A comparison of methods for the detection of Ascochyta rabiei in chickpea seeds
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2019 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Relatório |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Summa phytopathologica (Online) |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-54052019000200197 |
Resumo: | ABSTRACT Seed health is one of the most important factors affecting the quality of chickpea (Cicer arietinum) seeds. The present study aimed to compare and identify the best incubation methods for detecting Ascochyta rabiei associated with chickpea seeds. Four protocols were compared for their sensitivity in detecting A. rabiei: T1) Incubation on paper substrate or filter paper method (blotter test) without surface disinfection, T2) Blotter test through the water restriction technique, T3) PDA plate test, and T4) MEA plate test. Four independent chickpea seed lots, naturally infected with A. rabiei, were sampled from Córdoba Province and other four were sampled from Buenos Aires Province, Argentina. Each treatment was applied to a total of 400 seeds from each locality for the methods to be comparable. T2 and T3 were statistically more sensitive in detecting A. rabiei-infected seeds from Córdoba. Only these two treatments were repeated for seeds from Buenos Aires Province, and T3 proved to be more sensitive; thus, it is recommended for routine sanitary analysis of chickpea seeds. |
id |
GPF-1_754dd55c2301b076e046092e54802892 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S0100-54052019000200197 |
network_acronym_str |
GPF-1 |
network_name_str |
Summa phytopathologica (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
A comparison of methods for the detection of Ascochyta rabiei in chickpea seedsAscochyta blightCicer arietinumStandard blotter testPDA plate testABSTRACT Seed health is one of the most important factors affecting the quality of chickpea (Cicer arietinum) seeds. The present study aimed to compare and identify the best incubation methods for detecting Ascochyta rabiei associated with chickpea seeds. Four protocols were compared for their sensitivity in detecting A. rabiei: T1) Incubation on paper substrate or filter paper method (blotter test) without surface disinfection, T2) Blotter test through the water restriction technique, T3) PDA plate test, and T4) MEA plate test. Four independent chickpea seed lots, naturally infected with A. rabiei, were sampled from Córdoba Province and other four were sampled from Buenos Aires Province, Argentina. Each treatment was applied to a total of 400 seeds from each locality for the methods to be comparable. T2 and T3 were statistically more sensitive in detecting A. rabiei-infected seeds from Córdoba. Only these two treatments were repeated for seeds from Buenos Aires Province, and T3 proved to be more sensitive; thus, it is recommended for routine sanitary analysis of chickpea seeds.Grupo Paulista de Fitopatologia2019-04-01info:eu-repo/semantics/reportinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-54052019000200197Summa Phytopathologica v.45 n.2 2019reponame:Summa phytopathologica (Online)instname:Grupo Paulista de Fitopatologiainstacron:GPF10.1590/0100-5405/185396info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSautua,Francisco JoséCasey,Santiago AgustínZapata,Raúl LorenzoScandiani,María MercedesCarmona,Marcelo Aníbaleng2019-07-03T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0100-54052019000200197Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/sphttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpsumma@fca.unesp.br1980-54540100-5405opendoar:2019-07-03T00:00Summa phytopathologica (Online) - Grupo Paulista de Fitopatologiafalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
A comparison of methods for the detection of Ascochyta rabiei in chickpea seeds |
title |
A comparison of methods for the detection of Ascochyta rabiei in chickpea seeds |
spellingShingle |
A comparison of methods for the detection of Ascochyta rabiei in chickpea seeds Sautua,Francisco José Ascochyta blight Cicer arietinum Standard blotter test PDA plate test |
title_short |
A comparison of methods for the detection of Ascochyta rabiei in chickpea seeds |
title_full |
A comparison of methods for the detection of Ascochyta rabiei in chickpea seeds |
title_fullStr |
A comparison of methods for the detection of Ascochyta rabiei in chickpea seeds |
title_full_unstemmed |
A comparison of methods for the detection of Ascochyta rabiei in chickpea seeds |
title_sort |
A comparison of methods for the detection of Ascochyta rabiei in chickpea seeds |
author |
Sautua,Francisco José |
author_facet |
Sautua,Francisco José Casey,Santiago Agustín Zapata,Raúl Lorenzo Scandiani,María Mercedes Carmona,Marcelo Aníbal |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Casey,Santiago Agustín Zapata,Raúl Lorenzo Scandiani,María Mercedes Carmona,Marcelo Aníbal |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Sautua,Francisco José Casey,Santiago Agustín Zapata,Raúl Lorenzo Scandiani,María Mercedes Carmona,Marcelo Aníbal |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Ascochyta blight Cicer arietinum Standard blotter test PDA plate test |
topic |
Ascochyta blight Cicer arietinum Standard blotter test PDA plate test |
description |
ABSTRACT Seed health is one of the most important factors affecting the quality of chickpea (Cicer arietinum) seeds. The present study aimed to compare and identify the best incubation methods for detecting Ascochyta rabiei associated with chickpea seeds. Four protocols were compared for their sensitivity in detecting A. rabiei: T1) Incubation on paper substrate or filter paper method (blotter test) without surface disinfection, T2) Blotter test through the water restriction technique, T3) PDA plate test, and T4) MEA plate test. Four independent chickpea seed lots, naturally infected with A. rabiei, were sampled from Córdoba Province and other four were sampled from Buenos Aires Province, Argentina. Each treatment was applied to a total of 400 seeds from each locality for the methods to be comparable. T2 and T3 were statistically more sensitive in detecting A. rabiei-infected seeds from Córdoba. Only these two treatments were repeated for seeds from Buenos Aires Province, and T3 proved to be more sensitive; thus, it is recommended for routine sanitary analysis of chickpea seeds. |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-04-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/report |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
report |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-54052019000200197 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-54052019000200197 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/0100-5405/185396 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Grupo Paulista de Fitopatologia |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Grupo Paulista de Fitopatologia |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Summa Phytopathologica v.45 n.2 2019 reponame:Summa phytopathologica (Online) instname:Grupo Paulista de Fitopatologia instacron:GPF |
instname_str |
Grupo Paulista de Fitopatologia |
instacron_str |
GPF |
institution |
GPF |
reponame_str |
Summa phytopathologica (Online) |
collection |
Summa phytopathologica (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Summa phytopathologica (Online) - Grupo Paulista de Fitopatologia |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
summa@fca.unesp.br |
_version_ |
1754193419325931520 |