Do Clinical Experience Time and Postgraduate Training Influence the Choice of Materials for Posterior Restorations? Results of a Survey with Brazilian General Dentists
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2013 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Brazilian Dental Journal |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-64402013000600642 |
Resumo: | The aims of this study were to evaluate the materials available for posterior restorations and to assess whether clinical experience time and post-graduate training influence dentists' choices. A cross-sectional study was conducted using a questionnaire with closed questions applied to dentists (n=276) of a mid-sized city of the southern Brazil. Information was collected regarding sociodemographic variables, level of specialization, time since graduation and working place. In addition, options regarding posterior restorations including the first choice of material, type of composite resin (if used) and use of rubber dam were also collected data. Data were submitted to descriptive analysis and the associations were evaluated using chi-square and Fisher's exact tests (α=0.05). The response rate was 68% (187). Direct composite resin was broadly indicated (73.2%) as the first-choice for posterior restorations. Most professionals used microhybrid composite (74.5%) and 42.6% of the participants used rubber dam for placement of posterior composite restorations. Dentists with more time of clinical practice used less composite (p=0.014). Specialists used more frequently rubber dam to restore posterior teeth than did non-specialists (p=0.006). The results of this survey revealed that direct composite was the first choice of dentists for posterior restorations; microhybrid was the preferred type of composite and the use of rubber dam for composite resin placement in posterior teeth was not frequent; time since graduation and level of specialization affected dentists' choices. |
id |
FUNORP-1_5ea1d9d38e07e7da0d76c1f138475783 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S0103-64402013000600642 |
network_acronym_str |
FUNORP-1 |
network_name_str |
Brazilian Dental Journal |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Do Clinical Experience Time and Postgraduate Training Influence the Choice of Materials for Posterior Restorations? Results of a Survey with Brazilian General Dentistscomposite resinscross-sectional studiesdentistsdental restorationpermanentThe aims of this study were to evaluate the materials available for posterior restorations and to assess whether clinical experience time and post-graduate training influence dentists' choices. A cross-sectional study was conducted using a questionnaire with closed questions applied to dentists (n=276) of a mid-sized city of the southern Brazil. Information was collected regarding sociodemographic variables, level of specialization, time since graduation and working place. In addition, options regarding posterior restorations including the first choice of material, type of composite resin (if used) and use of rubber dam were also collected data. Data were submitted to descriptive analysis and the associations were evaluated using chi-square and Fisher's exact tests (α=0.05). The response rate was 68% (187). Direct composite resin was broadly indicated (73.2%) as the first-choice for posterior restorations. Most professionals used microhybrid composite (74.5%) and 42.6% of the participants used rubber dam for placement of posterior composite restorations. Dentists with more time of clinical practice used less composite (p=0.014). Specialists used more frequently rubber dam to restore posterior teeth than did non-specialists (p=0.006). The results of this survey revealed that direct composite was the first choice of dentists for posterior restorations; microhybrid was the preferred type of composite and the use of rubber dam for composite resin placement in posterior teeth was not frequent; time since graduation and level of specialization affected dentists' choices.Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto2013-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-64402013000600642Brazilian Dental Journal v.24 n.6 2013reponame:Brazilian Dental Journalinstname:Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto (FUNORP)instacron:FUNORP10.1590/0103-6440201302361info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessNascimento,Gustavo GiacomelliCorrea,Marcos BrittoOpdam,NiekDemarco,Flavio Fernandoeng2014-01-14T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0103-64402013000600642Revistahttps://www.scielo.br/j/bdj/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpbdj@forp.usp.br||sergio@fosjc.unesp.br1806-47600103-6440opendoar:2014-01-14T00:00Brazilian Dental Journal - Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto (FUNORP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Do Clinical Experience Time and Postgraduate Training Influence the Choice of Materials for Posterior Restorations? Results of a Survey with Brazilian General Dentists |
title |
Do Clinical Experience Time and Postgraduate Training Influence the Choice of Materials for Posterior Restorations? Results of a Survey with Brazilian General Dentists |
spellingShingle |
Do Clinical Experience Time and Postgraduate Training Influence the Choice of Materials for Posterior Restorations? Results of a Survey with Brazilian General Dentists Nascimento,Gustavo Giacomelli composite resins cross-sectional studies dentists dental restoration permanent |
title_short |
Do Clinical Experience Time and Postgraduate Training Influence the Choice of Materials for Posterior Restorations? Results of a Survey with Brazilian General Dentists |
title_full |
Do Clinical Experience Time and Postgraduate Training Influence the Choice of Materials for Posterior Restorations? Results of a Survey with Brazilian General Dentists |
title_fullStr |
Do Clinical Experience Time and Postgraduate Training Influence the Choice of Materials for Posterior Restorations? Results of a Survey with Brazilian General Dentists |
title_full_unstemmed |
Do Clinical Experience Time and Postgraduate Training Influence the Choice of Materials for Posterior Restorations? Results of a Survey with Brazilian General Dentists |
title_sort |
Do Clinical Experience Time and Postgraduate Training Influence the Choice of Materials for Posterior Restorations? Results of a Survey with Brazilian General Dentists |
author |
Nascimento,Gustavo Giacomelli |
author_facet |
Nascimento,Gustavo Giacomelli Correa,Marcos Britto Opdam,Niek Demarco,Flavio Fernando |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Correa,Marcos Britto Opdam,Niek Demarco,Flavio Fernando |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Nascimento,Gustavo Giacomelli Correa,Marcos Britto Opdam,Niek Demarco,Flavio Fernando |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
composite resins cross-sectional studies dentists dental restoration permanent |
topic |
composite resins cross-sectional studies dentists dental restoration permanent |
description |
The aims of this study were to evaluate the materials available for posterior restorations and to assess whether clinical experience time and post-graduate training influence dentists' choices. A cross-sectional study was conducted using a questionnaire with closed questions applied to dentists (n=276) of a mid-sized city of the southern Brazil. Information was collected regarding sociodemographic variables, level of specialization, time since graduation and working place. In addition, options regarding posterior restorations including the first choice of material, type of composite resin (if used) and use of rubber dam were also collected data. Data were submitted to descriptive analysis and the associations were evaluated using chi-square and Fisher's exact tests (α=0.05). The response rate was 68% (187). Direct composite resin was broadly indicated (73.2%) as the first-choice for posterior restorations. Most professionals used microhybrid composite (74.5%) and 42.6% of the participants used rubber dam for placement of posterior composite restorations. Dentists with more time of clinical practice used less composite (p=0.014). Specialists used more frequently rubber dam to restore posterior teeth than did non-specialists (p=0.006). The results of this survey revealed that direct composite was the first choice of dentists for posterior restorations; microhybrid was the preferred type of composite and the use of rubber dam for composite resin placement in posterior teeth was not frequent; time since graduation and level of specialization affected dentists' choices. |
publishDate |
2013 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2013-12-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-64402013000600642 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-64402013000600642 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/0103-6440201302361 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Dental Journal v.24 n.6 2013 reponame:Brazilian Dental Journal instname:Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto (FUNORP) instacron:FUNORP |
instname_str |
Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto (FUNORP) |
instacron_str |
FUNORP |
institution |
FUNORP |
reponame_str |
Brazilian Dental Journal |
collection |
Brazilian Dental Journal |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Dental Journal - Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto (FUNORP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
bdj@forp.usp.br||sergio@fosjc.unesp.br |
_version_ |
1754204093018013696 |