Influence of etching time and bonding strategies on the microshear bond strength of self- and light-cured pit-and-fissure sealants
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2012 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Brazilian Dental Journal |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-64402012000500002 |
Resumo: | This study evaluated the impact of extended etching and bonding strategies on the microshear bond strength of three sealant materials. Two pit-and-fissure sealants [FluroShield, Dentsply (light-cured) and AlphaSeal, DFL (self-cured)] and one light-cured flowable composite resin (Permaflo, Ultradent) were evaluated according to different enamel etching times (15 s or 30 s) and bonding procedures (no adhesive application, application of primer/hydrophobic resin or hydrophobic resin only). Intact enamel blocks were obtained from bovine teeth and sealed via the tested protocols. After 24 h, the microshear bond strength test was performed in a universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min. Failure modes were classified by stereomicroscopy. Data were submitted to a three-way ANOVA and to Tukey's test (α=0.05). There was no statistically significant difference (p>0.05) among the materials. Permaflo showed higher bond strength when etched for 30 s alone. Enamel overetching decreased the bond strength of the light-cured sealant. Primer/bond previous treatment improved bond performance for AlphaSeal. In conclusion, from the tested conditions, all sealant materials presented similar bond strength values in relation to bonding protocol and etching time. The flowable composite can be used as a pit-and-fissure sealant. The use of a three-step adhesive system was essential for the self-cured sealant application. |
id |
FUNORP-1_ee4dfe8d9d1080ae19082bbdf33010d8 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S0103-64402012000500002 |
network_acronym_str |
FUNORP-1 |
network_name_str |
Brazilian Dental Journal |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Influence of etching time and bonding strategies on the microshear bond strength of self- and light-cured pit-and-fissure sealantspit-and-fissure sealantsenamelshear bond strengthThis study evaluated the impact of extended etching and bonding strategies on the microshear bond strength of three sealant materials. Two pit-and-fissure sealants [FluroShield, Dentsply (light-cured) and AlphaSeal, DFL (self-cured)] and one light-cured flowable composite resin (Permaflo, Ultradent) were evaluated according to different enamel etching times (15 s or 30 s) and bonding procedures (no adhesive application, application of primer/hydrophobic resin or hydrophobic resin only). Intact enamel blocks were obtained from bovine teeth and sealed via the tested protocols. After 24 h, the microshear bond strength test was performed in a universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min. Failure modes were classified by stereomicroscopy. Data were submitted to a three-way ANOVA and to Tukey's test (α=0.05). There was no statistically significant difference (p>0.05) among the materials. Permaflo showed higher bond strength when etched for 30 s alone. Enamel overetching decreased the bond strength of the light-cured sealant. Primer/bond previous treatment improved bond performance for AlphaSeal. In conclusion, from the tested conditions, all sealant materials presented similar bond strength values in relation to bonding protocol and etching time. The flowable composite can be used as a pit-and-fissure sealant. The use of a three-step adhesive system was essential for the self-cured sealant application.Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto2012-10-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-64402012000500002Brazilian Dental Journal v.23 n.5 2012reponame:Brazilian Dental Journalinstname:Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto (FUNORP)instacron:FUNORP10.1590/S0103-64402012000500002info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSouza-Junior,Eduardo JoséBorges,Boniek Castillo DutraMontes,Marcos Antônio Japiassú ResendeAlonso,Roberta Caroline BruschiAmbrosano,Glaucia Maria BoviSinhoreti,Mário Alexandre Coelhoeng2013-01-08T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0103-64402012000500002Revistahttps://www.scielo.br/j/bdj/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpbdj@forp.usp.br||sergio@fosjc.unesp.br1806-47600103-6440opendoar:2013-01-08T00:00Brazilian Dental Journal - Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto (FUNORP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Influence of etching time and bonding strategies on the microshear bond strength of self- and light-cured pit-and-fissure sealants |
title |
Influence of etching time and bonding strategies on the microshear bond strength of self- and light-cured pit-and-fissure sealants |
spellingShingle |
Influence of etching time and bonding strategies on the microshear bond strength of self- and light-cured pit-and-fissure sealants Souza-Junior,Eduardo José pit-and-fissure sealants enamel shear bond strength |
title_short |
Influence of etching time and bonding strategies on the microshear bond strength of self- and light-cured pit-and-fissure sealants |
title_full |
Influence of etching time and bonding strategies on the microshear bond strength of self- and light-cured pit-and-fissure sealants |
title_fullStr |
Influence of etching time and bonding strategies on the microshear bond strength of self- and light-cured pit-and-fissure sealants |
title_full_unstemmed |
Influence of etching time and bonding strategies on the microshear bond strength of self- and light-cured pit-and-fissure sealants |
title_sort |
Influence of etching time and bonding strategies on the microshear bond strength of self- and light-cured pit-and-fissure sealants |
author |
Souza-Junior,Eduardo José |
author_facet |
Souza-Junior,Eduardo José Borges,Boniek Castillo Dutra Montes,Marcos Antônio Japiassú Resende Alonso,Roberta Caroline Bruschi Ambrosano,Glaucia Maria Bovi Sinhoreti,Mário Alexandre Coelho |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Borges,Boniek Castillo Dutra Montes,Marcos Antônio Japiassú Resende Alonso,Roberta Caroline Bruschi Ambrosano,Glaucia Maria Bovi Sinhoreti,Mário Alexandre Coelho |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Souza-Junior,Eduardo José Borges,Boniek Castillo Dutra Montes,Marcos Antônio Japiassú Resende Alonso,Roberta Caroline Bruschi Ambrosano,Glaucia Maria Bovi Sinhoreti,Mário Alexandre Coelho |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
pit-and-fissure sealants enamel shear bond strength |
topic |
pit-and-fissure sealants enamel shear bond strength |
description |
This study evaluated the impact of extended etching and bonding strategies on the microshear bond strength of three sealant materials. Two pit-and-fissure sealants [FluroShield, Dentsply (light-cured) and AlphaSeal, DFL (self-cured)] and one light-cured flowable composite resin (Permaflo, Ultradent) were evaluated according to different enamel etching times (15 s or 30 s) and bonding procedures (no adhesive application, application of primer/hydrophobic resin or hydrophobic resin only). Intact enamel blocks were obtained from bovine teeth and sealed via the tested protocols. After 24 h, the microshear bond strength test was performed in a universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min. Failure modes were classified by stereomicroscopy. Data were submitted to a three-way ANOVA and to Tukey's test (α=0.05). There was no statistically significant difference (p>0.05) among the materials. Permaflo showed higher bond strength when etched for 30 s alone. Enamel overetching decreased the bond strength of the light-cured sealant. Primer/bond previous treatment improved bond performance for AlphaSeal. In conclusion, from the tested conditions, all sealant materials presented similar bond strength values in relation to bonding protocol and etching time. The flowable composite can be used as a pit-and-fissure sealant. The use of a three-step adhesive system was essential for the self-cured sealant application. |
publishDate |
2012 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2012-10-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-64402012000500002 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-64402012000500002 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/S0103-64402012000500002 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Dental Journal v.23 n.5 2012 reponame:Brazilian Dental Journal instname:Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto (FUNORP) instacron:FUNORP |
instname_str |
Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto (FUNORP) |
instacron_str |
FUNORP |
institution |
FUNORP |
reponame_str |
Brazilian Dental Journal |
collection |
Brazilian Dental Journal |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Dental Journal - Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto (FUNORP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
bdj@forp.usp.br||sergio@fosjc.unesp.br |
_version_ |
1754204092239970304 |