Concrete beam subjected to shear and torsion: a comparison between the Brazilian Standard Code NBR 6118, ACI and AASHTO Provisions

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: ANDRADE,R. C. de
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: BITTENCOURT,T. N.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista IBRACON de Estruturas e Materiais
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1983-41952020000100160
Resumo: Abstract Most of torsion studies available are relative to pure torsion, arising from the exclusive application of a torsion moment in a concrete beam. This situation, however, is only possible in laboratories. In practice, the vast majority of twisted beams are subjected to the combination of shear forces and torsion, which gives rise to a more complex state of stress to be analyzed. The purpose of this paper is to present the provisions of the ACI 318/2014 Codes, AASHTO and ABNT NBR 6118: 2014 related to shear and torsion, and compare some results with experimental data from Rahal & Collins[3]. It is shown that if the recommended value of 45º is used for θ, the ACI 318/2014 provisions for shear-torsion interaction give similar results compared to ABNT NBR6118: 2014, but these results are very conservative. If the lower limit of 30º is used, the results obtained using both codes departs, and less consistent results are obtained. This paper concludes that using the recommended value of 36º obtained with the AASHTO provisions, some consistent and more accurate results are obtained.
id IBRACON-1_9e7984bd8a54dc0b7d2a5c217fad7b48
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1983-41952020000100160
network_acronym_str IBRACON-1
network_name_str Revista IBRACON de Estruturas e Materiais
repository_id_str
spelling Concrete beam subjected to shear and torsion: a comparison between the Brazilian Standard Code NBR 6118, ACI and AASHTO Provisionstorsionshearconcrete beamsACI 318/2014 provisionsABNT NBR 6118: 2014 provisionsAbstract Most of torsion studies available are relative to pure torsion, arising from the exclusive application of a torsion moment in a concrete beam. This situation, however, is only possible in laboratories. In practice, the vast majority of twisted beams are subjected to the combination of shear forces and torsion, which gives rise to a more complex state of stress to be analyzed. The purpose of this paper is to present the provisions of the ACI 318/2014 Codes, AASHTO and ABNT NBR 6118: 2014 related to shear and torsion, and compare some results with experimental data from Rahal & Collins[3]. It is shown that if the recommended value of 45º is used for θ, the ACI 318/2014 provisions for shear-torsion interaction give similar results compared to ABNT NBR6118: 2014, but these results are very conservative. If the lower limit of 30º is used, the results obtained using both codes departs, and less consistent results are obtained. This paper concludes that using the recommended value of 36º obtained with the AASHTO provisions, some consistent and more accurate results are obtained.IBRACON - Instituto Brasileiro do Concreto2020-02-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1983-41952020000100160Revista IBRACON de Estruturas e Materiais v.13 n.1 2020reponame:Revista IBRACON de Estruturas e Materiaisinstname:Instituto Brasileiro do Concreto (IBRACON)instacron:IBRACON10.1590/s1983-41952020000100011info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessANDRADE,R. C. deBITTENCOURT,T. N.eng2020-03-24T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1983-41952020000100160Revistahttp://www.revistas.ibracon.org.br/index.php/riemhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpeditores.riem@gmail.com||arlene@ibracon.org.br1983-41951983-4195opendoar:2020-03-24T00:00Revista IBRACON de Estruturas e Materiais - Instituto Brasileiro do Concreto (IBRACON)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Concrete beam subjected to shear and torsion: a comparison between the Brazilian Standard Code NBR 6118, ACI and AASHTO Provisions
title Concrete beam subjected to shear and torsion: a comparison between the Brazilian Standard Code NBR 6118, ACI and AASHTO Provisions
spellingShingle Concrete beam subjected to shear and torsion: a comparison between the Brazilian Standard Code NBR 6118, ACI and AASHTO Provisions
ANDRADE,R. C. de
torsion
shear
concrete beams
ACI 318/2014 provisions
ABNT NBR 6118: 2014 provisions
title_short Concrete beam subjected to shear and torsion: a comparison between the Brazilian Standard Code NBR 6118, ACI and AASHTO Provisions
title_full Concrete beam subjected to shear and torsion: a comparison between the Brazilian Standard Code NBR 6118, ACI and AASHTO Provisions
title_fullStr Concrete beam subjected to shear and torsion: a comparison between the Brazilian Standard Code NBR 6118, ACI and AASHTO Provisions
title_full_unstemmed Concrete beam subjected to shear and torsion: a comparison between the Brazilian Standard Code NBR 6118, ACI and AASHTO Provisions
title_sort Concrete beam subjected to shear and torsion: a comparison between the Brazilian Standard Code NBR 6118, ACI and AASHTO Provisions
author ANDRADE,R. C. de
author_facet ANDRADE,R. C. de
BITTENCOURT,T. N.
author_role author
author2 BITTENCOURT,T. N.
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv ANDRADE,R. C. de
BITTENCOURT,T. N.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv torsion
shear
concrete beams
ACI 318/2014 provisions
ABNT NBR 6118: 2014 provisions
topic torsion
shear
concrete beams
ACI 318/2014 provisions
ABNT NBR 6118: 2014 provisions
description Abstract Most of torsion studies available are relative to pure torsion, arising from the exclusive application of a torsion moment in a concrete beam. This situation, however, is only possible in laboratories. In practice, the vast majority of twisted beams are subjected to the combination of shear forces and torsion, which gives rise to a more complex state of stress to be analyzed. The purpose of this paper is to present the provisions of the ACI 318/2014 Codes, AASHTO and ABNT NBR 6118: 2014 related to shear and torsion, and compare some results with experimental data from Rahal & Collins[3]. It is shown that if the recommended value of 45º is used for θ, the ACI 318/2014 provisions for shear-torsion interaction give similar results compared to ABNT NBR6118: 2014, but these results are very conservative. If the lower limit of 30º is used, the results obtained using both codes departs, and less consistent results are obtained. This paper concludes that using the recommended value of 36º obtained with the AASHTO provisions, some consistent and more accurate results are obtained.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-02-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1983-41952020000100160
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1983-41952020000100160
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/s1983-41952020000100011
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv IBRACON - Instituto Brasileiro do Concreto
publisher.none.fl_str_mv IBRACON - Instituto Brasileiro do Concreto
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista IBRACON de Estruturas e Materiais v.13 n.1 2020
reponame:Revista IBRACON de Estruturas e Materiais
instname:Instituto Brasileiro do Concreto (IBRACON)
instacron:IBRACON
instname_str Instituto Brasileiro do Concreto (IBRACON)
instacron_str IBRACON
institution IBRACON
reponame_str Revista IBRACON de Estruturas e Materiais
collection Revista IBRACON de Estruturas e Materiais
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista IBRACON de Estruturas e Materiais - Instituto Brasileiro do Concreto (IBRACON)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv editores.riem@gmail.com||arlene@ibracon.org.br
_version_ 1754193606053199872