Adhesion of Epiphany and AH Plus sealers to human root dentin treated with different solutions
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2008 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Brazilian Dental Journal |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-64402008000100008 |
Resumo: | This study evaluated comparatively the adhesion of Epiphany and AH Plus endodontic sealers to human root dentin treated with 1% NaOCl and 1% NaOCl+17% EDTA, using the push-out test. Sixty root cylinders obtained from maxillary canines had the canals prepared and were randomly assigned to 3 groups (n=20), according to root dentin treatment: GI - distilled water (control), GII - 1% NaOCl and GIII - 1% NaOCl+17% EDTA. Each group was divided into 2 subgroups (n=10) filled with either Epiphany or AH Plus. Bond strength push-out test data (kN) were obtained and analyzed statistically by ANOVA and Tukey's post-hoc test. There was statistically significant difference between sealers (AH Plus: 0.78 ± 0.13; Epiphany: 0.61 ± 0.19; p<0.01) and among root dentin treatments (distilled water: 0.58 ± 0.19; 1% NaOCl: 0.71 ± 0.12; 1% NaOCl+17% EDTA: 0.80 ± 0.17; p<0.05). In conclusion, AH Plus sealer presented greater adhesion to dentin than Epiphany, regardless of the treatment of root canal walls. |
id |
FUNORP-1_0475ea97d71454f336b1878c588eda2e |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S0103-64402008000100008 |
network_acronym_str |
FUNORP-1 |
network_name_str |
Brazilian Dental Journal |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Adhesion of Epiphany and AH Plus sealers to human root dentin treated with different solutionsroot canal sealeradhesionNaOClEDTApush-out testThis study evaluated comparatively the adhesion of Epiphany and AH Plus endodontic sealers to human root dentin treated with 1% NaOCl and 1% NaOCl+17% EDTA, using the push-out test. Sixty root cylinders obtained from maxillary canines had the canals prepared and were randomly assigned to 3 groups (n=20), according to root dentin treatment: GI - distilled water (control), GII - 1% NaOCl and GIII - 1% NaOCl+17% EDTA. Each group was divided into 2 subgroups (n=10) filled with either Epiphany or AH Plus. Bond strength push-out test data (kN) were obtained and analyzed statistically by ANOVA and Tukey's post-hoc test. There was statistically significant difference between sealers (AH Plus: 0.78 ± 0.13; Epiphany: 0.61 ± 0.19; p<0.01) and among root dentin treatments (distilled water: 0.58 ± 0.19; 1% NaOCl: 0.71 ± 0.12; 1% NaOCl+17% EDTA: 0.80 ± 0.17; p<0.05). In conclusion, AH Plus sealer presented greater adhesion to dentin than Epiphany, regardless of the treatment of root canal walls.Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto2008-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-64402008000100008Brazilian Dental Journal v.19 n.1 2008reponame:Brazilian Dental Journalinstname:Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto (FUNORP)instacron:FUNORP10.1590/S0103-64402008000100008info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessNunes,Vinicius HumbertoSilva,Ricardo GaribaAlfredo,EdsonSousa-Neto,Manoel D.Silva-Sousa,Yara T. C.eng2008-04-22T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0103-64402008000100008Revistahttps://www.scielo.br/j/bdj/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpbdj@forp.usp.br||sergio@fosjc.unesp.br1806-47600103-6440opendoar:2008-04-22T00:00Brazilian Dental Journal - Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto (FUNORP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Adhesion of Epiphany and AH Plus sealers to human root dentin treated with different solutions |
title |
Adhesion of Epiphany and AH Plus sealers to human root dentin treated with different solutions |
spellingShingle |
Adhesion of Epiphany and AH Plus sealers to human root dentin treated with different solutions Nunes,Vinicius Humberto root canal sealer adhesion NaOCl EDTA push-out test |
title_short |
Adhesion of Epiphany and AH Plus sealers to human root dentin treated with different solutions |
title_full |
Adhesion of Epiphany and AH Plus sealers to human root dentin treated with different solutions |
title_fullStr |
Adhesion of Epiphany and AH Plus sealers to human root dentin treated with different solutions |
title_full_unstemmed |
Adhesion of Epiphany and AH Plus sealers to human root dentin treated with different solutions |
title_sort |
Adhesion of Epiphany and AH Plus sealers to human root dentin treated with different solutions |
author |
Nunes,Vinicius Humberto |
author_facet |
Nunes,Vinicius Humberto Silva,Ricardo Gariba Alfredo,Edson Sousa-Neto,Manoel D. Silva-Sousa,Yara T. C. |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Silva,Ricardo Gariba Alfredo,Edson Sousa-Neto,Manoel D. Silva-Sousa,Yara T. C. |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Nunes,Vinicius Humberto Silva,Ricardo Gariba Alfredo,Edson Sousa-Neto,Manoel D. Silva-Sousa,Yara T. C. |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
root canal sealer adhesion NaOCl EDTA push-out test |
topic |
root canal sealer adhesion NaOCl EDTA push-out test |
description |
This study evaluated comparatively the adhesion of Epiphany and AH Plus endodontic sealers to human root dentin treated with 1% NaOCl and 1% NaOCl+17% EDTA, using the push-out test. Sixty root cylinders obtained from maxillary canines had the canals prepared and were randomly assigned to 3 groups (n=20), according to root dentin treatment: GI - distilled water (control), GII - 1% NaOCl and GIII - 1% NaOCl+17% EDTA. Each group was divided into 2 subgroups (n=10) filled with either Epiphany or AH Plus. Bond strength push-out test data (kN) were obtained and analyzed statistically by ANOVA and Tukey's post-hoc test. There was statistically significant difference between sealers (AH Plus: 0.78 ± 0.13; Epiphany: 0.61 ± 0.19; p<0.01) and among root dentin treatments (distilled water: 0.58 ± 0.19; 1% NaOCl: 0.71 ± 0.12; 1% NaOCl+17% EDTA: 0.80 ± 0.17; p<0.05). In conclusion, AH Plus sealer presented greater adhesion to dentin than Epiphany, regardless of the treatment of root canal walls. |
publishDate |
2008 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2008-01-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-64402008000100008 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-64402008000100008 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/S0103-64402008000100008 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Dental Journal v.19 n.1 2008 reponame:Brazilian Dental Journal instname:Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto (FUNORP) instacron:FUNORP |
instname_str |
Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto (FUNORP) |
instacron_str |
FUNORP |
institution |
FUNORP |
reponame_str |
Brazilian Dental Journal |
collection |
Brazilian Dental Journal |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Dental Journal - Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto (FUNORP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
bdj@forp.usp.br||sergio@fosjc.unesp.br |
_version_ |
1754204090579025920 |