A CONCEPTUAL AND METHODOLOGICAL FRAMEWORK FOR EVALUATING R&D PROJECTS

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Moura de Holanda, Giovanni
Data de Publicação: 2017
Outros Autores: de Almeida Loural, Claudio, Vaghetti Mattos, Carolina, Maria Alves, Angela
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: P2P e Inovação
Texto Completo: http://revista.ibict.br/p2p/article/view/3989
Resumo: It is quite common the usage of generic terms in the description of Research & Development (R&D) projects and in the guidelines of public policies. Such an occurrence leads to polysemous or empty concepts, hampering the evaluation of policy and project results. In the field of innovation management, the terms "competitiveness" and "technological capacity building" are examples of such conceptual ambiguities. Moreover, some central objectives of incentive policies do not present directly measurable dimensions, being necessary the use of intermediate indicators to assess the impacts of such policies. This paper presents a reflection on the concept of these terms within the context of an incentive policy – the Brazilian Informatics Law –, and a methodological approach to evaluate these two attributes in R&D projects that benefit from this law. In this effort, projects are categorized and positioned in a Quadrant Matrix, in accordance with their level of competitiveness and capacity building.
id IBICT-4_2e5af579c6a3bd9bc1f36f61239e833a
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.revista.ibict.br:article/3989
network_acronym_str IBICT-4
network_name_str P2P e Inovação
spelling A CONCEPTUAL AND METHODOLOGICAL FRAMEWORK FOR EVALUATING R&D PROJECTSIt is quite common the usage of generic terms in the description of Research & Development (R&D) projects and in the guidelines of public policies. Such an occurrence leads to polysemous or empty concepts, hampering the evaluation of policy and project results. In the field of innovation management, the terms "competitiveness" and "technological capacity building" are examples of such conceptual ambiguities. Moreover, some central objectives of incentive policies do not present directly measurable dimensions, being necessary the use of intermediate indicators to assess the impacts of such policies. This paper presents a reflection on the concept of these terms within the context of an incentive policy – the Brazilian Informatics Law –, and a methodological approach to evaluate these two attributes in R&D projects that benefit from this law. In this effort, projects are categorized and positioned in a Quadrant Matrix, in accordance with their level of competitiveness and capacity building.IBICTMoura de Holanda, Giovannide Almeida Loural, ClaudioVaghetti Mattos, CarolinaMaria Alves, Angela2017-10-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://revista.ibict.br/p2p/article/view/398910.21721/p2p.2017v4n1.p147-168P2P & INOVAÇÃO; v. 4, n. 1 (2017): P2P & INOVAÇÃO; 147-168P2P E INOVAÇÃO; v. 4, n. 1 (2017): P2P & INOVAÇÃO; 147-1682358-7814reponame:P2P e Inovaçãoinstname:Instituto Brasileiro de Informação Ciência e Tecnologiainstacron:IBICTenghttp://revista.ibict.br/p2p/article/view/3989/3657Direitos autorais 2017 P2P E INOVAÇÃOhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2019-05-11T18:21:55Zmail@mail.com -
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv A CONCEPTUAL AND METHODOLOGICAL FRAMEWORK FOR EVALUATING R&D PROJECTS
title A CONCEPTUAL AND METHODOLOGICAL FRAMEWORK FOR EVALUATING R&D PROJECTS
spellingShingle A CONCEPTUAL AND METHODOLOGICAL FRAMEWORK FOR EVALUATING R&D PROJECTS
Moura de Holanda, Giovanni
title_short A CONCEPTUAL AND METHODOLOGICAL FRAMEWORK FOR EVALUATING R&D PROJECTS
title_full A CONCEPTUAL AND METHODOLOGICAL FRAMEWORK FOR EVALUATING R&D PROJECTS
title_fullStr A CONCEPTUAL AND METHODOLOGICAL FRAMEWORK FOR EVALUATING R&D PROJECTS
title_full_unstemmed A CONCEPTUAL AND METHODOLOGICAL FRAMEWORK FOR EVALUATING R&D PROJECTS
title_sort A CONCEPTUAL AND METHODOLOGICAL FRAMEWORK FOR EVALUATING R&D PROJECTS
author Moura de Holanda, Giovanni
author_facet Moura de Holanda, Giovanni
de Almeida Loural, Claudio
Vaghetti Mattos, Carolina
Maria Alves, Angela
author_role author
author2 de Almeida Loural, Claudio
Vaghetti Mattos, Carolina
Maria Alves, Angela
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Moura de Holanda, Giovanni
de Almeida Loural, Claudio
Vaghetti Mattos, Carolina
Maria Alves, Angela
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv It is quite common the usage of generic terms in the description of Research & Development (R&D) projects and in the guidelines of public policies. Such an occurrence leads to polysemous or empty concepts, hampering the evaluation of policy and project results. In the field of innovation management, the terms "competitiveness" and "technological capacity building" are examples of such conceptual ambiguities. Moreover, some central objectives of incentive policies do not present directly measurable dimensions, being necessary the use of intermediate indicators to assess the impacts of such policies. This paper presents a reflection on the concept of these terms within the context of an incentive policy – the Brazilian Informatics Law –, and a methodological approach to evaluate these two attributes in R&D projects that benefit from this law. In this effort, projects are categorized and positioned in a Quadrant Matrix, in accordance with their level of competitiveness and capacity building.
description It is quite common the usage of generic terms in the description of Research & Development (R&D) projects and in the guidelines of public policies. Such an occurrence leads to polysemous or empty concepts, hampering the evaluation of policy and project results. In the field of innovation management, the terms "competitiveness" and "technological capacity building" are examples of such conceptual ambiguities. Moreover, some central objectives of incentive policies do not present directly measurable dimensions, being necessary the use of intermediate indicators to assess the impacts of such policies. This paper presents a reflection on the concept of these terms within the context of an incentive policy – the Brazilian Informatics Law –, and a methodological approach to evaluate these two attributes in R&D projects that benefit from this law. In this effort, projects are categorized and positioned in a Quadrant Matrix, in accordance with their level of competitiveness and capacity building.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-10-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://revista.ibict.br/p2p/article/view/3989
10.21721/p2p.2017v4n1.p147-168
url http://revista.ibict.br/p2p/article/view/3989
identifier_str_mv 10.21721/p2p.2017v4n1.p147-168
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://revista.ibict.br/p2p/article/view/3989/3657
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Direitos autorais 2017 P2P E INOVAÇÃO
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Direitos autorais 2017 P2P E INOVAÇÃO
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv IBICT
publisher.none.fl_str_mv IBICT
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv P2P & INOVAÇÃO; v. 4, n. 1 (2017): P2P & INOVAÇÃO; 147-168
P2P E INOVAÇÃO; v. 4, n. 1 (2017): P2P & INOVAÇÃO; 147-168
2358-7814
reponame:P2P e Inovação
instname:Instituto Brasileiro de Informação Ciência e Tecnologia
instacron:IBICT
reponame_str P2P e Inovação
collection P2P e Inovação
instname_str Instituto Brasileiro de Informação Ciência e Tecnologia
instacron_str IBICT
institution IBICT
repository.name.fl_str_mv -
repository.mail.fl_str_mv mail@mail.com
_version_ 1633520620215992320

Registros relacionados