Middle Ear Auditory Implants: Options and Overall Outcome Evaluation

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Perdigão de Assis Machado Campos , Clara
Data de Publicação: 2024
Outros Autores: Aparecida Rocha Cabral , Talita, de Miranda Franco Costa , Giovana, Kale Mendes, Gabriel, Rodrigues Laranjeira, Mel
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Brazilian Journal of Implantology and Health Sciences
Texto Completo: https://bjihs.emnuvens.com.br/bjihs/article/view/1841
Resumo: Treatment through middle ear auditory implants represents an advanced approach to dealing with hearing loss, a condition that can significantly impact individuals' quality of life. These implants offer a valuable alternative for those who do not benefit from conventional hearing aids or other interventions. However, choosing the most suitable auditory implant is crucial as there are various options available, including bone conduction implants, active anchoring systems, and passive anchoring devices. Each of these options has its own technical requirements and clinical considerations, and it is essential to examine these differences to assist healthcare professionals and patients in making informed decisions. When exploring the different options for middle ear auditory implants, it is important to consider not only effectiveness in terms of improving hearing but also factors such as comfort, aesthetics, and psychosocial impact. Additionally, it is necessary to evaluate the overall outcome of patients after implantation of the auditory implant, including patient adaptation, post-operative quality of life, and satisfaction with the result. This comprehensive assessment can provide valuable insights into the impact of the auditory implant on patients' daily lives and emotional well-being. Another important aspect to consider is the customization of treatment, taking into account individual needs and preferences of the patient, as well as their specific auditory condition. This may involve a careful assessment of the patient's auditory profile, their expectations regarding treatment, and their lifestyle. By adopting a patient-centered approach, auditory healthcare professionals can ensure that the chosen auditory implant meets specific needs and provides the best possible outcomes. In summary, the study and understanding of options for middle ear auditory implants and their overall outcome evaluation are essential to ensure successful treatment and patient satisfaction. By considering a variety of factors, from technical effectiveness to psychosocial impact, auditory healthcare professionals can make more informed and personalized decisions, thus improving the quality of life for patients with hearing loss.
id GOE-1_fe9bc874cfe1db70b2f5139e261ea98c
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.bjihs.emnuvens.com.br:article/1841
network_acronym_str GOE-1
network_name_str Brazilian Journal of Implantology and Health Sciences
repository_id_str
spelling Middle Ear Auditory Implants: Options and Overall Outcome Evaluation Implantes Auditivos de Orelha Média: Opções e Avaliação do Desfecho GeralOrelha média; Implantes auditivos; Avaliação de desfecho.Middle era; Auditory implants; Outcome evaluation.Treatment through middle ear auditory implants represents an advanced approach to dealing with hearing loss, a condition that can significantly impact individuals' quality of life. These implants offer a valuable alternative for those who do not benefit from conventional hearing aids or other interventions. However, choosing the most suitable auditory implant is crucial as there are various options available, including bone conduction implants, active anchoring systems, and passive anchoring devices. Each of these options has its own technical requirements and clinical considerations, and it is essential to examine these differences to assist healthcare professionals and patients in making informed decisions. When exploring the different options for middle ear auditory implants, it is important to consider not only effectiveness in terms of improving hearing but also factors such as comfort, aesthetics, and psychosocial impact. Additionally, it is necessary to evaluate the overall outcome of patients after implantation of the auditory implant, including patient adaptation, post-operative quality of life, and satisfaction with the result. This comprehensive assessment can provide valuable insights into the impact of the auditory implant on patients' daily lives and emotional well-being. Another important aspect to consider is the customization of treatment, taking into account individual needs and preferences of the patient, as well as their specific auditory condition. This may involve a careful assessment of the patient's auditory profile, their expectations regarding treatment, and their lifestyle. By adopting a patient-centered approach, auditory healthcare professionals can ensure that the chosen auditory implant meets specific needs and provides the best possible outcomes. In summary, the study and understanding of options for middle ear auditory implants and their overall outcome evaluation are essential to ensure successful treatment and patient satisfaction. By considering a variety of factors, from technical effectiveness to psychosocial impact, auditory healthcare professionals can make more informed and personalized decisions, thus improving the quality of life for patients with hearing loss. O tratamento por meio de implantes auditivos na orelha média representa uma abordagem avançada para lidar com a perda auditiva, uma condição que pode afetar significativamente a qualidade de vida dos indivíduos. Esses implantes oferecem uma alternativa valiosa para aqueles que não se beneficiam de aparelhos auditivos convencionais ou outras intervenções. No entanto, a escolha do implante auditivo mais adequado é crucial, pois existem várias opções disponíveis, incluindo implantes de condução óssea, sistemas de ancoragem ativa e dispositivos de ancoragem passiva. Cada uma dessas opções tem seus próprios requisitos técnicos e considerações clínicas, e é essencial examinar essas diferenças para ajudar os profissionais de saúde e os pacientes a tomar decisões informadas. Ao explorar as diferentes opções de implantes auditivos de orelha média, é importante considerar não apenas a eficácia em termos de melhoria na audição, mas também fatores como conforto, estética e impacto psicossocial. Além disso, é necessário avaliar o desfecho geral dos pacientes após a implantação do implante auditivo, incluindo a adaptação do paciente, a qualidade de vida pós-operatória e a satisfação com o resultado. Essa avaliação abrangente pode fornecer insights valiosos sobre o impacto do implante auditivo na vida cotidiana e no bem-estar emocional dos pacientes. Outro aspecto importante a considerar é a personalização do tratamento, levando em conta as necessidades individuais e preferências do paciente, bem como sua condição auditiva específica. Isso pode envolver uma avaliação cuidadosa do perfil auditivo do paciente, suas expectativas em relação ao tratamento e seu estilo de vida. Ao adotar uma abordagem centrada no paciente, os profissionais de saúde auditiva podem garantir que o implante auditivo escolhido atenda às necessidades específicas e proporcione os melhores resultados possíveis. Em resumo, o estudo e a compreensão das opções de implantes auditivos de orelha média e sua avaliação do desfecho geral são essenciais para garantir o sucesso do tratamento e a satisfação do paciente. Ao considerar uma variedade de fatores, desde a eficácia técnica até o impacto psicossocial, os profissionais de saúde auditiva podem tomar decisões mais informadas e personalizadas, melhorando assim a qualidade de vida dos pacientes com perda auditiva.Specialized Dentistry Group2024-04-04info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://bjihs.emnuvens.com.br/bjihs/article/view/184110.36557/2674-8169.2024v6n4p498-510Brazilian Journal of Implantology and Health Sciences ; Vol. 6 No. 4 (2024): BJIHS QUALIS B3 - IMPACT FACTOR SJIF 5.807; 498-510Brazilian Journal of Implantology and Health Sciences ; Vol. 6 Núm. 4 (2024): BJIHS QUALIS B3 - FATOR DE IMPACTO SJIF 5.807; 498-510Brazilian Journal of Implantology and Health Sciences ; v. 6 n. 4 (2024): BJIHS QUALIS B3 - FATOR DE IMPACTO SJIF 5.807; 498-5102674-8169reponame:Brazilian Journal of Implantology and Health Sciencesinstname:Grupo de Odontologia Especializada (GOE)instacron:GOEporhttps://bjihs.emnuvens.com.br/bjihs/article/view/1841/2060Copyright (c) 2024 Clara Perdigão de Assis Machado Campos , Talita Aparecida Rocha Cabral , Giovana de Miranda Franco Costa , Gabriel Kale Mendes, Mel Rodrigues Laranjeirahttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessPerdigão de Assis Machado Campos , ClaraAparecida Rocha Cabral , Talita de Miranda Franco Costa , GiovanaKale Mendes, GabrielRodrigues Laranjeira, Mel2024-04-09T11:05:05Zoai:ojs.bjihs.emnuvens.com.br:article/1841Revistahttps://bjihs.emnuvens.com.br/bjihsONGhttps://bjihs.emnuvens.com.br/bjihs/oaijournal.bjihs@periodicosbrasil.com.br2674-81692674-8169opendoar:2024-04-09T11:05:05Brazilian Journal of Implantology and Health Sciences - Grupo de Odontologia Especializada (GOE)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Middle Ear Auditory Implants: Options and Overall Outcome Evaluation
Implantes Auditivos de Orelha Média: Opções e Avaliação do Desfecho Geral
title Middle Ear Auditory Implants: Options and Overall Outcome Evaluation
spellingShingle Middle Ear Auditory Implants: Options and Overall Outcome Evaluation
Perdigão de Assis Machado Campos , Clara
Orelha média; Implantes auditivos; Avaliação de desfecho.
Middle era; Auditory implants; Outcome evaluation.
title_short Middle Ear Auditory Implants: Options and Overall Outcome Evaluation
title_full Middle Ear Auditory Implants: Options and Overall Outcome Evaluation
title_fullStr Middle Ear Auditory Implants: Options and Overall Outcome Evaluation
title_full_unstemmed Middle Ear Auditory Implants: Options and Overall Outcome Evaluation
title_sort Middle Ear Auditory Implants: Options and Overall Outcome Evaluation
author Perdigão de Assis Machado Campos , Clara
author_facet Perdigão de Assis Machado Campos , Clara
Aparecida Rocha Cabral , Talita
de Miranda Franco Costa , Giovana
Kale Mendes, Gabriel
Rodrigues Laranjeira, Mel
author_role author
author2 Aparecida Rocha Cabral , Talita
de Miranda Franco Costa , Giovana
Kale Mendes, Gabriel
Rodrigues Laranjeira, Mel
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Perdigão de Assis Machado Campos , Clara
Aparecida Rocha Cabral , Talita
de Miranda Franco Costa , Giovana
Kale Mendes, Gabriel
Rodrigues Laranjeira, Mel
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Orelha média; Implantes auditivos; Avaliação de desfecho.
Middle era; Auditory implants; Outcome evaluation.
topic Orelha média; Implantes auditivos; Avaliação de desfecho.
Middle era; Auditory implants; Outcome evaluation.
description Treatment through middle ear auditory implants represents an advanced approach to dealing with hearing loss, a condition that can significantly impact individuals' quality of life. These implants offer a valuable alternative for those who do not benefit from conventional hearing aids or other interventions. However, choosing the most suitable auditory implant is crucial as there are various options available, including bone conduction implants, active anchoring systems, and passive anchoring devices. Each of these options has its own technical requirements and clinical considerations, and it is essential to examine these differences to assist healthcare professionals and patients in making informed decisions. When exploring the different options for middle ear auditory implants, it is important to consider not only effectiveness in terms of improving hearing but also factors such as comfort, aesthetics, and psychosocial impact. Additionally, it is necessary to evaluate the overall outcome of patients after implantation of the auditory implant, including patient adaptation, post-operative quality of life, and satisfaction with the result. This comprehensive assessment can provide valuable insights into the impact of the auditory implant on patients' daily lives and emotional well-being. Another important aspect to consider is the customization of treatment, taking into account individual needs and preferences of the patient, as well as their specific auditory condition. This may involve a careful assessment of the patient's auditory profile, their expectations regarding treatment, and their lifestyle. By adopting a patient-centered approach, auditory healthcare professionals can ensure that the chosen auditory implant meets specific needs and provides the best possible outcomes. In summary, the study and understanding of options for middle ear auditory implants and their overall outcome evaluation are essential to ensure successful treatment and patient satisfaction. By considering a variety of factors, from technical effectiveness to psychosocial impact, auditory healthcare professionals can make more informed and personalized decisions, thus improving the quality of life for patients with hearing loss.
publishDate 2024
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2024-04-04
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://bjihs.emnuvens.com.br/bjihs/article/view/1841
10.36557/2674-8169.2024v6n4p498-510
url https://bjihs.emnuvens.com.br/bjihs/article/view/1841
identifier_str_mv 10.36557/2674-8169.2024v6n4p498-510
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://bjihs.emnuvens.com.br/bjihs/article/view/1841/2060
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Specialized Dentistry Group
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Specialized Dentistry Group
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Implantology and Health Sciences ; Vol. 6 No. 4 (2024): BJIHS QUALIS B3 - IMPACT FACTOR SJIF 5.807; 498-510
Brazilian Journal of Implantology and Health Sciences ; Vol. 6 Núm. 4 (2024): BJIHS QUALIS B3 - FATOR DE IMPACTO SJIF 5.807; 498-510
Brazilian Journal of Implantology and Health Sciences ; v. 6 n. 4 (2024): BJIHS QUALIS B3 - FATOR DE IMPACTO SJIF 5.807; 498-510
2674-8169
reponame:Brazilian Journal of Implantology and Health Sciences
instname:Grupo de Odontologia Especializada (GOE)
instacron:GOE
instname_str Grupo de Odontologia Especializada (GOE)
instacron_str GOE
institution GOE
reponame_str Brazilian Journal of Implantology and Health Sciences
collection Brazilian Journal of Implantology and Health Sciences
repository.name.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Implantology and Health Sciences - Grupo de Odontologia Especializada (GOE)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv journal.bjihs@periodicosbrasil.com.br
_version_ 1796798446966931456