Comparison of different ultrasonic vibration modes for post removal

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Braga,Neilor Mateus Antunes
Data de Publicação: 2012
Outros Autores: Silva,Juliana Monteiro da, Carvalho-Júnior,Jacy Ribeiro de, Ferreira,Raquel Conceição, Saquy,Paulo César, Brito-Júnior,Manoel
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Brazilian Dental Journal
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-64402012000100009
Resumo: This in vitro study compared different ultrasonic vibration modes for intraradicular cast post removal. The crowns of 24 maxillary canines were removed, the roots were embedded in acrylic resin blocks, and the canals were treated endodontically. The post holes were prepared and root canal impressions were taken with self-cured resin acrylic. After casting, the posts were cemented with zinc phosphate cement. The samples were randomly distributed into 3 groups (n=8): G1: no ultrasonic vibration (control); G2: tip of the ultrasonic device positioned perpendicularly to core surface and close to the incisal edge; and G3: tip of the ultrasonic device positioned perpendicularly to core surface at cervical region, close to the line of cementation. An Enac OE-5 ultrasound unit with an ST-09 tip was used. All samples were submitted to the tensile test using an universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 1 mm/min. Data were subjected to one-way ANOVA and Tukey's post-hoc tests (α=0.05). Mean values of the load to dislodge the posts (MPa) were: G1 = 4.6 (± 1.4) A; G2 = 2.8 (± 0.9) B, and G3= 0.9 (± 0.3) C. Therefore, the ultrasonic vibration applied with the tip of device close to the core's cervical area showed higher ability to reduce the retention of cast post to root canal.
id FUNORP-1_028996ac29923d84f39282b028e904f4
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0103-64402012000100009
network_acronym_str FUNORP-1
network_name_str Brazilian Dental Journal
repository_id_str
spelling Comparison of different ultrasonic vibration modes for post removalcast postpost removalultrasoundThis in vitro study compared different ultrasonic vibration modes for intraradicular cast post removal. The crowns of 24 maxillary canines were removed, the roots were embedded in acrylic resin blocks, and the canals were treated endodontically. The post holes were prepared and root canal impressions were taken with self-cured resin acrylic. After casting, the posts were cemented with zinc phosphate cement. The samples were randomly distributed into 3 groups (n=8): G1: no ultrasonic vibration (control); G2: tip of the ultrasonic device positioned perpendicularly to core surface and close to the incisal edge; and G3: tip of the ultrasonic device positioned perpendicularly to core surface at cervical region, close to the line of cementation. An Enac OE-5 ultrasound unit with an ST-09 tip was used. All samples were submitted to the tensile test using an universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 1 mm/min. Data were subjected to one-way ANOVA and Tukey's post-hoc tests (α=0.05). Mean values of the load to dislodge the posts (MPa) were: G1 = 4.6 (± 1.4) A; G2 = 2.8 (± 0.9) B, and G3= 0.9 (± 0.3) C. Therefore, the ultrasonic vibration applied with the tip of device close to the core's cervical area showed higher ability to reduce the retention of cast post to root canal.Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto2012-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-64402012000100009Brazilian Dental Journal v.23 n.1 2012reponame:Brazilian Dental Journalinstname:Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto (FUNORP)instacron:FUNORP10.1590/S0103-64402012000100009info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBraga,Neilor Mateus AntunesSilva,Juliana Monteiro daCarvalho-Júnior,Jacy Ribeiro deFerreira,Raquel ConceiçãoSaquy,Paulo CésarBrito-Júnior,Manoeleng2012-03-28T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0103-64402012000100009Revistahttps://www.scielo.br/j/bdj/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpbdj@forp.usp.br||sergio@fosjc.unesp.br1806-47600103-6440opendoar:2012-03-28T00:00Brazilian Dental Journal - Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto (FUNORP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Comparison of different ultrasonic vibration modes for post removal
title Comparison of different ultrasonic vibration modes for post removal
spellingShingle Comparison of different ultrasonic vibration modes for post removal
Braga,Neilor Mateus Antunes
cast post
post removal
ultrasound
title_short Comparison of different ultrasonic vibration modes for post removal
title_full Comparison of different ultrasonic vibration modes for post removal
title_fullStr Comparison of different ultrasonic vibration modes for post removal
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of different ultrasonic vibration modes for post removal
title_sort Comparison of different ultrasonic vibration modes for post removal
author Braga,Neilor Mateus Antunes
author_facet Braga,Neilor Mateus Antunes
Silva,Juliana Monteiro da
Carvalho-Júnior,Jacy Ribeiro de
Ferreira,Raquel Conceição
Saquy,Paulo César
Brito-Júnior,Manoel
author_role author
author2 Silva,Juliana Monteiro da
Carvalho-Júnior,Jacy Ribeiro de
Ferreira,Raquel Conceição
Saquy,Paulo César
Brito-Júnior,Manoel
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Braga,Neilor Mateus Antunes
Silva,Juliana Monteiro da
Carvalho-Júnior,Jacy Ribeiro de
Ferreira,Raquel Conceição
Saquy,Paulo César
Brito-Júnior,Manoel
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv cast post
post removal
ultrasound
topic cast post
post removal
ultrasound
description This in vitro study compared different ultrasonic vibration modes for intraradicular cast post removal. The crowns of 24 maxillary canines were removed, the roots were embedded in acrylic resin blocks, and the canals were treated endodontically. The post holes were prepared and root canal impressions were taken with self-cured resin acrylic. After casting, the posts were cemented with zinc phosphate cement. The samples were randomly distributed into 3 groups (n=8): G1: no ultrasonic vibration (control); G2: tip of the ultrasonic device positioned perpendicularly to core surface and close to the incisal edge; and G3: tip of the ultrasonic device positioned perpendicularly to core surface at cervical region, close to the line of cementation. An Enac OE-5 ultrasound unit with an ST-09 tip was used. All samples were submitted to the tensile test using an universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 1 mm/min. Data were subjected to one-way ANOVA and Tukey's post-hoc tests (α=0.05). Mean values of the load to dislodge the posts (MPa) were: G1 = 4.6 (± 1.4) A; G2 = 2.8 (± 0.9) B, and G3= 0.9 (± 0.3) C. Therefore, the ultrasonic vibration applied with the tip of device close to the core's cervical area showed higher ability to reduce the retention of cast post to root canal.
publishDate 2012
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2012-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-64402012000100009
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-64402012000100009
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/S0103-64402012000100009
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Dental Journal v.23 n.1 2012
reponame:Brazilian Dental Journal
instname:Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto (FUNORP)
instacron:FUNORP
instname_str Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto (FUNORP)
instacron_str FUNORP
institution FUNORP
reponame_str Brazilian Dental Journal
collection Brazilian Dental Journal
repository.name.fl_str_mv Brazilian Dental Journal - Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto (FUNORP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv bdj@forp.usp.br||sergio@fosjc.unesp.br
_version_ 1754204092129869824