NSK reciprocating handpiece: in vitro comparative analysis of dentinal removal during root canal preparation by different operators

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Wagner,Márcia Helena
Data de Publicação: 2006
Outros Autores: Barletta,Fernando Branco, Reis,Magda de Souza, Mello,Luciano Loureiro, Ferreira,Ronise, Fernandes,Antônio Luiz Rocha
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Brazilian Dental Journal
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-64402006000100003
Resumo: The purpose of this study was to assess dentin removal during root canal preparation by different operators using a NSK reciprocating handpiece. Eighty-four human single-rooted mandibular premolars were hand instrumented using Triple-Flex stainless-steel files (Kerr) up to #30, weighed in analytical balance and randomly assigned to 4 groups (n=21). All specimens were mechanically prepared at the working length with #35 to #45 Triple-Flex files (Kerr) coupled to a NSK (TEP-E10R, Nakanishi Inc.) reciprocating handpiece powered by an electric motor (Endo Plus; VK Driller). Groups 1 to 4 were prepared by a professor of Endodontics, an endodontist, a third-year dental student and a general dentist, respectively. Teeth were reweighed after root canal preparation. The difference between weights was calculated and the means of dentin removal in each group were analyzed statistically by ANOVA and Tukey's test at 5 % significance level. The greatest amount of dentin removal was found in group 4, followed by groups 2, 3 and 1. Group 4 differed statistically from the other groups regarding dentin removal means [p<0.001 (group 1); p=0.005 (group 2); and p=0.001 (group3)]. No statistically significant difference was found between groups 1 and 2 (p=0.608), 1 and 3 (p=0.914) and 2 and 3 (p=0.938). In conclusion, although the group prepared by a general dentist differed statistically from the other groups in terms of amount of dentin removal, this difference was clinically irrelevant. The NSK reciprocating handpiece powered by an electric engine was proved an effective auxiliary tool in root canal preparation, regardless of the operator's skills.
id FUNORP-1_4f305f932d2b6a3e322b973fee389977
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0103-64402006000100003
network_acronym_str FUNORP-1
network_name_str Brazilian Dental Journal
repository_id_str
spelling NSK reciprocating handpiece: in vitro comparative analysis of dentinal removal during root canal preparation by different operatorsroot canal preparationrotary instrumentationreciprocating handpieceThe purpose of this study was to assess dentin removal during root canal preparation by different operators using a NSK reciprocating handpiece. Eighty-four human single-rooted mandibular premolars were hand instrumented using Triple-Flex stainless-steel files (Kerr) up to #30, weighed in analytical balance and randomly assigned to 4 groups (n=21). All specimens were mechanically prepared at the working length with #35 to #45 Triple-Flex files (Kerr) coupled to a NSK (TEP-E10R, Nakanishi Inc.) reciprocating handpiece powered by an electric motor (Endo Plus; VK Driller). Groups 1 to 4 were prepared by a professor of Endodontics, an endodontist, a third-year dental student and a general dentist, respectively. Teeth were reweighed after root canal preparation. The difference between weights was calculated and the means of dentin removal in each group were analyzed statistically by ANOVA and Tukey's test at 5 % significance level. The greatest amount of dentin removal was found in group 4, followed by groups 2, 3 and 1. Group 4 differed statistically from the other groups regarding dentin removal means [p<0.001 (group 1); p=0.005 (group 2); and p=0.001 (group3)]. No statistically significant difference was found between groups 1 and 2 (p=0.608), 1 and 3 (p=0.914) and 2 and 3 (p=0.938). In conclusion, although the group prepared by a general dentist differed statistically from the other groups in terms of amount of dentin removal, this difference was clinically irrelevant. The NSK reciprocating handpiece powered by an electric engine was proved an effective auxiliary tool in root canal preparation, regardless of the operator's skills.Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto2006-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-64402006000100003Brazilian Dental Journal v.17 n.1 2006reponame:Brazilian Dental Journalinstname:Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto (FUNORP)instacron:FUNORP10.1590/S0103-64402006000100003info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessWagner,Márcia HelenaBarletta,Fernando BrancoReis,Magda de SouzaMello,Luciano LoureiroFerreira,RoniseFernandes,Antônio Luiz Rochaeng2006-05-02T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0103-64402006000100003Revistahttps://www.scielo.br/j/bdj/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpbdj@forp.usp.br||sergio@fosjc.unesp.br1806-47600103-6440opendoar:2006-05-02T00:00Brazilian Dental Journal - Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto (FUNORP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv NSK reciprocating handpiece: in vitro comparative analysis of dentinal removal during root canal preparation by different operators
title NSK reciprocating handpiece: in vitro comparative analysis of dentinal removal during root canal preparation by different operators
spellingShingle NSK reciprocating handpiece: in vitro comparative analysis of dentinal removal during root canal preparation by different operators
Wagner,Márcia Helena
root canal preparation
rotary instrumentation
reciprocating handpiece
title_short NSK reciprocating handpiece: in vitro comparative analysis of dentinal removal during root canal preparation by different operators
title_full NSK reciprocating handpiece: in vitro comparative analysis of dentinal removal during root canal preparation by different operators
title_fullStr NSK reciprocating handpiece: in vitro comparative analysis of dentinal removal during root canal preparation by different operators
title_full_unstemmed NSK reciprocating handpiece: in vitro comparative analysis of dentinal removal during root canal preparation by different operators
title_sort NSK reciprocating handpiece: in vitro comparative analysis of dentinal removal during root canal preparation by different operators
author Wagner,Márcia Helena
author_facet Wagner,Márcia Helena
Barletta,Fernando Branco
Reis,Magda de Souza
Mello,Luciano Loureiro
Ferreira,Ronise
Fernandes,Antônio Luiz Rocha
author_role author
author2 Barletta,Fernando Branco
Reis,Magda de Souza
Mello,Luciano Loureiro
Ferreira,Ronise
Fernandes,Antônio Luiz Rocha
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Wagner,Márcia Helena
Barletta,Fernando Branco
Reis,Magda de Souza
Mello,Luciano Loureiro
Ferreira,Ronise
Fernandes,Antônio Luiz Rocha
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv root canal preparation
rotary instrumentation
reciprocating handpiece
topic root canal preparation
rotary instrumentation
reciprocating handpiece
description The purpose of this study was to assess dentin removal during root canal preparation by different operators using a NSK reciprocating handpiece. Eighty-four human single-rooted mandibular premolars were hand instrumented using Triple-Flex stainless-steel files (Kerr) up to #30, weighed in analytical balance and randomly assigned to 4 groups (n=21). All specimens were mechanically prepared at the working length with #35 to #45 Triple-Flex files (Kerr) coupled to a NSK (TEP-E10R, Nakanishi Inc.) reciprocating handpiece powered by an electric motor (Endo Plus; VK Driller). Groups 1 to 4 were prepared by a professor of Endodontics, an endodontist, a third-year dental student and a general dentist, respectively. Teeth were reweighed after root canal preparation. The difference between weights was calculated and the means of dentin removal in each group were analyzed statistically by ANOVA and Tukey's test at 5 % significance level. The greatest amount of dentin removal was found in group 4, followed by groups 2, 3 and 1. Group 4 differed statistically from the other groups regarding dentin removal means [p<0.001 (group 1); p=0.005 (group 2); and p=0.001 (group3)]. No statistically significant difference was found between groups 1 and 2 (p=0.608), 1 and 3 (p=0.914) and 2 and 3 (p=0.938). In conclusion, although the group prepared by a general dentist differed statistically from the other groups in terms of amount of dentin removal, this difference was clinically irrelevant. The NSK reciprocating handpiece powered by an electric engine was proved an effective auxiliary tool in root canal preparation, regardless of the operator's skills.
publishDate 2006
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2006-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-64402006000100003
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-64402006000100003
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/S0103-64402006000100003
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Dental Journal v.17 n.1 2006
reponame:Brazilian Dental Journal
instname:Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto (FUNORP)
instacron:FUNORP
instname_str Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto (FUNORP)
instacron_str FUNORP
institution FUNORP
reponame_str Brazilian Dental Journal
collection Brazilian Dental Journal
repository.name.fl_str_mv Brazilian Dental Journal - Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto (FUNORP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv bdj@forp.usp.br||sergio@fosjc.unesp.br
_version_ 1754204090113458176