Tensile Strength of Glass Fiber Posts Submitted to Different Surface Treatments
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2013 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Brazilian Dental Journal |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-64402013000600626 |
Resumo: | The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the tensile strength of glass fiber posts submitted to different surface treatments. Forty-eight maxillary canines had their crowns sectioned and root canals endodontically treated. The roots were embedded in acrylic resin and distributed into 3 groups according to the surface treatment: Group I: the posts were treated with silane agent for 30 s and adhesive; Group II: the posts were cleaned with alcohol before treatment with silane agent and adhesive; Group III: the posts were submitted to conditioning with 37% phosphoric acid for 30 s before treatment with silane agent and adhesive. Each group was divided into 2 subgroups for adhesive polymerization or not before insertion into the canal: A - adhesive was not light cured and B - adhesive was light cured. All posts were cemented with Panavia F and the samples were subjected to tensile strength test in a universal testing machine at crosshead speed of 1 mm/min. Data were submitted to one-way ANOVA and Tukey's test at 5% significance level. There was statistically significant difference (p<0.01) only between group GIII-B and groups GI-A and GI-B. No significant difference was found among the other groups (p>0.05). It was concluded that the products used for cleaning the posts influenced the retention regardless of adhesive light curing. |
id |
FUNORP-1_4845ee4b43815f31548864c8efd889c3 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S0103-64402013000600626 |
network_acronym_str |
FUNORP-1 |
network_name_str |
Brazilian Dental Journal |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Tensile Strength of Glass Fiber Posts Submitted to Different Surface Treatmentsglass fiber postssurface treatmentadhesiontensile strengthThe aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the tensile strength of glass fiber posts submitted to different surface treatments. Forty-eight maxillary canines had their crowns sectioned and root canals endodontically treated. The roots were embedded in acrylic resin and distributed into 3 groups according to the surface treatment: Group I: the posts were treated with silane agent for 30 s and adhesive; Group II: the posts were cleaned with alcohol before treatment with silane agent and adhesive; Group III: the posts were submitted to conditioning with 37% phosphoric acid for 30 s before treatment with silane agent and adhesive. Each group was divided into 2 subgroups for adhesive polymerization or not before insertion into the canal: A - adhesive was not light cured and B - adhesive was light cured. All posts were cemented with Panavia F and the samples were subjected to tensile strength test in a universal testing machine at crosshead speed of 1 mm/min. Data were submitted to one-way ANOVA and Tukey's test at 5% significance level. There was statistically significant difference (p<0.01) only between group GIII-B and groups GI-A and GI-B. No significant difference was found among the other groups (p>0.05). It was concluded that the products used for cleaning the posts influenced the retention regardless of adhesive light curing.Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto2013-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-64402013000600626Brazilian Dental Journal v.24 n.6 2013reponame:Brazilian Dental Journalinstname:Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto (FUNORP)instacron:FUNORP10.1590/0103-6440201302365info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessFaria,Maria Isabel A.Gomes,Erica AlvesMessias,Danielle CristineSilva Filho,Joao ManoelSouza Filho,Celso BernardoPaulino,Silvana Mariaeng2014-01-14T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0103-64402013000600626Revistahttps://www.scielo.br/j/bdj/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpbdj@forp.usp.br||sergio@fosjc.unesp.br1806-47600103-6440opendoar:2014-01-14T00:00Brazilian Dental Journal - Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto (FUNORP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Tensile Strength of Glass Fiber Posts Submitted to Different Surface Treatments |
title |
Tensile Strength of Glass Fiber Posts Submitted to Different Surface Treatments |
spellingShingle |
Tensile Strength of Glass Fiber Posts Submitted to Different Surface Treatments Faria,Maria Isabel A. glass fiber posts surface treatment adhesion tensile strength |
title_short |
Tensile Strength of Glass Fiber Posts Submitted to Different Surface Treatments |
title_full |
Tensile Strength of Glass Fiber Posts Submitted to Different Surface Treatments |
title_fullStr |
Tensile Strength of Glass Fiber Posts Submitted to Different Surface Treatments |
title_full_unstemmed |
Tensile Strength of Glass Fiber Posts Submitted to Different Surface Treatments |
title_sort |
Tensile Strength of Glass Fiber Posts Submitted to Different Surface Treatments |
author |
Faria,Maria Isabel A. |
author_facet |
Faria,Maria Isabel A. Gomes,Erica Alves Messias,Danielle Cristine Silva Filho,Joao Manoel Souza Filho,Celso Bernardo Paulino,Silvana Maria |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Gomes,Erica Alves Messias,Danielle Cristine Silva Filho,Joao Manoel Souza Filho,Celso Bernardo Paulino,Silvana Maria |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Faria,Maria Isabel A. Gomes,Erica Alves Messias,Danielle Cristine Silva Filho,Joao Manoel Souza Filho,Celso Bernardo Paulino,Silvana Maria |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
glass fiber posts surface treatment adhesion tensile strength |
topic |
glass fiber posts surface treatment adhesion tensile strength |
description |
The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the tensile strength of glass fiber posts submitted to different surface treatments. Forty-eight maxillary canines had their crowns sectioned and root canals endodontically treated. The roots were embedded in acrylic resin and distributed into 3 groups according to the surface treatment: Group I: the posts were treated with silane agent for 30 s and adhesive; Group II: the posts were cleaned with alcohol before treatment with silane agent and adhesive; Group III: the posts were submitted to conditioning with 37% phosphoric acid for 30 s before treatment with silane agent and adhesive. Each group was divided into 2 subgroups for adhesive polymerization or not before insertion into the canal: A - adhesive was not light cured and B - adhesive was light cured. All posts were cemented with Panavia F and the samples were subjected to tensile strength test in a universal testing machine at crosshead speed of 1 mm/min. Data were submitted to one-way ANOVA and Tukey's test at 5% significance level. There was statistically significant difference (p<0.01) only between group GIII-B and groups GI-A and GI-B. No significant difference was found among the other groups (p>0.05). It was concluded that the products used for cleaning the posts influenced the retention regardless of adhesive light curing. |
publishDate |
2013 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2013-12-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-64402013000600626 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-64402013000600626 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/0103-6440201302365 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Dental Journal v.24 n.6 2013 reponame:Brazilian Dental Journal instname:Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto (FUNORP) instacron:FUNORP |
instname_str |
Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto (FUNORP) |
instacron_str |
FUNORP |
institution |
FUNORP |
reponame_str |
Brazilian Dental Journal |
collection |
Brazilian Dental Journal |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Dental Journal - Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto (FUNORP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
bdj@forp.usp.br||sergio@fosjc.unesp.br |
_version_ |
1754204093012770816 |