Influential parameters in the shear strength of RC beams without stirrups

• Autor(a) principal: Leme,Guilherme Frank
• Data de Publicação: 2023
• Outros Autores: Liberati,Elyson Andrew Pozo, Marques,Marília Gonçalves, Trautwein,Leandro Mouta, Almeida,Luiz Carlos de
• Tipo de documento: Artigo
• Idioma: eng
• Título da fonte: Revista IBRACON de Estruturas e Materiais
• Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1983-41952023000400203
• topic: reinforced concrete; shear; numerical analysis; beams

abstract: Experimental investigations have been commonly used to improve the existing knowledge about structural design, presenting accurate conclusions regarding structure behavior. However, considering the limitations of experimental studies, such as restricted amount of strain gauges, unexpected pathologies, difficulties to foresee the correct position of cracks, or simply saving in costs, the use of numerical analysis can present some innovative approaches to understand the process of failure in concrete elements, presenting easier results where experimental programs can hardly report. This study presents the numerical analysis of eight beams experimented by Sherwood [26], with two different sizes and variable aggregate sizes, seeking to understand the influence of coarse aggregate size in shear strength of beams without stirrups. The numerical approach was used to derive the influence of each internal shear mechanism and to identify the specific amount of dowel force, shear transfer by uncracked compression zone and aggregate interlock portion. The results showed that fair results can be obtained by 2D smeared crack approaches, enabling the identification of major aggregate interlock portion in beams with bigger coarse aggregate sizes. Comparing the size effect in beams allowed us to conclude that a higher contribution of aggregate interlock contribution can be obtained in large beams, with almost 64% of the total contribution, whereas smaller beams had only 43%. To evaluate the accuracy of the studied mechanisms, the results of Sherwood [26] were compared with the standards Model Code [23], CSA-A.23.3 [24], NBR 6118 [38], and ACI 318 [39]. Regarding the prediction of element rupture by concrete internal mechanisms, the normative instructions Model Code [23] and CSA A.23.3 [24] were the closest to the experimental results.