Gianfrancesco d’Asola, the “Creator” of Parmenides’ Third Way
| Autor(a) principal: | |
|---|---|
| Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
| Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
| Idioma: | spa |
| Título da fonte: | Hypnos |
| Texto Completo: | https://hypnos.org.br/index.php/hypnos/article/view/610 |
Resumo: | We can identify the invention of a conjecture that was to define XIXth century scholarship on the Poem of Parmenides in the Renascentist edition of Simplicius’ Commentary on Aristotle’s Physics. Because of his choice for filling the gap on verse B6.3 with a verb expressing refusal or withdrawal, editor Gianfrancesco d’Asola is indeed at the origins of the interpretation that supposes the existence of three ways of investigation in the Poem. As argued in this paper, though, all textual evidence, as well as the transmitted notices since Antiquity, point to an Alêtheia-Doxa dualism, with the consequence that any trichotomic scheme forcibly depends on a fabrication dating from the XVIth century. |
| id |
FSB_3765be02ae492d3773ebdb22dfaf94d3 |
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.hypnos.org.br:article/610 |
| network_acronym_str |
FSB |
| network_name_str |
Hypnos |
| repository_id_str |
|
| spelling |
Gianfrancesco d’Asola, the “Creator” of Parmenides’ Third WayGianfrancesco d'Asola, el "creador" de la tercera via parmenideaGianfrancesco d’Asola, el “creador” de la tercera vía parmenídeaParmenides of EleaSimpliciusPresocraticsphilologyParmênides de EleiaSimplícioPré-socráticosfilologiaParménidesSimplicioAldinadicotomÃa ParmenidesSimpliciusdichotomy.We can identify the invention of a conjecture that was to define XIXth century scholarship on the Poem of Parmenides in the Renascentist edition of Simplicius’ Commentary on Aristotle’s Physics. Because of his choice for filling the gap on verse B6.3 with a verb expressing refusal or withdrawal, editor Gianfrancesco d’Asola is indeed at the origins of the interpretation that supposes the existence of three ways of investigation in the Poem. As argued in this paper, though, all textual evidence, as well as the transmitted notices since Antiquity, point to an Alêtheia-Doxa dualism, with the consequence that any trichotomic scheme forcibly depends on a fabrication dating from the XVIth century.La filosofía de Parménides se basa en un esquema dicotómico: "o...o...". La disyunción, en cambio, "...y..." es propia de "los mortales, que nada saben". Tanto los caminos de Proemio (Dia/Noche) como los requisitos para llegar a ser alguien que sabe" (Verdad/Opiniones), los "únicos" caminos "para pensar" de B 2.2, y, finalmente, el único camino válido retenido una vez suprimido el inválido, sin testigos de ducho esquema. No obstante, una conjetura propuesta por un editor veneciano para completar el verso B 6.3 sugiere que hay tres caminos posibles: dos erróneos y uno a retener. En este trabajo exponemos las insospechadas consecuencias que derivan de la desafortunada conjetura. Parmenides' philosophy is based on a dichotomic scheme: "or... o...". Disjunction, on the other hand, "... and..." it's typical of "mortals, who know nothing." Both the paths of Proemium (Day/Night), the requirements to become "someone who knows" (Truth/Opinions), the "unique" way "to think" of B 2.2, and finally the only valid way retained once the invalid is suppressed, are witnesses of this scheme. However, a conjecture proposed by a Venetian publisher to complete the verse B 6.3 suggests that there are three possibleways: two erroneous and one to beretained. In this work we expose the unsuspected consequences that come from the unfortunate Venetian conjecture.Identificamos, na edição renascentista do Comentário de Simplício à Física de Aristóteles, a invenção de uma conjectura que determinaria os rumos da interpretação do Poema de Parmênides desde o século XIX. Com a escolha de preencher a lacuna do verso B6,3 com um verbo que exprime a ideia de recusa ou afastamento, o editor Gianfrancesco d’Asola está efetivamente na origem da interpretação que supõe a existência de três caminhos de investigação no Poema. Ora, como vai se argumentar, todos os indícios textuais, bem como as notícias transmitidas desde a Antiguidade, apontam para um dualismo entre Alêtheia e Doxa, de maneira que qualquer esquema tricotômico depende forçosamente de uma criação datada do século XVI.Revista HypnosHypnos Journal2020-10-09info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://hypnos.org.br/index.php/hypnos/article/view/610Revista Hypnos; n. 45 (2020); 185-195Hypnos Journal; No. 45 (2020); 185-1952177-53461413-9138reponame:Hypnosinstname:Faculdade de São Bento (FSB)instacron:FSBspahttps://hypnos.org.br/index.php/hypnos/article/view/610/605Copyright (c) 2020 Nestor-Luís Corderohttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCordero, Nestor-Luís2020-10-10T02:44:28Zoai:ojs.hypnos.org.br:article/610Revistahttps://hypnos.org.br/index.php/hypnosPRIhttps://hypnos.org.br/index.php/hypnos/oairachelgazolla@gmail.com2177-53461413-9138opendoar:2023-01-13T09:47:10.154771Hypnos - Faculdade de São Bento (FSB)false |
| dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Gianfrancesco d’Asola, the “Creator” of Parmenides’ Third Way Gianfrancesco d'Asola, el "creador" de la tercera via parmenidea Gianfrancesco d’Asola, el “creador” de la tercera vía parmenídea |
| title |
Gianfrancesco d’Asola, the “Creator” of Parmenides’ Third Way |
| spellingShingle |
Gianfrancesco d’Asola, the “Creator” of Parmenides’ Third Way Cordero, Nestor-Luís Parmenides of Elea Simplicius Presocratics philology Parmênides de Eleia Simplício Pré-socráticos filologia Parménides Simplicio Aldina dicotomÃa Parmenides Simplicius dichotomy. |
| title_short |
Gianfrancesco d’Asola, the “Creator” of Parmenides’ Third Way |
| title_full |
Gianfrancesco d’Asola, the “Creator” of Parmenides’ Third Way |
| title_fullStr |
Gianfrancesco d’Asola, the “Creator” of Parmenides’ Third Way |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Gianfrancesco d’Asola, the “Creator” of Parmenides’ Third Way |
| title_sort |
Gianfrancesco d’Asola, the “Creator” of Parmenides’ Third Way |
| author |
Cordero, Nestor-Luís |
| author_facet |
Cordero, Nestor-Luís |
| author_role |
author |
| dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Cordero, Nestor-Luís |
| dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Parmenides of Elea Simplicius Presocratics philology Parmênides de Eleia Simplício Pré-socráticos filologia Parménides Simplicio Aldina dicotomÃa Parmenides Simplicius dichotomy. |
| topic |
Parmenides of Elea Simplicius Presocratics philology Parmênides de Eleia Simplício Pré-socráticos filologia Parménides Simplicio Aldina dicotomÃa Parmenides Simplicius dichotomy. |
| description |
We can identify the invention of a conjecture that was to define XIXth century scholarship on the Poem of Parmenides in the Renascentist edition of Simplicius’ Commentary on Aristotle’s Physics. Because of his choice for filling the gap on verse B6.3 with a verb expressing refusal or withdrawal, editor Gianfrancesco d’Asola is indeed at the origins of the interpretation that supposes the existence of three ways of investigation in the Poem. As argued in this paper, though, all textual evidence, as well as the transmitted notices since Antiquity, point to an Alêtheia-Doxa dualism, with the consequence that any trichotomic scheme forcibly depends on a fabrication dating from the XVIth century. |
| publishDate |
2020 |
| dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-10-09 |
| dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
| format |
article |
| status_str |
publishedVersion |
| dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://hypnos.org.br/index.php/hypnos/article/view/610 |
| url |
https://hypnos.org.br/index.php/hypnos/article/view/610 |
| dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
spa |
| language |
spa |
| dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://hypnos.org.br/index.php/hypnos/article/view/610/605 |
| dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Nestor-Luís Cordero https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Nestor-Luís Cordero https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 |
| eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
| dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
| dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Hypnos Hypnos Journal |
| publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Hypnos Hypnos Journal |
| dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Hypnos; n. 45 (2020); 185-195 Hypnos Journal; No. 45 (2020); 185-195 2177-5346 1413-9138 reponame:Hypnos instname:Faculdade de São Bento (FSB) instacron:FSB |
| instname_str |
Faculdade de São Bento (FSB) |
| instacron_str |
FSB |
| institution |
FSB |
| reponame_str |
Hypnos |
| collection |
Hypnos |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Hypnos - Faculdade de São Bento (FSB) |
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
rachelgazolla@gmail.com |
| _version_ |
1797051294012145664 |