Verification of the flexion and shear behavior in masonry panels accordance to ABNT NBR 15961-1 (2011), EN 1996-1-1 (2005) and ACI TMS 530 (2013)

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: MATA,R. C.
Data de Publicação: 2018
Outros Autores: RAMOS,C. S., SILVA,M. L. C.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista IBRACON de Estruturas e Materiais
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1983-41952018000400673
Resumo: Abstract This paper presents a numerical analysis of the mechanical behavior of structural masonry panels submitted to horizontal and vertical stresses. To evaluate the design process of these structures, the results obtained by the computer simulations were compared with the results determined by the design criteria of ABNT NBR 15961-1 (2011), ACI TMS 530 (2013) and EN 1996-1-1 (2005). The finite element software DIANA v.9.3 was used to simulate two-dimensional models with the simplified micro modelling procedure. The results obtained by the normative standards were more conservative than the results of the numerical model, as expected. With the increase of the pre-compression level, the computer simulation has demonstrated the increasing trend of the values of resistant forces, besides the change of the way of rupture of the panels. Among the three standards evaluated, the American Standard was the most conservative.
id IBRACON-1_69a6ff7343b81b2a77934d3757e21a14
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1983-41952018000400673
network_acronym_str IBRACON-1
network_name_str Revista IBRACON de Estruturas e Materiais
repository_id_str
spelling Verification of the flexion and shear behavior in masonry panels accordance to ABNT NBR 15961-1 (2011), EN 1996-1-1 (2005) and ACI TMS 530 (2013)structural masonrynumerical analysisFEMstandards criteriaAbstract This paper presents a numerical analysis of the mechanical behavior of structural masonry panels submitted to horizontal and vertical stresses. To evaluate the design process of these structures, the results obtained by the computer simulations were compared with the results determined by the design criteria of ABNT NBR 15961-1 (2011), ACI TMS 530 (2013) and EN 1996-1-1 (2005). The finite element software DIANA v.9.3 was used to simulate two-dimensional models with the simplified micro modelling procedure. The results obtained by the normative standards were more conservative than the results of the numerical model, as expected. With the increase of the pre-compression level, the computer simulation has demonstrated the increasing trend of the values of resistant forces, besides the change of the way of rupture of the panels. Among the three standards evaluated, the American Standard was the most conservative.IBRACON - Instituto Brasileiro do Concreto2018-08-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1983-41952018000400673Revista IBRACON de Estruturas e Materiais v.11 n.4 2018reponame:Revista IBRACON de Estruturas e Materiaisinstname:Instituto Brasileiro do Concreto (IBRACON)instacron:IBRACON10.1590/s1983-41952018000400003info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMATA,R. C.RAMOS,C. S.SILVA,M. L. C.eng2018-09-04T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1983-41952018000400673Revistahttp://www.revistas.ibracon.org.br/index.php/riemhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpeditores.riem@gmail.com||arlene@ibracon.org.br1983-41951983-4195opendoar:2018-09-04T00:00Revista IBRACON de Estruturas e Materiais - Instituto Brasileiro do Concreto (IBRACON)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Verification of the flexion and shear behavior in masonry panels accordance to ABNT NBR 15961-1 (2011), EN 1996-1-1 (2005) and ACI TMS 530 (2013)
title Verification of the flexion and shear behavior in masonry panels accordance to ABNT NBR 15961-1 (2011), EN 1996-1-1 (2005) and ACI TMS 530 (2013)
spellingShingle Verification of the flexion and shear behavior in masonry panels accordance to ABNT NBR 15961-1 (2011), EN 1996-1-1 (2005) and ACI TMS 530 (2013)
MATA,R. C.
structural masonry
numerical analysis
FEM
standards criteria
title_short Verification of the flexion and shear behavior in masonry panels accordance to ABNT NBR 15961-1 (2011), EN 1996-1-1 (2005) and ACI TMS 530 (2013)
title_full Verification of the flexion and shear behavior in masonry panels accordance to ABNT NBR 15961-1 (2011), EN 1996-1-1 (2005) and ACI TMS 530 (2013)
title_fullStr Verification of the flexion and shear behavior in masonry panels accordance to ABNT NBR 15961-1 (2011), EN 1996-1-1 (2005) and ACI TMS 530 (2013)
title_full_unstemmed Verification of the flexion and shear behavior in masonry panels accordance to ABNT NBR 15961-1 (2011), EN 1996-1-1 (2005) and ACI TMS 530 (2013)
title_sort Verification of the flexion and shear behavior in masonry panels accordance to ABNT NBR 15961-1 (2011), EN 1996-1-1 (2005) and ACI TMS 530 (2013)
author MATA,R. C.
author_facet MATA,R. C.
RAMOS,C. S.
SILVA,M. L. C.
author_role author
author2 RAMOS,C. S.
SILVA,M. L. C.
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv MATA,R. C.
RAMOS,C. S.
SILVA,M. L. C.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv structural masonry
numerical analysis
FEM
standards criteria
topic structural masonry
numerical analysis
FEM
standards criteria
description Abstract This paper presents a numerical analysis of the mechanical behavior of structural masonry panels submitted to horizontal and vertical stresses. To evaluate the design process of these structures, the results obtained by the computer simulations were compared with the results determined by the design criteria of ABNT NBR 15961-1 (2011), ACI TMS 530 (2013) and EN 1996-1-1 (2005). The finite element software DIANA v.9.3 was used to simulate two-dimensional models with the simplified micro modelling procedure. The results obtained by the normative standards were more conservative than the results of the numerical model, as expected. With the increase of the pre-compression level, the computer simulation has demonstrated the increasing trend of the values of resistant forces, besides the change of the way of rupture of the panels. Among the three standards evaluated, the American Standard was the most conservative.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-08-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1983-41952018000400673
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1983-41952018000400673
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/s1983-41952018000400003
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv IBRACON - Instituto Brasileiro do Concreto
publisher.none.fl_str_mv IBRACON - Instituto Brasileiro do Concreto
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista IBRACON de Estruturas e Materiais v.11 n.4 2018
reponame:Revista IBRACON de Estruturas e Materiais
instname:Instituto Brasileiro do Concreto (IBRACON)
instacron:IBRACON
instname_str Instituto Brasileiro do Concreto (IBRACON)
instacron_str IBRACON
institution IBRACON
reponame_str Revista IBRACON de Estruturas e Materiais
collection Revista IBRACON de Estruturas e Materiais
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista IBRACON de Estruturas e Materiais - Instituto Brasileiro do Concreto (IBRACON)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv editores.riem@gmail.com||arlene@ibracon.org.br
_version_ 1754193605548834816