TARIFF OF EXTRAPATRIMONIAL DAMAGE AND HUMAN DIGNITY VIOLATION
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por eng |
Título da fonte: | Meritum (Belo Horizonte. Online) |
Texto Completo: | http://revista.fumec.br/index.php/meritum/article/view/8356 |
Resumo: | This scientific article seeks to analyze whether the pricing of off-balance sheet damage, under Law No. 13.467/17, is unconstitutional in view of the fundamental principles of equality and human dignity, embodied in the Constitution of the Federative Republic of Brazil of 1988. To achieve this goal, the work was organized into three items and used instruments such as books, articles, laws and jurisprudence, to demonstrate how compensation was paid for off-balance sheet damages before the new law, as well as to exemplify discussions about the theme. The first item provides a historical retrospective on the origin of moral damage in the Brazilian legal system, as well as a thorough analysis of certain types of damage, by making doctrinal and jurisprudential citations to corroborate the thinking exposed there. The second item aims to delimit off-balance sheet damage based on the rules set forth in Title II-A of the Consolidation of Labor Laws. In addition, criticisms were made as to the manner in which reparation takes place. Finally, in the third item, an analysis was made about the Direct Unconstitutionality Action No. 6069, filed by the Federal Council of the Brazilian Bar Association, in order to declare unconstitutional this charge for off-balance sheet damages, as well as to observe the offenses against the fundamental principles of human dignity and equality, embodied in CRFB/88. At the end of this article, it will be demonstrated if the new rule of art. 223-G of the CLT violates fundamental and individual principles and guarantees. |
id |
FUMEC-1_5a503aa99d753fff1bdb440a5645d7ae |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.fumec.br:article/8356 |
network_acronym_str |
FUMEC-1 |
network_name_str |
Meritum (Belo Horizonte. Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
TARIFF OF EXTRAPATRIMONIAL DAMAGE AND HUMAN DIGNITY VIOLATIONTARIFAÇÃO DO DANO EXTRAPATRIMONIAL E VIOLAÇÃO À DIGNIDADE HUMANA This scientific article seeks to analyze whether the pricing of off-balance sheet damage, under Law No. 13.467/17, is unconstitutional in view of the fundamental principles of equality and human dignity, embodied in the Constitution of the Federative Republic of Brazil of 1988. To achieve this goal, the work was organized into three items and used instruments such as books, articles, laws and jurisprudence, to demonstrate how compensation was paid for off-balance sheet damages before the new law, as well as to exemplify discussions about the theme. The first item provides a historical retrospective on the origin of moral damage in the Brazilian legal system, as well as a thorough analysis of certain types of damage, by making doctrinal and jurisprudential citations to corroborate the thinking exposed there. The second item aims to delimit off-balance sheet damage based on the rules set forth in Title II-A of the Consolidation of Labor Laws. In addition, criticisms were made as to the manner in which reparation takes place. Finally, in the third item, an analysis was made about the Direct Unconstitutionality Action No. 6069, filed by the Federal Council of the Brazilian Bar Association, in order to declare unconstitutional this charge for off-balance sheet damages, as well as to observe the offenses against the fundamental principles of human dignity and equality, embodied in CRFB/88. At the end of this article, it will be demonstrated if the new rule of art. 223-G of the CLT violates fundamental and individual principles and guarantees.O presente artigo científico busca analisar se a tarifação do dano extrapatrimonial, à luz da Lei nº 13.467/17, é inconstitucional frente aos princípios fundamentais da igualdade e da dignidade da pessoa humana, consubstanciados na Constituição da República Federativa do Brasil de 1988. Para se alcançar essa finalidade, organizou-se o trabalho em três itens e utilizou-se de instrumentos como livros, artigos, leis e jurisprudências, para demonstrar como se dava a indenização por dano extrapatrimonial antes da nova lei, bem como para se exemplificar as discussões acerca do tema. O primeiro item realiza uma retrospectiva histórica sobre a origem do dano moral no ordenamento jurídico brasileiro, bem como se faz uma análise minuciosa de determinadas espécies de dano, além de realizar citações doutrinárias e jurisprudenciais para corroborar com o pensamento ali exposto. O segundo item, por outro viés, visa delimitar o dano extrapatrimonial a partir do regramento exposto no Título II-A da Consolidação das Leis do Trabalho. Ademais, foram realizadas críticas quanto à forma em que se dá a reparação. Por fim, no terceiro item, realizou-se uma análise acerca da Ação Direta de Inconstitucionalidade nº 6069, ajuizada pelo Conselho Federal da Ordem dos Advogados do Brasil, a fim de declarar inconstitucional essa tarifação por dano extrapatrimonial, bem como se observou, detalhadamente, as afrontas aos princípios fundamentais da dignidade da pessoa humana e da igualdade, consubstanciados na CRFB/88. Ao final do presente artigo, será demonstrado se o novo regramento do art. 223-G, da CLT, fere princípios e garantias fundamentais e individuais.Universidade FUMEC2021-11-12info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://revista.fumec.br/index.php/meritum/article/view/835610.46560/meritum.v16i1.8356Meritum, Law Journal of FUMEC University; Vol. 16, Nº 1 - janeiro/abril 2021Meritum, Revista de Derecho de la Universidad FUMEC; Vol. 16, Nº 1 - janeiro/abril 2021Meritum, Journal de droit de l'Université FUMEC; Vol. 16, Nº 1 - janeiro/abril 2021Meritum, Revista de Direito da Universidade FUMEC; Vol. 16, Nº 1 - janeiro/abril 20212238-69391980-207210.46560/meritum.v16i1reponame:Meritum (Belo Horizonte. Online)instname:Universidade FUMECinstacron:FUMECporenghttp://revista.fumec.br/index.php/meritum/article/view/8356/4265http://revista.fumec.br/index.php/meritum/article/view/8356/451610.21714/pretexto.v19i4.5932.s1864Ferreira, Vanessa RochaCebolão, Fabiana Sabino de Oliveirainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2022-02-04T12:19:36Zoai:ojs.fumec.br:article/8356Revistahttp://revista.fumec.br/index.php/meritumPUBhttps://revista.fumec.br/index.php/meritum/oairevistameritum@fumec.br2238-69391980-2072opendoar:2022-02-04T12:19:36Meritum (Belo Horizonte. Online) - Universidade FUMECfalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
TARIFF OF EXTRAPATRIMONIAL DAMAGE AND HUMAN DIGNITY VIOLATION TARIFAÇÃO DO DANO EXTRAPATRIMONIAL E VIOLAÇÃO À DIGNIDADE HUMANA |
title |
TARIFF OF EXTRAPATRIMONIAL DAMAGE AND HUMAN DIGNITY VIOLATION |
spellingShingle |
TARIFF OF EXTRAPATRIMONIAL DAMAGE AND HUMAN DIGNITY VIOLATION Ferreira, Vanessa Rocha |
title_short |
TARIFF OF EXTRAPATRIMONIAL DAMAGE AND HUMAN DIGNITY VIOLATION |
title_full |
TARIFF OF EXTRAPATRIMONIAL DAMAGE AND HUMAN DIGNITY VIOLATION |
title_fullStr |
TARIFF OF EXTRAPATRIMONIAL DAMAGE AND HUMAN DIGNITY VIOLATION |
title_full_unstemmed |
TARIFF OF EXTRAPATRIMONIAL DAMAGE AND HUMAN DIGNITY VIOLATION |
title_sort |
TARIFF OF EXTRAPATRIMONIAL DAMAGE AND HUMAN DIGNITY VIOLATION |
author |
Ferreira, Vanessa Rocha |
author_facet |
Ferreira, Vanessa Rocha Cebolão, Fabiana Sabino de Oliveira |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Cebolão, Fabiana Sabino de Oliveira |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Ferreira, Vanessa Rocha Cebolão, Fabiana Sabino de Oliveira |
description |
This scientific article seeks to analyze whether the pricing of off-balance sheet damage, under Law No. 13.467/17, is unconstitutional in view of the fundamental principles of equality and human dignity, embodied in the Constitution of the Federative Republic of Brazil of 1988. To achieve this goal, the work was organized into three items and used instruments such as books, articles, laws and jurisprudence, to demonstrate how compensation was paid for off-balance sheet damages before the new law, as well as to exemplify discussions about the theme. The first item provides a historical retrospective on the origin of moral damage in the Brazilian legal system, as well as a thorough analysis of certain types of damage, by making doctrinal and jurisprudential citations to corroborate the thinking exposed there. The second item aims to delimit off-balance sheet damage based on the rules set forth in Title II-A of the Consolidation of Labor Laws. In addition, criticisms were made as to the manner in which reparation takes place. Finally, in the third item, an analysis was made about the Direct Unconstitutionality Action No. 6069, filed by the Federal Council of the Brazilian Bar Association, in order to declare unconstitutional this charge for off-balance sheet damages, as well as to observe the offenses against the fundamental principles of human dignity and equality, embodied in CRFB/88. At the end of this article, it will be demonstrated if the new rule of art. 223-G of the CLT violates fundamental and individual principles and guarantees. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-11-12 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://revista.fumec.br/index.php/meritum/article/view/8356 10.46560/meritum.v16i1.8356 |
url |
http://revista.fumec.br/index.php/meritum/article/view/8356 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.46560/meritum.v16i1.8356 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por eng |
language |
por eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
http://revista.fumec.br/index.php/meritum/article/view/8356/4265 http://revista.fumec.br/index.php/meritum/article/view/8356/4516 10.21714/pretexto.v19i4.5932.s1864 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade FUMEC |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade FUMEC |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Meritum, Law Journal of FUMEC University; Vol. 16, Nº 1 - janeiro/abril 2021 Meritum, Revista de Derecho de la Universidad FUMEC; Vol. 16, Nº 1 - janeiro/abril 2021 Meritum, Journal de droit de l'Université FUMEC; Vol. 16, Nº 1 - janeiro/abril 2021 Meritum, Revista de Direito da Universidade FUMEC; Vol. 16, Nº 1 - janeiro/abril 2021 2238-6939 1980-2072 10.46560/meritum.v16i1 reponame:Meritum (Belo Horizonte. Online) instname:Universidade FUMEC instacron:FUMEC |
instname_str |
Universidade FUMEC |
instacron_str |
FUMEC |
institution |
FUMEC |
reponame_str |
Meritum (Belo Horizonte. Online) |
collection |
Meritum (Belo Horizonte. Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Meritum (Belo Horizonte. Online) - Universidade FUMEC |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revistameritum@fumec.br |
_version_ |
1798945263588474880 |