Email Vs. Instagram Recruitment Strategies For Online Survey Research

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Moraes,Rafael R.
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Correa,Marcos B., Daneris,Ândrea, Queiroz,Ana B., Lopes,João P., Lima,Giana S., Cenci,Maximiliano S., D’Avila,Otávio P., Pannuti,Claudio M., Pereira-Cenci,Tatiana, Demarco,Flávio F.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Brazilian Dental Journal
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-64402021000100067
Resumo: Abstract In this study, we describe a method for reaching a target population (i.e., dentists practicing in Brazil) to engage in survey research using traditional e-mail invites and recruitment campaigns created on Instagram. This study addresses methodological aspects and compares respondents reached by different methods. A pre-tested questionnaire was used and participants were recruited for 10 days via a source list of email addresses and two discrete Instagram organic open campaigns. A total of 3,122 responses were collected: 509 participants were recruited by email (2.1% response rate) and 2,613 by the two Instagram campaigns (20.7% and 11.7% conversion rates), respectively. Response/min collection rates in the first 24 h ranged between 0.23 (email) and 1.09 (first campaign). In total, 98.8% of all responses were received in the first 48 h for the different recruitment strategies. There were significant differences for all demographic variables (p< 0.001) between email and Instagram respondents, except for sex (p=0.37). Instagram respondents were slightly older, had more professional experience (years in practice), and a higher graduate education level than email respondents. Moreover, most email and Instagram respondents worked in the public sector and private practice, respectively. Although both strategies could collect responses from all Brazilian regions, email responses were slightly better distributed across the five territorial areas compared to Instagram. This study provides evidence that survey recruitment of a diverse, large population sample using Instagram is feasible. However, combination of email and Instagram recruitment led to a more diverse population and improved response rates.
id FUNORP-1_0cc2b86d7940923dfd6739757789fa13
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0103-64402021000100067
network_acronym_str FUNORP-1
network_name_str Brazilian Dental Journal
repository_id_str
spelling Email Vs. Instagram Recruitment Strategies For Online Survey Researchsocial mediasurveys and questionnairesresponse collectiondemographyAbstract In this study, we describe a method for reaching a target population (i.e., dentists practicing in Brazil) to engage in survey research using traditional e-mail invites and recruitment campaigns created on Instagram. This study addresses methodological aspects and compares respondents reached by different methods. A pre-tested questionnaire was used and participants were recruited for 10 days via a source list of email addresses and two discrete Instagram organic open campaigns. A total of 3,122 responses were collected: 509 participants were recruited by email (2.1% response rate) and 2,613 by the two Instagram campaigns (20.7% and 11.7% conversion rates), respectively. Response/min collection rates in the first 24 h ranged between 0.23 (email) and 1.09 (first campaign). In total, 98.8% of all responses were received in the first 48 h for the different recruitment strategies. There were significant differences for all demographic variables (p< 0.001) between email and Instagram respondents, except for sex (p=0.37). Instagram respondents were slightly older, had more professional experience (years in practice), and a higher graduate education level than email respondents. Moreover, most email and Instagram respondents worked in the public sector and private practice, respectively. Although both strategies could collect responses from all Brazilian regions, email responses were slightly better distributed across the five territorial areas compared to Instagram. This study provides evidence that survey recruitment of a diverse, large population sample using Instagram is feasible. However, combination of email and Instagram recruitment led to a more diverse population and improved response rates.Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto2021-02-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-64402021000100067Brazilian Dental Journal v.32 n.1 2021reponame:Brazilian Dental Journalinstname:Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto (FUNORP)instacron:FUNORP10.1590/0103-6440202104291info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMoraes,Rafael R.Correa,Marcos B.Daneris,ÂndreaQueiroz,Ana B.Lopes,João P.Lima,Giana S.Cenci,Maximiliano S.D’Avila,Otávio P.Pannuti,Claudio M.Pereira-Cenci,TatianaDemarco,Flávio F.eng2021-03-30T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0103-64402021000100067Revistahttps://www.scielo.br/j/bdj/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpbdj@forp.usp.br||sergio@fosjc.unesp.br1806-47600103-6440opendoar:2021-03-30T00:00Brazilian Dental Journal - Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto (FUNORP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Email Vs. Instagram Recruitment Strategies For Online Survey Research
title Email Vs. Instagram Recruitment Strategies For Online Survey Research
spellingShingle Email Vs. Instagram Recruitment Strategies For Online Survey Research
Moraes,Rafael R.
social media
surveys and questionnaires
response collection
demography
title_short Email Vs. Instagram Recruitment Strategies For Online Survey Research
title_full Email Vs. Instagram Recruitment Strategies For Online Survey Research
title_fullStr Email Vs. Instagram Recruitment Strategies For Online Survey Research
title_full_unstemmed Email Vs. Instagram Recruitment Strategies For Online Survey Research
title_sort Email Vs. Instagram Recruitment Strategies For Online Survey Research
author Moraes,Rafael R.
author_facet Moraes,Rafael R.
Correa,Marcos B.
Daneris,Ândrea
Queiroz,Ana B.
Lopes,João P.
Lima,Giana S.
Cenci,Maximiliano S.
D’Avila,Otávio P.
Pannuti,Claudio M.
Pereira-Cenci,Tatiana
Demarco,Flávio F.
author_role author
author2 Correa,Marcos B.
Daneris,Ândrea
Queiroz,Ana B.
Lopes,João P.
Lima,Giana S.
Cenci,Maximiliano S.
D’Avila,Otávio P.
Pannuti,Claudio M.
Pereira-Cenci,Tatiana
Demarco,Flávio F.
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Moraes,Rafael R.
Correa,Marcos B.
Daneris,Ândrea
Queiroz,Ana B.
Lopes,João P.
Lima,Giana S.
Cenci,Maximiliano S.
D’Avila,Otávio P.
Pannuti,Claudio M.
Pereira-Cenci,Tatiana
Demarco,Flávio F.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv social media
surveys and questionnaires
response collection
demography
topic social media
surveys and questionnaires
response collection
demography
description Abstract In this study, we describe a method for reaching a target population (i.e., dentists practicing in Brazil) to engage in survey research using traditional e-mail invites and recruitment campaigns created on Instagram. This study addresses methodological aspects and compares respondents reached by different methods. A pre-tested questionnaire was used and participants were recruited for 10 days via a source list of email addresses and two discrete Instagram organic open campaigns. A total of 3,122 responses were collected: 509 participants were recruited by email (2.1% response rate) and 2,613 by the two Instagram campaigns (20.7% and 11.7% conversion rates), respectively. Response/min collection rates in the first 24 h ranged between 0.23 (email) and 1.09 (first campaign). In total, 98.8% of all responses were received in the first 48 h for the different recruitment strategies. There were significant differences for all demographic variables (p< 0.001) between email and Instagram respondents, except for sex (p=0.37). Instagram respondents were slightly older, had more professional experience (years in practice), and a higher graduate education level than email respondents. Moreover, most email and Instagram respondents worked in the public sector and private practice, respectively. Although both strategies could collect responses from all Brazilian regions, email responses were slightly better distributed across the five territorial areas compared to Instagram. This study provides evidence that survey recruitment of a diverse, large population sample using Instagram is feasible. However, combination of email and Instagram recruitment led to a more diverse population and improved response rates.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-02-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-64402021000100067
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-64402021000100067
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/0103-6440202104291
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Dental Journal v.32 n.1 2021
reponame:Brazilian Dental Journal
instname:Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto (FUNORP)
instacron:FUNORP
instname_str Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto (FUNORP)
instacron_str FUNORP
institution FUNORP
reponame_str Brazilian Dental Journal
collection Brazilian Dental Journal
repository.name.fl_str_mv Brazilian Dental Journal - Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto (FUNORP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv bdj@forp.usp.br||sergio@fosjc.unesp.br
_version_ 1754204096207781888