Researcher perceptions and practices in open access publication in two engineering postgraduate programs
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2017 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista Brasileira de Direito Civil (Online) |
DOI: | 10.20396/rdbci.v15i2.8646398 |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/rdbci/article/view/8646398 |
Resumo: | The article presents the results and discussion of a study that aimed to identify the practices and perceptions of researchers concerning making their publications available in open access, as compared to publishing in subscription, paywalled journals. The study subjects were researchers accredited in two postgraduate Engineering programs that have obtained the maximum evaluation by CAPES. A mixed methodological approach was used. Quantitative publication data for the period 2008 to 2016 were collected and tabulated from the researchers´ Lattes curricula using the ScriptLattes and VantagePoint software respectively. The 244 periodicals and 970 published articles identified in this phase were then researched in other platforms such as SciELO, DOAJ, SHERPA/ ROMEO, Google Scholar and in the postgraduate programs´ Institutional Repository itself to verify the proportion of published articles available in open access. Concomitantly, semi-structured interviews were conducted with 11 researchers of the two postgraduate programs to identify their perceptions regarding publication in general and specifically, in open access and self-archiving in open repositories. From the quantitative data collected, it was found that only 21.9% of the articles published in the first postgraduate program and 29.8% of the second are available in open access. However, in the interviews, most authors support open access while at the same time demonstrating little knowledge of open access repositories, including that of their own institution. They are also unaware of the complementary possibility of first publishing in high-impact journals, and subsequently depositing the same article in the open access repository on the completion of an eventual publisher embargo period. |
id |
IBDCivil_e9acc20e4b6de62f0e67355bf2d01f2b |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br:article/8646398 |
network_acronym_str |
IBDCivil |
network_name_str |
Revista Brasileira de Direito Civil (Online) |
spelling |
Researcher perceptions and practices in open access publication in two engineering postgraduate programsAs percepções e práticas de publicação em acesso aberto dos pesquisadores de dois programas de pós-graduação em engenhariaAcesso à informação. Bases de dados de texto completo. Publicação. Pesquisador.Acesso AbertoOpen access. Scientific communication. Publishing practices. Researcher perceptions.The article presents the results and discussion of a study that aimed to identify the practices and perceptions of researchers concerning making their publications available in open access, as compared to publishing in subscription, paywalled journals. The study subjects were researchers accredited in two postgraduate Engineering programs that have obtained the maximum evaluation by CAPES. A mixed methodological approach was used. Quantitative publication data for the period 2008 to 2016 were collected and tabulated from the researchers´ Lattes curricula using the ScriptLattes and VantagePoint software respectively. The 244 periodicals and 970 published articles identified in this phase were then researched in other platforms such as SciELO, DOAJ, SHERPA/ ROMEO, Google Scholar and in the postgraduate programs´ Institutional Repository itself to verify the proportion of published articles available in open access. Concomitantly, semi-structured interviews were conducted with 11 researchers of the two postgraduate programs to identify their perceptions regarding publication in general and specifically, in open access and self-archiving in open repositories. From the quantitative data collected, it was found that only 21.9% of the articles published in the first postgraduate program and 29.8% of the second are available in open access. However, in the interviews, most authors support open access while at the same time demonstrating little knowledge of open access repositories, including that of their own institution. They are also unaware of the complementary possibility of first publishing in high-impact journals, and subsequently depositing the same article in the open access repository on the completion of an eventual publisher embargo period.Apresenta os resultados de um estudo que buscou conhecer as práticas e percepções de pesquisadores credenciados em dois programas de pós-graduação em engenharia avaliados com nota sete pela CAPES, em relação à publicação em canais de acesso aberto comparado com aqueles restritos, de assinatura. Foi usada uma abordagem metodológica mista. Dados de publicação referentes ao período 2008 a 2012 foram levantados e tabulados dos currículos Lattes dos pesquisadores usando os softwares ScriptLattes e VantagePoint respectivamente. Os 212 títulos de revistas científicas e os 561 artigos identificados dessa fase foram daí pesquisados em outras plataformas como o SciELO, DOAJ, SHERPA/ROMEO, Google Acadêmico e o próprio Repositório Institucional da instituição dos programas de pós-graduação para verificar a proporção de artigos publicados disponível em acesso aberto. Concomitantemente a esses levantamentos quantitativos, foram realizadas entrevistas semiestruturadas com 11 dos pesquisadores dos dois programas para identificar suas percepções em relação à publicação em geral e especificamente em acesso aberto, e em repositórios abertos. Dos dados quantitativos levantados, foi verificado que apenas 25,8% dos artigos publicados do primeiro programa de pós e 23,3% do segundo são disponíveis em acesso aberto. No entanto, nas entrevistas, a maioria dos autores apoia o acesso aberto, embora manifestem pouco conhecimento sobre a via verde, ou os repositórios abertos, incluindo aquele da sua própria instituição, como também desconhecem o caminho complementar de se publicar primeiramente em revistas de alto impacto com o posterior arquivamento do mesmo artigo no repositório, no término do eventual tempo de embargo da editora.Universidade Estadual de Campinas2017-04-12info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPesquisa Empírica de CampoField empirical researchapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/xmlhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/rdbci/article/view/864639810.20396/rdbci.v15i2.8646398RDBCI: Digital Journal of Library and Information Science; Vol. 15 No. 2 (2017): May/Ago.: "Information professional, acdemic libraries and the information production in the current context"; 469-488RDBCI: Revista Digital de Biblioteconomia e Ciência da Informação; v. 15 n. 2 (2017): maio/ago.: "Profissional da informação, bibliotecas universitárias e a produção da informação no contexto atual"; 469-4881678-765Xreponame:Revista Brasileira de Direito Civil (Online)instname:Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Civil (IBDCivil)instacron:Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Civilporhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/rdbci/article/view/8646398/pdfhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/rdbci/article/view/8646398/pdf_1https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/rdbci/article/view/8646398/xmlFurnival, Ariadne ChloeGuirra, Daniel Andre Rigoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2017-05-29T12:59:50Zoai:ojs.periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br:article/8646398Revistahttps://rbdcivil.ibdcivil.org.br/rbdchttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/rdbci/oai||rbdcivil@ibdcivil.org.br2358-69742358-6974opendoar:2017-05-29T12:59:50Revista Brasileira de Direito Civil (Online) - Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Civil (IBDCivil)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Researcher perceptions and practices in open access publication in two engineering postgraduate programs As percepções e práticas de publicação em acesso aberto dos pesquisadores de dois programas de pós-graduação em engenharia |
title |
Researcher perceptions and practices in open access publication in two engineering postgraduate programs |
spellingShingle |
Researcher perceptions and practices in open access publication in two engineering postgraduate programs Researcher perceptions and practices in open access publication in two engineering postgraduate programs Furnival, Ariadne Chloe Acesso à informação. Bases de dados de texto completo. Publicação. Pesquisador. Acesso Aberto Open access. Scientific communication. Publishing practices. Researcher perceptions. Furnival, Ariadne Chloe Acesso à informação. Bases de dados de texto completo. Publicação. Pesquisador. Acesso Aberto Open access. Scientific communication. Publishing practices. Researcher perceptions. |
title_short |
Researcher perceptions and practices in open access publication in two engineering postgraduate programs |
title_full |
Researcher perceptions and practices in open access publication in two engineering postgraduate programs |
title_fullStr |
Researcher perceptions and practices in open access publication in two engineering postgraduate programs Researcher perceptions and practices in open access publication in two engineering postgraduate programs |
title_full_unstemmed |
Researcher perceptions and practices in open access publication in two engineering postgraduate programs Researcher perceptions and practices in open access publication in two engineering postgraduate programs |
title_sort |
Researcher perceptions and practices in open access publication in two engineering postgraduate programs |
author |
Furnival, Ariadne Chloe |
author_facet |
Furnival, Ariadne Chloe Furnival, Ariadne Chloe Guirra, Daniel Andre Rigo Guirra, Daniel Andre Rigo |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Guirra, Daniel Andre Rigo |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Furnival, Ariadne Chloe Guirra, Daniel Andre Rigo |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Acesso à informação. Bases de dados de texto completo. Publicação. Pesquisador. Acesso Aberto Open access. Scientific communication. Publishing practices. Researcher perceptions. |
topic |
Acesso à informação. Bases de dados de texto completo. Publicação. Pesquisador. Acesso Aberto Open access. Scientific communication. Publishing practices. Researcher perceptions. |
description |
The article presents the results and discussion of a study that aimed to identify the practices and perceptions of researchers concerning making their publications available in open access, as compared to publishing in subscription, paywalled journals. The study subjects were researchers accredited in two postgraduate Engineering programs that have obtained the maximum evaluation by CAPES. A mixed methodological approach was used. Quantitative publication data for the period 2008 to 2016 were collected and tabulated from the researchers´ Lattes curricula using the ScriptLattes and VantagePoint software respectively. The 244 periodicals and 970 published articles identified in this phase were then researched in other platforms such as SciELO, DOAJ, SHERPA/ ROMEO, Google Scholar and in the postgraduate programs´ Institutional Repository itself to verify the proportion of published articles available in open access. Concomitantly, semi-structured interviews were conducted with 11 researchers of the two postgraduate programs to identify their perceptions regarding publication in general and specifically, in open access and self-archiving in open repositories. From the quantitative data collected, it was found that only 21.9% of the articles published in the first postgraduate program and 29.8% of the second are available in open access. However, in the interviews, most authors support open access while at the same time demonstrating little knowledge of open access repositories, including that of their own institution. They are also unaware of the complementary possibility of first publishing in high-impact journals, and subsequently depositing the same article in the open access repository on the completion of an eventual publisher embargo period. |
publishDate |
2017 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2017-04-12 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Pesquisa Empírica de Campo Field empirical research |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/rdbci/article/view/8646398 10.20396/rdbci.v15i2.8646398 |
url |
https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/rdbci/article/view/8646398 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.20396/rdbci.v15i2.8646398 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/rdbci/article/view/8646398/pdf https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/rdbci/article/view/8646398/pdf_1 https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/rdbci/article/view/8646398/xml |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf application/xml |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Campinas |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Campinas |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
RDBCI: Digital Journal of Library and Information Science; Vol. 15 No. 2 (2017): May/Ago.: "Information professional, acdemic libraries and the information production in the current context"; 469-488 RDBCI: Revista Digital de Biblioteconomia e Ciência da Informação; v. 15 n. 2 (2017): maio/ago.: "Profissional da informação, bibliotecas universitárias e a produção da informação no contexto atual"; 469-488 1678-765X reponame:Revista Brasileira de Direito Civil (Online) instname:Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Civil (IBDCivil) instacron:Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Civil |
instname_str |
Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Civil (IBDCivil) |
instacron_str |
Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Civil |
institution |
Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Civil |
reponame_str |
Revista Brasileira de Direito Civil (Online) |
collection |
Revista Brasileira de Direito Civil (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira de Direito Civil (Online) - Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Civil (IBDCivil) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||rbdcivil@ibdcivil.org.br |
_version_ |
1822181164589252608 |
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv |
10.20396/rdbci.v15i2.8646398 |