Slum upgrading in Brazil: lessons from evaluation processes

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Balbim, Renato Nunes
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: Krause, Cleandro Henrique
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Ciência & Trópico (Online)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.fundaj.gov.br/CIC/article/view/1850
Resumo: Slum population has had a relative decrease during the 21st century in Brazil. Beginning in the 1990’s, the Brazilian public policy towards slums has been notable, both at national and local levels. Nevertheless, priority has been given to improvement works, evaluation of their results has been a neglected aspect, and a knowledge gap between investments and their impacts has broadened. This paper aims at summarizing the contributions of researchers at the Institute for Applied Economic Research (IPEA), who conducted slum-upgrading evaluations from 2009 until 2014. They comprise methodologies and procedures for a meta-evaluation of intervention projects as a means to improving programs; a logical model for the evaluation of the intervention in one of the largest favelas in the country; an evaluation guideline proposal for a nationwide precarious settlements urbanization program; and relevant findings of the focus group technique as a qualitative research method. The paper seeks to publicize the results achieved in an effort to advise governments and improve their policies; to foster discussion on tailored evaluation methodologies; to contribute critically with international development agencies; and to reinforce the exercise of citizenship through evaluation practices, transparency, and accountability.
id FUNDAJ-1_59888afab12a38c2ff4007c675cd0049
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.emnuvens.com.br:article/1850
network_acronym_str FUNDAJ-1
network_name_str Ciência & Trópico (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Slum upgrading in Brazil: lessons from evaluation processesSlum population has had a relative decrease during the 21st century in Brazil. Beginning in the 1990’s, the Brazilian public policy towards slums has been notable, both at national and local levels. Nevertheless, priority has been given to improvement works, evaluation of their results has been a neglected aspect, and a knowledge gap between investments and their impacts has broadened. This paper aims at summarizing the contributions of researchers at the Institute for Applied Economic Research (IPEA), who conducted slum-upgrading evaluations from 2009 until 2014. They comprise methodologies and procedures for a meta-evaluation of intervention projects as a means to improving programs; a logical model for the evaluation of the intervention in one of the largest favelas in the country; an evaluation guideline proposal for a nationwide precarious settlements urbanization program; and relevant findings of the focus group technique as a qualitative research method. The paper seeks to publicize the results achieved in an effort to advise governments and improve their policies; to foster discussion on tailored evaluation methodologies; to contribute critically with international development agencies; and to reinforce the exercise of citizenship through evaluation practices, transparency, and accountability.Fundação Joaquim Nabuco2019-07-26info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.fundaj.gov.br/CIC/article/view/185010.33148/CeTropico_v.43n.esp(2019)p.177-195Ciência & Trópico; Vol. 43 (2019)Ciência & Trópico; Vol. 43 (2019)Ciência & Trópico; v. 43 (2019)2526-93720304-2685reponame:Ciência & Trópico (Online)instname:Fundação Joaquim Nabuco (FUNDAJ)instacron:FUNDAJenghttps://periodicos.fundaj.gov.br/CIC/article/view/1850/pdfCopyright (c) 2019 Renato Nunes Balbim, Cleandro Henrique Krauseinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBalbim, Renato NunesKrause, Cleandro Henrique2020-07-31T21:45:56Zoai:ojs.emnuvens.com.br:article/1850Revistahttps://periodicos.fundaj.gov.br/CIC/indexONGhttps://periodicos.fundaj.gov.br/CIC/oailuis.silva-tc@fundaj.gov.br || alexandrina.sobreira@fundaj.gov.br2526-93720304-2685opendoar:2020-07-31T21:45:56Ciência & Trópico (Online) - Fundação Joaquim Nabuco (FUNDAJ)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Slum upgrading in Brazil: lessons from evaluation processes
title Slum upgrading in Brazil: lessons from evaluation processes
spellingShingle Slum upgrading in Brazil: lessons from evaluation processes
Balbim, Renato Nunes
title_short Slum upgrading in Brazil: lessons from evaluation processes
title_full Slum upgrading in Brazil: lessons from evaluation processes
title_fullStr Slum upgrading in Brazil: lessons from evaluation processes
title_full_unstemmed Slum upgrading in Brazil: lessons from evaluation processes
title_sort Slum upgrading in Brazil: lessons from evaluation processes
author Balbim, Renato Nunes
author_facet Balbim, Renato Nunes
Krause, Cleandro Henrique
author_role author
author2 Krause, Cleandro Henrique
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Balbim, Renato Nunes
Krause, Cleandro Henrique
description Slum population has had a relative decrease during the 21st century in Brazil. Beginning in the 1990’s, the Brazilian public policy towards slums has been notable, both at national and local levels. Nevertheless, priority has been given to improvement works, evaluation of their results has been a neglected aspect, and a knowledge gap between investments and their impacts has broadened. This paper aims at summarizing the contributions of researchers at the Institute for Applied Economic Research (IPEA), who conducted slum-upgrading evaluations from 2009 until 2014. They comprise methodologies and procedures for a meta-evaluation of intervention projects as a means to improving programs; a logical model for the evaluation of the intervention in one of the largest favelas in the country; an evaluation guideline proposal for a nationwide precarious settlements urbanization program; and relevant findings of the focus group technique as a qualitative research method. The paper seeks to publicize the results achieved in an effort to advise governments and improve their policies; to foster discussion on tailored evaluation methodologies; to contribute critically with international development agencies; and to reinforce the exercise of citizenship through evaluation practices, transparency, and accountability.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-07-26
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.fundaj.gov.br/CIC/article/view/1850
10.33148/CeTropico_v.43n.esp(2019)p.177-195
url https://periodicos.fundaj.gov.br/CIC/article/view/1850
identifier_str_mv 10.33148/CeTropico_v.43n.esp(2019)p.177-195
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.fundaj.gov.br/CIC/article/view/1850/pdf
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2019 Renato Nunes Balbim, Cleandro Henrique Krause
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2019 Renato Nunes Balbim, Cleandro Henrique Krause
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Fundação Joaquim Nabuco
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Fundação Joaquim Nabuco
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Ciência & Trópico; Vol. 43 (2019)
Ciência & Trópico; Vol. 43 (2019)
Ciência & Trópico; v. 43 (2019)
2526-9372
0304-2685
reponame:Ciência & Trópico (Online)
instname:Fundação Joaquim Nabuco (FUNDAJ)
instacron:FUNDAJ
instname_str Fundação Joaquim Nabuco (FUNDAJ)
instacron_str FUNDAJ
institution FUNDAJ
reponame_str Ciência & Trópico (Online)
collection Ciência & Trópico (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Ciência & Trópico (Online) - Fundação Joaquim Nabuco (FUNDAJ)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv luis.silva-tc@fundaj.gov.br || alexandrina.sobreira@fundaj.gov.br
_version_ 1798042570603888640