Researcher perceptions and practices in open access publication in two engineering postgraduate programs

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Furnival, Ariadne Chloe
Data de Publicação: 2017
Outros Autores: Guirra, Daniel Andre Rigo
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista Brasileira de Direito Civil (Online)
DOI: 10.20396/rdbci.v15i2.8646398
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/rdbci/article/view/8646398
Resumo: The article presents the results and discussion of a study that aimed to identify the practices and perceptions of researchers concerning making their publications available in open access, as compared to publishing in subscription, paywalled journals. The study subjects were researchers accredited in two postgraduate Engineering programs that have obtained the maximum evaluation by CAPES. A mixed methodological approach was used. Quantitative publication data for the period 2008 to 2016 were collected and tabulated from the researchers´ Lattes curricula using the ScriptLattes and VantagePoint software respectively. The 244 periodicals and 970 published articles identified in this phase were then researched in other platforms such as SciELO, DOAJ, SHERPA/ ROMEO, Google Scholar and in the postgraduate programs´ Institutional Repository itself to verify the proportion of published articles available in open access. Concomitantly, semi-structured interviews were conducted with 11 researchers of the two postgraduate programs to identify their perceptions regarding publication in general and specifically, in open access and self-archiving in open repositories. From the quantitative data collected, it was found that only 21.9% of the articles published in the first postgraduate program and 29.8% of the second are available in open access. However, in the interviews, most authors support open access while at the same time demonstrating little knowledge of open access repositories, including that of their own institution. They are also unaware of the complementary possibility of first publishing in high-impact journals, and subsequently depositing the same article in the open access repository on the completion of an eventual publisher embargo period.
id IBDCivil_e9acc20e4b6de62f0e67355bf2d01f2b
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br:article/8646398
network_acronym_str IBDCivil
network_name_str Revista Brasileira de Direito Civil (Online)
spelling Researcher perceptions and practices in open access publication in two engineering postgraduate programsAs percepções e práticas de publicação em acesso aberto dos pesquisadores de dois programas de pós-graduação em engenhariaAcesso à informação. Bases de dados de texto completo. Publicação. Pesquisador.Acesso AbertoOpen access. Scientific communication. Publishing practices. Researcher perceptions.The article presents the results and discussion of a study that aimed to identify the practices and perceptions of researchers concerning making their publications available in open access, as compared to publishing in subscription, paywalled journals. The study subjects were researchers accredited in two postgraduate Engineering programs that have obtained the maximum evaluation by CAPES. A mixed methodological approach was used. Quantitative publication data for the period 2008 to 2016 were collected and tabulated from the researchers´ Lattes curricula using the ScriptLattes and VantagePoint software respectively. The 244 periodicals and 970 published articles identified in this phase were then researched in other platforms such as SciELO, DOAJ, SHERPA/ ROMEO, Google Scholar and in the postgraduate programs´ Institutional Repository itself to verify the proportion of published articles available in open access. Concomitantly, semi-structured interviews were conducted with 11 researchers of the two postgraduate programs to identify their perceptions regarding publication in general and specifically, in open access and self-archiving in open repositories. From the quantitative data collected, it was found that only 21.9% of the articles published in the first postgraduate program and 29.8% of the second are available in open access. However, in the interviews, most authors support open access while at the same time demonstrating little knowledge of open access repositories, including that of their own institution. They are also unaware of the complementary possibility of first publishing in high-impact journals, and subsequently depositing the same article in the open access repository on the completion of an eventual publisher embargo period.Apresenta os resultados de um estudo que buscou conhecer as práticas e percepções de pesquisadores credenciados em dois programas de pós-graduação em engenharia avaliados com nota sete pela CAPES, em relação à publicação em canais de acesso aberto comparado com aqueles restritos, de assinatura.  Foi usada uma abordagem metodológica mista. Dados de publicação referentes ao período 2008 a 2012 foram levantados e tabulados dos currículos Lattes dos pesquisadores usando os softwares ScriptLattes e VantagePoint respectivamente. Os 212 títulos de revistas científicas e os 561 artigos identificados dessa fase foram daí pesquisados em outras plataformas como o SciELO, DOAJ, SHERPA/ROMEO, Google Acadêmico e o próprio Repositório Institucional da instituição dos programas de pós-graduação para verificar a proporção de artigos publicados disponível em acesso aberto. Concomitantemente a esses levantamentos quantitativos, foram realizadas entrevistas semiestruturadas com 11 dos pesquisadores dos dois programas para identificar suas percepções em relação à publicação em geral e especificamente em acesso aberto, e em repositórios abertos. Dos dados quantitativos levantados, foi verificado que apenas 25,8% dos artigos publicados do primeiro programa de pós e 23,3% do segundo são disponíveis em acesso aberto. No entanto, nas entrevistas, a maioria dos autores apoia o acesso aberto, embora manifestem pouco conhecimento sobre a via verde, ou os repositórios abertos, incluindo aquele da sua própria instituição, como também desconhecem o caminho complementar de se publicar primeiramente em revistas de alto impacto com o posterior arquivamento do mesmo artigo no repositório, no término do eventual tempo de embargo da editora.Universidade Estadual de Campinas2017-04-12info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPesquisa Empírica de CampoField empirical researchapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/xmlhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/rdbci/article/view/864639810.20396/rdbci.v15i2.8646398RDBCI: Digital Journal of Library and Information Science; Vol. 15 No. 2 (2017): May/Ago.: "Information professional, acdemic libraries and the information production in the current context"; 469-488RDBCI: Revista Digital de Biblioteconomia e Ciência da Informação; v. 15 n. 2 (2017): maio/ago.: "Profissional da informação, bibliotecas universitárias e a produção da informação no contexto atual"; 469-4881678-765Xreponame:Revista Brasileira de Direito Civil (Online)instname:Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Civil (IBDCivil)instacron:Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Civilporhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/rdbci/article/view/8646398/pdfhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/rdbci/article/view/8646398/pdf_1https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/rdbci/article/view/8646398/xmlFurnival, Ariadne ChloeGuirra, Daniel Andre Rigoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2017-05-29T12:59:50Zoai:ojs.periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br:article/8646398Revistahttps://rbdcivil.ibdcivil.org.br/rbdchttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/rdbci/oai||rbdcivil@ibdcivil.org.br2358-69742358-6974opendoar:2017-05-29T12:59:50Revista Brasileira de Direito Civil (Online) - Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Civil (IBDCivil)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Researcher perceptions and practices in open access publication in two engineering postgraduate programs
As percepções e práticas de publicação em acesso aberto dos pesquisadores de dois programas de pós-graduação em engenharia
title Researcher perceptions and practices in open access publication in two engineering postgraduate programs
spellingShingle Researcher perceptions and practices in open access publication in two engineering postgraduate programs
Researcher perceptions and practices in open access publication in two engineering postgraduate programs
Furnival, Ariadne Chloe
Acesso à informação. Bases de dados de texto completo. Publicação. Pesquisador.
Acesso Aberto
Open access. Scientific communication. Publishing practices. Researcher perceptions.
Furnival, Ariadne Chloe
Acesso à informação. Bases de dados de texto completo. Publicação. Pesquisador.
Acesso Aberto
Open access. Scientific communication. Publishing practices. Researcher perceptions.
title_short Researcher perceptions and practices in open access publication in two engineering postgraduate programs
title_full Researcher perceptions and practices in open access publication in two engineering postgraduate programs
title_fullStr Researcher perceptions and practices in open access publication in two engineering postgraduate programs
Researcher perceptions and practices in open access publication in two engineering postgraduate programs
title_full_unstemmed Researcher perceptions and practices in open access publication in two engineering postgraduate programs
Researcher perceptions and practices in open access publication in two engineering postgraduate programs
title_sort Researcher perceptions and practices in open access publication in two engineering postgraduate programs
author Furnival, Ariadne Chloe
author_facet Furnival, Ariadne Chloe
Furnival, Ariadne Chloe
Guirra, Daniel Andre Rigo
Guirra, Daniel Andre Rigo
author_role author
author2 Guirra, Daniel Andre Rigo
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Furnival, Ariadne Chloe
Guirra, Daniel Andre Rigo
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Acesso à informação. Bases de dados de texto completo. Publicação. Pesquisador.
Acesso Aberto
Open access. Scientific communication. Publishing practices. Researcher perceptions.
topic Acesso à informação. Bases de dados de texto completo. Publicação. Pesquisador.
Acesso Aberto
Open access. Scientific communication. Publishing practices. Researcher perceptions.
description The article presents the results and discussion of a study that aimed to identify the practices and perceptions of researchers concerning making their publications available in open access, as compared to publishing in subscription, paywalled journals. The study subjects were researchers accredited in two postgraduate Engineering programs that have obtained the maximum evaluation by CAPES. A mixed methodological approach was used. Quantitative publication data for the period 2008 to 2016 were collected and tabulated from the researchers´ Lattes curricula using the ScriptLattes and VantagePoint software respectively. The 244 periodicals and 970 published articles identified in this phase were then researched in other platforms such as SciELO, DOAJ, SHERPA/ ROMEO, Google Scholar and in the postgraduate programs´ Institutional Repository itself to verify the proportion of published articles available in open access. Concomitantly, semi-structured interviews were conducted with 11 researchers of the two postgraduate programs to identify their perceptions regarding publication in general and specifically, in open access and self-archiving in open repositories. From the quantitative data collected, it was found that only 21.9% of the articles published in the first postgraduate program and 29.8% of the second are available in open access. However, in the interviews, most authors support open access while at the same time demonstrating little knowledge of open access repositories, including that of their own institution. They are also unaware of the complementary possibility of first publishing in high-impact journals, and subsequently depositing the same article in the open access repository on the completion of an eventual publisher embargo period.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-04-12
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Pesquisa Empírica de Campo
Field empirical research
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/rdbci/article/view/8646398
10.20396/rdbci.v15i2.8646398
url https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/rdbci/article/view/8646398
identifier_str_mv 10.20396/rdbci.v15i2.8646398
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/rdbci/article/view/8646398/pdf
https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/rdbci/article/view/8646398/pdf_1
https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/rdbci/article/view/8646398/xml
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
application/xml
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Campinas
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Campinas
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv RDBCI: Digital Journal of Library and Information Science; Vol. 15 No. 2 (2017): May/Ago.: "Information professional, acdemic libraries and the information production in the current context"; 469-488
RDBCI: Revista Digital de Biblioteconomia e Ciência da Informação; v. 15 n. 2 (2017): maio/ago.: "Profissional da informação, bibliotecas universitárias e a produção da informação no contexto atual"; 469-488
1678-765X
reponame:Revista Brasileira de Direito Civil (Online)
instname:Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Civil (IBDCivil)
instacron:Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Civil
instname_str Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Civil (IBDCivil)
instacron_str Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Civil
institution Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Civil
reponame_str Revista Brasileira de Direito Civil (Online)
collection Revista Brasileira de Direito Civil (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Direito Civil (Online) - Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Civil (IBDCivil)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||rbdcivil@ibdcivil.org.br
_version_ 1822181164589252608
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv 10.20396/rdbci.v15i2.8646398