An evaluation of progress in implementing ecosystem-based management of fisheries in 33 countries.

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Pitcher, Tony J.
Data de Publicação: 2009
Outros Autores: Kalikoski, Daniela Coswig, Short, Katherine, Varkey, Divya, Pramod, Ganapathiraju
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da FURG (RI FURG)
Texto Completo: http://repositorio.furg.br/handle/1/3743
Resumo: The performance of 33 countries was evaluated for ecosystem-based management (EBM) of fisheries in three fields (principles, criteria and implementation) using quantitative ordination including uncertainty. No country rated overall as ‘good’, only four countries were ‘adequate’, while over half received ‘fail’ grades. A few developing countries performed better than many developed nations. Two case studies test the method. In Indonesia, Raja Ampat and Papua, rated similar to the national evaluation, but better performance might follow successful implementation of a planned EBM initiative. A workshop in Australia rated regional fisheries managed by New South Wales 20% lower for EBM than federally managed fisheries.
id FURG_abdbf3134de33bb5cac1f815b597e601
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.furg.br:1/3743
network_acronym_str FURG
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da FURG (RI FURG)
repository_id_str
spelling An evaluation of progress in implementing ecosystem-based management of fisheries in 33 countries.The performance of 33 countries was evaluated for ecosystem-based management (EBM) of fisheries in three fields (principles, criteria and implementation) using quantitative ordination including uncertainty. No country rated overall as ‘good’, only four countries were ‘adequate’, while over half received ‘fail’ grades. A few developing countries performed better than many developed nations. Two case studies test the method. In Indonesia, Raja Ampat and Papua, rated similar to the national evaluation, but better performance might follow successful implementation of a planned EBM initiative. A workshop in Australia rated regional fisheries managed by New South Wales 20% lower for EBM than federally managed fisheries.2013-09-04T20:43:08Z2013-09-04T20:43:08Z2009info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfPITCHER, Tony j; et al. An evaluation of progress in implementing ecosystem-based management of fisheries in 33 countries. Marine Policy, v. 33, p. 223– 232. < Disponivel em: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308597X08001036#>. Acesso em: 04 abr. 2013.0308-597Xhttp://repositorio.furg.br/handle/1/374310.1016/j.marpol.2008.06.002engPitcher, Tony J.Kalikoski, Daniela CoswigShort, KatherineVarkey, DivyaPramod, Ganapathirajuinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da FURG (RI FURG)instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande (FURG)instacron:FURG2014-09-12T13:11:24Zoai:repositorio.furg.br:1/3743Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttps://repositorio.furg.br/oai/request || http://200.19.254.174/oai/requestopendoar:2014-09-12T13:11:24Repositório Institucional da FURG (RI FURG) - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande (FURG)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv An evaluation of progress in implementing ecosystem-based management of fisheries in 33 countries.
title An evaluation of progress in implementing ecosystem-based management of fisheries in 33 countries.
spellingShingle An evaluation of progress in implementing ecosystem-based management of fisheries in 33 countries.
Pitcher, Tony J.
title_short An evaluation of progress in implementing ecosystem-based management of fisheries in 33 countries.
title_full An evaluation of progress in implementing ecosystem-based management of fisheries in 33 countries.
title_fullStr An evaluation of progress in implementing ecosystem-based management of fisheries in 33 countries.
title_full_unstemmed An evaluation of progress in implementing ecosystem-based management of fisheries in 33 countries.
title_sort An evaluation of progress in implementing ecosystem-based management of fisheries in 33 countries.
author Pitcher, Tony J.
author_facet Pitcher, Tony J.
Kalikoski, Daniela Coswig
Short, Katherine
Varkey, Divya
Pramod, Ganapathiraju
author_role author
author2 Kalikoski, Daniela Coswig
Short, Katherine
Varkey, Divya
Pramod, Ganapathiraju
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Pitcher, Tony J.
Kalikoski, Daniela Coswig
Short, Katherine
Varkey, Divya
Pramod, Ganapathiraju
description The performance of 33 countries was evaluated for ecosystem-based management (EBM) of fisheries in three fields (principles, criteria and implementation) using quantitative ordination including uncertainty. No country rated overall as ‘good’, only four countries were ‘adequate’, while over half received ‘fail’ grades. A few developing countries performed better than many developed nations. Two case studies test the method. In Indonesia, Raja Ampat and Papua, rated similar to the national evaluation, but better performance might follow successful implementation of a planned EBM initiative. A workshop in Australia rated regional fisheries managed by New South Wales 20% lower for EBM than federally managed fisheries.
publishDate 2009
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2009
2013-09-04T20:43:08Z
2013-09-04T20:43:08Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv PITCHER, Tony j; et al. An evaluation of progress in implementing ecosystem-based management of fisheries in 33 countries. Marine Policy, v. 33, p. 223– 232. < Disponivel em: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308597X08001036#>. Acesso em: 04 abr. 2013.
0308-597X
http://repositorio.furg.br/handle/1/3743
10.1016/j.marpol.2008.06.002
identifier_str_mv PITCHER, Tony j; et al. An evaluation of progress in implementing ecosystem-based management of fisheries in 33 countries. Marine Policy, v. 33, p. 223– 232. < Disponivel em: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308597X08001036#>. Acesso em: 04 abr. 2013.
0308-597X
10.1016/j.marpol.2008.06.002
url http://repositorio.furg.br/handle/1/3743
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da FURG (RI FURG)
instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande (FURG)
instacron:FURG
instname_str Universidade Federal do Rio Grande (FURG)
instacron_str FURG
institution FURG
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da FURG (RI FURG)
collection Repositório Institucional da FURG (RI FURG)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da FURG (RI FURG) - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande (FURG)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1813187247074181120

Registros relacionados