Periapical Repair Following Endodontic Surgery: Two- and Three-Dimensional Imaging Evaluation Methods

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Jorge,Érica Gouveia
Data de Publicação: 2015
Outros Autores: Tanomaru-Filho,Mario, Guerreiro-Tanomaru,Juliane Maria, Reis,José Maurício dos Santos Nunes, Spin-Neto,Rubens, Gonçalves,Marcelo
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Brazilian Dental Journal
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-64402015000100069
Resumo: This study quantitatively assessed the periapical bone repair following endodontic surgery, using planimetric evaluation based on two- (conventional and digital intraoral radiographic images - IRs) and three-dimensional (cone beam computed tomography - CBCT) evaluation. Eleven maxillary anterior teeth (of 11 patients) with periapical bone lesions and indication for surgical endodontic treatment were selected. IRs and CBCT images were acquired before the endodontic surgery, and 48 h, 4, and 8-months after the surgery. In each period of evaluation, the area (mm2) of the bone lesion was measured in the images, and the values for the three methods were compared. The area in the CBCT images was measured in the mesio-distal sections comprising the largest diameter of the lesion. Data were submitted to repeated measures 2-way ANOVA and t-tests with Bonferroni correction. There was significant difference between the periods of evaluation (p=0.002) regarding the assessed periapical bone lesion area. There was no statistically significant difference between the methods of evaluation (p=0.023). In the CBCT images the lesion areas were 10% larger than those observed in the conventional IRs (22.84 mm2) and 15% larger than those observed in the digital IRs (21.48 mm2). From the baseline (40.12 mm2) to 4 (20.06 mm2) and 8-months (9.40 mm2), reductions of 50 and 77% in the lesion area, respectively, were observed (p<0.0001). From 4 to 8-months, this value was 53%. Progressive bone repair could be seen from 48h to 8-months following endodontic surgery based on two- (conventional and digital IRs) and three-dimensional (CBCT) evaluation. CBCT images provided results similar to those assessed by means of IRs.
id FUNORP-1_9381f626c70ff58eeec0277f491f8292
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0103-64402015000100069
network_acronym_str FUNORP-1
network_name_str Brazilian Dental Journal
repository_id_str
spelling Periapical Repair Following Endodontic Surgery: Two- and Three-Dimensional Imaging Evaluation MethodsBone repairradiographycomputed tomographydiagnosisendodonticsThis study quantitatively assessed the periapical bone repair following endodontic surgery, using planimetric evaluation based on two- (conventional and digital intraoral radiographic images - IRs) and three-dimensional (cone beam computed tomography - CBCT) evaluation. Eleven maxillary anterior teeth (of 11 patients) with periapical bone lesions and indication for surgical endodontic treatment were selected. IRs and CBCT images were acquired before the endodontic surgery, and 48 h, 4, and 8-months after the surgery. In each period of evaluation, the area (mm2) of the bone lesion was measured in the images, and the values for the three methods were compared. The area in the CBCT images was measured in the mesio-distal sections comprising the largest diameter of the lesion. Data were submitted to repeated measures 2-way ANOVA and t-tests with Bonferroni correction. There was significant difference between the periods of evaluation (p=0.002) regarding the assessed periapical bone lesion area. There was no statistically significant difference between the methods of evaluation (p=0.023). In the CBCT images the lesion areas were 10% larger than those observed in the conventional IRs (22.84 mm2) and 15% larger than those observed in the digital IRs (21.48 mm2). From the baseline (40.12 mm2) to 4 (20.06 mm2) and 8-months (9.40 mm2), reductions of 50 and 77% in the lesion area, respectively, were observed (p<0.0001). From 4 to 8-months, this value was 53%. Progressive bone repair could be seen from 48h to 8-months following endodontic surgery based on two- (conventional and digital IRs) and three-dimensional (CBCT) evaluation. CBCT images provided results similar to those assessed by means of IRs.Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto2015-02-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-64402015000100069Brazilian Dental Journal v.26 n.1 2015reponame:Brazilian Dental Journalinstname:Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto (FUNORP)instacron:FUNORP10.1590/0103-6440201300252info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessJorge,Érica GouveiaTanomaru-Filho,MarioGuerreiro-Tanomaru,Juliane MariaReis,José Maurício dos Santos NunesSpin-Neto,RubensGonçalves,Marceloeng2015-02-06T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0103-64402015000100069Revistahttps://www.scielo.br/j/bdj/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpbdj@forp.usp.br||sergio@fosjc.unesp.br1806-47600103-6440opendoar:2015-02-06T00:00Brazilian Dental Journal - Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto (FUNORP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Periapical Repair Following Endodontic Surgery: Two- and Three-Dimensional Imaging Evaluation Methods
title Periapical Repair Following Endodontic Surgery: Two- and Three-Dimensional Imaging Evaluation Methods
spellingShingle Periapical Repair Following Endodontic Surgery: Two- and Three-Dimensional Imaging Evaluation Methods
Jorge,Érica Gouveia
Bone repair
radiography
computed tomography
diagnosis
endodontics
title_short Periapical Repair Following Endodontic Surgery: Two- and Three-Dimensional Imaging Evaluation Methods
title_full Periapical Repair Following Endodontic Surgery: Two- and Three-Dimensional Imaging Evaluation Methods
title_fullStr Periapical Repair Following Endodontic Surgery: Two- and Three-Dimensional Imaging Evaluation Methods
title_full_unstemmed Periapical Repair Following Endodontic Surgery: Two- and Three-Dimensional Imaging Evaluation Methods
title_sort Periapical Repair Following Endodontic Surgery: Two- and Three-Dimensional Imaging Evaluation Methods
author Jorge,Érica Gouveia
author_facet Jorge,Érica Gouveia
Tanomaru-Filho,Mario
Guerreiro-Tanomaru,Juliane Maria
Reis,José Maurício dos Santos Nunes
Spin-Neto,Rubens
Gonçalves,Marcelo
author_role author
author2 Tanomaru-Filho,Mario
Guerreiro-Tanomaru,Juliane Maria
Reis,José Maurício dos Santos Nunes
Spin-Neto,Rubens
Gonçalves,Marcelo
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Jorge,Érica Gouveia
Tanomaru-Filho,Mario
Guerreiro-Tanomaru,Juliane Maria
Reis,José Maurício dos Santos Nunes
Spin-Neto,Rubens
Gonçalves,Marcelo
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Bone repair
radiography
computed tomography
diagnosis
endodontics
topic Bone repair
radiography
computed tomography
diagnosis
endodontics
description This study quantitatively assessed the periapical bone repair following endodontic surgery, using planimetric evaluation based on two- (conventional and digital intraoral radiographic images - IRs) and three-dimensional (cone beam computed tomography - CBCT) evaluation. Eleven maxillary anterior teeth (of 11 patients) with periapical bone lesions and indication for surgical endodontic treatment were selected. IRs and CBCT images were acquired before the endodontic surgery, and 48 h, 4, and 8-months after the surgery. In each period of evaluation, the area (mm2) of the bone lesion was measured in the images, and the values for the three methods were compared. The area in the CBCT images was measured in the mesio-distal sections comprising the largest diameter of the lesion. Data were submitted to repeated measures 2-way ANOVA and t-tests with Bonferroni correction. There was significant difference between the periods of evaluation (p=0.002) regarding the assessed periapical bone lesion area. There was no statistically significant difference between the methods of evaluation (p=0.023). In the CBCT images the lesion areas were 10% larger than those observed in the conventional IRs (22.84 mm2) and 15% larger than those observed in the digital IRs (21.48 mm2). From the baseline (40.12 mm2) to 4 (20.06 mm2) and 8-months (9.40 mm2), reductions of 50 and 77% in the lesion area, respectively, were observed (p<0.0001). From 4 to 8-months, this value was 53%. Progressive bone repair could be seen from 48h to 8-months following endodontic surgery based on two- (conventional and digital IRs) and three-dimensional (CBCT) evaluation. CBCT images provided results similar to those assessed by means of IRs.
publishDate 2015
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2015-02-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-64402015000100069
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-64402015000100069
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/0103-6440201300252
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Dental Journal v.26 n.1 2015
reponame:Brazilian Dental Journal
instname:Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto (FUNORP)
instacron:FUNORP
instname_str Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto (FUNORP)
instacron_str FUNORP
institution FUNORP
reponame_str Brazilian Dental Journal
collection Brazilian Dental Journal
repository.name.fl_str_mv Brazilian Dental Journal - Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto (FUNORP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv bdj@forp.usp.br||sergio@fosjc.unesp.br
_version_ 1754204093487775744