Next

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Crichton, M
Data de Publicação: 2022
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Brazilian Journal of Implantology and Health Sciences
Texto Completo: https://bjihs.emnuvens.com.br/bjihs/article/view/215
Resumo: I draw these brief lines for a simple constructive criticism of the Next theme. The theme of Next interested me right away. Genetic experiments, transgenic animals, gene patents! Themes that are not only fashionable, but that completely match our current situation. It is the nearest future, a concern and also a dream of science. With this interest, I immediately got the book and some articles and put it in front of a line to read. I would have left it before. Next is actually a very diverse group of characters. It begins with a lawsuit from a firm that wants to use a man's special cells for cancer treatment. Then he talks about an orangutan who speaks and swears in Dutch. Then comes a parrot that does the math and a boy half chimpanzee, half human. In the midst of all this, many unscrupulous lawyers and researchers. There are experiments with gene therapy, with hypotheses about the maturity gene and many others. The lack of ethics in research is expressed in every page, in every subject, in every article and in every book. And it is so expressed that it fills one's patience. All researchers are failed nerds or unscrupulous capitalists. That wouldn't be a bad thing if the manuscripts were well developed. Scientists are almost always great villains like Moreau and even some geniuses who aren't scientists but are cool like Professor Moriarty. The problem is that no character has depth. They are all thrown in the middle of the story flying back and forth with no solid connection. Everything has very fragile and forced ties. And there are many, many of them, most of them for no reason to be there. The orangutan is a more direct example of this. It appears in the manuscripts, is talked about and commented on, but seems to have appeared for nothing, along with the characters connected to it. And so it goes on and the reader or researcher is waiting for everything to come together in the end. When the end comes, the plot comes together in an ending more pitiful than the end of a Brazilian telenovela season. In the end, this Next set seemed to me like a series of short stories whose parts were mixed together. Nothing more. But the cool thing was to see the surnames of some important researchers in the characters. Only. I definitely don't recommend it.1, 2, 3
id GOE-1_b66c020ad083454b5e7afa4d1afdc762
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.bjihs.emnuvens.com.br:article/215
network_acronym_str GOE-1
network_name_str Brazilian Journal of Implantology and Health Sciences
repository_id_str
spelling NextNextNextBJIHSEditorialCrichtonI draw these brief lines for a simple constructive criticism of the Next theme. The theme of Next interested me right away. Genetic experiments, transgenic animals, gene patents! Themes that are not only fashionable, but that completely match our current situation. It is the nearest future, a concern and also a dream of science. With this interest, I immediately got the book and some articles and put it in front of a line to read. I would have left it before. Next is actually a very diverse group of characters. It begins with a lawsuit from a firm that wants to use a man's special cells for cancer treatment. Then he talks about an orangutan who speaks and swears in Dutch. Then comes a parrot that does the math and a boy half chimpanzee, half human. In the midst of all this, many unscrupulous lawyers and researchers. There are experiments with gene therapy, with hypotheses about the maturity gene and many others. The lack of ethics in research is expressed in every page, in every subject, in every article and in every book. And it is so expressed that it fills one's patience. All researchers are failed nerds or unscrupulous capitalists. That wouldn't be a bad thing if the manuscripts were well developed. Scientists are almost always great villains like Moreau and even some geniuses who aren't scientists but are cool like Professor Moriarty. The problem is that no character has depth. They are all thrown in the middle of the story flying back and forth with no solid connection. Everything has very fragile and forced ties. And there are many, many of them, most of them for no reason to be there. The orangutan is a more direct example of this. It appears in the manuscripts, is talked about and commented on, but seems to have appeared for nothing, along with the characters connected to it. And so it goes on and the reader or researcher is waiting for everything to come together in the end. When the end comes, the plot comes together in an ending more pitiful than the end of a Brazilian telenovela season. In the end, this Next set seemed to me like a series of short stories whose parts were mixed together. Nothing more. But the cool thing was to see the surnames of some important researchers in the characters. Only. I definitely don't recommend it.1, 2, 3I draw these brief lines for a simple constructive criticism of the Next theme. The theme of Next interested me right away. Genetic experiments, transgenic animals, gene patents! Themes that are not only fashionable, but that completely match our current situation. It is the nearest future, a concern and also a dream of science. With this interest, I immediately got the book and some articles and put it in front of a line to read. I would have left it before. Next is actually a very diverse group of characters. It begins with a lawsuit from a firm that wants to use a man's special cells for cancer treatment. Then he talks about an orangutan who speaks and swears in Dutch. Then comes a parrot that does the math and a boy half chimpanzee, half human. In the midst of all this, many unscrupulous lawyers and researchers. There are experiments with gene therapy, with hypotheses about the maturity gene and many others. The lack of ethics in research is expressed in every page, in every subject, in every article and in every book. And it is so expressed that it fills one's patience. All researchers are failed nerds or unscrupulous capitalists. That wouldn't be a bad thing if the manuscripts were well developed. Scientists are almost always great villains like Moreau and even some geniuses who aren't scientists but are cool like Professor Moriarty. The problem is that no character has depth. They are all thrown in the middle of the story flying back and forth with no solid connection. Everything has very fragile and forced ties. And there are many, many of them, most of them for no reason to be there. The orangutan is a more direct example of this. It appears in the manuscripts, is talked about and commented on, but seems to have appeared for nothing, along with the characters connected to it. And so it goes on and the reader or researcher is waiting for everything to come together in the end. When the end comes, the plot comes together in an ending more pitiful than the end of a Brazilian telenovela season. In the end, this Next set seemed to me like a series of short stories whose parts were mixed together. Nothing more. But the cool thing was to see the surnames of some important researchers in the characters. Only. I definitely don't recommend it.1, 2, 3Specialized Dentistry Group2022-07-28info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://bjihs.emnuvens.com.br/bjihs/article/view/21510.36557/2674-8169.2022v4n4p01-02Brazilian Journal of Implantology and Health Sciences ; Vol. 4 No. 4 (2022): July 2022; 01-02Brazilian Journal of Implantology and Health Sciences ; Vol. 4 Núm. 4 (2022): Julho de 2022; 01-02Brazilian Journal of Implantology and Health Sciences ; v. 4 n. 4 (2022): Julho de 2022; 01-022674-8169reponame:Brazilian Journal of Implantology and Health Sciencesinstname:Grupo de Odontologia Especializada (GOE)instacron:GOEenghttps://bjihs.emnuvens.com.br/bjihs/article/view/215/282Copyright (c) 2022 M Crichtonhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCrichton, M2022-07-28T12:36:35Zoai:ojs.bjihs.emnuvens.com.br:article/215Revistahttps://bjihs.emnuvens.com.br/bjihsONGhttps://bjihs.emnuvens.com.br/bjihs/oaijournal.bjihs@periodicosbrasil.com.br2674-81692674-8169opendoar:2022-07-28T12:36:35Brazilian Journal of Implantology and Health Sciences - Grupo de Odontologia Especializada (GOE)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Next
Next
title Next
spellingShingle Next
Crichton, M
Next
BJIHS
Editorial
Crichton
title_short Next
title_full Next
title_fullStr Next
title_full_unstemmed Next
title_sort Next
author Crichton, M
author_facet Crichton, M
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Crichton, M
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Next
BJIHS
Editorial
Crichton
topic Next
BJIHS
Editorial
Crichton
description I draw these brief lines for a simple constructive criticism of the Next theme. The theme of Next interested me right away. Genetic experiments, transgenic animals, gene patents! Themes that are not only fashionable, but that completely match our current situation. It is the nearest future, a concern and also a dream of science. With this interest, I immediately got the book and some articles and put it in front of a line to read. I would have left it before. Next is actually a very diverse group of characters. It begins with a lawsuit from a firm that wants to use a man's special cells for cancer treatment. Then he talks about an orangutan who speaks and swears in Dutch. Then comes a parrot that does the math and a boy half chimpanzee, half human. In the midst of all this, many unscrupulous lawyers and researchers. There are experiments with gene therapy, with hypotheses about the maturity gene and many others. The lack of ethics in research is expressed in every page, in every subject, in every article and in every book. And it is so expressed that it fills one's patience. All researchers are failed nerds or unscrupulous capitalists. That wouldn't be a bad thing if the manuscripts were well developed. Scientists are almost always great villains like Moreau and even some geniuses who aren't scientists but are cool like Professor Moriarty. The problem is that no character has depth. They are all thrown in the middle of the story flying back and forth with no solid connection. Everything has very fragile and forced ties. And there are many, many of them, most of them for no reason to be there. The orangutan is a more direct example of this. It appears in the manuscripts, is talked about and commented on, but seems to have appeared for nothing, along with the characters connected to it. And so it goes on and the reader or researcher is waiting for everything to come together in the end. When the end comes, the plot comes together in an ending more pitiful than the end of a Brazilian telenovela season. In the end, this Next set seemed to me like a series of short stories whose parts were mixed together. Nothing more. But the cool thing was to see the surnames of some important researchers in the characters. Only. I definitely don't recommend it.1, 2, 3
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-07-28
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://bjihs.emnuvens.com.br/bjihs/article/view/215
10.36557/2674-8169.2022v4n4p01-02
url https://bjihs.emnuvens.com.br/bjihs/article/view/215
identifier_str_mv 10.36557/2674-8169.2022v4n4p01-02
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://bjihs.emnuvens.com.br/bjihs/article/view/215/282
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 M Crichton
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 M Crichton
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Specialized Dentistry Group
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Specialized Dentistry Group
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Implantology and Health Sciences ; Vol. 4 No. 4 (2022): July 2022; 01-02
Brazilian Journal of Implantology and Health Sciences ; Vol. 4 Núm. 4 (2022): Julho de 2022; 01-02
Brazilian Journal of Implantology and Health Sciences ; v. 4 n. 4 (2022): Julho de 2022; 01-02
2674-8169
reponame:Brazilian Journal of Implantology and Health Sciences
instname:Grupo de Odontologia Especializada (GOE)
instacron:GOE
instname_str Grupo de Odontologia Especializada (GOE)
instacron_str GOE
institution GOE
reponame_str Brazilian Journal of Implantology and Health Sciences
collection Brazilian Journal of Implantology and Health Sciences
repository.name.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Implantology and Health Sciences - Grupo de Odontologia Especializada (GOE)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv journal.bjihs@periodicosbrasil.com.br
_version_ 1796798449165795328