A comparison of methods for the detection of Ascochyta rabiei in chickpea seeds

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Sautua,Francisco José
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: Casey,Santiago Agustín, Zapata,Raúl Lorenzo, Scandiani,María Mercedes, Carmona,Marcelo Aníbal
Tipo de documento: Relatório
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Summa phytopathologica (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-54052019000200197
Resumo: ABSTRACT Seed health is one of the most important factors affecting the quality of chickpea (Cicer arietinum) seeds. The present study aimed to compare and identify the best incubation methods for detecting Ascochyta rabiei associated with chickpea seeds. Four protocols were compared for their sensitivity in detecting A. rabiei: T1) Incubation on paper substrate or filter paper method (blotter test) without surface disinfection, T2) Blotter test through the water restriction technique, T3) PDA plate test, and T4) MEA plate test. Four independent chickpea seed lots, naturally infected with A. rabiei, were sampled from Córdoba Province and other four were sampled from Buenos Aires Province, Argentina. Each treatment was applied to a total of 400 seeds from each locality for the methods to be comparable. T2 and T3 were statistically more sensitive in detecting A. rabiei-infected seeds from Córdoba. Only these two treatments were repeated for seeds from Buenos Aires Province, and T3 proved to be more sensitive; thus, it is recommended for routine sanitary analysis of chickpea seeds.
id GPF-1_754dd55c2301b076e046092e54802892
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0100-54052019000200197
network_acronym_str GPF-1
network_name_str Summa phytopathologica (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling A comparison of methods for the detection of Ascochyta rabiei in chickpea seedsAscochyta blightCicer arietinumStandard blotter testPDA plate testABSTRACT Seed health is one of the most important factors affecting the quality of chickpea (Cicer arietinum) seeds. The present study aimed to compare and identify the best incubation methods for detecting Ascochyta rabiei associated with chickpea seeds. Four protocols were compared for their sensitivity in detecting A. rabiei: T1) Incubation on paper substrate or filter paper method (blotter test) without surface disinfection, T2) Blotter test through the water restriction technique, T3) PDA plate test, and T4) MEA plate test. Four independent chickpea seed lots, naturally infected with A. rabiei, were sampled from Córdoba Province and other four were sampled from Buenos Aires Province, Argentina. Each treatment was applied to a total of 400 seeds from each locality for the methods to be comparable. T2 and T3 were statistically more sensitive in detecting A. rabiei-infected seeds from Córdoba. Only these two treatments were repeated for seeds from Buenos Aires Province, and T3 proved to be more sensitive; thus, it is recommended for routine sanitary analysis of chickpea seeds.Grupo Paulista de Fitopatologia2019-04-01info:eu-repo/semantics/reportinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-54052019000200197Summa Phytopathologica v.45 n.2 2019reponame:Summa phytopathologica (Online)instname:Grupo Paulista de Fitopatologiainstacron:GPF10.1590/0100-5405/185396info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSautua,Francisco JoséCasey,Santiago AgustínZapata,Raúl LorenzoScandiani,María MercedesCarmona,Marcelo Aníbaleng2019-07-03T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0100-54052019000200197Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/sphttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpsumma@fca.unesp.br1980-54540100-5405opendoar:2019-07-03T00:00Summa phytopathologica (Online) - Grupo Paulista de Fitopatologiafalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv A comparison of methods for the detection of Ascochyta rabiei in chickpea seeds
title A comparison of methods for the detection of Ascochyta rabiei in chickpea seeds
spellingShingle A comparison of methods for the detection of Ascochyta rabiei in chickpea seeds
Sautua,Francisco José
Ascochyta blight
Cicer arietinum
Standard blotter test
PDA plate test
title_short A comparison of methods for the detection of Ascochyta rabiei in chickpea seeds
title_full A comparison of methods for the detection of Ascochyta rabiei in chickpea seeds
title_fullStr A comparison of methods for the detection of Ascochyta rabiei in chickpea seeds
title_full_unstemmed A comparison of methods for the detection of Ascochyta rabiei in chickpea seeds
title_sort A comparison of methods for the detection of Ascochyta rabiei in chickpea seeds
author Sautua,Francisco José
author_facet Sautua,Francisco José
Casey,Santiago Agustín
Zapata,Raúl Lorenzo
Scandiani,María Mercedes
Carmona,Marcelo Aníbal
author_role author
author2 Casey,Santiago Agustín
Zapata,Raúl Lorenzo
Scandiani,María Mercedes
Carmona,Marcelo Aníbal
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Sautua,Francisco José
Casey,Santiago Agustín
Zapata,Raúl Lorenzo
Scandiani,María Mercedes
Carmona,Marcelo Aníbal
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Ascochyta blight
Cicer arietinum
Standard blotter test
PDA plate test
topic Ascochyta blight
Cicer arietinum
Standard blotter test
PDA plate test
description ABSTRACT Seed health is one of the most important factors affecting the quality of chickpea (Cicer arietinum) seeds. The present study aimed to compare and identify the best incubation methods for detecting Ascochyta rabiei associated with chickpea seeds. Four protocols were compared for their sensitivity in detecting A. rabiei: T1) Incubation on paper substrate or filter paper method (blotter test) without surface disinfection, T2) Blotter test through the water restriction technique, T3) PDA plate test, and T4) MEA plate test. Four independent chickpea seed lots, naturally infected with A. rabiei, were sampled from Córdoba Province and other four were sampled from Buenos Aires Province, Argentina. Each treatment was applied to a total of 400 seeds from each locality for the methods to be comparable. T2 and T3 were statistically more sensitive in detecting A. rabiei-infected seeds from Córdoba. Only these two treatments were repeated for seeds from Buenos Aires Province, and T3 proved to be more sensitive; thus, it is recommended for routine sanitary analysis of chickpea seeds.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-04-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/report
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format report
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-54052019000200197
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-54052019000200197
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/0100-5405/185396
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Grupo Paulista de Fitopatologia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Grupo Paulista de Fitopatologia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Summa Phytopathologica v.45 n.2 2019
reponame:Summa phytopathologica (Online)
instname:Grupo Paulista de Fitopatologia
instacron:GPF
instname_str Grupo Paulista de Fitopatologia
instacron_str GPF
institution GPF
reponame_str Summa phytopathologica (Online)
collection Summa phytopathologica (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Summa phytopathologica (Online) - Grupo Paulista de Fitopatologia
repository.mail.fl_str_mv summa@fca.unesp.br
_version_ 1754193419325931520