Middle Ear Auditory Implants: Options and Overall Outcome Evaluation
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2024 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Brazilian Journal of Implantology and Health Sciences |
Texto Completo: | https://bjihs.emnuvens.com.br/bjihs/article/view/1841 |
Resumo: | Treatment through middle ear auditory implants represents an advanced approach to dealing with hearing loss, a condition that can significantly impact individuals' quality of life. These implants offer a valuable alternative for those who do not benefit from conventional hearing aids or other interventions. However, choosing the most suitable auditory implant is crucial as there are various options available, including bone conduction implants, active anchoring systems, and passive anchoring devices. Each of these options has its own technical requirements and clinical considerations, and it is essential to examine these differences to assist healthcare professionals and patients in making informed decisions. When exploring the different options for middle ear auditory implants, it is important to consider not only effectiveness in terms of improving hearing but also factors such as comfort, aesthetics, and psychosocial impact. Additionally, it is necessary to evaluate the overall outcome of patients after implantation of the auditory implant, including patient adaptation, post-operative quality of life, and satisfaction with the result. This comprehensive assessment can provide valuable insights into the impact of the auditory implant on patients' daily lives and emotional well-being. Another important aspect to consider is the customization of treatment, taking into account individual needs and preferences of the patient, as well as their specific auditory condition. This may involve a careful assessment of the patient's auditory profile, their expectations regarding treatment, and their lifestyle. By adopting a patient-centered approach, auditory healthcare professionals can ensure that the chosen auditory implant meets specific needs and provides the best possible outcomes. In summary, the study and understanding of options for middle ear auditory implants and their overall outcome evaluation are essential to ensure successful treatment and patient satisfaction. By considering a variety of factors, from technical effectiveness to psychosocial impact, auditory healthcare professionals can make more informed and personalized decisions, thus improving the quality of life for patients with hearing loss. |
id |
GOE-1_fe9bc874cfe1db70b2f5139e261ea98c |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.bjihs.emnuvens.com.br:article/1841 |
network_acronym_str |
GOE-1 |
network_name_str |
Brazilian Journal of Implantology and Health Sciences |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Middle Ear Auditory Implants: Options and Overall Outcome Evaluation Implantes Auditivos de Orelha Média: Opções e Avaliação do Desfecho GeralOrelha média; Implantes auditivos; Avaliação de desfecho.Middle era; Auditory implants; Outcome evaluation.Treatment through middle ear auditory implants represents an advanced approach to dealing with hearing loss, a condition that can significantly impact individuals' quality of life. These implants offer a valuable alternative for those who do not benefit from conventional hearing aids or other interventions. However, choosing the most suitable auditory implant is crucial as there are various options available, including bone conduction implants, active anchoring systems, and passive anchoring devices. Each of these options has its own technical requirements and clinical considerations, and it is essential to examine these differences to assist healthcare professionals and patients in making informed decisions. When exploring the different options for middle ear auditory implants, it is important to consider not only effectiveness in terms of improving hearing but also factors such as comfort, aesthetics, and psychosocial impact. Additionally, it is necessary to evaluate the overall outcome of patients after implantation of the auditory implant, including patient adaptation, post-operative quality of life, and satisfaction with the result. This comprehensive assessment can provide valuable insights into the impact of the auditory implant on patients' daily lives and emotional well-being. Another important aspect to consider is the customization of treatment, taking into account individual needs and preferences of the patient, as well as their specific auditory condition. This may involve a careful assessment of the patient's auditory profile, their expectations regarding treatment, and their lifestyle. By adopting a patient-centered approach, auditory healthcare professionals can ensure that the chosen auditory implant meets specific needs and provides the best possible outcomes. In summary, the study and understanding of options for middle ear auditory implants and their overall outcome evaluation are essential to ensure successful treatment and patient satisfaction. By considering a variety of factors, from technical effectiveness to psychosocial impact, auditory healthcare professionals can make more informed and personalized decisions, thus improving the quality of life for patients with hearing loss. O tratamento por meio de implantes auditivos na orelha média representa uma abordagem avançada para lidar com a perda auditiva, uma condição que pode afetar significativamente a qualidade de vida dos indivíduos. Esses implantes oferecem uma alternativa valiosa para aqueles que não se beneficiam de aparelhos auditivos convencionais ou outras intervenções. No entanto, a escolha do implante auditivo mais adequado é crucial, pois existem várias opções disponíveis, incluindo implantes de condução óssea, sistemas de ancoragem ativa e dispositivos de ancoragem passiva. Cada uma dessas opções tem seus próprios requisitos técnicos e considerações clínicas, e é essencial examinar essas diferenças para ajudar os profissionais de saúde e os pacientes a tomar decisões informadas. Ao explorar as diferentes opções de implantes auditivos de orelha média, é importante considerar não apenas a eficácia em termos de melhoria na audição, mas também fatores como conforto, estética e impacto psicossocial. Além disso, é necessário avaliar o desfecho geral dos pacientes após a implantação do implante auditivo, incluindo a adaptação do paciente, a qualidade de vida pós-operatória e a satisfação com o resultado. Essa avaliação abrangente pode fornecer insights valiosos sobre o impacto do implante auditivo na vida cotidiana e no bem-estar emocional dos pacientes. Outro aspecto importante a considerar é a personalização do tratamento, levando em conta as necessidades individuais e preferências do paciente, bem como sua condição auditiva específica. Isso pode envolver uma avaliação cuidadosa do perfil auditivo do paciente, suas expectativas em relação ao tratamento e seu estilo de vida. Ao adotar uma abordagem centrada no paciente, os profissionais de saúde auditiva podem garantir que o implante auditivo escolhido atenda às necessidades específicas e proporcione os melhores resultados possíveis. Em resumo, o estudo e a compreensão das opções de implantes auditivos de orelha média e sua avaliação do desfecho geral são essenciais para garantir o sucesso do tratamento e a satisfação do paciente. Ao considerar uma variedade de fatores, desde a eficácia técnica até o impacto psicossocial, os profissionais de saúde auditiva podem tomar decisões mais informadas e personalizadas, melhorando assim a qualidade de vida dos pacientes com perda auditiva.Specialized Dentistry Group2024-04-04info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://bjihs.emnuvens.com.br/bjihs/article/view/184110.36557/2674-8169.2024v6n4p498-510Brazilian Journal of Implantology and Health Sciences ; Vol. 6 No. 4 (2024): BJIHS QUALIS B3 - IMPACT FACTOR SJIF 5.807; 498-510Brazilian Journal of Implantology and Health Sciences ; Vol. 6 Núm. 4 (2024): BJIHS QUALIS B3 - FATOR DE IMPACTO SJIF 5.807; 498-510Brazilian Journal of Implantology and Health Sciences ; v. 6 n. 4 (2024): BJIHS QUALIS B3 - FATOR DE IMPACTO SJIF 5.807; 498-5102674-8169reponame:Brazilian Journal of Implantology and Health Sciencesinstname:Grupo de Odontologia Especializada (GOE)instacron:GOEporhttps://bjihs.emnuvens.com.br/bjihs/article/view/1841/2060Copyright (c) 2024 Clara Perdigão de Assis Machado Campos , Talita Aparecida Rocha Cabral , Giovana de Miranda Franco Costa , Gabriel Kale Mendes, Mel Rodrigues Laranjeirahttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessPerdigão de Assis Machado Campos , ClaraAparecida Rocha Cabral , Talita de Miranda Franco Costa , GiovanaKale Mendes, GabrielRodrigues Laranjeira, Mel2024-04-09T11:05:05Zoai:ojs.bjihs.emnuvens.com.br:article/1841Revistahttps://bjihs.emnuvens.com.br/bjihsONGhttps://bjihs.emnuvens.com.br/bjihs/oaijournal.bjihs@periodicosbrasil.com.br2674-81692674-8169opendoar:2024-04-09T11:05:05Brazilian Journal of Implantology and Health Sciences - Grupo de Odontologia Especializada (GOE)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Middle Ear Auditory Implants: Options and Overall Outcome Evaluation Implantes Auditivos de Orelha Média: Opções e Avaliação do Desfecho Geral |
title |
Middle Ear Auditory Implants: Options and Overall Outcome Evaluation |
spellingShingle |
Middle Ear Auditory Implants: Options and Overall Outcome Evaluation Perdigão de Assis Machado Campos , Clara Orelha média; Implantes auditivos; Avaliação de desfecho. Middle era; Auditory implants; Outcome evaluation. |
title_short |
Middle Ear Auditory Implants: Options and Overall Outcome Evaluation |
title_full |
Middle Ear Auditory Implants: Options and Overall Outcome Evaluation |
title_fullStr |
Middle Ear Auditory Implants: Options and Overall Outcome Evaluation |
title_full_unstemmed |
Middle Ear Auditory Implants: Options and Overall Outcome Evaluation |
title_sort |
Middle Ear Auditory Implants: Options and Overall Outcome Evaluation |
author |
Perdigão de Assis Machado Campos , Clara |
author_facet |
Perdigão de Assis Machado Campos , Clara Aparecida Rocha Cabral , Talita de Miranda Franco Costa , Giovana Kale Mendes, Gabriel Rodrigues Laranjeira, Mel |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Aparecida Rocha Cabral , Talita de Miranda Franco Costa , Giovana Kale Mendes, Gabriel Rodrigues Laranjeira, Mel |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Perdigão de Assis Machado Campos , Clara Aparecida Rocha Cabral , Talita de Miranda Franco Costa , Giovana Kale Mendes, Gabriel Rodrigues Laranjeira, Mel |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Orelha média; Implantes auditivos; Avaliação de desfecho. Middle era; Auditory implants; Outcome evaluation. |
topic |
Orelha média; Implantes auditivos; Avaliação de desfecho. Middle era; Auditory implants; Outcome evaluation. |
description |
Treatment through middle ear auditory implants represents an advanced approach to dealing with hearing loss, a condition that can significantly impact individuals' quality of life. These implants offer a valuable alternative for those who do not benefit from conventional hearing aids or other interventions. However, choosing the most suitable auditory implant is crucial as there are various options available, including bone conduction implants, active anchoring systems, and passive anchoring devices. Each of these options has its own technical requirements and clinical considerations, and it is essential to examine these differences to assist healthcare professionals and patients in making informed decisions. When exploring the different options for middle ear auditory implants, it is important to consider not only effectiveness in terms of improving hearing but also factors such as comfort, aesthetics, and psychosocial impact. Additionally, it is necessary to evaluate the overall outcome of patients after implantation of the auditory implant, including patient adaptation, post-operative quality of life, and satisfaction with the result. This comprehensive assessment can provide valuable insights into the impact of the auditory implant on patients' daily lives and emotional well-being. Another important aspect to consider is the customization of treatment, taking into account individual needs and preferences of the patient, as well as their specific auditory condition. This may involve a careful assessment of the patient's auditory profile, their expectations regarding treatment, and their lifestyle. By adopting a patient-centered approach, auditory healthcare professionals can ensure that the chosen auditory implant meets specific needs and provides the best possible outcomes. In summary, the study and understanding of options for middle ear auditory implants and their overall outcome evaluation are essential to ensure successful treatment and patient satisfaction. By considering a variety of factors, from technical effectiveness to psychosocial impact, auditory healthcare professionals can make more informed and personalized decisions, thus improving the quality of life for patients with hearing loss. |
publishDate |
2024 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2024-04-04 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://bjihs.emnuvens.com.br/bjihs/article/view/1841 10.36557/2674-8169.2024v6n4p498-510 |
url |
https://bjihs.emnuvens.com.br/bjihs/article/view/1841 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.36557/2674-8169.2024v6n4p498-510 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://bjihs.emnuvens.com.br/bjihs/article/view/1841/2060 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Specialized Dentistry Group |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Specialized Dentistry Group |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Journal of Implantology and Health Sciences ; Vol. 6 No. 4 (2024): BJIHS QUALIS B3 - IMPACT FACTOR SJIF 5.807; 498-510 Brazilian Journal of Implantology and Health Sciences ; Vol. 6 Núm. 4 (2024): BJIHS QUALIS B3 - FATOR DE IMPACTO SJIF 5.807; 498-510 Brazilian Journal of Implantology and Health Sciences ; v. 6 n. 4 (2024): BJIHS QUALIS B3 - FATOR DE IMPACTO SJIF 5.807; 498-510 2674-8169 reponame:Brazilian Journal of Implantology and Health Sciences instname:Grupo de Odontologia Especializada (GOE) instacron:GOE |
instname_str |
Grupo de Odontologia Especializada (GOE) |
instacron_str |
GOE |
institution |
GOE |
reponame_str |
Brazilian Journal of Implantology and Health Sciences |
collection |
Brazilian Journal of Implantology and Health Sciences |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Journal of Implantology and Health Sciences - Grupo de Odontologia Especializada (GOE) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
journal.bjihs@periodicosbrasil.com.br |
_version_ |
1796798446966931456 |