A Critical Review of the Differential Diagnosis of Root Fracture Line in CBCT scans
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Brazilian Dental Journal |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-64402021000500114 |
Resumo: | Abstract The objective of this critical review of literature is to discuss relevant clinical factors associated with root fractures (RF) visualized by using a new CBCT software. RF constitutes a common occurrence and a challenge in clinical practice, in which the diagnosis becomes essential for the definition of rapid and precise decision-making. The characterization of RF may involve different aspects, such as orientation of the fracture line (horizontal, vertical, oblique), root position of the fracture (cervical, middle, apical third), fracture's coronal-radicular position (coronary, coronal-radicular, radicular), continuity of the fracture (crack, incomplete fracture, complete), bone extension of the fracture (supraosseous, bone level, infraosseous fracture). Imaging examinations have been routinely used to aid in the RF diagnosis. Even with high-resolution cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans, many doubts often remain about the diagnostic outcome. Many interferences in the analysis of image quality to determine the diagnosis are identified, such as the sharpness, the noise, light and dark artifacts, among others. The professional's knowledge is essential for identifying the different patterns of fracture lines and their repercussions on adjacent bone tissues, as well as for the analysis of artifacts that may hide or show similarities to fracture lines. Fractures lines and root fractures that may be associated with phantom conditions that mimic fractures should be carefully analyzed. CBCT is the exam indicated to identify a root fracture. It is also added to the success of the diagnosis that the professional has scientific knowledge, training and mastery of advanced CBCT software. |
id |
FUNORP-1_55bbcdf77e592d5b9498892a88eae80d |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S0103-64402021000500114 |
network_acronym_str |
FUNORP-1 |
network_name_str |
Brazilian Dental Journal |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
A Critical Review of the Differential Diagnosis of Root Fracture Line in CBCT scansCone-beam computed tomographydiagnosisroot canal treatmentroot fracturesoftwareAbstract The objective of this critical review of literature is to discuss relevant clinical factors associated with root fractures (RF) visualized by using a new CBCT software. RF constitutes a common occurrence and a challenge in clinical practice, in which the diagnosis becomes essential for the definition of rapid and precise decision-making. The characterization of RF may involve different aspects, such as orientation of the fracture line (horizontal, vertical, oblique), root position of the fracture (cervical, middle, apical third), fracture's coronal-radicular position (coronary, coronal-radicular, radicular), continuity of the fracture (crack, incomplete fracture, complete), bone extension of the fracture (supraosseous, bone level, infraosseous fracture). Imaging examinations have been routinely used to aid in the RF diagnosis. Even with high-resolution cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans, many doubts often remain about the diagnostic outcome. Many interferences in the analysis of image quality to determine the diagnosis are identified, such as the sharpness, the noise, light and dark artifacts, among others. The professional's knowledge is essential for identifying the different patterns of fracture lines and their repercussions on adjacent bone tissues, as well as for the analysis of artifacts that may hide or show similarities to fracture lines. Fractures lines and root fractures that may be associated with phantom conditions that mimic fractures should be carefully analyzed. CBCT is the exam indicated to identify a root fracture. It is also added to the success of the diagnosis that the professional has scientific knowledge, training and mastery of advanced CBCT software.Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto2021-09-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-64402021000500114Brazilian Dental Journal v.32 n.5 2021reponame:Brazilian Dental Journalinstname:Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto (FUNORP)instacron:FUNORP10.1590/0103-6440202104742info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBueno,Mike R.Azevedo,Bruno CorreaEstrela,Carloseng2021-12-01T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0103-64402021000500114Revistahttps://www.scielo.br/j/bdj/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpbdj@forp.usp.br||sergio@fosjc.unesp.br1806-47600103-6440opendoar:2021-12-01T00:00Brazilian Dental Journal - Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto (FUNORP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
A Critical Review of the Differential Diagnosis of Root Fracture Line in CBCT scans |
title |
A Critical Review of the Differential Diagnosis of Root Fracture Line in CBCT scans |
spellingShingle |
A Critical Review of the Differential Diagnosis of Root Fracture Line in CBCT scans Bueno,Mike R. Cone-beam computed tomography diagnosis root canal treatment root fracture software |
title_short |
A Critical Review of the Differential Diagnosis of Root Fracture Line in CBCT scans |
title_full |
A Critical Review of the Differential Diagnosis of Root Fracture Line in CBCT scans |
title_fullStr |
A Critical Review of the Differential Diagnosis of Root Fracture Line in CBCT scans |
title_full_unstemmed |
A Critical Review of the Differential Diagnosis of Root Fracture Line in CBCT scans |
title_sort |
A Critical Review of the Differential Diagnosis of Root Fracture Line in CBCT scans |
author |
Bueno,Mike R. |
author_facet |
Bueno,Mike R. Azevedo,Bruno Correa Estrela,Carlos |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Azevedo,Bruno Correa Estrela,Carlos |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Bueno,Mike R. Azevedo,Bruno Correa Estrela,Carlos |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Cone-beam computed tomography diagnosis root canal treatment root fracture software |
topic |
Cone-beam computed tomography diagnosis root canal treatment root fracture software |
description |
Abstract The objective of this critical review of literature is to discuss relevant clinical factors associated with root fractures (RF) visualized by using a new CBCT software. RF constitutes a common occurrence and a challenge in clinical practice, in which the diagnosis becomes essential for the definition of rapid and precise decision-making. The characterization of RF may involve different aspects, such as orientation of the fracture line (horizontal, vertical, oblique), root position of the fracture (cervical, middle, apical third), fracture's coronal-radicular position (coronary, coronal-radicular, radicular), continuity of the fracture (crack, incomplete fracture, complete), bone extension of the fracture (supraosseous, bone level, infraosseous fracture). Imaging examinations have been routinely used to aid in the RF diagnosis. Even with high-resolution cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans, many doubts often remain about the diagnostic outcome. Many interferences in the analysis of image quality to determine the diagnosis are identified, such as the sharpness, the noise, light and dark artifacts, among others. The professional's knowledge is essential for identifying the different patterns of fracture lines and their repercussions on adjacent bone tissues, as well as for the analysis of artifacts that may hide or show similarities to fracture lines. Fractures lines and root fractures that may be associated with phantom conditions that mimic fractures should be carefully analyzed. CBCT is the exam indicated to identify a root fracture. It is also added to the success of the diagnosis that the professional has scientific knowledge, training and mastery of advanced CBCT software. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-09-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-64402021000500114 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-64402021000500114 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/0103-6440202104742 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Dental Journal v.32 n.5 2021 reponame:Brazilian Dental Journal instname:Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto (FUNORP) instacron:FUNORP |
instname_str |
Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto (FUNORP) |
instacron_str |
FUNORP |
institution |
FUNORP |
reponame_str |
Brazilian Dental Journal |
collection |
Brazilian Dental Journal |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Dental Journal - Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto (FUNORP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
bdj@forp.usp.br||sergio@fosjc.unesp.br |
_version_ |
1754204096563249152 |