Productivity of organic Cichorium intybus produced with alternative substrates

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Uchôa, Thays Lemos
Data de Publicação: 2018
Outros Autores: Almeida, Waldiane Araújo de, Araújo Neto, Sebastião Elviro de, Souza, Luís Gustavo de Souza e, Ferreira, Regina Lúcia Félix, Silva, Nilciléia Mendes da
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista Verde de Agroecologia e Desenvolvimento Sustentavel
Texto Completo: https://www.gvaa.com.br/revista/index.php/RVADS/article/view/5038
Resumo: The objective of this work was to evaluate alternative substrates in the quality of seedlings and in the productivity of chicory in organic cultivation. The experiment conducted in two phases: plant nursery and field, in June 2016. The experimental field is located at Seridó Ecological farm, in Rio Branco, Acre. The experimental design was a randomized block with five treatments and four replications. The treatments constituted by the Golden commercial substrate used as control and by four other alternative substrates: soil (30%), organic compound (30%); Soil conditioner (30%), coal (10%), natural thermophosphate (1.5 kg m-3), dolomitic limestone (1.0 kg m-3) and potassium sulphate (1.0 kg m-3). What differentiated them was the substitution of the conditioner: Carbonized rice husk; Coconut fiber; Fiber of the stem of ouricurí palm (Attalea phalerata) or Cork decomposed of kapok (Ceiba pentandra). The cultivar used was Sugar loaf. At 22 days after sowing, the seedlings evaluated to obtain the quality index and at 60 days after transplanting to the field the total fresh mass, commercial, total dry, commercial and total and commercial productivity were evaluated. The substrates containing kapok and coconut fiber had better performance for root dry mass and Dickson quality index in the seedlings phase, total fresh mass, total and commercial dry mass and total field productivity.
id GVAA-1_cba54de9c02afb8b4c169640c985c1ce
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.gvaa.com.br:article/5038
network_acronym_str GVAA-1
network_name_str Revista Verde de Agroecologia e Desenvolvimento Sustentavel
repository_id_str
spelling Productivity of organic Cichorium intybus produced with alternative substratesProdutividade de almeirão orgânico produzido com substratos alternativosCichorium intybusCultivo orgânicoProdução de mudas.Cichorium intybusOrganic farmingSeedling production.The objective of this work was to evaluate alternative substrates in the quality of seedlings and in the productivity of chicory in organic cultivation. The experiment conducted in two phases: plant nursery and field, in June 2016. The experimental field is located at Seridó Ecological farm, in Rio Branco, Acre. The experimental design was a randomized block with five treatments and four replications. The treatments constituted by the Golden commercial substrate used as control and by four other alternative substrates: soil (30%), organic compound (30%); Soil conditioner (30%), coal (10%), natural thermophosphate (1.5 kg m-3), dolomitic limestone (1.0 kg m-3) and potassium sulphate (1.0 kg m-3). What differentiated them was the substitution of the conditioner: Carbonized rice husk; Coconut fiber; Fiber of the stem of ouricurí palm (Attalea phalerata) or Cork decomposed of kapok (Ceiba pentandra). The cultivar used was Sugar loaf. At 22 days after sowing, the seedlings evaluated to obtain the quality index and at 60 days after transplanting to the field the total fresh mass, commercial, total dry, commercial and total and commercial productivity were evaluated. The substrates containing kapok and coconut fiber had better performance for root dry mass and Dickson quality index in the seedlings phase, total fresh mass, total and commercial dry mass and total field productivity.O objetivo deste trabalho foi avaliar substratos alternativos na qualidade de mudas e produtividade do almeirão em cultivo orgânico. O experimento foi conduzido em duas fases: em viveiro e em campo, em junho de 2016. O campo experimental está localizado no Sítio Ecológico Seridó, em Rio Branco, Acre. O delineamento utilizado foi em blocos casualizados com cinco tratamentos e quatro repetições. Os tratamentos foram constituídos pelo substrato comercial Golden® utilizado como controle e por mais quatro substratos alternativos. Os substratos alternativos foram compostos por: terra (30%), composto orgânico (30%); condicionador de solo (30%), carvão (10%), termofosfato natural (1,5 kg m-3), calcário dolomítico (1,0 kg m-3) e sulfato de potássio (1,0 kg m-3), o que os diferenciaram foi a substituição do condicionador: casca de arroz carbonizada; fibra de coco; fibra do caule da palmeira ouricurí (Attalea phalerata) ou caule decomposto de sumaúma (Ceiba pentandra). A cultivar utilizada foi almeirão pão de açúcar. Aos 22 dias após a semeadura as mudas foram avaliadas para a obtenção do índice de qualidade e aos 60 dias após o transplantio a campo avaliou-se a massa fresca total, comercial, seca total, comercial e a produtividade total e comercial. Os substratos contendo sumaúma e fibra de coco tiveram melhor desempenho para massa seca da raiz e índice de qualidade de Dickson na fase de muda, massa fresca total, massa seca total e comercial e produtividade total à campo.Editora Verde2018-04-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlapplication/pdfapplication/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.documentapplication/pdfapplication/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.documenthttps://www.gvaa.com.br/revista/index.php/RVADS/article/view/503810.18378/rvads.v13i2.5038Revista Verde de Agroecologia e Desenvolvimento Sustentável; Vol. 13 No. 2 (2018); 132 - 137Revista Verde de Agroecologia e Desenvolvimento Sustentável; Vol. 13 Núm. 2 (2018); 132 - 137Revista Verde de Agroecologia e Desenvolvimento Sustentável; v. 13 n. 2 (2018); 132 - 1371981-8203reponame:Revista Verde de Agroecologia e Desenvolvimento Sustentavelinstname:Grupo Verde de Agroecologia e Abelhas (GVAA)instacron:GVAAporhttps://www.gvaa.com.br/revista/index.php/RVADS/article/view/5038/5831https://www.gvaa.com.br/revista/index.php/RVADS/article/view/5038/5832https://www.gvaa.com.br/revista/index.php/RVADS/article/view/5038/9248https://www.gvaa.com.br/revista/index.php/RVADS/article/view/5038/9249https://www.gvaa.com.br/revista/index.php/RVADS/article/view/5038/9256Copyright (c) 2018 Thays Lemos Uchôa et al.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessUchôa, Thays LemosAlmeida, Waldiane Araújo deAraújo Neto, Sebastião Elviro deSouza, Luís Gustavo de Souza eFerreira, Regina Lúcia FélixSilva, Nilciléia Mendes da2021-06-14T13:14:19Zoai:ojs.gvaa.com.br:article/5038Revistahttps://www.gvaa.com.br/revista/index.php/RVADS/PUBhttps://www.gvaa.com.br/revista/index.php/RVADS/oairvadsgvaa@gmail.com || patriciomaracaja@gmail.com || revistaverde1@gmail.com || suporte@antsoft.com.br1981-82031981-8203opendoar:2024-03-06T12:59:21.346677Revista Verde de Agroecologia e Desenvolvimento Sustentavel - Grupo Verde de Agroecologia e Abelhas (GVAA)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Productivity of organic Cichorium intybus produced with alternative substrates
Produtividade de almeirão orgânico produzido com substratos alternativos
title Productivity of organic Cichorium intybus produced with alternative substrates
spellingShingle Productivity of organic Cichorium intybus produced with alternative substrates
Uchôa, Thays Lemos
Cichorium intybus
Cultivo orgânico
Produção de mudas.
Cichorium intybus
Organic farming
Seedling production.
title_short Productivity of organic Cichorium intybus produced with alternative substrates
title_full Productivity of organic Cichorium intybus produced with alternative substrates
title_fullStr Productivity of organic Cichorium intybus produced with alternative substrates
title_full_unstemmed Productivity of organic Cichorium intybus produced with alternative substrates
title_sort Productivity of organic Cichorium intybus produced with alternative substrates
author Uchôa, Thays Lemos
author_facet Uchôa, Thays Lemos
Almeida, Waldiane Araújo de
Araújo Neto, Sebastião Elviro de
Souza, Luís Gustavo de Souza e
Ferreira, Regina Lúcia Félix
Silva, Nilciléia Mendes da
author_role author
author2 Almeida, Waldiane Araújo de
Araújo Neto, Sebastião Elviro de
Souza, Luís Gustavo de Souza e
Ferreira, Regina Lúcia Félix
Silva, Nilciléia Mendes da
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Uchôa, Thays Lemos
Almeida, Waldiane Araújo de
Araújo Neto, Sebastião Elviro de
Souza, Luís Gustavo de Souza e
Ferreira, Regina Lúcia Félix
Silva, Nilciléia Mendes da
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Cichorium intybus
Cultivo orgânico
Produção de mudas.
Cichorium intybus
Organic farming
Seedling production.
topic Cichorium intybus
Cultivo orgânico
Produção de mudas.
Cichorium intybus
Organic farming
Seedling production.
description The objective of this work was to evaluate alternative substrates in the quality of seedlings and in the productivity of chicory in organic cultivation. The experiment conducted in two phases: plant nursery and field, in June 2016. The experimental field is located at Seridó Ecological farm, in Rio Branco, Acre. The experimental design was a randomized block with five treatments and four replications. The treatments constituted by the Golden commercial substrate used as control and by four other alternative substrates: soil (30%), organic compound (30%); Soil conditioner (30%), coal (10%), natural thermophosphate (1.5 kg m-3), dolomitic limestone (1.0 kg m-3) and potassium sulphate (1.0 kg m-3). What differentiated them was the substitution of the conditioner: Carbonized rice husk; Coconut fiber; Fiber of the stem of ouricurí palm (Attalea phalerata) or Cork decomposed of kapok (Ceiba pentandra). The cultivar used was Sugar loaf. At 22 days after sowing, the seedlings evaluated to obtain the quality index and at 60 days after transplanting to the field the total fresh mass, commercial, total dry, commercial and total and commercial productivity were evaluated. The substrates containing kapok and coconut fiber had better performance for root dry mass and Dickson quality index in the seedlings phase, total fresh mass, total and commercial dry mass and total field productivity.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-04-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.gvaa.com.br/revista/index.php/RVADS/article/view/5038
10.18378/rvads.v13i2.5038
url https://www.gvaa.com.br/revista/index.php/RVADS/article/view/5038
identifier_str_mv 10.18378/rvads.v13i2.5038
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.gvaa.com.br/revista/index.php/RVADS/article/view/5038/5831
https://www.gvaa.com.br/revista/index.php/RVADS/article/view/5038/5832
https://www.gvaa.com.br/revista/index.php/RVADS/article/view/5038/9248
https://www.gvaa.com.br/revista/index.php/RVADS/article/view/5038/9249
https://www.gvaa.com.br/revista/index.php/RVADS/article/view/5038/9256
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2018 Thays Lemos Uchôa et al.
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2018 Thays Lemos Uchôa et al.
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
application/pdf
application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
application/pdf
application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Editora Verde
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Editora Verde
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Verde de Agroecologia e Desenvolvimento Sustentável; Vol. 13 No. 2 (2018); 132 - 137
Revista Verde de Agroecologia e Desenvolvimento Sustentável; Vol. 13 Núm. 2 (2018); 132 - 137
Revista Verde de Agroecologia e Desenvolvimento Sustentável; v. 13 n. 2 (2018); 132 - 137
1981-8203
reponame:Revista Verde de Agroecologia e Desenvolvimento Sustentavel
instname:Grupo Verde de Agroecologia e Abelhas (GVAA)
instacron:GVAA
instname_str Grupo Verde de Agroecologia e Abelhas (GVAA)
instacron_str GVAA
institution GVAA
reponame_str Revista Verde de Agroecologia e Desenvolvimento Sustentavel
collection Revista Verde de Agroecologia e Desenvolvimento Sustentavel
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Verde de Agroecologia e Desenvolvimento Sustentavel - Grupo Verde de Agroecologia e Abelhas (GVAA)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv rvadsgvaa@gmail.com || patriciomaracaja@gmail.com || revistaverde1@gmail.com || suporte@antsoft.com.br
_version_ 1798948091023327232