Relationship between doping in football and global socioeconomic indicators
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista Brasileira de Futsal e Futebol |
Texto Completo: | https://www.rbff.com.br/index.php/rbff/article/view/1060 |
Resumo: | The aim of this study is to understand the relationship between several global socio-economic indicators and positive cases of doping in soccer in all countries of the world. Methodologically, we use quantitative methods. Through official sources, we collect data from all previously defined socio-economic indicators and positive cases of doping. We performed several statistical procedures, namely descriptive statistics, hypothesis tests, correlations and variance analysis. hrough statistical procedures, we assess that the indicators with the highest averages are the human capital index (65.05) and the corruption index (41.93), meaning that these indicators are the most important for countries. We found that there are more countries without positive cases (n=126) than countries with positive cases of doping (n=58). The Sig (2 extremities) presents a p<0.05, so the Student's t test shows statistically significant differences between all variables analyzed and the number of doping cases, except for the unemployment rate and gini coefficient for a 95% confidence interval. We conclude that the greater the human capital and the perception of corruption, the lower the consumption of doping. We also measured that the higher the HDI and happiness index, the higher the doping consumption. The unemployment rate and gini coefficient did not show any statistical difference. |
id |
IBPEFEX-1_5bc773fff06a9ba8d2aa940a6cfb72b1 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.www.rbff.com.br:article/1060 |
network_acronym_str |
IBPEFEX-1 |
network_name_str |
Revista Brasileira de Futsal e Futebol |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Relationship between doping in football and global socioeconomic indicatorsRelación entre el dopaje en el fútbol y los indicadores socioeconómicos globalesRelazione tra doping nel calcio e indicatori socioeconomici globaliRelação entre dopagem no futebol e indicadores socioeconõmicos globaisRelação entre dopagem no futebol e indicadores socioeconõmicos globaisSport ManagementEthicDopingFootballSocioeconomic IndicatorsGestão do DesportoÉticaDopagemFutebolIndicadores SocioeconómicosThe aim of this study is to understand the relationship between several global socio-economic indicators and positive cases of doping in soccer in all countries of the world. Methodologically, we use quantitative methods. Through official sources, we collect data from all previously defined socio-economic indicators and positive cases of doping. We performed several statistical procedures, namely descriptive statistics, hypothesis tests, correlations and variance analysis. hrough statistical procedures, we assess that the indicators with the highest averages are the human capital index (65.05) and the corruption index (41.93), meaning that these indicators are the most important for countries. We found that there are more countries without positive cases (n=126) than countries with positive cases of doping (n=58). The Sig (2 extremities) presents a p<0.05, so the Student's t test shows statistically significant differences between all variables analyzed and the number of doping cases, except for the unemployment rate and gini coefficient for a 95% confidence interval. We conclude that the greater the human capital and the perception of corruption, the lower the consumption of doping. We also measured that the higher the HDI and happiness index, the higher the doping consumption. The unemployment rate and gini coefficient did not show any statistical difference.O objetivo deste estudo é compreender a relação entre os diversos indicadores socioeconómicos globais e os casos positivos de doping no futebol em todos os paÃses do mundo. Metodologicamente, recorremos a métodos quantitativos. Através de fontes oficiais, recolhemos os dados de todos os indicadores socioeconómico previamente definidos e dos casos positivos de doping. Realizámos vários procedimentos estatÃsticos, designadamente estatÃstica descritiva, testes de hipóteses, correlações e análise de Variância. Através dos procedimentos estatÃsticos, aferimos que os indicadores com maiores médias são o Ãndice capital humano (65,05) e o Ãndice de corrupção (41,93), significando que estes indicadores são os mais importantes para os paÃses. Verificamos, que existem mais paÃses sem casos positivos (n=126) do que paÃses com casos positivos de doping (n=58). O Sig (2 extremidades) apresenta um p<0.05, logo, o teste de t de Student mostra diferenças estatisticamente significativas entre todas as variáveis analisadas e o número de casos de doping,à exceção da taxa de desemprego e do coeficiente de Gini para um intervalo de confiança de 95%. ConcluÃmos que quanto maior o capital o humano e a perceção da corrupção menor o consumo de doping. Aferimos também que quanto maior o IDH e o Ãndice de felicidade, maior o consumo de doping. A taxa de desemprego e o coeficiente de Gini não mostraram qualquer diferença estatÃstica.IBPEFEX2021-07-17info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/octet-streamhttps://www.rbff.com.br/index.php/rbff/article/view/1060RBFF - Revista Brasileira de Futsal e Futebol; v. 13 n. 52 (2021); 60-73RBFF - Brazilian Journal of Futsal and Football; Vol. 13 No. 52 (2021); 60-73RBFF - Revista Brasileña de Fútbol Sala y Fútbol; Vol. 13 Núm. 52 (2021); 60-73RBFF - Revista Brasileira de Futsal e Futebol; v. 13 n. 52 (2021); 60-73RBFF - Rivista Brasiliana di Futsal e Calcio; V. 13 N. 52 (2021); 60-731984-4956reponame:Revista Brasileira de Futsal e Futebolinstname:Instituto Brasileiro de Ensino e Pesquisa em Fisiologia do Exercício (IBPEFEX)instacron:IBPEFEXporhttps://www.rbff.com.br/index.php/rbff/article/view/1060/881Copyright (c) 2021 Rui Camaradahttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCamarada, Rui2023-08-30T14:21:05Zoai:ojs.www.rbff.com.br:article/1060Revistahttps://www.rbff.com.br/index.php/rbffONGhttp://www.rbff.com.br/index.php/rbff/oai||ac-navarro@uol.com.br|| francisconunesnavarro@gmail.com1984-49561984-4956opendoar:2023-08-30T14:21:05Revista Brasileira de Futsal e Futebol - Instituto Brasileiro de Ensino e Pesquisa em Fisiologia do Exercício (IBPEFEX)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Relationship between doping in football and global socioeconomic indicators Relación entre el dopaje en el fútbol y los indicadores socioeconómicos globales Relazione tra doping nel calcio e indicatori socioeconomici globali Relação entre dopagem no futebol e indicadores socioeconõmicos globais Relação entre dopagem no futebol e indicadores socioeconõmicos globais |
title |
Relationship between doping in football and global socioeconomic indicators |
spellingShingle |
Relationship between doping in football and global socioeconomic indicators Camarada, Rui Sport Management Ethic Doping Football Socioeconomic Indicators Gestão do Desporto Ética Dopagem Futebol Indicadores Socioeconómicos |
title_short |
Relationship between doping in football and global socioeconomic indicators |
title_full |
Relationship between doping in football and global socioeconomic indicators |
title_fullStr |
Relationship between doping in football and global socioeconomic indicators |
title_full_unstemmed |
Relationship between doping in football and global socioeconomic indicators |
title_sort |
Relationship between doping in football and global socioeconomic indicators |
author |
Camarada, Rui |
author_facet |
Camarada, Rui |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Camarada, Rui |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Sport Management Ethic Doping Football Socioeconomic Indicators Gestão do Desporto Ética Dopagem Futebol Indicadores Socioeconómicos |
topic |
Sport Management Ethic Doping Football Socioeconomic Indicators Gestão do Desporto Ética Dopagem Futebol Indicadores Socioeconómicos |
description |
The aim of this study is to understand the relationship between several global socio-economic indicators and positive cases of doping in soccer in all countries of the world. Methodologically, we use quantitative methods. Through official sources, we collect data from all previously defined socio-economic indicators and positive cases of doping. We performed several statistical procedures, namely descriptive statistics, hypothesis tests, correlations and variance analysis. hrough statistical procedures, we assess that the indicators with the highest averages are the human capital index (65.05) and the corruption index (41.93), meaning that these indicators are the most important for countries. We found that there are more countries without positive cases (n=126) than countries with positive cases of doping (n=58). The Sig (2 extremities) presents a p<0.05, so the Student's t test shows statistically significant differences between all variables analyzed and the number of doping cases, except for the unemployment rate and gini coefficient for a 95% confidence interval. We conclude that the greater the human capital and the perception of corruption, the lower the consumption of doping. We also measured that the higher the HDI and happiness index, the higher the doping consumption. The unemployment rate and gini coefficient did not show any statistical difference. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-07-17 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://www.rbff.com.br/index.php/rbff/article/view/1060 |
url |
https://www.rbff.com.br/index.php/rbff/article/view/1060 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.rbff.com.br/index.php/rbff/article/view/1060/881 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Rui Camarada https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Rui Camarada https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/octet-stream |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
IBPEFEX |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
IBPEFEX |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
RBFF - Revista Brasileira de Futsal e Futebol; v. 13 n. 52 (2021); 60-73 RBFF - Brazilian Journal of Futsal and Football; Vol. 13 No. 52 (2021); 60-73 RBFF - Revista Brasileña de Fútbol Sala y Fútbol; Vol. 13 Núm. 52 (2021); 60-73 RBFF - Revista Brasileira de Futsal e Futebol; v. 13 n. 52 (2021); 60-73 RBFF - Rivista Brasiliana di Futsal e Calcio; V. 13 N. 52 (2021); 60-73 1984-4956 reponame:Revista Brasileira de Futsal e Futebol instname:Instituto Brasileiro de Ensino e Pesquisa em Fisiologia do Exercício (IBPEFEX) instacron:IBPEFEX |
instname_str |
Instituto Brasileiro de Ensino e Pesquisa em Fisiologia do Exercício (IBPEFEX) |
instacron_str |
IBPEFEX |
institution |
IBPEFEX |
reponame_str |
Revista Brasileira de Futsal e Futebol |
collection |
Revista Brasileira de Futsal e Futebol |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira de Futsal e Futebol - Instituto Brasileiro de Ensino e Pesquisa em Fisiologia do Exercício (IBPEFEX) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||ac-navarro@uol.com.br|| francisconunesnavarro@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1798949733929058304 |