Knowledge “with” or “about” others? The horizontalization of inter-epistemic knowledge in anthropological research and ethnographic writing

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Ferreira, Gilvanildo
Data de Publicação: 2022
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Ciência & Trópico (Online)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.fundaj.gov.br/CIC/article/view/2075
Resumo: This article, influenced by thinkers of the alleged “ontological turn” in anthropology”, presents a theoretical-methodological model constituted both from horizontal relationships in ethnographic theory and in the anthropological scientific field. When analyzing the specialized literature about the relationship between social actors and researchers, “textualists” assert that the writings are made only by them - even when using the names of the natives, they are only confirming the analysts' illustrations; In contrast, the “post-socials” believe that there are other ways of ethnographic textualization, besides the logic of co-authors as monological co-editors (as a “dialética do crítico-literário”, a term by Viveiro de Castro translated as “critical-literary dialectic”), breaking the connection of uneven exchange. Putting these perspectives in contrast, how to make ethnographic and anthropological methods results in a constructive negotiation, composed by allocutions that are not only dialogically in the discourse, but also in the research products? In this paper, we present the issues produced about these power relations that historically characterize the anthropological study and the ethnographic construction between different agents. Keywords: Ontological Turn. Collaborative Anthropology. Ethnographic Theory. Anthropological research.
id FUNDAJ-1_90ca84fd013c8576721bafb7604ede82
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.emnuvens.com.br:article/2075
network_acronym_str FUNDAJ-1
network_name_str Ciência & Trópico (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Knowledge “with” or “about” others? The horizontalization of inter-epistemic knowledge in anthropological research and ethnographic writing¿Conocimiento “con” o “sobre” otros? La horizontalización del saber interepistémico en la investigación antropológica y la escritura etnográficaConhecimento “com” ou “sobre” os outros? a horizontalização dos saberes inter-epistêmicos na pesquisa antropológica e escrita etnográficaThis article, influenced by thinkers of the alleged “ontological turn” in anthropology”, presents a theoretical-methodological model constituted both from horizontal relationships in ethnographic theory and in the anthropological scientific field. When analyzing the specialized literature about the relationship between social actors and researchers, “textualists” assert that the writings are made only by them - even when using the names of the natives, they are only confirming the analysts' illustrations; In contrast, the “post-socials” believe that there are other ways of ethnographic textualization, besides the logic of co-authors as monological co-editors (as a “dialética do crítico-literário”, a term by Viveiro de Castro translated as “critical-literary dialectic”), breaking the connection of uneven exchange. Putting these perspectives in contrast, how to make ethnographic and anthropological methods results in a constructive negotiation, composed by allocutions that are not only dialogically in the discourse, but also in the research products? In this paper, we present the issues produced about these power relations that historically characterize the anthropological study and the ethnographic construction between different agents. Keywords: Ontological Turn. Collaborative Anthropology. Ethnographic Theory. Anthropological research.Este artículo, influido por pensadores del llamado “giro ontológico de la antropología”, presenta un modelo teórico-metodológico constituido a partir de relaciones horizontales en los campos de la teoría etnográfica y de la investigación antropológica. Al analizar la literatura especializada sobre este vínculo entre los actores sociales y los investigadores, se observa que los “textualistas” afirman que los escritos son hechos solo por ellos - aún cuando usan los nombres de los indígenas, sólo están confirmando las ilustraciones de los analistas; Por otro lado, los “postsociales” creen que existen otras formas de textualización etnográfica que escapan a la lógica de los coautores como coeditores monológicos (dialéctica crítico-literaria), rompiendo la conexión del intercambio desigual. Contrastando estos enfoques divergentes; ¿cómo hacer de los métodos etnográficos y antropológicos el resultado de una negociación constructiva, compuesta de alocuciones que no sólo se relacionen dialógicamente en el discurso, sino también en los productos de la investigación? En el texto se presentan los problemas planteados acerca de estas relaciones de poder que caracterizan históricamente el estudio antropológico y la construcción etnográfica entre los distintos agentes. Palabras clave: Giro ontológico. Antropología colaborativa. Teoría etnográfica. Investigación antropológica.Este artigo, influenciado por pensadores da chamada “virada ontológica na antropologia”, apresenta um modelo teórico-metodológico constituído a partir de relações horizontalizadas nos campos da teoria etnografia e pesquisa antropológica. Ao analisar a literatura especializada sobre este liame entre atores sociais e pesquisadores, observa-se que “textualistas” afirmam que os escritos são confeccionados apenas por eles - mesmo quando se usam os nomes dos nativos, estão apenas confirmando as ilustrações dos analistas; já os “pós-sociais” acreditam que há outras formas de textualização etnográfica que foge da lógica de coautores como coeditores monológicos (dialética do crítico-literário), quebrando a conexão da troca desigual. Contrastando essas abordagens divergentes; como tornar os métodos etnográficos e antropológicos o resultado de uma negociação construtiva, composta por alocuções que não estejam apenas relacionados dialogicamente no discurso, mas também nos produtos das pesquisas? No texto, apresentam-se as problemáticas levantadas sobre estas relações de poder que historicamente caracterizam o estudo antropológico e a construção etnográfica entre os diferentes agentes. Palavras-chave: Virada ontológica. Antropologia colaborativa. Teoria etnográfica. Pesquisa antropológica.Fundação Joaquim Nabuco2022-07-08info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.fundaj.gov.br/CIC/article/view/207510.33148/cetropicov46n1(2022)art4Ciência & Trópico; Vol. 46 No. 1 (2022)Ciência & Trópico; Vol. 46 Núm. 1 (2022)Ciência & Trópico; v. 46 n. 1 (2022)2526-93720304-268510.33148/cetropicov46n1(2022)edicaocompletareponame:Ciência & Trópico (Online)instname:Fundação Joaquim Nabuco (FUNDAJ)instacron:FUNDAJporhttps://periodicos.fundaj.gov.br/CIC/article/view/2075/1667Copyright (c) 2022 Gilvanildo Ferreirahttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessFerreira, Gilvanildo2022-11-25T12:34:14Zoai:ojs.emnuvens.com.br:article/2075Revistahttps://periodicos.fundaj.gov.br/CIC/indexONGhttps://periodicos.fundaj.gov.br/CIC/oailuis.silva-tc@fundaj.gov.br || alexandrina.sobreira@fundaj.gov.br2526-93720304-2685opendoar:2022-11-25T12:34:14Ciência & Trópico (Online) - Fundação Joaquim Nabuco (FUNDAJ)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Knowledge “with” or “about” others? The horizontalization of inter-epistemic knowledge in anthropological research and ethnographic writing
¿Conocimiento “con” o “sobre” otros? La horizontalización del saber interepistémico en la investigación antropológica y la escritura etnográfica
Conhecimento “com” ou “sobre” os outros? a horizontalização dos saberes inter-epistêmicos na pesquisa antropológica e escrita etnográfica
title Knowledge “with” or “about” others? The horizontalization of inter-epistemic knowledge in anthropological research and ethnographic writing
spellingShingle Knowledge “with” or “about” others? The horizontalization of inter-epistemic knowledge in anthropological research and ethnographic writing
Ferreira, Gilvanildo
title_short Knowledge “with” or “about” others? The horizontalization of inter-epistemic knowledge in anthropological research and ethnographic writing
title_full Knowledge “with” or “about” others? The horizontalization of inter-epistemic knowledge in anthropological research and ethnographic writing
title_fullStr Knowledge “with” or “about” others? The horizontalization of inter-epistemic knowledge in anthropological research and ethnographic writing
title_full_unstemmed Knowledge “with” or “about” others? The horizontalization of inter-epistemic knowledge in anthropological research and ethnographic writing
title_sort Knowledge “with” or “about” others? The horizontalization of inter-epistemic knowledge in anthropological research and ethnographic writing
author Ferreira, Gilvanildo
author_facet Ferreira, Gilvanildo
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Ferreira, Gilvanildo
description This article, influenced by thinkers of the alleged “ontological turn” in anthropology”, presents a theoretical-methodological model constituted both from horizontal relationships in ethnographic theory and in the anthropological scientific field. When analyzing the specialized literature about the relationship between social actors and researchers, “textualists” assert that the writings are made only by them - even when using the names of the natives, they are only confirming the analysts' illustrations; In contrast, the “post-socials” believe that there are other ways of ethnographic textualization, besides the logic of co-authors as monological co-editors (as a “dialética do crítico-literário”, a term by Viveiro de Castro translated as “critical-literary dialectic”), breaking the connection of uneven exchange. Putting these perspectives in contrast, how to make ethnographic and anthropological methods results in a constructive negotiation, composed by allocutions that are not only dialogically in the discourse, but also in the research products? In this paper, we present the issues produced about these power relations that historically characterize the anthropological study and the ethnographic construction between different agents. Keywords: Ontological Turn. Collaborative Anthropology. Ethnographic Theory. Anthropological research.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-07-08
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.fundaj.gov.br/CIC/article/view/2075
10.33148/cetropicov46n1(2022)art4
url https://periodicos.fundaj.gov.br/CIC/article/view/2075
identifier_str_mv 10.33148/cetropicov46n1(2022)art4
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.fundaj.gov.br/CIC/article/view/2075/1667
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Gilvanildo Ferreira
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Gilvanildo Ferreira
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Fundação Joaquim Nabuco
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Fundação Joaquim Nabuco
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Ciência & Trópico; Vol. 46 No. 1 (2022)
Ciência & Trópico; Vol. 46 Núm. 1 (2022)
Ciência & Trópico; v. 46 n. 1 (2022)
2526-9372
0304-2685
10.33148/cetropicov46n1(2022)edicaocompleta
reponame:Ciência & Trópico (Online)
instname:Fundação Joaquim Nabuco (FUNDAJ)
instacron:FUNDAJ
instname_str Fundação Joaquim Nabuco (FUNDAJ)
instacron_str FUNDAJ
institution FUNDAJ
reponame_str Ciência & Trópico (Online)
collection Ciência & Trópico (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Ciência & Trópico (Online) - Fundação Joaquim Nabuco (FUNDAJ)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv luis.silva-tc@fundaj.gov.br || alexandrina.sobreira@fundaj.gov.br
_version_ 1798042563478814720