Comparative study of tissue response to polyglecaprone 25, polyglactin 910 and polytetrafluorethylene suture materials in rats

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Nary Filho,Hugo
Data de Publicação: 2002
Outros Autores: Matsumoto,Mariza Akemi, Batista,Aline Carvalho, Lopes,Luís César, Sampaio Góes,Fernanda Costa Grizzo de, Consolaro,Alberto
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Brazilian Dental Journal
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-64402002000200002
Resumo: The authors evaluated the biocompatibility of three suture materials, polyglecaprone 25, polyglactin 910 and polytetrafluorethylene, implanted into subcutaneous tissue in the dorsal region of 20 Wistar albinus rats. After periods of 2, 7, 14 and 21 days, the rats were sacrificed and the specimens were processed for routine histotechnical analysis and stained with hematoxylin and eosin. The rate of fibrosis, angioblastic and fibroblastic proliferation, and also the intensity of inflammation were observed with the optic microscope. The results showed that polyglecaprone 25 suture material induced a mild inflammatory reaction, followed by polyglactin 910 and polytetrafluorethylene, respectively. Such biological behavior must be considered during the selection of the suture material to be used in oral surgery.
id FUNORP-1_6e45113451b5cf503cc7130df82cdfb4
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0103-64402002000200002
network_acronym_str FUNORP-1
network_name_str Brazilian Dental Journal
repository_id_str
spelling Comparative study of tissue response to polyglecaprone 25, polyglactin 910 and polytetrafluorethylene suture materials in ratspolyglecaprone 25polyglactin 910polytetrafluorethylenesuture materialThe authors evaluated the biocompatibility of three suture materials, polyglecaprone 25, polyglactin 910 and polytetrafluorethylene, implanted into subcutaneous tissue in the dorsal region of 20 Wistar albinus rats. After periods of 2, 7, 14 and 21 days, the rats were sacrificed and the specimens were processed for routine histotechnical analysis and stained with hematoxylin and eosin. The rate of fibrosis, angioblastic and fibroblastic proliferation, and also the intensity of inflammation were observed with the optic microscope. The results showed that polyglecaprone 25 suture material induced a mild inflammatory reaction, followed by polyglactin 910 and polytetrafluorethylene, respectively. Such biological behavior must be considered during the selection of the suture material to be used in oral surgery.Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto2002-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-64402002000200002Brazilian Dental Journal v.13 n.2 2002reponame:Brazilian Dental Journalinstname:Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto (FUNORP)instacron:FUNORP10.1590/S0103-64402002000200002info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessNary Filho,HugoMatsumoto,Mariza AkemiBatista,Aline CarvalhoLopes,Luís CésarSampaio Góes,Fernanda Costa Grizzo deConsolaro,Albertoeng2003-04-04T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0103-64402002000200002Revistahttps://www.scielo.br/j/bdj/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpbdj@forp.usp.br||sergio@fosjc.unesp.br1806-47600103-6440opendoar:2003-04-04T00:00Brazilian Dental Journal - Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto (FUNORP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Comparative study of tissue response to polyglecaprone 25, polyglactin 910 and polytetrafluorethylene suture materials in rats
title Comparative study of tissue response to polyglecaprone 25, polyglactin 910 and polytetrafluorethylene suture materials in rats
spellingShingle Comparative study of tissue response to polyglecaprone 25, polyglactin 910 and polytetrafluorethylene suture materials in rats
Nary Filho,Hugo
polyglecaprone 25
polyglactin 910
polytetrafluorethylene
suture material
title_short Comparative study of tissue response to polyglecaprone 25, polyglactin 910 and polytetrafluorethylene suture materials in rats
title_full Comparative study of tissue response to polyglecaprone 25, polyglactin 910 and polytetrafluorethylene suture materials in rats
title_fullStr Comparative study of tissue response to polyglecaprone 25, polyglactin 910 and polytetrafluorethylene suture materials in rats
title_full_unstemmed Comparative study of tissue response to polyglecaprone 25, polyglactin 910 and polytetrafluorethylene suture materials in rats
title_sort Comparative study of tissue response to polyglecaprone 25, polyglactin 910 and polytetrafluorethylene suture materials in rats
author Nary Filho,Hugo
author_facet Nary Filho,Hugo
Matsumoto,Mariza Akemi
Batista,Aline Carvalho
Lopes,Luís César
Sampaio Góes,Fernanda Costa Grizzo de
Consolaro,Alberto
author_role author
author2 Matsumoto,Mariza Akemi
Batista,Aline Carvalho
Lopes,Luís César
Sampaio Góes,Fernanda Costa Grizzo de
Consolaro,Alberto
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Nary Filho,Hugo
Matsumoto,Mariza Akemi
Batista,Aline Carvalho
Lopes,Luís César
Sampaio Góes,Fernanda Costa Grizzo de
Consolaro,Alberto
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv polyglecaprone 25
polyglactin 910
polytetrafluorethylene
suture material
topic polyglecaprone 25
polyglactin 910
polytetrafluorethylene
suture material
description The authors evaluated the biocompatibility of three suture materials, polyglecaprone 25, polyglactin 910 and polytetrafluorethylene, implanted into subcutaneous tissue in the dorsal region of 20 Wistar albinus rats. After periods of 2, 7, 14 and 21 days, the rats were sacrificed and the specimens were processed for routine histotechnical analysis and stained with hematoxylin and eosin. The rate of fibrosis, angioblastic and fibroblastic proliferation, and also the intensity of inflammation were observed with the optic microscope. The results showed that polyglecaprone 25 suture material induced a mild inflammatory reaction, followed by polyglactin 910 and polytetrafluorethylene, respectively. Such biological behavior must be considered during the selection of the suture material to be used in oral surgery.
publishDate 2002
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2002-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-64402002000200002
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-64402002000200002
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/S0103-64402002000200002
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Dental Journal v.13 n.2 2002
reponame:Brazilian Dental Journal
instname:Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto (FUNORP)
instacron:FUNORP
instname_str Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto (FUNORP)
instacron_str FUNORP
institution FUNORP
reponame_str Brazilian Dental Journal
collection Brazilian Dental Journal
repository.name.fl_str_mv Brazilian Dental Journal - Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto (FUNORP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv bdj@forp.usp.br||sergio@fosjc.unesp.br
_version_ 1754204089624821760

Registros relacionados