Greenhouse and field assessment of rhizobacteria to control guava decline

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Almeida,Alexandre Macedo
Data de Publicação: 2011
Outros Autores: Gomes,Vicente Martins, Souza,Ricardo Moreira
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Bragantia
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0006-87052011000400016
Resumo: In an effort to devise a biological strategy to control guava decline, 120 rhizobacteria isolates were obtained from symptomless guava trees located in Meloidogyne enterolobii-infested orchards. Of those isolates, 44 were assessed for their potential to reduce nematode's reproduction: for each isolate, six guava stem cuttings were embedded for eight hours with bacterial suspension and transplanted. Upon development of the roots, the plants were inoculated with 2000 nematode eggs and allowed to grow for four months under greenhouse. Seedlings embedded with water, inoculated or not with the nematode, served as controls. All treatments were equivalent in the five variables that assessed plant development. Several rhizobacteria reduced (p<0.05) the final nematode population (Fp), Fp/gram of root and reproduction factor, although not to satisfactory levels. Subsequently, a two-year experiment was set up in a guava orchard affected by guava decline, in which three of the most effective rhizobacterial isolates were compared with the biological products Nemat® and Nemaplus® for their ability to reduce variables related to nematode parasitism and increase guava productivity. Seven bimonthly applications of these treatments under the tree canopy were unable to reduce nematode parasitism and increase productivity. The decline and death of some plants forced the experiment to be stopped after the first harvest. In conclusion, rhizobacteria applications seem unable to reduce the parasitism of M. enterolobii on guava plants, and even less to reduce the extensive root decay or alleviate the physiological stress suffered by trees affected by guava decline.
id IAC-1_2cc44e50c88977bde3f7de0ca63a6e2c
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0006-87052011000400016
network_acronym_str IAC-1
network_name_str Bragantia
repository_id_str
spelling Greenhouse and field assessment of rhizobacteria to control guava declinePsidium guajavaMeloidogyne enterolobiibiological controlFusarium solaniIn an effort to devise a biological strategy to control guava decline, 120 rhizobacteria isolates were obtained from symptomless guava trees located in Meloidogyne enterolobii-infested orchards. Of those isolates, 44 were assessed for their potential to reduce nematode's reproduction: for each isolate, six guava stem cuttings were embedded for eight hours with bacterial suspension and transplanted. Upon development of the roots, the plants were inoculated with 2000 nematode eggs and allowed to grow for four months under greenhouse. Seedlings embedded with water, inoculated or not with the nematode, served as controls. All treatments were equivalent in the five variables that assessed plant development. Several rhizobacteria reduced (p<0.05) the final nematode population (Fp), Fp/gram of root and reproduction factor, although not to satisfactory levels. Subsequently, a two-year experiment was set up in a guava orchard affected by guava decline, in which three of the most effective rhizobacterial isolates were compared with the biological products Nemat® and Nemaplus® for their ability to reduce variables related to nematode parasitism and increase guava productivity. Seven bimonthly applications of these treatments under the tree canopy were unable to reduce nematode parasitism and increase productivity. The decline and death of some plants forced the experiment to be stopped after the first harvest. In conclusion, rhizobacteria applications seem unable to reduce the parasitism of M. enterolobii on guava plants, and even less to reduce the extensive root decay or alleviate the physiological stress suffered by trees affected by guava decline.Instituto Agronômico de Campinas2011-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0006-87052011000400016Bragantia v.70 n.4 2011reponame:Bragantiainstname:Instituto Agronômico de Campinas (IAC)instacron:IAC10.1590/S0006-87052011000400016info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAlmeida,Alexandre MacedoGomes,Vicente MartinsSouza,Ricardo Moreiraeng2012-01-18T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0006-87052011000400016Revistahttps://www.scielo.br/j/brag/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpbragantia@iac.sp.gov.br||bragantia@iac.sp.gov.br1678-44990006-8705opendoar:2012-01-18T00:00Bragantia - Instituto Agronômico de Campinas (IAC)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Greenhouse and field assessment of rhizobacteria to control guava decline
title Greenhouse and field assessment of rhizobacteria to control guava decline
spellingShingle Greenhouse and field assessment of rhizobacteria to control guava decline
Almeida,Alexandre Macedo
Psidium guajava
Meloidogyne enterolobii
biological control
Fusarium solani
title_short Greenhouse and field assessment of rhizobacteria to control guava decline
title_full Greenhouse and field assessment of rhizobacteria to control guava decline
title_fullStr Greenhouse and field assessment of rhizobacteria to control guava decline
title_full_unstemmed Greenhouse and field assessment of rhizobacteria to control guava decline
title_sort Greenhouse and field assessment of rhizobacteria to control guava decline
author Almeida,Alexandre Macedo
author_facet Almeida,Alexandre Macedo
Gomes,Vicente Martins
Souza,Ricardo Moreira
author_role author
author2 Gomes,Vicente Martins
Souza,Ricardo Moreira
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Almeida,Alexandre Macedo
Gomes,Vicente Martins
Souza,Ricardo Moreira
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Psidium guajava
Meloidogyne enterolobii
biological control
Fusarium solani
topic Psidium guajava
Meloidogyne enterolobii
biological control
Fusarium solani
description In an effort to devise a biological strategy to control guava decline, 120 rhizobacteria isolates were obtained from symptomless guava trees located in Meloidogyne enterolobii-infested orchards. Of those isolates, 44 were assessed for their potential to reduce nematode's reproduction: for each isolate, six guava stem cuttings were embedded for eight hours with bacterial suspension and transplanted. Upon development of the roots, the plants were inoculated with 2000 nematode eggs and allowed to grow for four months under greenhouse. Seedlings embedded with water, inoculated or not with the nematode, served as controls. All treatments were equivalent in the five variables that assessed plant development. Several rhizobacteria reduced (p<0.05) the final nematode population (Fp), Fp/gram of root and reproduction factor, although not to satisfactory levels. Subsequently, a two-year experiment was set up in a guava orchard affected by guava decline, in which three of the most effective rhizobacterial isolates were compared with the biological products Nemat® and Nemaplus® for their ability to reduce variables related to nematode parasitism and increase guava productivity. Seven bimonthly applications of these treatments under the tree canopy were unable to reduce nematode parasitism and increase productivity. The decline and death of some plants forced the experiment to be stopped after the first harvest. In conclusion, rhizobacteria applications seem unable to reduce the parasitism of M. enterolobii on guava plants, and even less to reduce the extensive root decay or alleviate the physiological stress suffered by trees affected by guava decline.
publishDate 2011
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2011-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0006-87052011000400016
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0006-87052011000400016
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/S0006-87052011000400016
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto Agronômico de Campinas
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto Agronômico de Campinas
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Bragantia v.70 n.4 2011
reponame:Bragantia
instname:Instituto Agronômico de Campinas (IAC)
instacron:IAC
instname_str Instituto Agronômico de Campinas (IAC)
instacron_str IAC
institution IAC
reponame_str Bragantia
collection Bragantia
repository.name.fl_str_mv Bragantia - Instituto Agronômico de Campinas (IAC)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv bragantia@iac.sp.gov.br||bragantia@iac.sp.gov.br
_version_ 1754193302080454656