COMPARISON OF THE EFFECTIVENESS OF EPIDURAL AND SPINAL ANALGESIA IN FIRST PARTURIENT WOMEN

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Cardoso , Rômulo Henrique da Silva
Data de Publicação: 2024
Outros Autores: coelho , Joyce Araújo Ribeiro, Vieira , Solange Mendes, Beirith , Victoria Wollf, Eulálio, João Pedro Libório Neiva, kudo , Kin Alexia da Rocha, Cunha , Lucas Andrade Fidalgo, Camilo , Darlenne Galdino, Fernandes , Brena Suanne Carvalho, Martins , Milena Villela, Carvalho , Carolina de Castro, Vieira , Ingrid Paloma machado, Buarque , Mariana Delgado Santos, Farias, Thiago Webster Fernandes, Castro, Pedro Victor Alves, Rezende, Mateus ribeiro Vasconcelos
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Brazilian Journal of Implantology and Health Sciences
Texto Completo: https://bjihs.emnuvens.com.br/bjihs/article/view/1443
Resumo: The aim of this study is to comprehensively compare the efficacy of epidural and spinal analgesia in relieving pain during labor in primiparous women. Methodology:  To achieve the proposed objective, we conducted a systematic literature review, consulting electronic databases such as PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science. A combination of search terms was used. Only comparative studies, such as randomized controlled trials and cohort studies, that directly investigated the efficacy of epidural versus spinal analgesia in primiparous women were included. The methodological quality of the selected studies was assessed following specific guidelines and predefined criteria. Results:  After a thorough analysis of the included studies, we observed that both epidural and spinal analgesia were effective in relieving pain during labor in primiparous women. However, the results indicated that epidural analgesia may provide more complete and prolonged pain relief, while spinal analgesia tends to have a quicker onset of action. Additionally, both techniques were associated with acceptable rates of complications and adverse effects, although some differences were observed regarding safety profiles. Conclusion: Based on the results obtained, we conclude that both epidural and spinal analgesia are effective options for pain relief during labor in primiparous women. The choice between these techniques should be individualized, taking into consideration patient preferences, progression of labor, and specific characteristics of each technique. A detailed discussion between the patient and the medical team is essential to determine the best analgesic approach for each case.
id GOE-1_61d192eec7a1f4d7c096de0a4f6d2f9a
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.bjihs.emnuvens.com.br:article/1443
network_acronym_str GOE-1
network_name_str Brazilian Journal of Implantology and Health Sciences
repository_id_str
spelling COMPARISON OF THE EFFECTIVENESS OF EPIDURAL AND SPINAL ANALGESIA IN FIRST PARTURIENT WOMENCOMPARAÇÃO DA EFICÁCIA DA ANALGESIA EPIDURAL E RAQUIDIANA EM PARTURIENTES PRIMÍPARASanalgesia epidural, analgesia raquidiana, parturientes primíparas, trabalho de parto, dor, eficácia.epidural analgesia, spinal analgesia, primiparous women, labor, pain, efficacy.The aim of this study is to comprehensively compare the efficacy of epidural and spinal analgesia in relieving pain during labor in primiparous women. Methodology:  To achieve the proposed objective, we conducted a systematic literature review, consulting electronic databases such as PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science. A combination of search terms was used. Only comparative studies, such as randomized controlled trials and cohort studies, that directly investigated the efficacy of epidural versus spinal analgesia in primiparous women were included. The methodological quality of the selected studies was assessed following specific guidelines and predefined criteria. Results:  After a thorough analysis of the included studies, we observed that both epidural and spinal analgesia were effective in relieving pain during labor in primiparous women. However, the results indicated that epidural analgesia may provide more complete and prolonged pain relief, while spinal analgesia tends to have a quicker onset of action. Additionally, both techniques were associated with acceptable rates of complications and adverse effects, although some differences were observed regarding safety profiles. Conclusion: Based on the results obtained, we conclude that both epidural and spinal analgesia are effective options for pain relief during labor in primiparous women. The choice between these techniques should be individualized, taking into consideration patient preferences, progression of labor, and specific characteristics of each technique. A detailed discussion between the patient and the medical team is essential to determine the best analgesic approach for each case.O objetivo deste estudo é comparar de maneira abrangente a eficácia da analgesia epidural e raquidiana no alívio da dor durante o trabalho de parto em parturientes primíparas. Metodologia: Para atingir o objetivo proposto, realizamos uma revisão sistemática da literatura, consultando bases de dados eletrônicas, como PubMed, Scopus e Web of Science. Utilizou-se uma combinação de termos de busca. Foram incluídos apenas estudos comparativos, como ensaios clínicos randomizados e estudos de coorte, que investigaram diretamente a eficácia da analgesia epidural versus raquidiana em parturientes primíparas. A qualidade metodológica dos estudos selecionados foi avaliada seguindo diretrizes específicas e critérios predefinidos. Resultados: Após uma análise minuciosa dos estudos incluídos, observamos que tanto a analgesia epidural quanto a analgesia raquidiana demonstraram ser eficazes no alívio da dor durante o trabalho de parto em parturientes primíparas. No entanto, os resultados indicaram que a analgesia epidural pode proporcionar um alívio mais completo e prolongado da dor, enquanto a analgesia raquidiana tende a ter um início mais rápido de ação. Além disso, ambas as técnicas foram associadas a taxas aceitáveis de complicações e efeitos adversos, embora algumas diferenças tenham sido observadas em relação aos perfis de segurança. Conclusão: Com base nos resultados obtidos, concluímos que tanto a analgesia epidural quanto a raquidiana são opções eficazes de alívio da dor durante o trabalho de parto em parturientes primíparas. A escolha entre essas técnicas deve ser individualizada, levando em consideração as preferências da paciente, a progressão do trabalho de parto e as características específicas de cada técnica. É fundamental uma discussão detalhada entre a paciente e a equipe médica para determinar a melhor abordagem analgésica para cada caso.Specialized Dentistry Group2024-02-08info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://bjihs.emnuvens.com.br/bjihs/article/view/144310.36557/2674-8169.2024v6n2p830-847Brazilian Journal of Implantology and Health Sciences ; Vol. 6 No. 2 (2024): BJIHS QUALIS B3; 830-847Brazilian Journal of Implantology and Health Sciences ; Vol. 6 Núm. 2 (2024): BJIHS QUALIS B3; 830-847Brazilian Journal of Implantology and Health Sciences ; v. 6 n. 2 (2024): BJIHS QUALIS B3; 830-8472674-8169reponame:Brazilian Journal of Implantology and Health Sciencesinstname:Grupo de Odontologia Especializada (GOE)instacron:GOEporhttps://bjihs.emnuvens.com.br/bjihs/article/view/1443/1620Copyright (c) 2024 Rômulo Henrique da Silva Cardoso , Joyce Araújo Ribeiro coelho , Solange Mendes Vieira , Victoria Wollf Beirith , João Pedro Libório Neiva Eulálio, Kin Alexia da Rocha kudo , Lucas Andrade Fidalgo Cunha , Darlenne Galdino Camilo , Brena Suanne Carvalho Fernandes , Milena Villela Martins , Carolina de Castro Carvalho , Ingrid Paloma machado Vieira , Mariana Delgado Santos Buarque , Thiago Webster Fernandes Farias, Pedro Victor Alves Castro, Mateus ribeiro Vasconcelos Rezendehttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCardoso , Rômulo Henrique da Silvacoelho , Joyce Araújo RibeiroVieira , Solange Mendes Beirith , Victoria WollfEulálio, João Pedro Libório Neiva kudo , Kin Alexia da RochaCunha , Lucas Andrade FidalgoCamilo , Darlenne GaldinoFernandes , Brena Suanne CarvalhoMartins , Milena VillelaCarvalho , Carolina de Castro Vieira , Ingrid Paloma machadoBuarque , Mariana Delgado SantosFarias, Thiago Webster FernandesCastro, Pedro Victor AlvesRezende, Mateus ribeiro Vasconcelos2024-02-08T21:20:28Zoai:ojs.bjihs.emnuvens.com.br:article/1443Revistahttps://bjihs.emnuvens.com.br/bjihsONGhttps://bjihs.emnuvens.com.br/bjihs/oaijournal.bjihs@periodicosbrasil.com.br2674-81692674-8169opendoar:2024-02-08T21:20:28Brazilian Journal of Implantology and Health Sciences - Grupo de Odontologia Especializada (GOE)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv COMPARISON OF THE EFFECTIVENESS OF EPIDURAL AND SPINAL ANALGESIA IN FIRST PARTURIENT WOMEN
COMPARAÇÃO DA EFICÁCIA DA ANALGESIA EPIDURAL E RAQUIDIANA EM PARTURIENTES PRIMÍPARAS
title COMPARISON OF THE EFFECTIVENESS OF EPIDURAL AND SPINAL ANALGESIA IN FIRST PARTURIENT WOMEN
spellingShingle COMPARISON OF THE EFFECTIVENESS OF EPIDURAL AND SPINAL ANALGESIA IN FIRST PARTURIENT WOMEN
Cardoso , Rômulo Henrique da Silva
analgesia epidural, analgesia raquidiana, parturientes primíparas, trabalho de parto, dor, eficácia.
epidural analgesia, spinal analgesia, primiparous women, labor, pain, efficacy.
title_short COMPARISON OF THE EFFECTIVENESS OF EPIDURAL AND SPINAL ANALGESIA IN FIRST PARTURIENT WOMEN
title_full COMPARISON OF THE EFFECTIVENESS OF EPIDURAL AND SPINAL ANALGESIA IN FIRST PARTURIENT WOMEN
title_fullStr COMPARISON OF THE EFFECTIVENESS OF EPIDURAL AND SPINAL ANALGESIA IN FIRST PARTURIENT WOMEN
title_full_unstemmed COMPARISON OF THE EFFECTIVENESS OF EPIDURAL AND SPINAL ANALGESIA IN FIRST PARTURIENT WOMEN
title_sort COMPARISON OF THE EFFECTIVENESS OF EPIDURAL AND SPINAL ANALGESIA IN FIRST PARTURIENT WOMEN
author Cardoso , Rômulo Henrique da Silva
author_facet Cardoso , Rômulo Henrique da Silva
coelho , Joyce Araújo Ribeiro
Vieira , Solange Mendes
Beirith , Victoria Wollf
Eulálio, João Pedro Libório Neiva
kudo , Kin Alexia da Rocha
Cunha , Lucas Andrade Fidalgo
Camilo , Darlenne Galdino
Fernandes , Brena Suanne Carvalho
Martins , Milena Villela
Carvalho , Carolina de Castro
Vieira , Ingrid Paloma machado
Buarque , Mariana Delgado Santos
Farias, Thiago Webster Fernandes
Castro, Pedro Victor Alves
Rezende, Mateus ribeiro Vasconcelos
author_role author
author2 coelho , Joyce Araújo Ribeiro
Vieira , Solange Mendes
Beirith , Victoria Wollf
Eulálio, João Pedro Libório Neiva
kudo , Kin Alexia da Rocha
Cunha , Lucas Andrade Fidalgo
Camilo , Darlenne Galdino
Fernandes , Brena Suanne Carvalho
Martins , Milena Villela
Carvalho , Carolina de Castro
Vieira , Ingrid Paloma machado
Buarque , Mariana Delgado Santos
Farias, Thiago Webster Fernandes
Castro, Pedro Victor Alves
Rezende, Mateus ribeiro Vasconcelos
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Cardoso , Rômulo Henrique da Silva
coelho , Joyce Araújo Ribeiro
Vieira , Solange Mendes
Beirith , Victoria Wollf
Eulálio, João Pedro Libório Neiva
kudo , Kin Alexia da Rocha
Cunha , Lucas Andrade Fidalgo
Camilo , Darlenne Galdino
Fernandes , Brena Suanne Carvalho
Martins , Milena Villela
Carvalho , Carolina de Castro
Vieira , Ingrid Paloma machado
Buarque , Mariana Delgado Santos
Farias, Thiago Webster Fernandes
Castro, Pedro Victor Alves
Rezende, Mateus ribeiro Vasconcelos
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv analgesia epidural, analgesia raquidiana, parturientes primíparas, trabalho de parto, dor, eficácia.
epidural analgesia, spinal analgesia, primiparous women, labor, pain, efficacy.
topic analgesia epidural, analgesia raquidiana, parturientes primíparas, trabalho de parto, dor, eficácia.
epidural analgesia, spinal analgesia, primiparous women, labor, pain, efficacy.
description The aim of this study is to comprehensively compare the efficacy of epidural and spinal analgesia in relieving pain during labor in primiparous women. Methodology:  To achieve the proposed objective, we conducted a systematic literature review, consulting electronic databases such as PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science. A combination of search terms was used. Only comparative studies, such as randomized controlled trials and cohort studies, that directly investigated the efficacy of epidural versus spinal analgesia in primiparous women were included. The methodological quality of the selected studies was assessed following specific guidelines and predefined criteria. Results:  After a thorough analysis of the included studies, we observed that both epidural and spinal analgesia were effective in relieving pain during labor in primiparous women. However, the results indicated that epidural analgesia may provide more complete and prolonged pain relief, while spinal analgesia tends to have a quicker onset of action. Additionally, both techniques were associated with acceptable rates of complications and adverse effects, although some differences were observed regarding safety profiles. Conclusion: Based on the results obtained, we conclude that both epidural and spinal analgesia are effective options for pain relief during labor in primiparous women. The choice between these techniques should be individualized, taking into consideration patient preferences, progression of labor, and specific characteristics of each technique. A detailed discussion between the patient and the medical team is essential to determine the best analgesic approach for each case.
publishDate 2024
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2024-02-08
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://bjihs.emnuvens.com.br/bjihs/article/view/1443
10.36557/2674-8169.2024v6n2p830-847
url https://bjihs.emnuvens.com.br/bjihs/article/view/1443
identifier_str_mv 10.36557/2674-8169.2024v6n2p830-847
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://bjihs.emnuvens.com.br/bjihs/article/view/1443/1620
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Specialized Dentistry Group
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Specialized Dentistry Group
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Implantology and Health Sciences ; Vol. 6 No. 2 (2024): BJIHS QUALIS B3; 830-847
Brazilian Journal of Implantology and Health Sciences ; Vol. 6 Núm. 2 (2024): BJIHS QUALIS B3; 830-847
Brazilian Journal of Implantology and Health Sciences ; v. 6 n. 2 (2024): BJIHS QUALIS B3; 830-847
2674-8169
reponame:Brazilian Journal of Implantology and Health Sciences
instname:Grupo de Odontologia Especializada (GOE)
instacron:GOE
instname_str Grupo de Odontologia Especializada (GOE)
instacron_str GOE
institution GOE
reponame_str Brazilian Journal of Implantology and Health Sciences
collection Brazilian Journal of Implantology and Health Sciences
repository.name.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Implantology and Health Sciences - Grupo de Odontologia Especializada (GOE)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv journal.bjihs@periodicosbrasil.com.br
_version_ 1796798444462931968