Auditory Evoked Potentials with Different Speech Stimuli: a Comparison and Standardization of Values

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Didoné,Dayane Domeneghini
Data de Publicação: 2016
Outros Autores: Oppitz,Sheila Jacques, Folgearini,Jordana, Biaggio,Eliara Pinto Vieira, Garcia,Michele Vargas
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: International Archives of Otorhinolaryngology
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1809-48642016000200099
Resumo: Abstract Introduction Long Latency Auditory Evoked Potentials (LLAEP) with speech sounds has been the subject of research, as these stimuli would be ideal to check individualś detection and discrimination. Objective The objective of this study is to compare and describe the values of latency and amplitude of cortical potentials for speech stimuli in adults with normal hearing. Methods The sample population included 30 normal hearing individuals aged between 18 and 32 years old with ontological disease and auditory processing. All participants underwent LLAEP search using pairs of speech stimuli (/ba/ x /ga/, /ba/ x /da/, and /ba/ x /di/. The authors studied the LLAEP using binaural stimuli at an intensity of 75dBNPS. In total, they used 300 stimuli were used (60 rare and 240 frequent) to obtain the LLAEP. Individuals received guidance to count the rare stimuli. The authors analyzed latencies of potential P1, N1, P2, N2, and P300, as well as the ampleness of P300. Results The mean age of the group was approximately 23 years. The averages of cortical potentials vary according to different speech stimuli. The N2 latency was greater for /ba/ x /di/ and P300 latency was greater for /ba/ x /ga/. Considering the overall average amplitude, it ranged from 5.35 and 7.35uV for different speech stimuli. Conclusion It was possible to obtain the values of latency and amplitude for different speech stimuli. Furthermore, the N2 component showed higher latency with the / ba / x / di / stimulus and P300 for /ba/ x / ga /.
id FORL-1_d9aa93f628437f773b5936943ff5d276
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1809-48642016000200099
network_acronym_str FORL-1
network_name_str International Archives of Otorhinolaryngology
repository_id_str
spelling Auditory Evoked Potentials with Different Speech Stimuli: a Comparison and Standardization of Valuesevoked potentialsauditoryspeech perceptionelectrophysiologyAbstract Introduction Long Latency Auditory Evoked Potentials (LLAEP) with speech sounds has been the subject of research, as these stimuli would be ideal to check individualś detection and discrimination. Objective The objective of this study is to compare and describe the values of latency and amplitude of cortical potentials for speech stimuli in adults with normal hearing. Methods The sample population included 30 normal hearing individuals aged between 18 and 32 years old with ontological disease and auditory processing. All participants underwent LLAEP search using pairs of speech stimuli (/ba/ x /ga/, /ba/ x /da/, and /ba/ x /di/. The authors studied the LLAEP using binaural stimuli at an intensity of 75dBNPS. In total, they used 300 stimuli were used (60 rare and 240 frequent) to obtain the LLAEP. Individuals received guidance to count the rare stimuli. The authors analyzed latencies of potential P1, N1, P2, N2, and P300, as well as the ampleness of P300. Results The mean age of the group was approximately 23 years. The averages of cortical potentials vary according to different speech stimuli. The N2 latency was greater for /ba/ x /di/ and P300 latency was greater for /ba/ x /ga/. Considering the overall average amplitude, it ranged from 5.35 and 7.35uV for different speech stimuli. Conclusion It was possible to obtain the values of latency and amplitude for different speech stimuli. Furthermore, the N2 component showed higher latency with the / ba / x / di / stimulus and P300 for /ba/ x / ga /.Fundação Otorrinolaringologia2016-06-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1809-48642016000200099International Archives of Otorhinolaryngology v.20 n.2 2016reponame:International Archives of Otorhinolaryngologyinstname:Fundação Otorrinolaringologia (FORL)instacron:FORL10.1055/s-0035-1566133info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessDidoné,Dayane DomeneghiniOppitz,Sheila JacquesFolgearini,JordanaBiaggio,Eliara Pinto VieiraGarcia,Michele Vargaseng2016-07-08T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1809-48642016000200099Revistahttps://www.scielo.br/j/iao/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||iaorl@iaorl.org||archives@internationalarchivesent.org||arquivos@forl.org.br1809-48641809-4864opendoar:2016-07-08T00:00International Archives of Otorhinolaryngology - Fundação Otorrinolaringologia (FORL)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Auditory Evoked Potentials with Different Speech Stimuli: a Comparison and Standardization of Values
title Auditory Evoked Potentials with Different Speech Stimuli: a Comparison and Standardization of Values
spellingShingle Auditory Evoked Potentials with Different Speech Stimuli: a Comparison and Standardization of Values
Didoné,Dayane Domeneghini
evoked potentials
auditory
speech perception
electrophysiology
title_short Auditory Evoked Potentials with Different Speech Stimuli: a Comparison and Standardization of Values
title_full Auditory Evoked Potentials with Different Speech Stimuli: a Comparison and Standardization of Values
title_fullStr Auditory Evoked Potentials with Different Speech Stimuli: a Comparison and Standardization of Values
title_full_unstemmed Auditory Evoked Potentials with Different Speech Stimuli: a Comparison and Standardization of Values
title_sort Auditory Evoked Potentials with Different Speech Stimuli: a Comparison and Standardization of Values
author Didoné,Dayane Domeneghini
author_facet Didoné,Dayane Domeneghini
Oppitz,Sheila Jacques
Folgearini,Jordana
Biaggio,Eliara Pinto Vieira
Garcia,Michele Vargas
author_role author
author2 Oppitz,Sheila Jacques
Folgearini,Jordana
Biaggio,Eliara Pinto Vieira
Garcia,Michele Vargas
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Didoné,Dayane Domeneghini
Oppitz,Sheila Jacques
Folgearini,Jordana
Biaggio,Eliara Pinto Vieira
Garcia,Michele Vargas
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv evoked potentials
auditory
speech perception
electrophysiology
topic evoked potentials
auditory
speech perception
electrophysiology
description Abstract Introduction Long Latency Auditory Evoked Potentials (LLAEP) with speech sounds has been the subject of research, as these stimuli would be ideal to check individualś detection and discrimination. Objective The objective of this study is to compare and describe the values of latency and amplitude of cortical potentials for speech stimuli in adults with normal hearing. Methods The sample population included 30 normal hearing individuals aged between 18 and 32 years old with ontological disease and auditory processing. All participants underwent LLAEP search using pairs of speech stimuli (/ba/ x /ga/, /ba/ x /da/, and /ba/ x /di/. The authors studied the LLAEP using binaural stimuli at an intensity of 75dBNPS. In total, they used 300 stimuli were used (60 rare and 240 frequent) to obtain the LLAEP. Individuals received guidance to count the rare stimuli. The authors analyzed latencies of potential P1, N1, P2, N2, and P300, as well as the ampleness of P300. Results The mean age of the group was approximately 23 years. The averages of cortical potentials vary according to different speech stimuli. The N2 latency was greater for /ba/ x /di/ and P300 latency was greater for /ba/ x /ga/. Considering the overall average amplitude, it ranged from 5.35 and 7.35uV for different speech stimuli. Conclusion It was possible to obtain the values of latency and amplitude for different speech stimuli. Furthermore, the N2 component showed higher latency with the / ba / x / di / stimulus and P300 for /ba/ x / ga /.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-06-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1809-48642016000200099
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1809-48642016000200099
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1055/s-0035-1566133
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Fundação Otorrinolaringologia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Fundação Otorrinolaringologia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv International Archives of Otorhinolaryngology v.20 n.2 2016
reponame:International Archives of Otorhinolaryngology
instname:Fundação Otorrinolaringologia (FORL)
instacron:FORL
instname_str Fundação Otorrinolaringologia (FORL)
instacron_str FORL
institution FORL
reponame_str International Archives of Otorhinolaryngology
collection International Archives of Otorhinolaryngology
repository.name.fl_str_mv International Archives of Otorhinolaryngology - Fundação Otorrinolaringologia (FORL)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||iaorl@iaorl.org||archives@internationalarchivesent.org||arquivos@forl.org.br
_version_ 1754203975298580480