Structural analysis of composite metakaolin-based geopolymer concrete

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: PELISSER,F.
Data de Publicação: 2018
Outros Autores: SILVA,B. V., MENGER,M. H., FRASSON,B. J., KELLER,T. A., TORII,A. J., LOPEZ,R. H.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista IBRACON de Estruturas e Materiais
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1983-41952018000300535
Resumo: Abstract The study of alternative binders to Portland cement, such as geopolymer cements, offers the chance to develop materials with different properties. With this purpose, this study evaluated experimentally the mechanical behavior of a geopolymer concrete beam and compared to a Finite Element (FE) nonlinear numerical model. Two concrete beams were fabricated, one of Portland cement and another of metakaolin-based geopolymer cement. The beams were instrumented with linear variable differential transformers and strain gauges to measure the deformation of the concrete and steel. Values for the compressive strength of the geopolymer cement concrete was 8% higher than the Portland cement concrete (55 MPa and 51 MPa, respectively) and the tensile rupture strength was also 8% higher (131 kN) for the geopolymer concrete beam in relation to Portland cement concrete beam (121 kN). Distinct failure mechanisms were verified between the two samples, with an extended plastic deformation of the geopolymer concrete, revealing post-fracture toughness. The geopolymer concrete showed higher tensile strength and better adhesion in cement-steel interface.
id IBRACON-1_90e2bf6193dd807936c0b80d91c1c43d
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1983-41952018000300535
network_acronym_str IBRACON-1
network_name_str Revista IBRACON de Estruturas e Materiais
repository_id_str
spelling Structural analysis of composite metakaolin-based geopolymer concreteconcretegeopolymerbeamfinite elementAbstract The study of alternative binders to Portland cement, such as geopolymer cements, offers the chance to develop materials with different properties. With this purpose, this study evaluated experimentally the mechanical behavior of a geopolymer concrete beam and compared to a Finite Element (FE) nonlinear numerical model. Two concrete beams were fabricated, one of Portland cement and another of metakaolin-based geopolymer cement. The beams were instrumented with linear variable differential transformers and strain gauges to measure the deformation of the concrete and steel. Values for the compressive strength of the geopolymer cement concrete was 8% higher than the Portland cement concrete (55 MPa and 51 MPa, respectively) and the tensile rupture strength was also 8% higher (131 kN) for the geopolymer concrete beam in relation to Portland cement concrete beam (121 kN). Distinct failure mechanisms were verified between the two samples, with an extended plastic deformation of the geopolymer concrete, revealing post-fracture toughness. The geopolymer concrete showed higher tensile strength and better adhesion in cement-steel interface.IBRACON - Instituto Brasileiro do Concreto2018-05-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1983-41952018000300535Revista IBRACON de Estruturas e Materiais v.11 n.3 2018reponame:Revista IBRACON de Estruturas e Materiaisinstname:Instituto Brasileiro do Concreto (IBRACON)instacron:IBRACON10.1590/s1983-41952018000300006info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessPELISSER,F.SILVA,B. V.MENGER,M. H.FRASSON,B. J.KELLER,T. A.TORII,A. J.LOPEZ,R. H.eng2018-07-12T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1983-41952018000300535Revistahttp://www.revistas.ibracon.org.br/index.php/riemhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpeditores.riem@gmail.com||arlene@ibracon.org.br1983-41951983-4195opendoar:2018-07-12T00:00Revista IBRACON de Estruturas e Materiais - Instituto Brasileiro do Concreto (IBRACON)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Structural analysis of composite metakaolin-based geopolymer concrete
title Structural analysis of composite metakaolin-based geopolymer concrete
spellingShingle Structural analysis of composite metakaolin-based geopolymer concrete
PELISSER,F.
concrete
geopolymer
beam
finite element
title_short Structural analysis of composite metakaolin-based geopolymer concrete
title_full Structural analysis of composite metakaolin-based geopolymer concrete
title_fullStr Structural analysis of composite metakaolin-based geopolymer concrete
title_full_unstemmed Structural analysis of composite metakaolin-based geopolymer concrete
title_sort Structural analysis of composite metakaolin-based geopolymer concrete
author PELISSER,F.
author_facet PELISSER,F.
SILVA,B. V.
MENGER,M. H.
FRASSON,B. J.
KELLER,T. A.
TORII,A. J.
LOPEZ,R. H.
author_role author
author2 SILVA,B. V.
MENGER,M. H.
FRASSON,B. J.
KELLER,T. A.
TORII,A. J.
LOPEZ,R. H.
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv PELISSER,F.
SILVA,B. V.
MENGER,M. H.
FRASSON,B. J.
KELLER,T. A.
TORII,A. J.
LOPEZ,R. H.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv concrete
geopolymer
beam
finite element
topic concrete
geopolymer
beam
finite element
description Abstract The study of alternative binders to Portland cement, such as geopolymer cements, offers the chance to develop materials with different properties. With this purpose, this study evaluated experimentally the mechanical behavior of a geopolymer concrete beam and compared to a Finite Element (FE) nonlinear numerical model. Two concrete beams were fabricated, one of Portland cement and another of metakaolin-based geopolymer cement. The beams were instrumented with linear variable differential transformers and strain gauges to measure the deformation of the concrete and steel. Values for the compressive strength of the geopolymer cement concrete was 8% higher than the Portland cement concrete (55 MPa and 51 MPa, respectively) and the tensile rupture strength was also 8% higher (131 kN) for the geopolymer concrete beam in relation to Portland cement concrete beam (121 kN). Distinct failure mechanisms were verified between the two samples, with an extended plastic deformation of the geopolymer concrete, revealing post-fracture toughness. The geopolymer concrete showed higher tensile strength and better adhesion in cement-steel interface.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-05-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1983-41952018000300535
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1983-41952018000300535
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/s1983-41952018000300006
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv IBRACON - Instituto Brasileiro do Concreto
publisher.none.fl_str_mv IBRACON - Instituto Brasileiro do Concreto
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista IBRACON de Estruturas e Materiais v.11 n.3 2018
reponame:Revista IBRACON de Estruturas e Materiais
instname:Instituto Brasileiro do Concreto (IBRACON)
instacron:IBRACON
instname_str Instituto Brasileiro do Concreto (IBRACON)
instacron_str IBRACON
institution IBRACON
reponame_str Revista IBRACON de Estruturas e Materiais
collection Revista IBRACON de Estruturas e Materiais
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista IBRACON de Estruturas e Materiais - Instituto Brasileiro do Concreto (IBRACON)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv editores.riem@gmail.com||arlene@ibracon.org.br
_version_ 1754193605536251904