Analysis of the assessment methods of reinforced concrete beams in fire conditions proposed by NBR 15200
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2018 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Revista IBRACON de Estruturas e Materiais |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1983-41952018000601308 |
Resumo: | Abstract In Brazil, reinforced concrete structures designed based on NBR 6118 [1] must be assessed in fire conditions through NBR 15200 [2], which proposes multiple test methods. Concerning beams, this standard offers the tabular and simplified methods as possible choices. This study aimed to compare these two methods by applying their principles to isostatic and hyperstatic beams with section of 20x50 cm, designed at room temperature according to NBR 6118 [1]. The temperature distribution along sections was obtained by means of a software program. The results from this study indicated that the simplified method yielded higher fire-resistance ratings (FRR) in 75% of cases, although not surpassing the tabular method by 30 minutes. The simplified method allowed an optimization of the results, despite the longer design time. |
id |
IBRACON-1_5f4591eb663d2a94e796817b58631499 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S1983-41952018000601308 |
network_acronym_str |
IBRACON-1 |
network_name_str |
Revista IBRACON de Estruturas e Materiais |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Analysis of the assessment methods of reinforced concrete beams in fire conditions proposed by NBR 15200reinforced concrete in fire conditionsfirestructural designNBR 15200Abstract In Brazil, reinforced concrete structures designed based on NBR 6118 [1] must be assessed in fire conditions through NBR 15200 [2], which proposes multiple test methods. Concerning beams, this standard offers the tabular and simplified methods as possible choices. This study aimed to compare these two methods by applying their principles to isostatic and hyperstatic beams with section of 20x50 cm, designed at room temperature according to NBR 6118 [1]. The temperature distribution along sections was obtained by means of a software program. The results from this study indicated that the simplified method yielded higher fire-resistance ratings (FRR) in 75% of cases, although not surpassing the tabular method by 30 minutes. The simplified method allowed an optimization of the results, despite the longer design time.IBRACON - Instituto Brasileiro do Concreto2018-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1983-41952018000601308Revista IBRACON de Estruturas e Materiais v.11 n.6 2018reponame:Revista IBRACON de Estruturas e Materiaisinstname:Instituto Brasileiro do Concreto (IBRACON)instacron:IBRACON10.1590/s1983-41952018000600008info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBOLINA,F. L.BAQUES,B.TUTIKIAN,B. F.RODRIGUES,J. P. C.eng2018-12-10T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1983-41952018000601308Revistahttp://www.revistas.ibracon.org.br/index.php/riemhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpeditores.riem@gmail.com||arlene@ibracon.org.br1983-41951983-4195opendoar:2018-12-10T00:00Revista IBRACON de Estruturas e Materiais - Instituto Brasileiro do Concreto (IBRACON)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Analysis of the assessment methods of reinforced concrete beams in fire conditions proposed by NBR 15200 |
title |
Analysis of the assessment methods of reinforced concrete beams in fire conditions proposed by NBR 15200 |
spellingShingle |
Analysis of the assessment methods of reinforced concrete beams in fire conditions proposed by NBR 15200 BOLINA,F. L. reinforced concrete in fire conditions fire structural design NBR 15200 |
title_short |
Analysis of the assessment methods of reinforced concrete beams in fire conditions proposed by NBR 15200 |
title_full |
Analysis of the assessment methods of reinforced concrete beams in fire conditions proposed by NBR 15200 |
title_fullStr |
Analysis of the assessment methods of reinforced concrete beams in fire conditions proposed by NBR 15200 |
title_full_unstemmed |
Analysis of the assessment methods of reinforced concrete beams in fire conditions proposed by NBR 15200 |
title_sort |
Analysis of the assessment methods of reinforced concrete beams in fire conditions proposed by NBR 15200 |
author |
BOLINA,F. L. |
author_facet |
BOLINA,F. L. BAQUES,B. TUTIKIAN,B. F. RODRIGUES,J. P. C. |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
BAQUES,B. TUTIKIAN,B. F. RODRIGUES,J. P. C. |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
BOLINA,F. L. BAQUES,B. TUTIKIAN,B. F. RODRIGUES,J. P. C. |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
reinforced concrete in fire conditions fire structural design NBR 15200 |
topic |
reinforced concrete in fire conditions fire structural design NBR 15200 |
description |
Abstract In Brazil, reinforced concrete structures designed based on NBR 6118 [1] must be assessed in fire conditions through NBR 15200 [2], which proposes multiple test methods. Concerning beams, this standard offers the tabular and simplified methods as possible choices. This study aimed to compare these two methods by applying their principles to isostatic and hyperstatic beams with section of 20x50 cm, designed at room temperature according to NBR 6118 [1]. The temperature distribution along sections was obtained by means of a software program. The results from this study indicated that the simplified method yielded higher fire-resistance ratings (FRR) in 75% of cases, although not surpassing the tabular method by 30 minutes. The simplified method allowed an optimization of the results, despite the longer design time. |
publishDate |
2018 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2018-12-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1983-41952018000601308 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1983-41952018000601308 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/s1983-41952018000600008 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
IBRACON - Instituto Brasileiro do Concreto |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
IBRACON - Instituto Brasileiro do Concreto |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista IBRACON de Estruturas e Materiais v.11 n.6 2018 reponame:Revista IBRACON de Estruturas e Materiais instname:Instituto Brasileiro do Concreto (IBRACON) instacron:IBRACON |
instname_str |
Instituto Brasileiro do Concreto (IBRACON) |
instacron_str |
IBRACON |
institution |
IBRACON |
reponame_str |
Revista IBRACON de Estruturas e Materiais |
collection |
Revista IBRACON de Estruturas e Materiais |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista IBRACON de Estruturas e Materiais - Instituto Brasileiro do Concreto (IBRACON) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
editores.riem@gmail.com||arlene@ibracon.org.br |
_version_ |
1754193605592875008 |