Comparison between synthetic models and human viscera in anatomy teaching
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2023 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista Brasileira de Educação e Saúde |
Texto Completo: | https://www.gvaa.com.br/revista/index.php/REBES/article/view/9394 |
Resumo: | Anatomical knowledge is essential in medical education and its transmission mode has undergone changes throughout these recent years. The use of synthetic anatomical models proved to be a common resource, even with the scarce supply of cadaveric material in some laboratories. It is noted, however, that there is a lack of summative empirical evidence in the literature about the best instrument used when teaching anatomy. The purpose of this work was to compare two pedagogical instruments most commonly used when teaching anatomy: synthetic anatomical models and human viscera, concerning the performance of students during evaluations. This was a randomized experimental study in which all first-year students from Medical and Nursing classes were invited to participate from 2019 to 2020. The modules selected from the anatomical curriculum to be used in the dynamic of the classes and evaluations were about the anatomy of the thorax and abdomen. The dynamics included the use of synthetic models and cadaveric specimens. In order to compare the results between participants who performed the practical lessons with synthetic models and those who performed it with cadaveric specimens, non-parametric tests were used, with the outcome being the number of correct answers in each assessment applied after the lessons. After excluding ineligible participants, from 185 individuals, were included in the research 122 students from the medical (n=69) and nursing (n=53) areas. For the two modules evaluated, in general terms, no differences were noted between the use of synthetical models and human viscera regarding the performance of participants in the assessments. We conclude that the use of synthetical models might be a suitable alternative to conventional training with cadaveric specimens for teaching anatomy. However, more studies should be conducted to support this evidence. |
id |
GVAA-2_94283c365e66c4c053e9a5be7ceebd05 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.gvaa.com.br:article/9394 |
network_acronym_str |
GVAA-2 |
network_name_str |
Revista Brasileira de Educação e Saúde |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Comparison between synthetic models and human viscera in anatomy teachingComparação entre modelos sintéticos e vísceras humanas no ensino da anatomiaDeCSAnatomyMedical educationEffectiveDeCSAnatomiaEducação médicaEfetivoAnatomical knowledge is essential in medical education and its transmission mode has undergone changes throughout these recent years. The use of synthetic anatomical models proved to be a common resource, even with the scarce supply of cadaveric material in some laboratories. It is noted, however, that there is a lack of summative empirical evidence in the literature about the best instrument used when teaching anatomy. The purpose of this work was to compare two pedagogical instruments most commonly used when teaching anatomy: synthetic anatomical models and human viscera, concerning the performance of students during evaluations. This was a randomized experimental study in which all first-year students from Medical and Nursing classes were invited to participate from 2019 to 2020. The modules selected from the anatomical curriculum to be used in the dynamic of the classes and evaluations were about the anatomy of the thorax and abdomen. The dynamics included the use of synthetic models and cadaveric specimens. In order to compare the results between participants who performed the practical lessons with synthetic models and those who performed it with cadaveric specimens, non-parametric tests were used, with the outcome being the number of correct answers in each assessment applied after the lessons. After excluding ineligible participants, from 185 individuals, were included in the research 122 students from the medical (n=69) and nursing (n=53) areas. For the two modules evaluated, in general terms, no differences were noted between the use of synthetical models and human viscera regarding the performance of participants in the assessments. We conclude that the use of synthetical models might be a suitable alternative to conventional training with cadaveric specimens for teaching anatomy. However, more studies should be conducted to support this evidence.O conhecimento da anatomia é imprescindível na formação médica e seu modo de transmissão passa por mudanças nos últimos anos. A utilização de peças anatômicas sintéticas revelou-se um recurso comum, suprindo inclusive a escassez de material cadavérico em alguns laboratórios. Nota-se, entretanto, que ainda há falta de evidência empírica quantitativa na literatura sobre o melhor instrumento de ensino anatômico. O objetivo deste trabalho foi comparar dois dos instrumentos pedagógicos mais comuns no ensino da anatomia, modelos anatômicos sintéticos e vísceras humanas, no desempenho de alunos em testes de avaliação. Métodos: Trata-se de um estudo experimental randomizado com estudantes do primeiro ano dos cursos de medicina e enfermagem de 2019 a 2020. Foram selecionados os módulos da grade curricular de anatomia de tórax e abdômen para a dinâmica de aulas e provas. As dinâmicas incluíram a utilização de modelos sintéticos e espécimes cadavéricos. Para comparar o desempenho entre os participantes que realizaram a prática com modelos sintéticos e aqueles que realizaram com espécimes cadavéricos, utilizaram-se testes não paramétricos, tendo como desfecho o número de acertos em cada avaliação aplicada após as práticas. Após a exclusão de participantes inelegíveis, dos 185 indivíduos, incluíram-se na pesquisa 122 estudantes das áreas de medicina (n=69) e enfermagem (n=53). Para os dois módulos avaliados, em linhas gerais, não houve diferença entre modelos sintéticos e peças humanas quanto ao desempenho dos participantes nas avaliações. O uso de material sintético não apresentou diferenças relevantes sobre o desempenho dos estudantes nas avaliações, quando comparado ao material cadavérico previamente dissecado. Desta forma, concluímos que os modelos sintéticos podem ser considerados como uma alternativa ao treinamento convencional no ensino da anatomia, embora mais estudos devam ser realizados para apoiar este achado.GRUPO VERDE DE AGROECOLOGIA E ABELHAS2023-05-26info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.gvaa.com.br/revista/index.php/REBES/article/view/939410.18378/rebes.v13i2.9394Revista Brasileira de Educação e Saúde; Vol. 13 No. 2 (2023); 132-139Revista Brasileira de Educação e Saúde; Vol. 13 Núm. 2 (2023); 132-139Revista Brasileira de Educação e Saúde; v. 13 n. 2 (2023); 132-1392358-2391reponame:Revista Brasileira de Educação e Saúdeinstname:Grupo Verde de Agroecologia e Abelhas (GVAA)instacron:GVAAporhttps://www.gvaa.com.br/revista/index.php/REBES/article/view/9394/11573Copyright (c) 2023 Jorge Nebhan Haidar Filho, Eunice Stancati, Ângela Tavares Paeshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessHaidar Filho, Jorge NebhanStancati, Eunice Paes, Ângela Tavares2023-05-26T22:51:54Zoai:ojs.gvaa.com.br:article/9394Revistahttps://www.gvaa.com.br/revista/index.php/REBESPRIhttp://www.gvaa.com.br/revista/index.php/REBES/oaimilenanunes@fiponline.edu.br||patriciomaracaja@gmail.com2358-23912358-2391opendoar:2023-05-26T22:51:54Revista Brasileira de Educação e Saúde - Grupo Verde de Agroecologia e Abelhas (GVAA)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Comparison between synthetic models and human viscera in anatomy teaching Comparação entre modelos sintéticos e vísceras humanas no ensino da anatomia |
title |
Comparison between synthetic models and human viscera in anatomy teaching |
spellingShingle |
Comparison between synthetic models and human viscera in anatomy teaching Haidar Filho, Jorge Nebhan DeCS Anatomy Medical education Effective DeCS Anatomia Educação médica Efetivo |
title_short |
Comparison between synthetic models and human viscera in anatomy teaching |
title_full |
Comparison between synthetic models and human viscera in anatomy teaching |
title_fullStr |
Comparison between synthetic models and human viscera in anatomy teaching |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comparison between synthetic models and human viscera in anatomy teaching |
title_sort |
Comparison between synthetic models and human viscera in anatomy teaching |
author |
Haidar Filho, Jorge Nebhan |
author_facet |
Haidar Filho, Jorge Nebhan Stancati, Eunice Paes, Ângela Tavares |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Stancati, Eunice Paes, Ângela Tavares |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Haidar Filho, Jorge Nebhan Stancati, Eunice Paes, Ângela Tavares |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
DeCS Anatomy Medical education Effective DeCS Anatomia Educação médica Efetivo |
topic |
DeCS Anatomy Medical education Effective DeCS Anatomia Educação médica Efetivo |
description |
Anatomical knowledge is essential in medical education and its transmission mode has undergone changes throughout these recent years. The use of synthetic anatomical models proved to be a common resource, even with the scarce supply of cadaveric material in some laboratories. It is noted, however, that there is a lack of summative empirical evidence in the literature about the best instrument used when teaching anatomy. The purpose of this work was to compare two pedagogical instruments most commonly used when teaching anatomy: synthetic anatomical models and human viscera, concerning the performance of students during evaluations. This was a randomized experimental study in which all first-year students from Medical and Nursing classes were invited to participate from 2019 to 2020. The modules selected from the anatomical curriculum to be used in the dynamic of the classes and evaluations were about the anatomy of the thorax and abdomen. The dynamics included the use of synthetic models and cadaveric specimens. In order to compare the results between participants who performed the practical lessons with synthetic models and those who performed it with cadaveric specimens, non-parametric tests were used, with the outcome being the number of correct answers in each assessment applied after the lessons. After excluding ineligible participants, from 185 individuals, were included in the research 122 students from the medical (n=69) and nursing (n=53) areas. For the two modules evaluated, in general terms, no differences were noted between the use of synthetical models and human viscera regarding the performance of participants in the assessments. We conclude that the use of synthetical models might be a suitable alternative to conventional training with cadaveric specimens for teaching anatomy. However, more studies should be conducted to support this evidence. |
publishDate |
2023 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2023-05-26 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://www.gvaa.com.br/revista/index.php/REBES/article/view/9394 10.18378/rebes.v13i2.9394 |
url |
https://www.gvaa.com.br/revista/index.php/REBES/article/view/9394 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.18378/rebes.v13i2.9394 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.gvaa.com.br/revista/index.php/REBES/article/view/9394/11573 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2023 Jorge Nebhan Haidar Filho, Eunice Stancati, Ângela Tavares Paes http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2023 Jorge Nebhan Haidar Filho, Eunice Stancati, Ângela Tavares Paes http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
GRUPO VERDE DE AGROECOLOGIA E ABELHAS |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
GRUPO VERDE DE AGROECOLOGIA E ABELHAS |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira de Educação e Saúde; Vol. 13 No. 2 (2023); 132-139 Revista Brasileira de Educação e Saúde; Vol. 13 Núm. 2 (2023); 132-139 Revista Brasileira de Educação e Saúde; v. 13 n. 2 (2023); 132-139 2358-2391 reponame:Revista Brasileira de Educação e Saúde instname:Grupo Verde de Agroecologia e Abelhas (GVAA) instacron:GVAA |
instname_str |
Grupo Verde de Agroecologia e Abelhas (GVAA) |
instacron_str |
GVAA |
institution |
GVAA |
reponame_str |
Revista Brasileira de Educação e Saúde |
collection |
Revista Brasileira de Educação e Saúde |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira de Educação e Saúde - Grupo Verde de Agroecologia e Abelhas (GVAA) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
milenanunes@fiponline.edu.br||patriciomaracaja@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1798949667957899264 |