Knowledge “with” or “about” others? The horizontalization of inter-epistemic knowledge in anthropological research and ethnographic writing
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Ciência & Trópico (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.fundaj.gov.br/CIC/article/view/2075 |
Resumo: | This article, influenced by thinkers of the alleged “ontological turn” in anthropology”, presents a theoretical-methodological model constituted both from horizontal relationships in ethnographic theory and in the anthropological scientific field. When analyzing the specialized literature about the relationship between social actors and researchers, “textualists” assert that the writings are made only by them - even when using the names of the natives, they are only confirming the analysts' illustrations; In contrast, the “post-socials” believe that there are other ways of ethnographic textualization, besides the logic of co-authors as monological co-editors (as a “dialética do crítico-literário”, a term by Viveiro de Castro translated as “critical-literary dialectic”), breaking the connection of uneven exchange. Putting these perspectives in contrast, how to make ethnographic and anthropological methods results in a constructive negotiation, composed by allocutions that are not only dialogically in the discourse, but also in the research products? In this paper, we present the issues produced about these power relations that historically characterize the anthropological study and the ethnographic construction between different agents. Keywords: Ontological Turn. Collaborative Anthropology. Ethnographic Theory. Anthropological research. |
id |
FUNDAJ-1_90ca84fd013c8576721bafb7604ede82 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.emnuvens.com.br:article/2075 |
network_acronym_str |
FUNDAJ-1 |
network_name_str |
Ciência & Trópico (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Knowledge “with” or “about” others? The horizontalization of inter-epistemic knowledge in anthropological research and ethnographic writing¿Conocimiento “con” o “sobre” otros? La horizontalización del saber interepistémico en la investigación antropológica y la escritura etnográficaConhecimento “com” ou “sobre” os outros? a horizontalização dos saberes inter-epistêmicos na pesquisa antropológica e escrita etnográficaThis article, influenced by thinkers of the alleged “ontological turn” in anthropology”, presents a theoretical-methodological model constituted both from horizontal relationships in ethnographic theory and in the anthropological scientific field. When analyzing the specialized literature about the relationship between social actors and researchers, “textualists” assert that the writings are made only by them - even when using the names of the natives, they are only confirming the analysts' illustrations; In contrast, the “post-socials” believe that there are other ways of ethnographic textualization, besides the logic of co-authors as monological co-editors (as a “dialética do crítico-literário”, a term by Viveiro de Castro translated as “critical-literary dialectic”), breaking the connection of uneven exchange. Putting these perspectives in contrast, how to make ethnographic and anthropological methods results in a constructive negotiation, composed by allocutions that are not only dialogically in the discourse, but also in the research products? In this paper, we present the issues produced about these power relations that historically characterize the anthropological study and the ethnographic construction between different agents. Keywords: Ontological Turn. Collaborative Anthropology. Ethnographic Theory. Anthropological research.Este artículo, influido por pensadores del llamado “giro ontológico de la antropología”, presenta un modelo teórico-metodológico constituido a partir de relaciones horizontales en los campos de la teoría etnográfica y de la investigación antropológica. Al analizar la literatura especializada sobre este vínculo entre los actores sociales y los investigadores, se observa que los “textualistas” afirman que los escritos son hechos solo por ellos - aún cuando usan los nombres de los indígenas, sólo están confirmando las ilustraciones de los analistas; Por otro lado, los “postsociales” creen que existen otras formas de textualización etnográfica que escapan a la lógica de los coautores como coeditores monológicos (dialéctica crítico-literaria), rompiendo la conexión del intercambio desigual. Contrastando estos enfoques divergentes; ¿cómo hacer de los métodos etnográficos y antropológicos el resultado de una negociación constructiva, compuesta de alocuciones que no sólo se relacionen dialógicamente en el discurso, sino también en los productos de la investigación? En el texto se presentan los problemas planteados acerca de estas relaciones de poder que caracterizan históricamente el estudio antropológico y la construcción etnográfica entre los distintos agentes. Palabras clave: Giro ontológico. Antropología colaborativa. Teoría etnográfica. Investigación antropológica.Este artigo, influenciado por pensadores da chamada “virada ontológica na antropologia”, apresenta um modelo teórico-metodológico constituído a partir de relações horizontalizadas nos campos da teoria etnografia e pesquisa antropológica. Ao analisar a literatura especializada sobre este liame entre atores sociais e pesquisadores, observa-se que “textualistas” afirmam que os escritos são confeccionados apenas por eles - mesmo quando se usam os nomes dos nativos, estão apenas confirmando as ilustrações dos analistas; já os “pós-sociais” acreditam que há outras formas de textualização etnográfica que foge da lógica de coautores como coeditores monológicos (dialética do crítico-literário), quebrando a conexão da troca desigual. Contrastando essas abordagens divergentes; como tornar os métodos etnográficos e antropológicos o resultado de uma negociação construtiva, composta por alocuções que não estejam apenas relacionados dialogicamente no discurso, mas também nos produtos das pesquisas? No texto, apresentam-se as problemáticas levantadas sobre estas relações de poder que historicamente caracterizam o estudo antropológico e a construção etnográfica entre os diferentes agentes. Palavras-chave: Virada ontológica. Antropologia colaborativa. Teoria etnográfica. Pesquisa antropológica.Fundação Joaquim Nabuco2022-07-08info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.fundaj.gov.br/CIC/article/view/207510.33148/cetropicov46n1(2022)art4Ciência & Trópico; Vol. 46 No. 1 (2022)Ciência & Trópico; Vol. 46 Núm. 1 (2022)Ciência & Trópico; v. 46 n. 1 (2022)2526-93720304-268510.33148/cetropicov46n1(2022)edicaocompletareponame:Ciência & Trópico (Online)instname:Fundação Joaquim Nabuco (FUNDAJ)instacron:FUNDAJporhttps://periodicos.fundaj.gov.br/CIC/article/view/2075/1667Copyright (c) 2022 Gilvanildo Ferreirahttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessFerreira, Gilvanildo2022-11-25T12:34:14Zoai:ojs.emnuvens.com.br:article/2075Revistahttps://periodicos.fundaj.gov.br/CIC/indexONGhttps://periodicos.fundaj.gov.br/CIC/oailuis.silva-tc@fundaj.gov.br || alexandrina.sobreira@fundaj.gov.br2526-93720304-2685opendoar:2022-11-25T12:34:14Ciência & Trópico (Online) - Fundação Joaquim Nabuco (FUNDAJ)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Knowledge “with” or “about” others? The horizontalization of inter-epistemic knowledge in anthropological research and ethnographic writing ¿Conocimiento “con” o “sobre” otros? La horizontalización del saber interepistémico en la investigación antropológica y la escritura etnográfica Conhecimento “com” ou “sobre” os outros? a horizontalização dos saberes inter-epistêmicos na pesquisa antropológica e escrita etnográfica |
title |
Knowledge “with” or “about” others? The horizontalization of inter-epistemic knowledge in anthropological research and ethnographic writing |
spellingShingle |
Knowledge “with” or “about” others? The horizontalization of inter-epistemic knowledge in anthropological research and ethnographic writing Ferreira, Gilvanildo |
title_short |
Knowledge “with” or “about” others? The horizontalization of inter-epistemic knowledge in anthropological research and ethnographic writing |
title_full |
Knowledge “with” or “about” others? The horizontalization of inter-epistemic knowledge in anthropological research and ethnographic writing |
title_fullStr |
Knowledge “with” or “about” others? The horizontalization of inter-epistemic knowledge in anthropological research and ethnographic writing |
title_full_unstemmed |
Knowledge “with” or “about” others? The horizontalization of inter-epistemic knowledge in anthropological research and ethnographic writing |
title_sort |
Knowledge “with” or “about” others? The horizontalization of inter-epistemic knowledge in anthropological research and ethnographic writing |
author |
Ferreira, Gilvanildo |
author_facet |
Ferreira, Gilvanildo |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Ferreira, Gilvanildo |
description |
This article, influenced by thinkers of the alleged “ontological turn” in anthropology”, presents a theoretical-methodological model constituted both from horizontal relationships in ethnographic theory and in the anthropological scientific field. When analyzing the specialized literature about the relationship between social actors and researchers, “textualists” assert that the writings are made only by them - even when using the names of the natives, they are only confirming the analysts' illustrations; In contrast, the “post-socials” believe that there are other ways of ethnographic textualization, besides the logic of co-authors as monological co-editors (as a “dialética do crítico-literário”, a term by Viveiro de Castro translated as “critical-literary dialectic”), breaking the connection of uneven exchange. Putting these perspectives in contrast, how to make ethnographic and anthropological methods results in a constructive negotiation, composed by allocutions that are not only dialogically in the discourse, but also in the research products? In this paper, we present the issues produced about these power relations that historically characterize the anthropological study and the ethnographic construction between different agents. Keywords: Ontological Turn. Collaborative Anthropology. Ethnographic Theory. Anthropological research. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-07-08 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.fundaj.gov.br/CIC/article/view/2075 10.33148/cetropicov46n1(2022)art4 |
url |
https://periodicos.fundaj.gov.br/CIC/article/view/2075 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.33148/cetropicov46n1(2022)art4 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.fundaj.gov.br/CIC/article/view/2075/1667 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Gilvanildo Ferreira https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Gilvanildo Ferreira https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Fundação Joaquim Nabuco |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Fundação Joaquim Nabuco |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Ciência & Trópico; Vol. 46 No. 1 (2022) Ciência & Trópico; Vol. 46 Núm. 1 (2022) Ciência & Trópico; v. 46 n. 1 (2022) 2526-9372 0304-2685 10.33148/cetropicov46n1(2022)edicaocompleta reponame:Ciência & Trópico (Online) instname:Fundação Joaquim Nabuco (FUNDAJ) instacron:FUNDAJ |
instname_str |
Fundação Joaquim Nabuco (FUNDAJ) |
instacron_str |
FUNDAJ |
institution |
FUNDAJ |
reponame_str |
Ciência & Trópico (Online) |
collection |
Ciência & Trópico (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Ciência & Trópico (Online) - Fundação Joaquim Nabuco (FUNDAJ) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
luis.silva-tc@fundaj.gov.br || alexandrina.sobreira@fundaj.gov.br |
_version_ |
1798042563478814720 |