Functional Results of Transverse Extended Incision in Cervical Neck Dissection

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Chiesa-Estomba,Carlos Miguel
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Sistiaga-Suarez,Jon Alexander, Thomas-Arrizabalaga,Izaskun, González-García,Jose Angel, Larruscain,Ekhiñe, Altuna,Xabier
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: International Archives of Otorhinolaryngology
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1809-48642021000100027
Resumo: Abstract Introduction Multiple incisions have been described for the surgical approach of cervical neck nodes. All of these descriptions are associated with better or worse exposure of the surgical field as well as with different functional and aesthetic results, which are not always satisfactory. Objective Compare the transverse cervical incision with the classic incision in J or U. Methods This is a retrospective study of 47 patients who required cervical neck dissection between June 15, 2016 and June 15, 2017.A transversal incision was made in these surgeries, and their results were then compared with those of a group of 57 patients treated between January 1, 2010 and January 1, 2012, in whose cases an incision in J or U was made. Results Regarding the incision type, complications were present in 4 (8.5 %) cases in the transversal incision group, and in 7 (12.2 %) patients of the group of traditional incisions in J or U, without statistical differences (p = 0.078). The only variables associated with complications of healing in the two groups was body mass index (BMI) < 18.5. The patients showed subjective satisfaction with the aesthetic result of the transverse incision, with an average of 7.51 vs 6.20 in the J or U incision. Conclusion The transverse incision represents a safe, aesthetic, and oncologically adequate option, associated with a lower cicatricial retraction rate, without significant complication rate and allowing adequate exposure of the surgical field, similar to the obtained with the classic incision in J or U.
id FORL-1_fe4818da2a2f0421411046484d7d714e
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1809-48642021000100027
network_acronym_str FORL-1
network_name_str International Archives of Otorhinolaryngology
repository_id_str
spelling Functional Results of Transverse Extended Incision in Cervical Neck Dissectioncervical neck dissectionpostoperative complicationscarAbstract Introduction Multiple incisions have been described for the surgical approach of cervical neck nodes. All of these descriptions are associated with better or worse exposure of the surgical field as well as with different functional and aesthetic results, which are not always satisfactory. Objective Compare the transverse cervical incision with the classic incision in J or U. Methods This is a retrospective study of 47 patients who required cervical neck dissection between June 15, 2016 and June 15, 2017.A transversal incision was made in these surgeries, and their results were then compared with those of a group of 57 patients treated between January 1, 2010 and January 1, 2012, in whose cases an incision in J or U was made. Results Regarding the incision type, complications were present in 4 (8.5 %) cases in the transversal incision group, and in 7 (12.2 %) patients of the group of traditional incisions in J or U, without statistical differences (p = 0.078). The only variables associated with complications of healing in the two groups was body mass index (BMI) < 18.5. The patients showed subjective satisfaction with the aesthetic result of the transverse incision, with an average of 7.51 vs 6.20 in the J or U incision. Conclusion The transverse incision represents a safe, aesthetic, and oncologically adequate option, associated with a lower cicatricial retraction rate, without significant complication rate and allowing adequate exposure of the surgical field, similar to the obtained with the classic incision in J or U.Fundação Otorrinolaringologia2021-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1809-48642021000100027International Archives of Otorhinolaryngology v.25 n.1 2021reponame:International Archives of Otorhinolaryngologyinstname:Fundação Otorrinolaringologia (FORL)instacron:FORL10.1055/s-0039-3402439info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessChiesa-Estomba,Carlos MiguelSistiaga-Suarez,Jon AlexanderThomas-Arrizabalaga,IzaskunGonzález-García,Jose AngelLarruscain,EkhiñeAltuna,Xabiereng2021-03-08T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1809-48642021000100027Revistahttps://www.scielo.br/j/iao/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||iaorl@iaorl.org||archives@internationalarchivesent.org||arquivos@forl.org.br1809-48641809-4864opendoar:2021-03-08T00:00International Archives of Otorhinolaryngology - Fundação Otorrinolaringologia (FORL)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Functional Results of Transverse Extended Incision in Cervical Neck Dissection
title Functional Results of Transverse Extended Incision in Cervical Neck Dissection
spellingShingle Functional Results of Transverse Extended Incision in Cervical Neck Dissection
Chiesa-Estomba,Carlos Miguel
cervical neck dissection
postoperative complication
scar
title_short Functional Results of Transverse Extended Incision in Cervical Neck Dissection
title_full Functional Results of Transverse Extended Incision in Cervical Neck Dissection
title_fullStr Functional Results of Transverse Extended Incision in Cervical Neck Dissection
title_full_unstemmed Functional Results of Transverse Extended Incision in Cervical Neck Dissection
title_sort Functional Results of Transverse Extended Incision in Cervical Neck Dissection
author Chiesa-Estomba,Carlos Miguel
author_facet Chiesa-Estomba,Carlos Miguel
Sistiaga-Suarez,Jon Alexander
Thomas-Arrizabalaga,Izaskun
González-García,Jose Angel
Larruscain,Ekhiñe
Altuna,Xabier
author_role author
author2 Sistiaga-Suarez,Jon Alexander
Thomas-Arrizabalaga,Izaskun
González-García,Jose Angel
Larruscain,Ekhiñe
Altuna,Xabier
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Chiesa-Estomba,Carlos Miguel
Sistiaga-Suarez,Jon Alexander
Thomas-Arrizabalaga,Izaskun
González-García,Jose Angel
Larruscain,Ekhiñe
Altuna,Xabier
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv cervical neck dissection
postoperative complication
scar
topic cervical neck dissection
postoperative complication
scar
description Abstract Introduction Multiple incisions have been described for the surgical approach of cervical neck nodes. All of these descriptions are associated with better or worse exposure of the surgical field as well as with different functional and aesthetic results, which are not always satisfactory. Objective Compare the transverse cervical incision with the classic incision in J or U. Methods This is a retrospective study of 47 patients who required cervical neck dissection between June 15, 2016 and June 15, 2017.A transversal incision was made in these surgeries, and their results were then compared with those of a group of 57 patients treated between January 1, 2010 and January 1, 2012, in whose cases an incision in J or U was made. Results Regarding the incision type, complications were present in 4 (8.5 %) cases in the transversal incision group, and in 7 (12.2 %) patients of the group of traditional incisions in J or U, without statistical differences (p = 0.078). The only variables associated with complications of healing in the two groups was body mass index (BMI) < 18.5. The patients showed subjective satisfaction with the aesthetic result of the transverse incision, with an average of 7.51 vs 6.20 in the J or U incision. Conclusion The transverse incision represents a safe, aesthetic, and oncologically adequate option, associated with a lower cicatricial retraction rate, without significant complication rate and allowing adequate exposure of the surgical field, similar to the obtained with the classic incision in J or U.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1809-48642021000100027
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1809-48642021000100027
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1055/s-0039-3402439
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Fundação Otorrinolaringologia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Fundação Otorrinolaringologia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv International Archives of Otorhinolaryngology v.25 n.1 2021
reponame:International Archives of Otorhinolaryngology
instname:Fundação Otorrinolaringologia (FORL)
instacron:FORL
instname_str Fundação Otorrinolaringologia (FORL)
instacron_str FORL
institution FORL
reponame_str International Archives of Otorhinolaryngology
collection International Archives of Otorhinolaryngology
repository.name.fl_str_mv International Archives of Otorhinolaryngology - Fundação Otorrinolaringologia (FORL)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||iaorl@iaorl.org||archives@internationalarchivesent.org||arquivos@forl.org.br
_version_ 1754203976968962048