Complete denture biofilm after brushing with specific denture paste, neutral soap and artificial saliva

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Paranhos,Helena de Freitas Oliveira
Data de Publicação: 2013
Outros Autores: Salles,Antônio Eduardo Sparça, Macedo,Leandro Dorigan de, Silva-Lovato,Cláudia Helena da, Pagnano,Valéria Oliveira, Watanabe,Evandro
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Brazilian Dental Journal
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-64402013000100047
Resumo: This study compared the levels of biofilm in maxillary and mandibular complete dentures and evaluated the number of colony-forming units (cfu) of yeasts, after using auxiliary brushing agents and artificial saliva. Twenty-three denture wearers with hyposalivation and xerostomia were instructed to brush the dentures 3 times a day during 3 weeks with the following products: Corega Brite denture dentifrice, neutral liquid soap, Corega Brite combined with Oral Balance (artificial saliva) or tap water. For biofilm quantification, the internal surfaces of the dentures were disclosed, photographed and measured using a software. For microbiological analysis, the biofilm was scrapped off, and the harvested material was diluted, sown in CHROMagar™ Candida and incubated at 37°C for 48 h. Data were analyzed statistically by two-way ANOVA and Tukey's test (α=0.05). Mandibular dentures presented a mean biofilm percentage (µ=26.90 ± 21.10) significantly greater than the maxillary ones (µ=18.0 ± 15.0) (p<0.05). Brushing using Corega Brite combined with Oral Balance (µ=15.87 ± 18.47) was more effective (p<0.05) than using the denture dentifrice (µ=19.47 ± 17.24), neutral soap (µ=23.90 ± 18.63) or tap water (control; µ=32.50 ± 20.68). For the microbiological analysis, the chi-square test did not indicate significant difference between the hygiene products for either type of denture. The more frequently isolated species of yeasts were C. albicans, C. tropicalis and C. glabrata. In conclusion, mandibular dentures had more biofilm formation than maxillary ones. Denture brushing with Corega Brite dentifrice combined with the use of Oral Balance was the most effective method for reduction of biofilm levels, but the use of products did not show difference in yeast cfu counts.
id FUNORP-1_0ba2c570b9df0052bfdd9ab4650fe1f7
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0103-64402013000100047
network_acronym_str FUNORP-1
network_name_str Brazilian Dental Journal
repository_id_str
spelling Complete denture biofilm after brushing with specific denture paste, neutral soap and artificial salivacomplete denturebiofilmdenture cleansersbrushingyeastsThis study compared the levels of biofilm in maxillary and mandibular complete dentures and evaluated the number of colony-forming units (cfu) of yeasts, after using auxiliary brushing agents and artificial saliva. Twenty-three denture wearers with hyposalivation and xerostomia were instructed to brush the dentures 3 times a day during 3 weeks with the following products: Corega Brite denture dentifrice, neutral liquid soap, Corega Brite combined with Oral Balance (artificial saliva) or tap water. For biofilm quantification, the internal surfaces of the dentures were disclosed, photographed and measured using a software. For microbiological analysis, the biofilm was scrapped off, and the harvested material was diluted, sown in CHROMagar™ Candida and incubated at 37°C for 48 h. Data were analyzed statistically by two-way ANOVA and Tukey's test (α=0.05). Mandibular dentures presented a mean biofilm percentage (µ=26.90 ± 21.10) significantly greater than the maxillary ones (µ=18.0 ± 15.0) (p<0.05). Brushing using Corega Brite combined with Oral Balance (µ=15.87 ± 18.47) was more effective (p<0.05) than using the denture dentifrice (µ=19.47 ± 17.24), neutral soap (µ=23.90 ± 18.63) or tap water (control; µ=32.50 ± 20.68). For the microbiological analysis, the chi-square test did not indicate significant difference between the hygiene products for either type of denture. The more frequently isolated species of yeasts were C. albicans, C. tropicalis and C. glabrata. In conclusion, mandibular dentures had more biofilm formation than maxillary ones. Denture brushing with Corega Brite dentifrice combined with the use of Oral Balance was the most effective method for reduction of biofilm levels, but the use of products did not show difference in yeast cfu counts.Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto2013-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-64402013000100047Brazilian Dental Journal v.24 n.1 2013reponame:Brazilian Dental Journalinstname:Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto (FUNORP)instacron:FUNORP10.1590/0103-6440201301946info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessParanhos,Helena de Freitas OliveiraSalles,Antônio Eduardo SparçaMacedo,Leandro Dorigan deSilva-Lovato,Cláudia Helena daPagnano,Valéria OliveiraWatanabe,Evandroeng2013-04-23T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0103-64402013000100047Revistahttps://www.scielo.br/j/bdj/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpbdj@forp.usp.br||sergio@fosjc.unesp.br1806-47600103-6440opendoar:2013-04-23T00:00Brazilian Dental Journal - Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto (FUNORP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Complete denture biofilm after brushing with specific denture paste, neutral soap and artificial saliva
title Complete denture biofilm after brushing with specific denture paste, neutral soap and artificial saliva
spellingShingle Complete denture biofilm after brushing with specific denture paste, neutral soap and artificial saliva
Paranhos,Helena de Freitas Oliveira
complete denture
biofilm
denture cleansers
brushing
yeasts
title_short Complete denture biofilm after brushing with specific denture paste, neutral soap and artificial saliva
title_full Complete denture biofilm after brushing with specific denture paste, neutral soap and artificial saliva
title_fullStr Complete denture biofilm after brushing with specific denture paste, neutral soap and artificial saliva
title_full_unstemmed Complete denture biofilm after brushing with specific denture paste, neutral soap and artificial saliva
title_sort Complete denture biofilm after brushing with specific denture paste, neutral soap and artificial saliva
author Paranhos,Helena de Freitas Oliveira
author_facet Paranhos,Helena de Freitas Oliveira
Salles,Antônio Eduardo Sparça
Macedo,Leandro Dorigan de
Silva-Lovato,Cláudia Helena da
Pagnano,Valéria Oliveira
Watanabe,Evandro
author_role author
author2 Salles,Antônio Eduardo Sparça
Macedo,Leandro Dorigan de
Silva-Lovato,Cláudia Helena da
Pagnano,Valéria Oliveira
Watanabe,Evandro
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Paranhos,Helena de Freitas Oliveira
Salles,Antônio Eduardo Sparça
Macedo,Leandro Dorigan de
Silva-Lovato,Cláudia Helena da
Pagnano,Valéria Oliveira
Watanabe,Evandro
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv complete denture
biofilm
denture cleansers
brushing
yeasts
topic complete denture
biofilm
denture cleansers
brushing
yeasts
description This study compared the levels of biofilm in maxillary and mandibular complete dentures and evaluated the number of colony-forming units (cfu) of yeasts, after using auxiliary brushing agents and artificial saliva. Twenty-three denture wearers with hyposalivation and xerostomia were instructed to brush the dentures 3 times a day during 3 weeks with the following products: Corega Brite denture dentifrice, neutral liquid soap, Corega Brite combined with Oral Balance (artificial saliva) or tap water. For biofilm quantification, the internal surfaces of the dentures were disclosed, photographed and measured using a software. For microbiological analysis, the biofilm was scrapped off, and the harvested material was diluted, sown in CHROMagar™ Candida and incubated at 37°C for 48 h. Data were analyzed statistically by two-way ANOVA and Tukey's test (α=0.05). Mandibular dentures presented a mean biofilm percentage (µ=26.90 ± 21.10) significantly greater than the maxillary ones (µ=18.0 ± 15.0) (p<0.05). Brushing using Corega Brite combined with Oral Balance (µ=15.87 ± 18.47) was more effective (p<0.05) than using the denture dentifrice (µ=19.47 ± 17.24), neutral soap (µ=23.90 ± 18.63) or tap water (control; µ=32.50 ± 20.68). For the microbiological analysis, the chi-square test did not indicate significant difference between the hygiene products for either type of denture. The more frequently isolated species of yeasts were C. albicans, C. tropicalis and C. glabrata. In conclusion, mandibular dentures had more biofilm formation than maxillary ones. Denture brushing with Corega Brite dentifrice combined with the use of Oral Balance was the most effective method for reduction of biofilm levels, but the use of products did not show difference in yeast cfu counts.
publishDate 2013
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2013-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-64402013000100047
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-64402013000100047
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/0103-6440201301946
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Dental Journal v.24 n.1 2013
reponame:Brazilian Dental Journal
instname:Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto (FUNORP)
instacron:FUNORP
instname_str Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto (FUNORP)
instacron_str FUNORP
institution FUNORP
reponame_str Brazilian Dental Journal
collection Brazilian Dental Journal
repository.name.fl_str_mv Brazilian Dental Journal - Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto (FUNORP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv bdj@forp.usp.br||sergio@fosjc.unesp.br
_version_ 1754204092588097536