Productivity of organic Cichorium intybus produced with alternative substrates
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2018 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista Verde de Agroecologia e Desenvolvimento Sustentavel |
Texto Completo: | https://www.gvaa.com.br/revista/index.php/RVADS/article/view/5038 |
Resumo: | The objective of this work was to evaluate alternative substrates in the quality of seedlings and in the productivity of chicory in organic cultivation. The experiment conducted in two phases: plant nursery and field, in June 2016. The experimental field is located at Seridó Ecological farm, in Rio Branco, Acre. The experimental design was a randomized block with five treatments and four replications. The treatments constituted by the Golden commercial substrate used as control and by four other alternative substrates: soil (30%), organic compound (30%); Soil conditioner (30%), coal (10%), natural thermophosphate (1.5 kg m-3), dolomitic limestone (1.0 kg m-3) and potassium sulphate (1.0 kg m-3). What differentiated them was the substitution of the conditioner: Carbonized rice husk; Coconut fiber; Fiber of the stem of ouricurí palm (Attalea phalerata) or Cork decomposed of kapok (Ceiba pentandra). The cultivar used was Sugar loaf. At 22 days after sowing, the seedlings evaluated to obtain the quality index and at 60 days after transplanting to the field the total fresh mass, commercial, total dry, commercial and total and commercial productivity were evaluated. The substrates containing kapok and coconut fiber had better performance for root dry mass and Dickson quality index in the seedlings phase, total fresh mass, total and commercial dry mass and total field productivity. |
id |
GVAA-1_cba54de9c02afb8b4c169640c985c1ce |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.gvaa.com.br:article/5038 |
network_acronym_str |
GVAA-1 |
network_name_str |
Revista Verde de Agroecologia e Desenvolvimento Sustentavel |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Productivity of organic Cichorium intybus produced with alternative substratesProdutividade de almeirão orgânico produzido com substratos alternativosCichorium intybusCultivo orgânicoProdução de mudas.Cichorium intybusOrganic farmingSeedling production.The objective of this work was to evaluate alternative substrates in the quality of seedlings and in the productivity of chicory in organic cultivation. The experiment conducted in two phases: plant nursery and field, in June 2016. The experimental field is located at Seridó Ecological farm, in Rio Branco, Acre. The experimental design was a randomized block with five treatments and four replications. The treatments constituted by the Golden commercial substrate used as control and by four other alternative substrates: soil (30%), organic compound (30%); Soil conditioner (30%), coal (10%), natural thermophosphate (1.5 kg m-3), dolomitic limestone (1.0 kg m-3) and potassium sulphate (1.0 kg m-3). What differentiated them was the substitution of the conditioner: Carbonized rice husk; Coconut fiber; Fiber of the stem of ouricurí palm (Attalea phalerata) or Cork decomposed of kapok (Ceiba pentandra). The cultivar used was Sugar loaf. At 22 days after sowing, the seedlings evaluated to obtain the quality index and at 60 days after transplanting to the field the total fresh mass, commercial, total dry, commercial and total and commercial productivity were evaluated. The substrates containing kapok and coconut fiber had better performance for root dry mass and Dickson quality index in the seedlings phase, total fresh mass, total and commercial dry mass and total field productivity.O objetivo deste trabalho foi avaliar substratos alternativos na qualidade de mudas e produtividade do almeirão em cultivo orgânico. O experimento foi conduzido em duas fases: em viveiro e em campo, em junho de 2016. O campo experimental está localizado no Sítio Ecológico Seridó, em Rio Branco, Acre. O delineamento utilizado foi em blocos casualizados com cinco tratamentos e quatro repetições. Os tratamentos foram constituídos pelo substrato comercial Golden® utilizado como controle e por mais quatro substratos alternativos. Os substratos alternativos foram compostos por: terra (30%), composto orgânico (30%); condicionador de solo (30%), carvão (10%), termofosfato natural (1,5 kg m-3), calcário dolomítico (1,0 kg m-3) e sulfato de potássio (1,0 kg m-3), o que os diferenciaram foi a substituição do condicionador: casca de arroz carbonizada; fibra de coco; fibra do caule da palmeira ouricurí (Attalea phalerata) ou caule decomposto de sumaúma (Ceiba pentandra). A cultivar utilizada foi almeirão pão de açúcar. Aos 22 dias após a semeadura as mudas foram avaliadas para a obtenção do índice de qualidade e aos 60 dias após o transplantio a campo avaliou-se a massa fresca total, comercial, seca total, comercial e a produtividade total e comercial. Os substratos contendo sumaúma e fibra de coco tiveram melhor desempenho para massa seca da raiz e índice de qualidade de Dickson na fase de muda, massa fresca total, massa seca total e comercial e produtividade total à campo.Editora Verde2018-04-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlapplication/pdfapplication/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.documentapplication/pdfapplication/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.documenthttps://www.gvaa.com.br/revista/index.php/RVADS/article/view/503810.18378/rvads.v13i2.5038Revista Verde de Agroecologia e Desenvolvimento Sustentável; Vol. 13 No. 2 (2018); 132 - 137Revista Verde de Agroecologia e Desenvolvimento Sustentável; Vol. 13 Núm. 2 (2018); 132 - 137Revista Verde de Agroecologia e Desenvolvimento Sustentável; v. 13 n. 2 (2018); 132 - 1371981-8203reponame:Revista Verde de Agroecologia e Desenvolvimento Sustentavelinstname:Grupo Verde de Agroecologia e Abelhas (GVAA)instacron:GVAAporhttps://www.gvaa.com.br/revista/index.php/RVADS/article/view/5038/5831https://www.gvaa.com.br/revista/index.php/RVADS/article/view/5038/5832https://www.gvaa.com.br/revista/index.php/RVADS/article/view/5038/9248https://www.gvaa.com.br/revista/index.php/RVADS/article/view/5038/9249https://www.gvaa.com.br/revista/index.php/RVADS/article/view/5038/9256Copyright (c) 2018 Thays Lemos Uchôa et al.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessUchôa, Thays LemosAlmeida, Waldiane Araújo deAraújo Neto, Sebastião Elviro deSouza, Luís Gustavo de Souza eFerreira, Regina Lúcia FélixSilva, Nilciléia Mendes da2021-06-14T13:14:19Zoai:ojs.gvaa.com.br:article/5038Revistahttps://www.gvaa.com.br/revista/index.php/RVADS/PUBhttps://www.gvaa.com.br/revista/index.php/RVADS/oairvadsgvaa@gmail.com || patriciomaracaja@gmail.com || revistaverde1@gmail.com || suporte@antsoft.com.br1981-82031981-8203opendoar:2024-03-06T12:59:21.346677Revista Verde de Agroecologia e Desenvolvimento Sustentavel - Grupo Verde de Agroecologia e Abelhas (GVAA)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Productivity of organic Cichorium intybus produced with alternative substrates Produtividade de almeirão orgânico produzido com substratos alternativos |
title |
Productivity of organic Cichorium intybus produced with alternative substrates |
spellingShingle |
Productivity of organic Cichorium intybus produced with alternative substrates Uchôa, Thays Lemos Cichorium intybus Cultivo orgânico Produção de mudas. Cichorium intybus Organic farming Seedling production. |
title_short |
Productivity of organic Cichorium intybus produced with alternative substrates |
title_full |
Productivity of organic Cichorium intybus produced with alternative substrates |
title_fullStr |
Productivity of organic Cichorium intybus produced with alternative substrates |
title_full_unstemmed |
Productivity of organic Cichorium intybus produced with alternative substrates |
title_sort |
Productivity of organic Cichorium intybus produced with alternative substrates |
author |
Uchôa, Thays Lemos |
author_facet |
Uchôa, Thays Lemos Almeida, Waldiane Araújo de Araújo Neto, Sebastião Elviro de Souza, Luís Gustavo de Souza e Ferreira, Regina Lúcia Félix Silva, Nilciléia Mendes da |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Almeida, Waldiane Araújo de Araújo Neto, Sebastião Elviro de Souza, Luís Gustavo de Souza e Ferreira, Regina Lúcia Félix Silva, Nilciléia Mendes da |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Uchôa, Thays Lemos Almeida, Waldiane Araújo de Araújo Neto, Sebastião Elviro de Souza, Luís Gustavo de Souza e Ferreira, Regina Lúcia Félix Silva, Nilciléia Mendes da |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Cichorium intybus Cultivo orgânico Produção de mudas. Cichorium intybus Organic farming Seedling production. |
topic |
Cichorium intybus Cultivo orgânico Produção de mudas. Cichorium intybus Organic farming Seedling production. |
description |
The objective of this work was to evaluate alternative substrates in the quality of seedlings and in the productivity of chicory in organic cultivation. The experiment conducted in two phases: plant nursery and field, in June 2016. The experimental field is located at Seridó Ecological farm, in Rio Branco, Acre. The experimental design was a randomized block with five treatments and four replications. The treatments constituted by the Golden commercial substrate used as control and by four other alternative substrates: soil (30%), organic compound (30%); Soil conditioner (30%), coal (10%), natural thermophosphate (1.5 kg m-3), dolomitic limestone (1.0 kg m-3) and potassium sulphate (1.0 kg m-3). What differentiated them was the substitution of the conditioner: Carbonized rice husk; Coconut fiber; Fiber of the stem of ouricurí palm (Attalea phalerata) or Cork decomposed of kapok (Ceiba pentandra). The cultivar used was Sugar loaf. At 22 days after sowing, the seedlings evaluated to obtain the quality index and at 60 days after transplanting to the field the total fresh mass, commercial, total dry, commercial and total and commercial productivity were evaluated. The substrates containing kapok and coconut fiber had better performance for root dry mass and Dickson quality index in the seedlings phase, total fresh mass, total and commercial dry mass and total field productivity. |
publishDate |
2018 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2018-04-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://www.gvaa.com.br/revista/index.php/RVADS/article/view/5038 10.18378/rvads.v13i2.5038 |
url |
https://www.gvaa.com.br/revista/index.php/RVADS/article/view/5038 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.18378/rvads.v13i2.5038 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.gvaa.com.br/revista/index.php/RVADS/article/view/5038/5831 https://www.gvaa.com.br/revista/index.php/RVADS/article/view/5038/5832 https://www.gvaa.com.br/revista/index.php/RVADS/article/view/5038/9248 https://www.gvaa.com.br/revista/index.php/RVADS/article/view/5038/9249 https://www.gvaa.com.br/revista/index.php/RVADS/article/view/5038/9256 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2018 Thays Lemos Uchôa et al. info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2018 Thays Lemos Uchôa et al. |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html application/pdf application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document application/pdf application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Editora Verde |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Editora Verde |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Verde de Agroecologia e Desenvolvimento Sustentável; Vol. 13 No. 2 (2018); 132 - 137 Revista Verde de Agroecologia e Desenvolvimento Sustentável; Vol. 13 Núm. 2 (2018); 132 - 137 Revista Verde de Agroecologia e Desenvolvimento Sustentável; v. 13 n. 2 (2018); 132 - 137 1981-8203 reponame:Revista Verde de Agroecologia e Desenvolvimento Sustentavel instname:Grupo Verde de Agroecologia e Abelhas (GVAA) instacron:GVAA |
instname_str |
Grupo Verde de Agroecologia e Abelhas (GVAA) |
instacron_str |
GVAA |
institution |
GVAA |
reponame_str |
Revista Verde de Agroecologia e Desenvolvimento Sustentavel |
collection |
Revista Verde de Agroecologia e Desenvolvimento Sustentavel |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Verde de Agroecologia e Desenvolvimento Sustentavel - Grupo Verde de Agroecologia e Abelhas (GVAA) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
rvadsgvaa@gmail.com || patriciomaracaja@gmail.com || revistaverde1@gmail.com || suporte@antsoft.com.br |
_version_ |
1798948091023327232 |