Tensile bond strength of different adhesive systems to enamel and dentin

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Souza-Zaroni,Wanessa Christine
Data de Publicação: 2007
Outros Autores: Seixas,Letícia Caliento, Ciccone-Nogueira,Juliane Cristina, Chimello,Daniela Thomazatti, Palma-Dibb,Regina Guenka
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Brazilian Dental Journal
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-64402007000200007
Resumo: The aim of this study was to assess the tensile bond strength of four adhesive systems to enamel and dentin: Clearfil Liner Bond 2V - C, Prime&Bond NT/NRC - PB, Single Bond - SB and All Bond 2 -AB. For such purpose, 40 sound human molars were selected. Crowns were bisected in a mesiodistal direction and each half was ground until flat enamel (E) or dentin (D) surfaces were obtained. A total of 80 specimens were randomly assigned to 4 groups (n=20, 10 in enamel and 10 in dentin). After surface treatment, a composite resin (Z250; 3M) cone was prepared using a split Teflon® matrix. Bond strength was tested in an universal testing machine (0.5 mm/min). Bond strength means in MPa were: C - E: 18.66 (±2.67) and D: 21.62 (±5.29); PB - E: 18.13 (±2.96) and D: 3.19 (±1.40); SB - E: 20.06 (±6.11) and D: 16.95 (±2.57); AB - E: 18.20 (±3.94) and D: 15.94 (±4.72). Statistical analysis of data by two-way ANOVA showed that C presented the best results followed by SB. In conclusion, among the tested materials, Clearfil Liner Bond 2V self-etching primer adhesive syetem had the best performance. The substrate type influenced bond strength, being higher to enamel.
id FUNORP-1_0b3277151012786fc0cd260111814cbb
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0103-64402007000200007
network_acronym_str FUNORP-1
network_name_str Brazilian Dental Journal
repository_id_str
spelling Tensile bond strength of different adhesive systems to enamel and dentinbond strengthenameldentinadhesive systemsThe aim of this study was to assess the tensile bond strength of four adhesive systems to enamel and dentin: Clearfil Liner Bond 2V - C, Prime&Bond NT/NRC - PB, Single Bond - SB and All Bond 2 -AB. For such purpose, 40 sound human molars were selected. Crowns were bisected in a mesiodistal direction and each half was ground until flat enamel (E) or dentin (D) surfaces were obtained. A total of 80 specimens were randomly assigned to 4 groups (n=20, 10 in enamel and 10 in dentin). After surface treatment, a composite resin (Z250; 3M) cone was prepared using a split Teflon® matrix. Bond strength was tested in an universal testing machine (0.5 mm/min). Bond strength means in MPa were: C - E: 18.66 (±2.67) and D: 21.62 (±5.29); PB - E: 18.13 (±2.96) and D: 3.19 (±1.40); SB - E: 20.06 (±6.11) and D: 16.95 (±2.57); AB - E: 18.20 (±3.94) and D: 15.94 (±4.72). Statistical analysis of data by two-way ANOVA showed that C presented the best results followed by SB. In conclusion, among the tested materials, Clearfil Liner Bond 2V self-etching primer adhesive syetem had the best performance. The substrate type influenced bond strength, being higher to enamel.Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto2007-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-64402007000200007Brazilian Dental Journal v.18 n.2 2007reponame:Brazilian Dental Journalinstname:Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto (FUNORP)instacron:FUNORP10.1590/S0103-64402007000200007info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSouza-Zaroni,Wanessa ChristineSeixas,Letícia CalientoCiccone-Nogueira,Juliane CristinaChimello,Daniela ThomazattiPalma-Dibb,Regina Guenkaeng2007-10-25T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0103-64402007000200007Revistahttps://www.scielo.br/j/bdj/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpbdj@forp.usp.br||sergio@fosjc.unesp.br1806-47600103-6440opendoar:2007-10-25T00:00Brazilian Dental Journal - Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto (FUNORP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Tensile bond strength of different adhesive systems to enamel and dentin
title Tensile bond strength of different adhesive systems to enamel and dentin
spellingShingle Tensile bond strength of different adhesive systems to enamel and dentin
Souza-Zaroni,Wanessa Christine
bond strength
enamel
dentin
adhesive systems
title_short Tensile bond strength of different adhesive systems to enamel and dentin
title_full Tensile bond strength of different adhesive systems to enamel and dentin
title_fullStr Tensile bond strength of different adhesive systems to enamel and dentin
title_full_unstemmed Tensile bond strength of different adhesive systems to enamel and dentin
title_sort Tensile bond strength of different adhesive systems to enamel and dentin
author Souza-Zaroni,Wanessa Christine
author_facet Souza-Zaroni,Wanessa Christine
Seixas,Letícia Caliento
Ciccone-Nogueira,Juliane Cristina
Chimello,Daniela Thomazatti
Palma-Dibb,Regina Guenka
author_role author
author2 Seixas,Letícia Caliento
Ciccone-Nogueira,Juliane Cristina
Chimello,Daniela Thomazatti
Palma-Dibb,Regina Guenka
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Souza-Zaroni,Wanessa Christine
Seixas,Letícia Caliento
Ciccone-Nogueira,Juliane Cristina
Chimello,Daniela Thomazatti
Palma-Dibb,Regina Guenka
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv bond strength
enamel
dentin
adhesive systems
topic bond strength
enamel
dentin
adhesive systems
description The aim of this study was to assess the tensile bond strength of four adhesive systems to enamel and dentin: Clearfil Liner Bond 2V - C, Prime&Bond NT/NRC - PB, Single Bond - SB and All Bond 2 -AB. For such purpose, 40 sound human molars were selected. Crowns were bisected in a mesiodistal direction and each half was ground until flat enamel (E) or dentin (D) surfaces were obtained. A total of 80 specimens were randomly assigned to 4 groups (n=20, 10 in enamel and 10 in dentin). After surface treatment, a composite resin (Z250; 3M) cone was prepared using a split Teflon® matrix. Bond strength was tested in an universal testing machine (0.5 mm/min). Bond strength means in MPa were: C - E: 18.66 (±2.67) and D: 21.62 (±5.29); PB - E: 18.13 (±2.96) and D: 3.19 (±1.40); SB - E: 20.06 (±6.11) and D: 16.95 (±2.57); AB - E: 18.20 (±3.94) and D: 15.94 (±4.72). Statistical analysis of data by two-way ANOVA showed that C presented the best results followed by SB. In conclusion, among the tested materials, Clearfil Liner Bond 2V self-etching primer adhesive syetem had the best performance. The substrate type influenced bond strength, being higher to enamel.
publishDate 2007
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2007-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-64402007000200007
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-64402007000200007
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/S0103-64402007000200007
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Dental Journal v.18 n.2 2007
reponame:Brazilian Dental Journal
instname:Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto (FUNORP)
instacron:FUNORP
instname_str Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto (FUNORP)
instacron_str FUNORP
institution FUNORP
reponame_str Brazilian Dental Journal
collection Brazilian Dental Journal
repository.name.fl_str_mv Brazilian Dental Journal - Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto (FUNORP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv bdj@forp.usp.br||sergio@fosjc.unesp.br
_version_ 1754204090504577024