing our Experience with Patients with Chronic Rhinosinusitis without Polyposis
Baptista,Peter
sinusitis
paranasal sinuses
nasolacrimal duct
minimally invasive surgical procedures
nasal surgical procedures
drug delivery systems
title_short Lacrimal Diversion Devices (Sinopsys Lacrimal Stent): Sharing our Experience with Patients with Chronic Rhinosinusitis without Polyposis
title_full Lacrimal Diversion Devices (Sinopsys Lacrimal Stent): Sharing our Experience with Patients with Chronic Rhinosinusitis without Polyposis
title_fullStr Lacrimal Diversion Devices (Sinopsys Lacrimal Stent): Sharing our Experience with Patients with Chronic Rhinosinusitis without Polyposis
title_full_unstemmed Lacrimal Diversion Devices (Sinopsys Lacrimal Stent): Sharing our Experience with Patients with Chronic Rhinosinusitis without Polyposis
title_sort Lacrimal Diversion Devices (Sinopsys Lacrimal Stent): Sharing our Experience with Patients with Chronic Rhinosinusitis without Polyposis
author Baptista,Peter
author_facet Baptista,Peter
Garaycochea,Octavio
Prieto-Matos,Carlos
Alperi,Marta Alvarez de Linera
Alcalde,Juan
author_role author
author2 Garaycochea,Octavio
Prieto-Matos,Carlos
Alperi,Marta Alvarez de Linera
Alcalde,Juan
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Baptista,Peter
Garaycochea,Octavio
Prieto-Matos,Carlos
Alperi,Marta Alvarez de Linera
Alcalde,Juan
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv sinusitis
paranasal sinuses
nasolacrimal duct
minimally invasive surgical procedures
nasal surgical procedures
drug delivery systems
topic sinusitis
paranasal sinuses
nasolacrimal duct
minimally invasive surgical procedures
nasal surgical procedures
drug delivery systems
description Abstract Introduction Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) is a highly prevalent pathology in our society. Due to the prevalence of this condition and to the persisting symptoms despite an appropriate medical treatment, surgical techniques are often required. Lately, minimal invasive techniques have been described, such as lacrimal diversion devices (LDDs). This technique offers a fast and convenient choice for delivery of sinus irrigation and topical medication. Objective We aimed to describe our experience with LDDs and evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the procedure in patients with moderate to severe CRS without nasal polyposis (CRSsNP) and persistent symptomatology despite medical therapy. Methods A total of 7 patients underwent bilateral lacrimal stents placement in the operating room. A retrospective observational study was conducted. The Sino-Nasal Outcome Test-20 (SNOT-20) survey was performed and the score obtained was compared before and 1 month after the procedure. Results The LDDs were used for an average of 80 days. During the follow-up, only three patients had a mild complication with the device (granuloma in the punctum, obstruction, and early extrusion). The mean baseline SNOT-20 score dropped significantly (p = 0.015) from 25.85 to 11.57 (mean: - 14.29) 1 month after the procedure. Conclusion According to our experience and results, the use of LDD is a novel, feasible, and less invasive technique to treat refractory CRS. It reduces the risk of mucosal stripping, provides short-term outcomes, and the surgical procedure does not require advanced training in endoscopic sinus surgery. Moreover, it can be performed in-office under local anesthesia or sedation.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-09-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1809-48642019000400422
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1809-48642019000400422
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1055/s-0039-1683849
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Fundação Otorrinolaringologia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Fundação Otorrinolaringologia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv International Archives of Otorhinolaryngology v.23 n.4 2019
reponame:International Archives of Otorhinolaryngology
instname:Fundação Otorrinolaringologia (FORL)
instacron:FORL
instname_str Fundação Otorrinolaringologia (FORL)
instacron_str FORL
institution FORL
reponame_str International Archives of Otorhinolaryngology
collection International Archives of Otorhinolaryngology
repository.name.fl_str_mv International Archives of Otorhinolaryngology - Fundação Otorrinolaringologia (FORL)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||iaorl@iaorl.org||archives@internationalarchivesent.org||arquivos@forl.org.br
_version_ 1754203976546385920